On the bright side, I guess he can't fukk anything up when he's golfing....
Was your first sentence an intended pun? I liked it either way
Intended, intended yes :::holds up martini glass::::
So in the face of that video, all the derision about playing golf, you now retort you need a pic of this ONE instance. As though anyone has access to take such a pic.
Golfing. Trump's number one hobby. And one he shi* on Obama for for YEARS. And that is what you have to say Saban.
Saban WAKE UP TO WHO YOU ARE. And that is a person ROTTING AWAY with loyalty to a president who will go down as the THE WORST EVER HANDS DOWN. You are part of that. And you'll go down with him.
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
On the bright side, I guess he can't fukk anything up when he's golfing....
Was your first sentence an intended pun? I liked it either way
Intended, intended yes :::holds up martini glass::::
So in the face of that video, all the derision about playing golf, you now retort you need a pic of this ONE instance. As though anyone has access to take such a pic.
Golfing. Trump's number one hobby. And one he shi* on Obama for for YEARS. And that is what you have to say Saban.
Saban WAKE UP TO WHO YOU ARE. And that is a person ROTTING AWAY with loyalty to a president who will go down as the THE WORST EVER HANDS DOWN. You are part of that. And you'll go down with him.
Let's hear what a black american genius thinks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFsMQd7mEco Thomas Sowell - Obama is the worst president ever.
Only a genius because he affirms a white bigots stance. And then all of a sudden he is a genius, just like David Clark. Serious SRH, do you think such a post furthers a debate or wouldn't be shot down in one like I just did in less than a second??
Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:
Let's hear what a black american genius thinks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFsMQd7mEco Thomas Sowell - Obama is the worst president ever.
Only a genius because he affirms a white bigots stance. And then all of a sudden he is a genius, just like David Clark. Serious SRH, do you think such a post furthers a debate or wouldn't be shot down in one like I just did in less than a second??
Only a genius because he affirms a white bigots stance. And then all of a sudden he is a genius, just like David Clark. Serious SRH, do you think such a post furthers a debate or wouldn't be shot down in one like I just did in less than a second??
Seriously? You’re questioning his intelligence? He is known as one of the most innovative thinkers to ever live. The man is a former US marine and has a bachelor’s degree from Harvard, a master’s degree from Columbia and a doctorate from the University of Chicago. He’s authored over 40 books.
How exactly is his stance white and bigoted? That’s such a racist thing to say, scalabrine. Is that dog whistle for uncle tom? His stance is that of a highly black educated man that came from nothing to be something. It’s obvious you’re a racist bigot that hates educated black republican men.
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Only a genius because he affirms a white bigots stance. And then all of a sudden he is a genius, just like David Clark. Serious SRH, do you think such a post furthers a debate or wouldn't be shot down in one like I just did in less than a second??
Seriously? You’re questioning his intelligence? He is known as one of the most innovative thinkers to ever live. The man is a former US marine and has a bachelor’s degree from Harvard, a master’s degree from Columbia and a doctorate from the University of Chicago. He’s authored over 40 books.
How exactly is his stance white and bigoted? That’s such a racist thing to say, scalabrine. Is that dog whistle for uncle tom? His stance is that of a highly black educated man that came from nothing to be something. It’s obvious you’re a racist bigot that hates educated black republican men.
Only a genius because he affirms a white bigots stance. And then all of a sudden he is a genius, just like David Clark. Serious SRH, do you think such a post furthers a debate or wouldn't be shot down in one like I just did in less than a second??
Don't you love it how they use the 'genius' label to strengthen their argument when it's in their favor, but when it comes to something like global warming they dismiss the thoughts of people like Stephen Hawking and Neil deGrasse Tyson?
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Only a genius because he affirms a white bigots stance. And then all of a sudden he is a genius, just like David Clark. Serious SRH, do you think such a post furthers a debate or wouldn't be shot down in one like I just did in less than a second??
Don't you love it how they use the 'genius' label to strengthen their argument when it's in their favor, but when it comes to something like global warming they dismiss the thoughts of people like Stephen Hawking and Neil deGrasse Tyson?
Trump and his supporters continue to display their utter ignorance. Terrible time for the US. absolutely terrible.
And darkhorse -- you are correct. the democrats who either did not vote or choose to protest vote for Bernie or any other candidate are almost, not quite but almost, as guilty as the brain dead trump supporters.
Trump and his supporters continue to display their utter ignorance. Terrible time for the US. absolutely terrible.
And darkhorse -- you are correct. the democrats who either did not vote or choose to protest vote for Bernie or any other candidate are almost, not quite but almost, as guilty as the brain dead trump supporters.
Nearly 3 million that did vote for hillary didn't really need to.
In hindsight, there is some truth to what you say.
Of course, those 3 million people you reference have more of a right to whine about Trump than the fat azz lazy ones who were to smug to go out and exercise their constitutional right, such as the OP.
Back to my original point ... if a HRC supporter did not vote for her, their lack of a vote has as much to do with who is our current president as someone who voted for him.
bigreds daddy
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
Nearly 3 million that did vote for hillary didn't really need to.
In hindsight, there is some truth to what you say.
Of course, those 3 million people you reference have more of a right to whine about Trump than the fat azz lazy ones who were to smug to go out and exercise their constitutional right, such as the OP.
Back to my original point ... if a HRC supporter did not vote for her, their lack of a vote has as much to do with who is our current president as someone who voted for him.
If you're talking about the voting, over 40% of this country didn't vote and that's specifically why Trump got elected. About 25% technically voted for Trump, which is what Trump supporters don't seem to understand. The rest of the country didn't and doesn't support his specific agenda, if that can even be clearly defined since I know he's deferring most policy issues to his peers who aren't qualified in the first place.
I know he's a compulsive liar who doesn't believe over 90% of the things he says and so ultimately the only choice I'm stuck with for the time being is ignoring Trump. What is interesting is that Fox News has taken a ratings' hit recently because they're so invested in protecting Trump's image that they're not breaking news on various subjects and people are using other news sources now to receive information.
If you're talking about the voting, over 40% of this country didn't vote and that's specifically why Trump got elected. About 25% technically voted for Trump, which is what Trump supporters don't seem to understand. The rest of the country didn't and doesn't support his specific agenda, if that can even be clearly defined since I know he's deferring most policy issues to his peers who aren't qualified in the first place.
I know he's a compulsive liar who doesn't believe over 90% of the things he says and so ultimately the only choice I'm stuck with for the time being is ignoring Trump. What is interesting is that Fox News has taken a ratings' hit recently because they're so invested in protecting Trump's image that they're not breaking news on various subjects and people are using other news sources now to receive information.
In hindsight, there is some truth to what you say.
Of course, those 3 million people you reference have more of a right to whine about Trump than the fat azz lazy ones who were to smug to go out and exercise their constitutional right, such as the OP.
Back to my original point ... if a HRC supporter did not vote for her, their lack of a vote has as much to do with who is our current president as someone who voted for him.
My point is that the electoral college is outdated.It does not reflect the population.
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
In hindsight, there is some truth to what you say.
Of course, those 3 million people you reference have more of a right to whine about Trump than the fat azz lazy ones who were to smug to go out and exercise their constitutional right, such as the OP.
Back to my original point ... if a HRC supporter did not vote for her, their lack of a vote has as much to do with who is our current president as someone who voted for him.
My point is that the electoral college is outdated.It does not reflect the population.
Hot Forum Topics
