pick of the week here fellows will slap350 on saint -3 and parlay it for 150 with the under. would like some insight as something else to two team parlay it up with i like it that muchi think the line will b going up up up in this one you never know with the totals but amthinking bears suck and cant do squat on offensei see it 27 to13( laening toward washington - wat cha all think tag yalls it6.5
0
pick of the week here fellows will slap350 on saint -3 and parlay it for 150 with the under. would like some insight as something else to two team parlay it up with i like it that muchi think the line will b going up up up in this one you never know with the totals but amthinking bears suck and cant do squat on offensei see it 27 to13( laening toward washington - wat cha all think tag yalls it6.5
I remember 2006 when the Saints were supposed to go all the way. They ran into a wall in Chicago in the championship game. Dome teams have trouble when they get to a frozen field late in the season. We could have a numbing wind chill factor in this one. I'm leaning Bears and Under.
0
I remember 2006 when the Saints were supposed to go all the way. They ran into a wall in Chicago in the championship game. Dome teams have trouble when they get to a frozen field late in the season. We could have a numbing wind chill factor in this one. I'm leaning Bears and Under.
Chicago looked really good Sunday, and New Orleans played what I thought was a good game against a good Atlanta team. Still need to study more but am leaning towards the over, but acutance has a valid point about the weather. Still too early to call...
0
Chicago looked really good Sunday, and New Orleans played what I thought was a good game against a good Atlanta team. Still need to study more but am leaning towards the over, but acutance has a valid point about the weather. Still too early to call...
A good amount of Brees interceptions this year hit the receivers' hands, and ends up in the defenders hand. So it's not like he pitches it to them. Our receivers are inconsistent at catching the balls.
But I do agree, this is a game where Chicago should win, by how much is up for debate.
0
A good amount of Brees interceptions this year hit the receivers' hands, and ends up in the defenders hand. So it's not like he pitches it to them. Our receivers are inconsistent at catching the balls.
But I do agree, this is a game where Chicago should win, by how much is up for debate.
That's what IIT IS !!! the weather is the factor here, also i think the Bear going crush saint in the icy chilly weather we see what happened Bear Under LETS MAKE SOME MONEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
0
lADIESS AND GENTS
That's what IIT IS !!! the weather is the factor here, also i think the Bear going crush saint in the icy chilly weather we see what happened Bear Under LETS MAKE SOME MONEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Two teams with identical records late in the season. One is bad on the road, one is very good at home.
One plays indoors on turf, the other outdoors on grass. One has a tough defense, one starts Jason David.
I'll happily give the 3 and watch Brees toss 3 picks while the Bears slow down Bush.
This almost seems too easy.
Someone smarter than me tell me what I'm missing.
You hit it on the head - and it's still a night game so it's gonna be colder than a witch's tit regardless of what the weather calls for - and Orton's been looking good lately - I'm leaning Bears -3
0
Quote Originally Posted by samfelix:
Two teams with identical records late in the season. One is bad on the road, one is very good at home.
One plays indoors on turf, the other outdoors on grass. One has a tough defense, one starts Jason David.
I'll happily give the 3 and watch Brees toss 3 picks while the Bears slow down Bush.
This almost seems too easy.
Someone smarter than me tell me what I'm missing.
You hit it on the head - and it's still a night game so it's gonna be colder than a witch's tit regardless of what the weather calls for - and Orton's been looking good lately - I'm leaning Bears -3
N.O. has had only two games go under in the last month.......both by a point!!! This total is at 44 and will go down with the bad weather low players that will bang it down in the last 23 hours.........load up on the over.......N.O. is one of the best over plays every single week...........the Bears don't have the type of defense to defend this balanced attack. Bears might win.......I don't care.........I'll be rooting for both teams all night and pounding the over!!!!
0
N.O. has had only two games go under in the last month.......both by a point!!! This total is at 44 and will go down with the bad weather low players that will bang it down in the last 23 hours.........load up on the over.......N.O. is one of the best over plays every single week...........the Bears don't have the type of defense to defend this balanced attack. Bears might win.......I don't care.........I'll be rooting for both teams all night and pounding the over!!!!
