K Train: That comment only applied to big govt liberals. Not a conservative Ron Paul supporter like yourself.
Charlie Delta: Are you one of those guys that have never had a job in the private sector? Surely you at least ran a lemonade stand? If you had to guess, why do you think those rich fat cats moved the jobs overseas?
Stiln: You post angry. Like Adrian Peterson runs angry. Or Giancarlo Stanton swings the bat angry. You mention the 3 billion we give to Israel. Should we stop giving money to other countries as well or just Israel?
And after you guys respond let's go back to singing...
"I'd like to teach the world to sing, in perfect harmony...I'd like to buy the world a Coke..."
You comparing me to a future hall of famer. I'm flattered.
But me posting angry? That's not even correct English little fella..
You post passive aggressively like 14truckdriver..
I mention the 3 billion to israel because the next country is Egypt which isn't' even on the same planet in terms of aid they receive..
0
Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:
K Train: That comment only applied to big govt liberals. Not a conservative Ron Paul supporter like yourself.
Charlie Delta: Are you one of those guys that have never had a job in the private sector? Surely you at least ran a lemonade stand? If you had to guess, why do you think those rich fat cats moved the jobs overseas?
Stiln: You post angry. Like Adrian Peterson runs angry. Or Giancarlo Stanton swings the bat angry. You mention the 3 billion we give to Israel. Should we stop giving money to other countries as well or just Israel?
And after you guys respond let's go back to singing...
"I'd like to teach the world to sing, in perfect harmony...I'd like to buy the world a Coke..."
You comparing me to a future hall of famer. I'm flattered.
But me posting angry? That's not even correct English little fella..
You post passive aggressively like 14truckdriver..
I mention the 3 billion to israel because the next country is Egypt which isn't' even on the same planet in terms of aid they receive..
K Train: That comment only applied to big govt liberals. Not a conservative Ron Paul supporter like yourself.
Charlie Delta: Are you one of those guys that have never had a job in the private sector? Surely you at least ran a lemonade stand? If you had to guess, why do you think those rich fat cats moved the jobs overseas?
Stiln: You post angry. Like Adrian Peterson runs angry. Or Giancarlo Stanton swings the bat angry. You mention the 3 billion we give to Israel. Should we stop giving money to other countries as well or just Israel?
And after you guys respond let's go back to singing...
"I'd like to teach the world to sing, in perfect harmony...I'd like to buy the world a Coke..."
What do you think a solution would be for this? Obviously we all know why corporations choose to move jobs overseas. However isn't it somewhat contradictory to say that these corporations are doing this country a favor by making as much money as possible, when it means sending jobs overseas?
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making as much money as possible. However, there has to be a certain point where it does become detrimental for America and its citizens for companies to keep sending jobs overseas in an effort to increase profits.
0
Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:
K Train: That comment only applied to big govt liberals. Not a conservative Ron Paul supporter like yourself.
Charlie Delta: Are you one of those guys that have never had a job in the private sector? Surely you at least ran a lemonade stand? If you had to guess, why do you think those rich fat cats moved the jobs overseas?
Stiln: You post angry. Like Adrian Peterson runs angry. Or Giancarlo Stanton swings the bat angry. You mention the 3 billion we give to Israel. Should we stop giving money to other countries as well or just Israel?
And after you guys respond let's go back to singing...
"I'd like to teach the world to sing, in perfect harmony...I'd like to buy the world a Coke..."
What do you think a solution would be for this? Obviously we all know why corporations choose to move jobs overseas. However isn't it somewhat contradictory to say that these corporations are doing this country a favor by making as much money as possible, when it means sending jobs overseas?
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making as much money as possible. However, there has to be a certain point where it does become detrimental for America and its citizens for companies to keep sending jobs overseas in an effort to increase profits.
What do you think a solution would be for this? Obviously we all know why corporations choose to move jobs overseas. However isn't it somewhat contradictory to say that these corporations are doing this country a favor by making as much money as possible, when it means sending jobs overseas?
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making as much money as possible. However, there has to be a certain point where it does become detrimental for America and its citizens for companies to keep sending jobs overseas in an effort to increase profits.
That sounds more like something a Michelle Obama supporter would say, not a Ron Paul supporter.
I don't concern myself with what companies move overseas or how much a company makes It has no bearing on my life.
I am concerned with how much money our govt taxes us and how much it wastes.
Govt money is taxpayer money. I look at what corporations make and how they decide to spend that money as their own choice since it is their money.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
What do you think a solution would be for this? Obviously we all know why corporations choose to move jobs overseas. However isn't it somewhat contradictory to say that these corporations are doing this country a favor by making as much money as possible, when it means sending jobs overseas?
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for making as much money as possible. However, there has to be a certain point where it does become detrimental for America and its citizens for companies to keep sending jobs overseas in an effort to increase profits.
That sounds more like something a Michelle Obama supporter would say, not a Ron Paul supporter.
I don't concern myself with what companies move overseas or how much a company makes It has no bearing on my life.
I am concerned with how much money our govt taxes us and how much it wastes.
