Trump looking to hire Impeachment Attorney
I would be willing to bet that I give more money and time to local charities than Wallstreet does. He’s under the assumption the welfare state is good for the people receiving the welfare. It isn’t. You believe in giving poor people a fish, I believe in teaching them how to fish. Jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs.
Well what I said (if you consider that an insult then YOU are insulted with your change, not me) is changing political party cannot change how you are as a person or how you think. YOU are the only one who has control over the things you mentioned. If that is an insult then evaluate yourself and find out why you find it to be an insult.
It is also interesting how you took what I said means I think the welfare state is good for people receiving welfare. What I said is you feel that helping people that are lesser than you is like taking money from your wallet but you are OK with corporate welfare...that is 100% fact. Giving freebies to corporations holding the government hostage for "jobs jobs jobs" is corporate welfare. Giving pref treatment from taxes to corps is corporate welfare. You are OK with corporate welfare but you are very much against welfare in other forms.
I would like for you to explain HOW you can teach someone to fish...what is your plan about teaching people to fish exactly? And what kind of fishing are you planning on teaching that will raise those you are teaching to an income level appropriate to not only live but to save and prepare for the future?
Words like jobs jobs jobs and teach people to fish are useless and vague without any detail or perspective. How about instead of throwing up catch phrases we give details?
I would be willing to bet that I give more money and time to local charities than Wallstreet does. He’s under the assumption the welfare state is good for the people receiving the welfare. It isn’t. You believe in giving poor people a fish, I believe in teaching them how to fish. Jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs.
Well what I said (if you consider that an insult then YOU are insulted with your change, not me) is changing political party cannot change how you are as a person or how you think. YOU are the only one who has control over the things you mentioned. If that is an insult then evaluate yourself and find out why you find it to be an insult.
It is also interesting how you took what I said means I think the welfare state is good for people receiving welfare. What I said is you feel that helping people that are lesser than you is like taking money from your wallet but you are OK with corporate welfare...that is 100% fact. Giving freebies to corporations holding the government hostage for "jobs jobs jobs" is corporate welfare. Giving pref treatment from taxes to corps is corporate welfare. You are OK with corporate welfare but you are very much against welfare in other forms.
I would like for you to explain HOW you can teach someone to fish...what is your plan about teaching people to fish exactly? And what kind of fishing are you planning on teaching that will raise those you are teaching to an income level appropriate to not only live but to save and prepare for the future?
Words like jobs jobs jobs and teach people to fish are useless and vague without any detail or perspective. How about instead of throwing up catch phrases we give details?
QUOTE Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: I would be willing to bet that I give more money and time to local charities than Wallstreet does. He’s under the assumption the welfare state is good for the people receiving the welfare. It isn’t. You believe in giving poor people a fish, I believe in teaching them how to fish. Jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs. Well what I said (if you consider that an insult then YOU are insulted with your change, not me) is changing political party cannot change how you are as a person or how you think. YOU are the only one who has control over the things you mentioned. If that is an insult then evaluate yourself and find out why you find it to be an insult. It is also interesting how you took what I said means I think the welfare state is good for people receiving welfare. What I said is you feel that helping people that are lesser than you is like taking money from your wallet but you are OK with corporate welfare...that is 100% fact. Giving freebies to corporations holding the government hostage for "jobs jobs jobs" is corporate welfare. Giving pref treatment from taxes to corps is corporate welfare. You are OK with corporate welfare but you are very much against welfare in other forms. I would like for you to explain HOW you can teach someone to fish...what is your plan about teaching people to fish exactly? And what kind of fishing are you planning on teaching that will raise those you are teaching to an income level appropriate to not only live but to save and prepare for the future? Words like jobs jobs jobs and teach people to fish are useless and vague without any detail or perspective. How about instead of throwing up catch phrases we give details?
I think he want's to teach them how to fish so he can charge them admission to the pond.
