Note: The sequester would reduce federal spending in the 2013 fiscal year by $85 billion. The federal government
will spend about $3.55 trillion this year, so $85 billion amounts to
about 2.4 percent of all federal spending.
And the SNAP program is....wait for it....$81 billion (FY 12) which is more than 1% of the federal budget.
You can stop asking for links. These are easily researched facts.
0
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
link please
Note: The sequester would reduce federal spending in the 2013 fiscal year by $85 billion. The federal government
will spend about $3.55 trillion this year, so $85 billion amounts to
about 2.4 percent of all federal spending.
And the SNAP program is....wait for it....$81 billion (FY 12) which is more than 1% of the federal budget.
You can stop asking for links. These are easily researched facts.
Note: The sequester would reduce federal spending in the 2013 fiscal year by $85 billion. The federal government will spend about $3.55 trillion this year, so $85 billion amounts to about 2.4 percent of all federal spending.
And the SNAP program is....wait for it....$81 billion (FY 12) which is more than 1% of the federal budget.
You can stop asking for links. These are easily researched facts.
link or just more bs from you?
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
Note: The sequester would reduce federal spending in the 2013 fiscal year by $85 billion. The federal government will spend about $3.55 trillion this year, so $85 billion amounts to about 2.4 percent of all federal spending.
And the SNAP program is....wait for it....$81 billion (FY 12) which is more than 1% of the federal budget.
You can stop asking for links. These are easily researched facts.
According to Congressional budget office, the major causes of federal deficits for 2009-19 are Bush tax cuts, weak economy and war on terror. Welfare spending isn't mentioned.
Fact is food stamps are still a tiny percentage of federal budget which barely affects debt. Any increase in economic activity from food stamps is a bonus according to economist Mark Zadi. Most importantly, food stamps are successful in helping to feed the poor.
0
According to Congressional budget office, the major causes of federal deficits for 2009-19 are Bush tax cuts, weak economy and war on terror. Welfare spending isn't mentioned.
Fact is food stamps are still a tiny percentage of federal budget which barely affects debt. Any increase in economic activity from food stamps is a bonus according to economist Mark Zadi. Most importantly, food stamps are successful in helping to feed the poor.
According to Congressional budget office, the major causes of federal deficits for 2009-19 are Bush tax cuts, weak economy and war on terror. Welfare spending isn't mentioned.
Complete nonsense.
You and the CBO don't seem to understand that the one time Obama Stimulus was 2/3rd the cost of 8 years spending on the Iraq war.
Anyone suggesting any causes of deficit without mentioning Medicare is simply lying.
It is utterly amazing that nobody on the left actually seems to understand what the federal government spends money on.
I guess finding that out would damage the narrative. And as we know with the left, the narrative is all that matters.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
According to Congressional budget office, the major causes of federal deficits for 2009-19 are Bush tax cuts, weak economy and war on terror. Welfare spending isn't mentioned.
Complete nonsense.
You and the CBO don't seem to understand that the one time Obama Stimulus was 2/3rd the cost of 8 years spending on the Iraq war.
Anyone suggesting any causes of deficit without mentioning Medicare is simply lying.
It is utterly amazing that nobody on the left actually seems to understand what the federal government spends money on.
I guess finding that out would damage the narrative. And as we know with the left, the narrative is all that matters.
As I said, you have no interest in actual facts, so what would be the point in providing links. See, even if the links were given, you wouldn't think that spending on Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP was any sort of problem.
Further, it has been widely reported what % of the budget the sequester is. This was all over the news, and the fact that you would think I need to give you a "link" is absurd.
If you think I'm somehow wrong. Prove it.
Go right ahead. You can show everyone in this forum what a big liar I am.
Wouldn't that be fun?
0
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
link or just more bs from you?
As I said, you have no interest in actual facts, so what would be the point in providing links. See, even if the links were given, you wouldn't think that spending on Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP was any sort of problem.