As I said earlier, any team that has the stones to start the universally awful Jason David is asking to play in shootouts. He sucks balz. As does NoLa's defense.
I'm also noticing that Chicago's pass D is not good.
Seems like the over is an even safer bet, especially given that these nationallly broadcasted games are high scoring affairs.
Bears -3 small, Over 44 big.
0
As I said earlier, any team that has the stones to start the universally awful Jason David is asking to play in shootouts. He sucks balz. As does NoLa's defense.
I'm also noticing that Chicago's pass D is not good.
Seems like the over is an even safer bet, especially given that these nationallly broadcasted games are high scoring affairs.
Saints have only won one of there outdoor games this year and that was against the Queefs. Now it's in the freezing cold, you gotta like the Bears.
This is coming from a die hard Vikings fan who would love nothing more than to see the Bears lose, but who knows the Vikes will get screwed in the end. Bears will win.
0
Saints have only won one of there outdoor games this year and that was against the Queefs. Now it's in the freezing cold, you gotta like the Bears.
This is coming from a die hard Vikings fan who would love nothing more than to see the Bears lose, but who knows the Vikes will get screwed in the end. Bears will win.
This is a tough game to cap. Like many of you have mentioned the Saints have been aweful on the road. But they've lost road games to Carolina, Atlanta, Tampa, Washington, and Denver. All pretty good home teams. Their only road win is against the lowly Chiefs.
Along with the weather the Saints lack of Def will be one of the deciding factors in this game. Chicago is a hard place to play on a normal Sunday. Move the game to prime time and lower the temp to about 20 degrees and its even more difficult.The Bears are averaging almost 27 points a game at home while allowing a little over 23 ppg. Meanwhile the Saints are allowing 28 points on the road while scoring an average of 22 points per outing on the road. IMO neither of these teams will put up a lot of points in tonight's match up and the UNDER is probably the play here.
Drew Brees is a different QB on the road than he is at home. He has 7 touchdown passes in 6 road games but 16 in 6 home games...one game that I didn't include with the home games was played in England where he had 3 TD passes. Brees also has 10 INT's on the road compared to just 4 at home. His QB rating is much worse on the road than it is at home and his play will be another factor in this game. On grass is QB rating is 86.6 compared to 105.3 on turf. His rating in road games is 76.7 compared to 117.2 in road games.
Kyle Orton isn't anything special whether he is playing at home or on the road, but has been playing better as of late. If the Bears can establish the run and allow Orton to make short 5 - 10 yards passes to Matt Forte and Devin Hester then the Bears will win this game.
Bears -3
Under 46
Good Luck on your play!
0
This is a tough game to cap. Like many of you have mentioned the Saints have been aweful on the road. But they've lost road games to Carolina, Atlanta, Tampa, Washington, and Denver. All pretty good home teams. Their only road win is against the lowly Chiefs.
Along with the weather the Saints lack of Def will be one of the deciding factors in this game. Chicago is a hard place to play on a normal Sunday. Move the game to prime time and lower the temp to about 20 degrees and its even more difficult.The Bears are averaging almost 27 points a game at home while allowing a little over 23 ppg. Meanwhile the Saints are allowing 28 points on the road while scoring an average of 22 points per outing on the road. IMO neither of these teams will put up a lot of points in tonight's match up and the UNDER is probably the play here.
Drew Brees is a different QB on the road than he is at home. He has 7 touchdown passes in 6 road games but 16 in 6 home games...one game that I didn't include with the home games was played in England where he had 3 TD passes. Brees also has 10 INT's on the road compared to just 4 at home. His QB rating is much worse on the road than it is at home and his play will be another factor in this game. On grass is QB rating is 86.6 compared to 105.3 on turf. His rating in road games is 76.7 compared to 117.2 in road games.
Kyle Orton isn't anything special whether he is playing at home or on the road, but has been playing better as of late. If the Bears can establish the run and allow Orton to make short 5 - 10 yards passes to Matt Forte and Devin Hester then the Bears will win this game.
6.5
Hot Forum Topics