QUOTE Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: I would be willing to bet that I give more money and time to local charities than Wallstreet does. He’s under the assumption the welfare state is good for the people receiving the welfare. It isn’t. You believe in giving poor people a fish, I believe in teaching them how to fish. Jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs. Well what I said (if you consider that an insult then YOU are insulted with your change, not me) is changing political party cannot change how you are as a person or how you think. YOU are the only one who has control over the things you mentioned. If that is an insult then evaluate yourself and find out why you find it to be an insult. It is also interesting how you took what I said means I think the welfare state is good for people receiving welfare. What I said is you feel that helping people that are lesser than you is like taking money from your wallet but you are OK with corporate welfare...that is 100% fact. Giving freebies to corporations holding the government hostage for "jobs jobs jobs" is corporate welfare. Giving pref treatment from taxes to corps is corporate welfare. You are OK with corporate welfare but you are very much against welfare in other forms. I would like for you to explain HOW you can teach someone to fish...what is your plan about teaching people to fish exactly? And what kind of fishing are you planning on teaching that will raise those you are teaching to an income level appropriate to not only live but to save and prepare for the future? Words like jobs jobs jobs and teach people to fish are useless and vague without any detail or perspective. How about instead of throwing up catch phrases we give details?
I think he want's to teach them how to fish so he can charge them admission to the pond.
See the problem with Obama or Sanders and for this point Trump Is they are popular candidates they hit a clear note with grass roots citizens. They are very hard to be controlled I campaigned for Trump why him cause the party stooges next to him were all yes men at one time. And the Democrats had all but given Hillary the nomination
I do respect the man. believe me the presidency is the toughest lowest paying job on the planet there is endless parade of men who went into the White House with vigor and left looking 90 the stress the responsibility and the power grinds great men into frail old men with white hair and face only a General could appreciate
See the problem with Obama or Sanders and for this point Trump Is they are popular candidates they hit a clear note with grass roots citizens. They are very hard to be controlled I campaigned for Trump why him cause the party stooges next to him were all yes men at one time. And the Democrats had all but given Hillary the nomination
I do respect the man. believe me the presidency is the toughest lowest paying job on the planet there is endless parade of men who went into the White House with vigor and left looking 90 the stress the responsibility and the power grinds great men into frail old men with white hair and face only a General could appreciate
Trump's IQ is 189
Fact checker Snopes rated false the claim of Trump's high IQ. Flawed estimate of Trump IQ is based on entrance requirements to Wharlton. However Trump spend two years at 66th ranked Fordham university before transferring to Wharlton. So entrance requirements are irrelevant since he didn't have to meet them. According to book "the Trumps", family connections with admissions officer allowed Trump to enroll.
Trump's braggings are exaggerated and unsubstantiated. His net worth is estimated to be less according to Forbes and Bloomberg. There is doubt about his business acumen because of business failures in airline, vodka, steak, casinos and Trump university. Trump fortune isn't entirely self-made because he inherited alot from his father. If Trump did nothing but invest in index funds, he would be richer today.
Trump's IQ is 189
Fact checker Snopes rated false the claim of Trump's high IQ. Flawed estimate of Trump IQ is based on entrance requirements to Wharlton. However Trump spend two years at 66th ranked Fordham university before transferring to Wharlton. So entrance requirements are irrelevant since he didn't have to meet them. According to book "the Trumps", family connections with admissions officer allowed Trump to enroll.
Trump's braggings are exaggerated and unsubstantiated. His net worth is estimated to be less according to Forbes and Bloomberg. There is doubt about his business acumen because of business failures in airline, vodka, steak, casinos and Trump university. Trump fortune isn't entirely self-made because he inherited alot from his father. If Trump did nothing but invest in index funds, he would be richer today.
@realDonaldTrump
The Failing New York Times purposely wrote a false story stating that I am unhappy with my legal team on the Russia case and am going to add another lawyer to help out. Wrong. I am VERY happy with my lawyers, John Dowd, Ty Cobb and Jay Sekulow. They are doing a great job and.....
......have shown conclusively that there was no Collusion with Russia..just excuse for losing. The only Collusion was that done by the DNC, the Democrats and Crooked Hillary. The writer of the story, Maggie Haberman, a Hillary flunky, knows nothing about me and is not given access.
@realDonaldTrump
The Failing New York Times purposely wrote a false story stating that I am unhappy with my legal team on the Russia case and am going to add another lawyer to help out. Wrong. I am VERY happy with my lawyers, John Dowd, Ty Cobb and Jay Sekulow. They are doing a great job and.....
......have shown conclusively that there was no Collusion with Russia..just excuse for losing. The only Collusion was that done by the DNC, the Democrats and Crooked Hillary. The writer of the story, Maggie Haberman, a Hillary flunky, knows nothing about me and is not given access.
Trump started over 500 businesses and democrats always mention the 5 that failed. Name one (d) politician with more business success than Trump.
