All Forums | Pro Football

Green Bay at Minnesota (10/23/2011)

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 4817
Posts: 33
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  Green Bay [5-1 ATS]
Home:  Minnesota [2-3-1 ATS]

Game Time: 4:15 PM
Stadium: Mall of America Field at H.H.H. Metrodome

Recent Meetings:
N/A

Team Leaders:

Green Bay:
Passing: Aaron Rodgers (2037)
Rushing: James Starks (299)
Receiving: Greg Jennings (530)

Minnesota:
Passing: Donovan McNabb (1026)
Rushing: Adrian Peterson (537)
Receiving: Percy Harvin (261)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1011
Posted: #2

take the OVER 47

 

even with Ponder...minn still SUCKS.  

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1040
Posted: #3
How can u not pound GB here?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 1827
Posted: #4

I'm feeling the Packers have not seen enough game tape on Christian Ponder. There's a reason this game is only at 9 points people....

Plus, Jared Allen running around trying to get the sack record.

Think the Carolina game earlier this year - Packers win, but they don't cover............

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 332
Posted: #5

line makes no sense but i will not overthink. -14 was what i would expect. sota has played decent @home....i guess, BUT HOW CAN U TAKE THE VIKES? Our D is starting to hit stride with 2 nice weeks, offense needs no introduction. PONDER=DESPERATION. FRAZIER IS A TERRIBLE COACH PROBABLY WORST IN LGE, 4TH N 1'S FEEDING TOBY? JUST A DUMBFUCK. PACK HAS SUPERIOR TALENT AND COACHING. GB FOR THE HUUUUUGE

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 618
Posted: #6
Let me Ponder this one for a moment.....
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #7

   The  Vikings management has basically conceded the season at the sake of giving young Mr. Ponder, some playing time. Until the WHOLE team starts to gel around him, expect Christian Ponder to be another sacrificial lamb, like Donovan Mc Nabb. Minnesota as a team was already in collapse mood shortly before Brett Favre left town!

GREEN BAY - 9  (Prime Play!)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 43
Posted: #8
[Quote: Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah]

I'm feeling the Packers have not seen enough game tape on Christian Ponder. There's a reason this game is only at 9 points people....

Plus, Jared Allen running around trying to get the sack record.

Think the Carolina game earlier this year - Packers win, but they don't cover............ /Quote]


LOL at the Pack worrying about Christian Ponder.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 1827
Posted: #9
Look, dmncnlou - whatever that means. I'm not an idiot. Let me break it down for you......... 
 
Do I think the Packers are "worrying" about Ponder? = No
 
Do I think they wouldv'e been "worrying" about McNabb? = No
 
Are they going to worry about the Vikings #5 ranked rushing defense and their all pro front 4 - specifically current sack leader (with 9.5!!!)Jared Allen? = Yes
 
Are they worried about "All Day"? = Yes
 
So, could the Packers allow some type of backdoor cover, just like they did against an even weaker team in the Carolina Panthers a few weeks ago? = Yes
 
Open your eyes man!!! - almost every quote in this thread says:
 
 "Why is this line so low???"
 "Why is this line so low???"
 "Why is this line so low???"
 "Why is this line so low???"
 "Why is this line so low???"
 
There's a reason - it's to bait suckers into a false sense of security........
"DUHHHH - There's no way in hell the Packers lose this game"
 
More than likely, they don't - but do they cover 9 points? Now, that's the million dollar question, isn't it...........
 
Good Luck Buddy!!!!!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 439
Posted: #10
I grabbed this when it was at -7 and bet the biggest bet this year.  Line's moving up to -9.5 now and it's scaring me because i've had very bad experience with line movements like this.  If it reaches -10.5, I might reverse bet and who knows.. might get lucky and win both ends or break even...
Now to the game... -10 is reasonable considering the stats and playing in Minny.. but 80% of the betters on here believe GB will cover so.. I'll tag along 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 746
Posted: #11
Agree with all of you and also like the fact that the Greenbay coach was upset that they didnt get more points in the second half of the Rams game, so they are trying to blow teams out apparently. Greenbays defense will make mincemeat of the Vikes offensive line.  Greenbay has a top ranked run defense so  Adrian Peterson will be little help here. I am backing up my truck on this one so I can load up.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 43
Posted: #12
If there is a backdoor cover it aint the end of the world! Gambling is not automatic. Seriously, the Pack have covered every game this year except 1 and that was against a freak of nature - future face of the league! And the Pack aint worrying about that sorry @ss rush defense of the 1-5 Vikes cuz they don't run the ball. Did you see the Vikes Pass D Sunday nite? Aaron Rodgers can't wait til 4:15 Sunday afternoon!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 277
Posted: #13
The only people that should be picking the Minn are there fans or ppl that really hate the Packs other than that I can not see why anyone would pick Minn. Like I always tell myself don't over think a game just pick emm.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 376
Posted: #14
GB-9 ov Minny
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 239
Posted: #15
minnesota will win this game
everything is so far stacked in bays favour that it will go the other way
and i love the fact 81% on pack
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1040
Posted: #16
GB
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 727
Posted: #17
be careful packer backers!

road game
AP running well
no pass defense
divisional rival
jarred allen
GB does not run well
MINN nothing to lose
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 746
Posted: #18
Well I went large on Greenbay hope I dont regret it.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 421
Posted: #19
Minny team total set at 19.5 for me thinking this might be a better option than the -9 just green bay defense worries me somtimes

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 746
Posted: #20
Yeah the rams thru for around 400 yards last week, but they seem to get it together defending the red zone.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 351
Posted: #21
Minnesota might not win but they will cover! This game could go over by the 3rd..
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 129
Posted: #22
Total is tough here. To go over, Packers may have to do all the scoring themselves
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1040
Posted: #23
GLA
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 8713
Posted: #24
gb
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 500
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:

Look, dmncnlou - whatever that means. I'm not an idiot. Let me break it down for you......... 
 
Do I think the Packers are "worrying" about Ponder? = No
 
Do I think they wouldv'e been "worrying" about McNabb? = No
 
Are they going to worry about the Vikings #5 ranked rushing defense and their all pro front 4 - specifically current sack leader (with 9.5!!!)Jared Allen? = Yes
 
Are they worried about "All Day"? = Yes
 
So, could the Packers allow some type of backdoor cover, just like they did against an even weaker team in the Carolina Panthers a few weeks ago? = Yes
 
Open your eyes man!!! - almost every quote in this thread says:
 
 "Why is this line so low???"
 "Why is this line so low???"
 "Why is this line so low???"
 "Why is this line so low???"
 "Why is this line so low???"
 
There's a reason - it's to bait suckers into a false sense of security........
"DUHHHH - There's no way in hell the Packers lose this game"
 
More than likely, they don't - but do they cover 9 points? Now, that's the million dollar question, isn't it...........
 
Good Luck Buddy!!!!!!!

 

no......i'm pretty sure you're an idiot.....have you not read your gibberish???? lmao

All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.