This monday night special is a tale of two cities.
Bankrupt City visits Emerald City. Guess who gonna win and cover the 10. Its not rocket science but lets break ti down.
Bankrupt city Lions is lead by Stafford who has thrown 5 td's on the season but also 5 Interceptions.
Problem with Bankrupt City Lions, they got no running game,lost Suh, and have 27th ranked pass D.
Emerald city hasnt gotten off to a great start either, but they still got wilson and lynch is hurt.
But guess what, for all the people usling lynch as a reason for taking Bankrupt City Lions plus 10, guess what, seattle backup rb ran for 104 yards rushing last week.
Emerald city pass d is also still great 3rd best against pass.
So who is gonna cover the spread tonight.
Emerald city by 2 td's at least.
This monday night special is a tale of two cities.
Bankrupt City visits Emerald City. Guess who gonna win and cover the 10. Its not rocket science but lets break ti down.
Bankrupt city Lions is lead by Stafford who has thrown 5 td's on the season but also 5 Interceptions.
Problem with Bankrupt City Lions, they got no running game,lost Suh, and have 27th ranked pass D.
Emerald city hasnt gotten off to a great start either, but they still got wilson and lynch is hurt.
But guess what, for all the people usling lynch as a reason for taking Bankrupt City Lions plus 10, guess what, seattle backup rb ran for 104 yards rushing last week.
Emerald city pass d is also still great 3rd best against pass.
Here's my take... Seattle at Home. I can't find it in me to put money on the Detroit Lions this year. I can already see it. Turn the bet in on the Lions and watch them get smoked! then sit there and say, goddd I'm an idiot! At Least if Seattle comes out and lays an egg at HOME against the 3rd worst team in the NFL, I can at least say I didn't bet on the Lions.
Small play (110) for me SEATTLE -10
Here's my take... Seattle at Home. I can't find it in me to put money on the Detroit Lions this year. I can already see it. Turn the bet in on the Lions and watch them get smoked! then sit there and say, goddd I'm an idiot! At Least if Seattle comes out and lays an egg at HOME against the 3rd worst team in the NFL, I can at least say I didn't bet on the Lions.
LIONS JOKE WORST IN RUSHING DEAD LAST 2.6 PER CARRY HAWKS 5-0 SU/ATS ON TV GAMES L5 THURS SUN MON CROWD GOES WILD ON THESE GAMES CAN EVEN HEAR KAM CHANCELLER IS BACK GB WOULD NOT EVEN COVER THIS # AT SEATTLE
LIONS JOKE WORST IN RUSHING DEAD LAST 2.6 PER CARRY HAWKS 5-0 SU/ATS ON TV GAMES L5 THURS SUN MON CROWD GOES WILD ON THESE GAMES CAN EVEN HEAR KAM CHANCELLER IS BACK GB WOULD NOT EVEN COVER THIS # AT SEATTLE
Going with DET on this one, winless teams are the most dangerous teams...They'll do some tricks plays, have nothing to lose and everything else to gain..But what do I know, that's why they play the game. Detroit and the over.
Going with DET on this one, winless teams are the most dangerous teams...They'll do some tricks plays, have nothing to lose and everything else to gain..But what do I know, that's why they play the game. Detroit and the over.
Tatamus I like your initial pick but you contradict with your over. Go with what you know you like lions+10 leave the total alone. Bookies love total betters for a reason that's why I bet unders more than overs
Tatamus I like your initial pick but you contradict with your over. Go with what you know you like lions+10 leave the total alone. Bookies love total betters for a reason that's why I bet unders more than overs
Over/Under? Well, Seattle is a proven gritty and defensive team at home with a crowd that can really get into taking the opposition out of its game plan. Basically the Lions should be gettin' around 13. Last time out at GB, the lions put up only 12 and gave up 24. The Hawks scored 26 and gave up 0 to a desperate Bear squad. I don't see things gettin' any better for Stafford and Co. in Seattle. I'll give the pts and take the Under .
goooood call!
Quote Originally Posted by high_psi:
Over/Under? Well, Seattle is a proven gritty and defensive team at home with a crowd that can really get into taking the opposition out of its game plan. Basically the Lions should be gettin' around 13. Last time out at GB, the lions put up only 12 and gave up 24. The Hawks scored 26 and gave up 0 to a desperate Bear squad. I don't see things gettin' any better for Stafford and Co. in Seattle. I'll give the pts and take the Under .
3) managed to score only 12 offensive points against the Bears (at home nonetheless) (one defensive TD and one special teams TD in that game)
is laying 10 points to a team that has Matthew Stafford, Calvin Johnson and Golden Tate?
Give me the 0-3 Lions and the points!
I also think this will go Over 43.5.
GREAT READ...thanks for sharing your knowledge...I took all the quarters @ Lions +.05 except the 2nd @ +3 and zall the Q's @ Under..plus the Lions +9.5....went 7-2.....plussed out $5525......thanks for sharing that knowledge!!
Quote Originally Posted by TATUMUS:
So you're telling me that a team that:
1) is 1-2 SU on the season
2) is without their star running back
3) managed to score only 12 offensive points against the Bears (at home nonetheless) (one defensive TD and one special teams TD in that game)
is laying 10 points to a team that has Matthew Stafford, Calvin Johnson and Golden Tate?
Give me the 0-3 Lions and the points!
I also think this will go Over 43.5.
GREAT READ...thanks for sharing your knowledge...I took all the quarters @ Lions +.05 except the 2nd @ +3 and zall the Q's @ Under..plus the Lions +9.5....went 7-2.....plussed out $5525......thanks for sharing that knowledge!!