See this is even biased and riddled with holes. Trump didnt start 500 businesses and 5 failed, inside every large corporate entity he "created" there are MANY business ventures and entities that exist. There is NO WAY he created 500 to the scale of his 5 failures. The failures are his LARGEST entities and had many sub-entities inside them. Do you count all the failed business ventures inside his large corporate entity that failed like his water lines, the real estate seminar lines, clothing lines etc etc that ARE separate entities that failed.
Posting something like this shows you really lack an understanding of what you say before you say it. He does not have entities that are successful to the scale of his failures that are similar in number and size. Before you lap up the water please make sure you know what the crap you are talking about.
Trump started over 500 businesses and democrats always mention the 5 that failed. Name one (d) politician with more business success than Trump.
See this is even biased and riddled with holes. Trump didnt start 500 businesses and 5 failed, inside every large corporate entity he "created" there are MANY business ventures and entities that exist. There is NO WAY he created 500 to the scale of his 5 failures. The failures are his LARGEST entities and had many sub-entities inside them. Do you count all the failed business ventures inside his large corporate entity that failed like his water lines, the real estate seminar lines, clothing lines etc etc that ARE separate entities that failed.
Posting something like this shows you really lack an understanding of what you say before you say it. He does not have entities that are successful to the scale of his failures that are similar in number and size. Before you lap up the water please make sure you know what the crap you are talking about.
Trump started over 500 businesses and democrats always mention the 5 that failed.
Trump started over 500 businesses and democrats always mention the 5 that failed.
Trump is not winning. He has survived but that is not winning. Pennsylvania 18th District was won by 20 plus points his candidate in that special election is in a virtual dead heat with the event horizon Wednesday. The republican canidate must win this cause it is a fire storm in Congress if he loses this would be a huge momentum boost for the dccc the momentum of this will magnify donor support. Volunteers campaign clean money the battle there is necessary for both sides. Trump has single handily done more to get democrats to the polls then all other democrats combined.
Trump is not winning. He has survived but that is not winning. Pennsylvania 18th District was won by 20 plus points his candidate in that special election is in a virtual dead heat with the event horizon Wednesday. The republican canidate must win this cause it is a fire storm in Congress if he loses this would be a huge momentum boost for the dccc the momentum of this will magnify donor support. Volunteers campaign clean money the battle there is necessary for both sides. Trump has single handily done more to get democrats to the polls then all other democrats combined.
So much for "he would use the office to personally enrich himself further”
So much for "he would use the office to personally enrich himself further”
According to Forbes recent list of the world's billionaires, President Donald Trump lost more than $400 million during 2017..So much for "he would use the office to personally enrich himself further”
No wonder he needs all of that Russian money. ![]()
According to Forbes recent list of the world's billionaires, President Donald Trump lost more than $400 million during 2017..So much for "he would use the office to personally enrich himself further”
No wonder he needs all of that Russian money. ![]()
The last time someone did this for our Country, it was one of our Founding Father's....
The last time someone did this for our Country, it was one of our Founding Father's....
JOE BIDEN: John’s last-minute economic plan does nothing to tackle the number-one job facing the middle class, and it happens to be, as Barack says, a three-letter word: jobs, j-o-b-s, jobs.
JOE BIDEN: John’s last-minute economic plan does nothing to tackle the number-one job facing the middle class, and it happens to be, as Barack says, a three-letter word: jobs, j-o-b-s, jobs.
The Trump Organization said Monday that the company, as President Donald Trump previously pledged, donated profits from foreign government officials patronizing its hotels to the Treasury Department....The last time someone did this for our Country, it was one of our Founding Father's....
Trump has promised to donate funds to charities in the past and failed to keep his word.
The Trump Organization said Monday that the company, as President Donald Trump previously pledged, donated profits from foreign government officials patronizing its hotels to the Treasury Department....The last time someone did this for our Country, it was one of our Founding Father's....
Trump has promised to donate funds to charities in the past and failed to keep his word.
Hot Forum Topics
- Thursday 10/22/2026 935
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,953
- Patriots vs Bears in-game live TNF 1,942
- NFL LOCKED IN! 109,719
- Patriots@Bears discussion 3,638
- NFL THREAD * 151 * 27,058
- Thursday”s POD 2,677
- Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,656
- Week 8 Money 7,462
- Republicans push back against the lunatic Trump and his team of liars. 23,327
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