Govt money is taxpayer money. I look at what corporations make and how they decide to spend that money as their own choice since it is their money.
Here i will try to make this very simple so maybe even a right winger can grasp it.
The reason more people are needing things like welfare and food stamps is because there are less and less jobs in the country every year, but at the same time the population keeps growing. Now i understand you right wingers arent good with math problems, but even you guys should be able to figure out what happens when the countries population goes up, while the countries jobs go down.
Yup thats right, more govt help needed for people.
And who can we thank for that? Those very rich fatcat corporations who keep sending the jobs overseas, while still recieving big fat corporate welfare checks from all of us taxpayers.
So thank you mr. corporate fatcat for destroying this once great country.
Someday, even the right wing nutcases might realize this, until then, keep talking your right winger trash that the corporations love to hear you talking aboutWhen the fatcats go to bed at night, they must laugh their butts off, knowing they still got suckers believing their BS
What checks are you referring to? Our government sends checks to corporations? This I'd like to see...
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
Here i will try to make this very simple so maybe even a right winger can grasp it.
The reason more people are needing things like welfare and food stamps is because there are less and less jobs in the country every year, but at the same time the population keeps growing. Now i understand you right wingers arent good with math problems, but even you guys should be able to figure out what happens when the countries population goes up, while the countries jobs go down.
Yup thats right, more govt help needed for people.
And who can we thank for that? Those very rich fatcat corporations who keep sending the jobs overseas, while still recieving big fat corporate welfare checks from all of us taxpayers.
So thank you mr. corporate fatcat for destroying this once great country.
Someday, even the right wing nutcases might realize this, until then, keep talking your right winger trash that the corporations love to hear you talking aboutWhen the fatcats go to bed at night, they must laugh their butts off, knowing they still got suckers believing their BS
What checks are you referring to? Our government sends checks to corporations? This I'd like to see...
hose very rich fatcat corporations who keep sending the jobs overseas, while still recieving big fat corporate welfare checks from all of us taxpayers.
Of course no such thing happens.
But you keep on, keeping on.
0
hose very rich fatcat corporations who keep sending the jobs overseas, while still recieving big fat corporate welfare checks from all of us taxpayers.
You want to know why we are in debt you stupid f*** the US provides upwards of 3 billion dollars in grants to the nation of israyel every year!!! That's 1 large reason why were in debt..
Right.
Where Stilin takes to the Internet to claim $3 billion, on a budget of $3.17 trillion, is a cause for debt.
After, mind you, specific details of the federal budget were provided for one to see, for example, that the federal government spends 20x on "welfare" than they spend on Israel.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:
You want to know why we are in debt you stupid f*** the US provides upwards of 3 billion dollars in grants to the nation of israyel every year!!! That's 1 large reason why were in debt..
Right.
Where Stilin takes to the Internet to claim $3 billion, on a budget of $3.17 trillion, is a cause for debt.
After, mind you, specific details of the federal budget were provided for one to see, for example, that the federal government spends 20x on "welfare" than they spend on Israel.
You comparing me to a future hall of famer. I'm flattered.
But me posting angry? That's not even correct English little fella..
You post passive aggressively like 14truckdriver..
I mention the 3 billion to israel because the next country is Egypt which isn't' even on the same planet in terms of aid they receive..
Where Stilin takes to the Internet to claim that the $2 billion Egypt receives (Egypt has averaged about $2 billion a year since 1979), 2/3 of what Israel receives, is on a "different planet" in terms of spending.
You
Can't
Make
This
Up
Folks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:
You comparing me to a future hall of famer. I'm flattered.
But me posting angry? That's not even correct English little fella..
You post passive aggressively like 14truckdriver..
I mention the 3 billion to israel because the next country is Egypt which isn't' even on the same planet in terms of aid they receive..
Where Stilin takes to the Internet to claim that the $2 billion Egypt receives (Egypt has averaged about $2 billion a year since 1979), 2/3 of what Israel receives, is on a "different planet" in terms of spending.
I didn't know Michelle Obama asked you questions? You must be quite proud then.
I think it would seem that Corporations money IS taxpayer money in some instances. Maybe it should be of some concern to you?
If you assume it is the govt's money then yes. I don't. I assume 100% of the money is for the corporation (and individual) and then the govt taxes that amount. It sounds like you, and liberals, assume it is the govt's money, and allow corporations (and individuals) to keep a certain portion of that.
Why exactly were you supporting Ron Paul?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
I didn't know Michelle Obama asked you questions? You must be quite proud then.
I think it would seem that Corporations money IS taxpayer money in some instances. Maybe it should be of some concern to you?
If you assume it is the govt's money then yes. I don't. I assume 100% of the money is for the corporation (and individual) and then the govt taxes that amount. It sounds like you, and liberals, assume it is the govt's money, and allow corporations (and individuals) to keep a certain portion of that.
What checks are you referring to? Our government sends checks to corporations? This I'd like to see...
No no no, that's not how it works. Many of the left call it "corporate welfare" when corporations have to pay LESS taxes than they previously did. IMO, its based upon a flawed assumption that all dollars generated or received by corporations or individuals inherently belong first to the government, and that companies and individuals are getting "welfare" or a favor/"tax cut" from the government when they collect less of your dollars every tax season.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:
What checks are you referring to? Our government sends checks to corporations? This I'd like to see...
