The “right-to-carry” movement has succeeded in boosting the number of licensed concealed-gun carriers from fewer than 1 million to a record 6 million today. Which is a fact. And nobody with any modicum of knowledge on the topic would say they are "decreasing"
All federal firearms licensees are required to conduct a background check for all firearms transactions, even if they sell the firearm at a gun show. The overwhelming majority of guns sold at gun shows are done by FFL’s. No person with a modicum of knowledge on the topic would suggest “majority of gun shows do not conduct background checks” because saying such a thing is absurdly false.
Of course by accusing me of "lying" you're projecting.
But we knew that already.
![]()
The “right-to-carry” movement has succeeded in boosting the number of licensed concealed-gun carriers from fewer than 1 million to a record 6 million today. Which is a fact. And nobody with any modicum of knowledge on the topic would say they are "decreasing"
All federal firearms licensees are required to conduct a background check for all firearms transactions, even if they sell the firearm at a gun show. The overwhelming majority of guns sold at gun shows are done by FFL’s. No person with a modicum of knowledge on the topic would suggest “majority of gun shows do not conduct background checks” because saying such a thing is absurdly false.
Of course by accusing me of "lying" you're projecting.
But we knew that already.
![]()
What checks are you referring to? Our government sends checks to corporations? This I'd like to see...
wow you dont know what corporate welfare is![]()
What checks are you referring to? Our government sends checks to corporations? This I'd like to see...
wow you dont know what corporate welfare is![]()
wow you dont know what corporate welfare is![]()
wow you dont know what corporate welfare is![]()
The “right-to-carry” movement has succeeded in boosting the number of licensed concealed-gun carriers from fewer than 1 million to a record 6 million today. Which is a fact. And nobody with any modicum of knowledge on the topic would say they are "decreasing"
All federal firearms licensees are required to conduct a background check for all firearms transactions, even if they sell the firearm at a gun show. The overwhelming majority of guns sold at gun shows are done by FFL’s. No person with a modicum of knowledge on the topic would suggest “majority of gun shows do not conduct background checks” because saying such a thing is absurdly false.
Of course by accusing me of "lying" you're projecting.
But we knew that already.
![]()
The “right-to-carry” movement has succeeded in boosting the number of licensed concealed-gun carriers from fewer than 1 million to a record 6 million today. Which is a fact. And nobody with any modicum of knowledge on the topic would say they are "decreasing"
All federal firearms licensees are required to conduct a background check for all firearms transactions, even if they sell the firearm at a gun show. The overwhelming majority of guns sold at gun shows are done by FFL’s. No person with a modicum of knowledge on the topic would suggest “majority of gun shows do not conduct background checks” because saying such a thing is absurdly false.
Of course by accusing me of "lying" you're projecting.
But we knew that already.
![]()
wow you dont know what corporate welfare is
wow you dont know what corporate welfare is
According to financial reports released by Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) in January, the abortion chain received over a billion dollars in taxpayer funds between June 2010 and June 2012 — nearly $1.48 million per day.
And during these hard economic times, with 45 percent of its revenue coming from taxpayers, Planned Parenthood reports that its revenue exceeded expenses by $242.9 million. That’s nearly a third of a million dollars profit every single day
According to financial reports released by Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) in January, the abortion chain received over a billion dollars in taxpayer funds between June 2010 and June 2012 — nearly $1.48 million per day.
And during these hard economic times, with 45 percent of its revenue coming from taxpayers, Planned Parenthood reports that its revenue exceeded expenses by $242.9 million. That’s nearly a third of a million dollars profit every single day
links please ![]()
links please ![]()
Over the next ten years, the costs of America's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will decline as the U.S. commitments there come to an end. But almost ten years, 6,000 U.S. dead and over a trillion dollars after the attacks of September 11, it's time to pay for our wars.
In May, the National Journal estimated that the total cost to the U.S. economy of the war against Al Qaeda will reach $3 trillion. In 2008, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz put the price of the Iraq conflict alone at $3 trillion.
But by 2020 and beyond, the direct cost to U.S. taxpayers could reach $3 trillion. In March, the Congressional Research Service put the total cost of the wars at $1.28 trillion, including $806 billion for Iraq and $444 billion for Afghanistan. For the 2012 fiscal year which begins on October 1, President Obama asked for $117 billion more. (That war-fighting funding is over and above Secretary Gates' $553 billion Pentagon budget request for next year.)
But in addition to the roughly $1.5 trillion tally for both conflicts through the theoretical 2014 American draw down date in Afghanistan, the U.S. faces staggering bills for veterans' health care and disability benefits. Last May, an analysis by the Center for American Progress estimated the total projected total cost of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans' health care and disability could reach between $422 billion to $717 billion. Reconstruction aid and other development assistance represent tens of billions more, as does the additional interest on the national debt. And none of the above counts the expanded funding for the new Department of Homeland Security.
But that two-plus trillion dollar tab doesn't account for the expansion of the United States military since the start of the "global war on terror." As a percentage of the American economy, defense spending jumped from 3.1% in 2001 to 4.8% last year. While ThinkProgress noted that the Pentagon's FY 2012 ask is "the largest request ever since World War II," McClatchy explained:
Such a boost would mark the 14th year in a row that Pentagon spending has increased, despite the waning U.S. presence in Iraq. In dollars, Pentagon spending has more than doubled in 10 years. Even adjusted for inflation, the Defense Department budget has risen 65% in the past decade.