Further, it has been widely reported what % of the budget the sequester is. This was all over the news, and the fact that you would think I need to give you a "link" is absurd.
If you think I'm somehow wrong. Prove it.
Go right ahead. You can show everyone in this forum what a big liar I am.
According to Congressional budget office, the major causes of federal deficits for 2009-19 are Bush tax cuts, weak economy and war on terror. Welfare spending isn't mentioned.
Fact is food stamps are still a tiny percentage of federal budget which barely affects debt.
From the Washington Post article on food stamps that started this thread.
"It also adds to rising federal entitlement spending and the U.S. debt."
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
According to Congressional budget office, the major causes of federal deficits for 2009-19 are Bush tax cuts, weak economy and war on terror. Welfare spending isn't mentioned.
Fact is food stamps are still a tiny percentage of federal budget which barely affects debt.
From the Washington Post article on food stamps that started this thread.
"It also adds to rising federal entitlement spending and the U.S. debt."
According to Congressional budget office, the major causes of federal deficits for 2009-19 are Bush tax cuts, weak economy and war on terror. Welfare spending isn't mentioned.
That's funny, given that in fiscal year 2012:
22% of the budget - $773 billion was spent on Social Security
21% the budget - $732 billion was spent on Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
12% the federal budget - $411 billion, was spent on programs that provide aid to individuals and families facing hardship.These programs include:the refundable portions of the Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit, which assist low- and moderate-income working families through the tax code; programs that provide cash payments to eligible individuals or households, including Supplemental Security Income for the elderly or disabled poor and unemployment insurance; various forms of in-kind assistance for low-income families and individuals, including SNAP (food stamps), school meals, low-income housing assistance, child care assistance, and assistance in meeting home energy bills; and various other programs such as those that aid abused and neglected children.
Given that 55% of the federal budget, totaling $1.91 trillion (more than the 10 year cost of the "unfunded wars" to date) is spent on welfare programs, how do you think this CBO statement is mathematically possible?
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
According to Congressional budget office, the major causes of federal deficits for 2009-19 are Bush tax cuts, weak economy and war on terror. Welfare spending isn't mentioned.
That's funny, given that in fiscal year 2012:
22% of the budget - $773 billion was spent on Social Security
21% the budget - $732 billion was spent on Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
12% the federal budget - $411 billion, was spent on programs that provide aid to individuals and families facing hardship.These programs include:the refundable portions of the Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit, which assist low- and moderate-income working families through the tax code; programs that provide cash payments to eligible individuals or households, including Supplemental Security Income for the elderly or disabled poor and unemployment insurance; various forms of in-kind assistance for low-income families and individuals, including SNAP (food stamps), school meals, low-income housing assistance, child care assistance, and assistance in meeting home energy bills; and various other programs such as those that aid abused and neglected children.
Given that 55% of the federal budget, totaling $1.91 trillion (more than the 10 year cost of the "unfunded wars" to date) is spent on welfare programs, how do you think this CBO statement is mathematically possible?
States don't require that FFL dealers have to be present at gun shows'
States don't require guns to be at gun shows either.
Who types stuff like this? I mean, really???
Do you understand what a private sale is you truck driver you!!!!!
34 states as of 2010 do not require that Federally Firearms licensed dealers have to make all transactions at guns do you understand that simple concept??
A majority of states allow UNLICENSED DEALERS to conduct business at their gun shows and as a result a large chunk of those guns are used in crimes...
0
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:
States don't require that FFL dealers have to be present at gun shows'
States don't require guns to be at gun shows either.
Who types stuff like this? I mean, really???
Do you understand what a private sale is you truck driver you!!!!!
34 states as of 2010 do not require that Federally Firearms licensed dealers have to make all transactions at guns do you understand that simple concept??
A majority of states allow UNLICENSED DEALERS to conduct business at their gun shows and as a result a large chunk of those guns are used in crimes...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.