No no no, that's not how it works. Many of the left call it "corporate welfare" when corporations have to pay LESS taxes than they previously did. IMO, its based upon a flawed assumption that all dollars generated or received by corporations or individuals inherently belong first to the government, and that companies and individuals are getting "welfare" or a favor/"tax cut" from the government when they collect less of your dollars every tax season.
If you assume it is the govt's money then yes. I don't. I assume 100% of the money is for the corporation (and individual) and then the govt taxes that amount. It sounds like you, and liberals, assume it is the govt's money, and allow corporations (and individuals) to keep a certain portion of that.
Why exactly were you supporting Ron Paul?
You don't think the TARP bailout is taxpayer money? That's what I was referring to.
0
Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:
If you assume it is the govt's money then yes. I don't. I assume 100% of the money is for the corporation (and individual) and then the govt taxes that amount. It sounds like you, and liberals, assume it is the govt's money, and allow corporations (and individuals) to keep a certain portion of that.
Why exactly were you supporting Ron Paul?
You don't think the TARP bailout is taxpayer money? That's what I was referring to.
Where Stilin takes to the Internet to claim $3 billion, on a budget of $3.17 trillion, is a cause for debt.
After, mind you, specific details of the federal budget were provided for one to see, for example, that the federal government spends 20x on "welfare" than they spend on Israel.
So you're saying that $3 billion is little to the US okay... little fella, little pal.... What alternate universe do you live in?
I have never said that Egypt's should not be reduced....? You just cant make this stuff up folks... Their aid should also be extremly reduced but it is on a different planet than Israel's granted Israel already receives about 2 billion in private donations from citizens as well Egpyt and Jordan's is a direct result of Israel...
You're really a weirdo the way you engage others on the internet. Like I'm serious, you exhibit an extremely anti-social personality....
Look at how you sound....
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
Right.
Where Stilin takes to the Internet to claim $3 billion, on a budget of $3.17 trillion, is a cause for debt.
After, mind you, specific details of the federal budget were provided for one to see, for example, that the federal government spends 20x on "welfare" than they spend on Israel.
So you're saying that $3 billion is little to the US okay... little fella, little pal.... What alternate universe do you live in?
I have never said that Egypt's should not be reduced....? You just cant make this stuff up folks... Their aid should also be extremly reduced but it is on a different planet than Israel's granted Israel already receives about 2 billion in private donations from citizens as well Egpyt and Jordan's is a direct result of Israel...
You're really a weirdo the way you engage others on the internet. Like I'm serious, you exhibit an extremely anti-social personality....
No no no, that's not how it works. Many of the left call it "corporate welfare" when corporations have to pay LESS taxes than they previously did. IMO, its based upon a flawed assumption that all dollars generated or received by corporations or individuals inherently belong first to the government, and that companies and individuals are getting "welfare" or a favor/"tax cut" from the government when they collect less of your dollars every tax season.
Many on the left also consider legal tax deductions as corporate welfare. The oil companies are a prime example. They put a large amount of money back into R&D and get to take that as a legal deduction, thus reducing what they owe in taxes on profits. This is not corporate welfare, it's our tax system at work. GE paid no taxes on profits recently because of this and a tax credit that they got for each wind turbine they created whether it was sold or not. As a result GE got a credit for a built up inventory that may or may not ever be a sold product. Corporate welfare? No. Stupid tax code? Yes.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:
No no no, that's not how it works. Many of the left call it "corporate welfare" when corporations have to pay LESS taxes than they previously did. IMO, its based upon a flawed assumption that all dollars generated or received by corporations or individuals inherently belong first to the government, and that companies and individuals are getting "welfare" or a favor/"tax cut" from the government when they collect less of your dollars every tax season.
Many on the left also consider legal tax deductions as corporate welfare. The oil companies are a prime example. They put a large amount of money back into R&D and get to take that as a legal deduction, thus reducing what they owe in taxes on profits. This is not corporate welfare, it's our tax system at work. GE paid no taxes on profits recently because of this and a tax credit that they got for each wind turbine they created whether it was sold or not. As a result GE got a credit for a built up inventory that may or may not ever be a sold product. Corporate welfare? No. Stupid tax code? Yes.
You want to know why we are in debt you stupid f*** the US provides upwards of 3 billion dollars in grants to the nation of israyel every year!!! That's 1 large reason why were in debt..
In 2010, the United States accumulated over $3.5 billion in new debt each and every day. That’s more than $2 million per minute.
For FY 2013: The US government now borrows approximately $5 billion every business day
Probably because of foreign aid to Israel!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:
You want to know why we are in debt you stupid f*** the US provides upwards of 3 billion dollars in grants to the nation of israyel every year!!! That's 1 large reason why were in debt..
In 2010, the United States accumulated over $3.5 billion in new debt each and every day. That’s more than $2 million per minute.
For FY 2013: The US government now borrows approximately $5 billion every business day
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.