Even as the World Trade Center site was still smoldering, Republicans insisted Al Qaeda represented an existential threat to the United States. President Bush repeatedly compared 9/11 to Pearl Harbor and his war on terror to World War II. But he never asked Americans to join the military or sacrifice at home. Instead, Bush told us to go shopping and "get down to Disney World."
From a public policy standpoint, post-9/11 America in no way resembles FDR's response to Pearl Harbor. George W. Bush was the first modern president to cut taxes during wartime. Barack Obama was the second.
It's time, as Bernie Sanders, Al Franken and the Congressional Progressive Caucus each proposed, to begin paying for the unfunded conflicts fought in our name.
* Crossposted at Perrspectives *
Over the next ten years, the costs of America's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan will decline as the U.S. commitments there come to an end. But almost ten years, 6,000 U.S. dead and over a trillion dollars after the attacks of September 11, it's time to pay for our wars.
In May, the National Journal estimated that the total cost to the U.S. economy of the war against Al Qaeda will reach $3 trillion. In 2008, Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz put the price of the Iraq conflict alone at $3 trillion.
But by 2020 and beyond, the direct cost to U.S. taxpayers could reach $3 trillion. In March, the Congressional Research Service put the total cost of the wars at $1.28 trillion, including $806 billion for Iraq and $444 billion for Afghanistan. For the 2012 fiscal year which begins on October 1, President Obama asked for $117 billion more. (That war-fighting funding is over and above Secretary Gates' $553 billion Pentagon budget request for next year.)
But in addition to the roughly $1.5 trillion tally for both conflicts through the theoretical 2014 American draw down date in Afghanistan, the U.S. faces staggering bills for veterans' health care and disability benefits. Last May, an analysis by the Center for American Progress estimated the total projected total cost of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans' health care and disability could reach between $422 billion to $717 billion. Reconstruction aid and other development assistance represent tens of billions more, as does the additional interest on the national debt. And none of the above counts the expanded funding for the new Department of Homeland Security.
But that two-plus trillion dollar tab doesn't account for the expansion of the United States military since the start of the "global war on terror." As a percentage of the American economy, defense spending jumped from 3.1% in 2001 to 4.8% last year. While ThinkProgress noted that the Pentagon's FY 2012 ask is "the largest request ever since World War II," McClatchy explained:
Such a boost would mark the 14th year in a row that Pentagon spending has increased, despite the waning U.S. presence in Iraq. In dollars, Pentagon spending has more than doubled in 10 years. Even adjusted for inflation, the Defense Department budget has risen 65% in the past decade.
Even as the World Trade Center site was still smoldering, Republicans insisted Al Qaeda represented an existential threat to the United States. President Bush repeatedly compared 9/11 to Pearl Harbor and his war on terror to World War II. But he never asked Americans to join the military or sacrifice at home. Instead, Bush told us to go shopping and "get down to Disney World."
From a public policy standpoint, post-9/11 America in no way resembles FDR's response to Pearl Harbor. George W. Bush was the first modern president to cut taxes during wartime. Barack Obama was the second.
It's time, as Bernie Sanders, Al Franken and the Congressional Progressive Caucus each proposed, to begin paying for the unfunded conflicts fought in our name.
* Crossposted at Perrspectives *
![]()
![]()
What is comical is that the % given is wrong - it is over 2% of the federal budget - and the "numbers' are wrong.
Yet you chime in supporting the false talking points.
Want to guess why?
![]()
link please ![]()
![]()
![]()
What is comical is that the % given is wrong - it is over 2% of the federal budget - and the "numbers' are wrong.
Yet you chime in supporting the false talking points.
Want to guess why?
![]()
link please ![]()
Almost 1% of total budget is spend on food stamps which hardly affects federal debt
![]()
Well.
The federal government spends 11% of the total federal budget - $654 billion on "welfare" Also, During fiscal year 2012, the U.S. government spent a record $80.4 billion on food stamps.
The federal government also spends 19% of the federal budget on "health care" - $1.148 trillion.
The people getting SNAP are also eligible for Medicaid ($599 Billion) and public housing( $68.5 Billion).
Oh and: the federal government was mailing out disability checks to more than 10.5 million individuals, including 2 million to spouses and children of disabled workers, at a cost of record $200 billion a year
And, the claim by CD that we spend more $ on "corporate welfare" than programs for the poor is false.
define welfare and provide link please.![]()
Almost 1% of total budget is spend on food stamps which hardly affects federal debt
![]()
Well.
The federal government spends 11% of the total federal budget - $654 billion on "welfare" Also, During fiscal year 2012, the U.S. government spent a record $80.4 billion on food stamps.
The federal government also spends 19% of the federal budget on "health care" - $1.148 trillion.
The people getting SNAP are also eligible for Medicaid ($599 Billion) and public housing( $68.5 Billion).
Oh and: the federal government was mailing out disability checks to more than 10.5 million individuals, including 2 million to spouses and children of disabled workers, at a cost of record $200 billion a year
And, the claim by CD that we spend more $ on "corporate welfare" than programs for the poor is false.
define welfare and provide link please.![]()
Link to your source please.
Link to your source please.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.