All Forums | Pro Football

Cincinnati at Oakland (11/22/2009)

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 4052
Posts: 58
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 225
Posted: #26
Cincy 

Perfect letdown spot for Cincy. It's already happend once in Wk 4 against the lowly Browns and it took them OT to win by a FG. OAK showed that they can be a spoiler...look at the Eagles game. 

If this is such an easy game for Cincy, don't you think Vegas would have them at least favored by double digits knowing that everyone like Pro-Z would pound on the Bengals. Without Benson, Palmer will like throw a little more and lest you not forget...there's a guy on the other side that can contain the best of WRs out there. 

Cincy should win...but not cover. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2937
Posted: #27
The organization is the reason Russel sucks, he didnt suck before he joined the commitment to excrement.
Gradkowski is an ambitious ok college qb and even if his mother shows up at the game they wont cover against a good Bengals team with Carson Palmer and 5 reciever options, Raiders cant compete  with this
Bengals cover
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 730
Posted: #28

Cincinnati -9.5 (2u)

Over 36 (1u)

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 113
Posted: #29
classic trap game for the bengals.. i think they will have a let down here and will not cover.. the bengals seem like the obvious pick but this is the nfl and the obvious always loses.. raiders and pts are the play
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 984
Posted: #30
 Cincinnati will be flat here. Coming off back-to-back victories against the hated Ravens and Steelers, the Bengals could have problems getting up for this pathetic Oakland squad, Score: Bengals 18-Raiders 12 (2 units)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 222
Posted: #31
This aint college ball Cici wins but doesn't cover so I aint f@#king with this one Yall can have it. Oakland is one of my top 5 Bi- polar teams! Iam still recovering from my burns. No thanks !!! However I do want to send a shout-out to my 2nd cousin Tyvon Branch C.B for the raiders and say go get it BOY!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 102
Posted: #32
Raiders cover,Cincy wins by 7
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 760
Posted: #33
YOU WILL ALL KNOW IN THE FIRST QUARTER IF THE RAIDERS HANG IN THIS ONE.....IF MCFADDEN COMES BACK AND THE BACKUP QB CAN COMPLETE THE 3 YARD DUMP OFF PASSES THAT THE BFD NUMBER ONE PICK COULDNT THEY HAVE A CHANCE AT HOME....ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN IN THE NFL......THE NATIONAL FIXED LEAGUE......AND I KNOW YOU GUYS CANT WAIT BECAUSE YOU ALL GET TO HAVE THE PLEASURE OF SEEING THE RAIDERS PLAY TWICE THIS WEEK!! LOL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2628
Posted: #34

The squares are killing the Bengals as expected.  Take Oakland +10.5.  Until you fools start betting like slicks, you never gonna win shit.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 30
Posted: #35
Yes, the Raiders will cover this one.  No doubt.  The box cats are pretenders.  Even if they make the playoffs they will get eliminated (boo-boo) in the first round.  

Raiders +10.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1979
Posted: #36

Quote Originally Posted by coltsalltheway:

don't run around calling people dumb when you don't know fuck all about football. this is a team that beat the champs 2wice and beat baltimore 2wice this season and are looking like champs. you really think a team that couldnt beat kc can cover on them go spend your money on what you think is gonna happen but you aint worth my time.

 

Ya, lots of football in Jordan !

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 727
Posted: #37
0k.. so the absence of Benson shouldn't make too much difference here, but i'm not taking a side, im thinkin OVER the total 

Benard Scott will run well, had some choice runs last week vs PI

CINCI avg 22 ppg whole season, and 22.8 last five games
CINCI giving up 16.3 ppg on the season, but D has gotten better since, allowing 15.9, 15.2, 14.2 ppg last respective 7, 6, and 5 weeks...


only problem is OAK and Gradkowski
although lets look up some stuff on Bruce.. i think i'll actually prefer
bruce, he has NOTHING to lose

OAK was getting 9.8 ppg avg with Jamarcus, but 7.9 avg ppg last 7 games

but...

OAK giving up 24.1 on the season, and 26.7 ppg last six weeks


running these #'s through the system and i got..

36.1 season
36.2 last 5 weeks
36 last 6 weeks
36 last 7 weeks


all right on the tee

still leaning over


 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 727
Posted: #38

Career statistics

Passing

YEAR G GS ATT CMP CMP% YDS YPA LNG TD INT RAT
2006 13 11 328 177 54.0% 1661 5.1 53 9 9 65.9
2007 4 0 24 13 54.2% 130 5.4 -- 0 1 52.4
2008 2 1 21 7 33.3% 26 1.2 -- 0 3 2.8

Rushing

YEAR G GS ATT YDS AVG LNG TD 1ST FUM LOST REC
2006 13 11 41 161 3.9 14 0 12 11 6 3
2007 4 0 7 20 2.9 -- 0 -- -- 0 0
2008 2 1 1 2 2.0 -- 0 -- -- 0 0
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 727
Posted: #39
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 727
Posted: #40
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 727
Posted: #41
take OVER for value
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 6405
Posted: #42
BENGALS -9.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 3328
Posted: #43
Cin hasn't beaten anybody on the road by more than one score- including the Browns.
OAK +10
GLTA 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 643
Posted: #44
thinking something like 23-3 bengals here lets gamble
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 398
Posted: #45

just when i told every one indi +1 , wash +10.5, new orleans -11.5, minni -10.5, buffalo +9.5 , cleavland +3.5, atlanta +6.5, and now i have ,new england -10.5, sd -3 , cinci -9.5 and tenn +4.5 left. suck on it support 81. i'm perfect on the day. what do you have in you pockets?!?

news flash sd is already up 7-0 and cinci 7-0 .

peaceee

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 398
Posted: #46

The squares are killing the Bengals as expected.  Take Oakland +10.5.  Until you fools start betting like slicks, you never gonna win shit.

ur a fool its already 14-0 jackass. god i love money

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2628
Posted: #47

Coltsalltheway you need to take your square ass to slick school.  Stop burning money on square plays.  Paying the book every week isn't any fun dude.  I bet you had Arizona today too.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2628
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by coltsalltheway:

The squares are killing the Bengals as expected.  Take Oakland +10.5.  Until you fools start betting like slicks, you never gonna win shit.

ur a fool its already 14-0 jackass. god i love money

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 3328
Posted: #49
How about that- Raiders pull it out. 
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 674
Posted: #50
yep the bengals win in pittsburgh then lose to the raiders. unbelievable
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.