• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 7
      NFL Week 7
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    This is gonna sound crazy but it is a serious question

    «First Previous 456 ... 567 Next Last»
    MoneySRH
    SportsFan9698
    bowlslit
    Relax_Dude
    ClubDirt
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 3161
    Posts: 166
    «First Previous 456 ... 567 Next Last»
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jun. 3, 2016 - 11:59 PM ET #76

    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:

    I'm with you Money. 

    Hopefully we can get Trump in the White House and then do away with these stupid elections. Just make Trump the Grand Supreme Leader of America and let him rule as long as he wants. Elections are stupid anyways and anyone that doesn't vote for Trump should just be shot on the spot. We don't need any trials for that. Just shoot them. 

    Kim Jung Trump forever!!!!!

    TRUMP BABY!!!!! 
    A king is supreme ruler. That would be more Hillary and Obama’s style. Well, treason is punishable by death. A vote for the democrats is treasonous.

    I know your post was sarcastic but there is a lot of truth to it. Let me make it clear: I am for democracy. The thing is - The population is too stupid to vote. The founders never envisioned the majority of the American population would become mentally disabled.

    The founders could never envision an America where…......

    America’s enemies would be in positions of power in the US government.  
    Americans would burn and stomp on their own nations flag.
    The news and media is anti-American, pro-communist/pro-socialist propaganda 24/7.  
    Public schools and colleges are anti-American indoctrination camps.  
    Murderous and pedophilic Islam is praised and acceptable but Christianity is condemned.
    Sharia Law and Islam are advocated but the American way of life is condemned.
    Border laws are considered bigoted.
    Illegal aliens are allowed to vote, drive, get free education etc.  
    Illegal aliens wave another nations flag and openly protest on American soil and demand rights.
    Police are vilified and the criminals are victims.
    Keeping humans with penises from using the women’s restroom is considered hateful and bigoted.
    Socialism and communism is acceptable while capitalism and republicanism is condemned.
    Racism towards whites is acceptable but racism towards any other race is considered unacceptable.
    Patriotism is now considered bigoted and racist.
    The declaration of independence is now considered racist.
    The American flag is now considered racist.
    The star spangled banner is now considered racist.
    The pledge of allegiance is now considered racist and bigoted.

    This is why it should be illegal to vote for anyone but Trump. A vote for a democrat is racist, treasonous, anti-American, dangerous, and against morality.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:

    I'm with you Money. 

    Hopefully we can get Trump in the White House and then do away with these stupid elections. Just make Trump the Grand Supreme Leader of America and let him rule as long as he wants. Elections are stupid anyways and anyone that doesn't vote for Trump should just be shot on the spot. We don't need any trials for that. Just shoot them. 

    Kim Jung Trump forever!!!!!

    TRUMP BABY!!!!! 
    A king is supreme ruler. That would be more Hillary and Obama’s style. Well, treason is punishable by death. A vote for the democrats is treasonous.

    I know your post was sarcastic but there is a lot of truth to it. Let me make it clear: I am for democracy. The thing is - The population is too stupid to vote. The founders never envisioned the majority of the American population would become mentally disabled.

    The founders could never envision an America where…......

    America’s enemies would be in positions of power in the US government.  
    Americans would burn and stomp on their own nations flag.
    The news and media is anti-American, pro-communist/pro-socialist propaganda 24/7.  
    Public schools and colleges are anti-American indoctrination camps.  
    Murderous and pedophilic Islam is praised and acceptable but Christianity is condemned.
    Sharia Law and Islam are advocated but the American way of life is condemned.
    Border laws are considered bigoted.
    Illegal aliens are allowed to vote, drive, get free education etc.  
    Illegal aliens wave another nations flag and openly protest on American soil and demand rights.
    Police are vilified and the criminals are victims.
    Keeping humans with penises from using the women’s restroom is considered hateful and bigoted.
    Socialism and communism is acceptable while capitalism and republicanism is condemned.
    Racism towards whites is acceptable but racism towards any other race is considered unacceptable.
    Patriotism is now considered bigoted and racist.
    The declaration of independence is now considered racist.
    The American flag is now considered racist.
    The star spangled banner is now considered racist.
    The pledge of allegiance is now considered racist and bigoted.

    This is why it should be illegal to vote for anyone but Trump. A vote for a democrat is racist, treasonous, anti-American, dangerous, and against morality.


     
    SportsFan9698
    SportsFan9698
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2010
    Posts: 5575
    Posted: Jun. 4, 2016 - 12:08 AM ET #77

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    A king is supreme ruler. That would be more Hillary and Obama’s style. Well, treason is punishable by death. A vote for the democrats is treasonous.

    I know your post was sarcastic but there is a lot of truth to it. Let me make it clear: I am for democracy. The thing is - The population is too stupid to vote. The founders never envisioned the majority of the American population would become mentally disabled.

    The founders could never envision an America where…......

    America’s enemies would be in positions of power in the US government.  
    Americans would burn and stomp on their own nations flag.
    The news and media is anti-American, pro-communist/pro-socialist propaganda 24/7.  
    Public schools and colleges are anti-American indoctrination camps.  
    Murderous and pedophilic Islam is praised and acceptable but Christianity is condemned.
    Sharia Law and Islam are advocated but the American way of life is condemned.
    Border laws are considered bigoted.
    Illegal aliens are allowed to vote, drive, get free education etc.  
    Illegal aliens wave another nations flag and openly protest on American soil and demand rights.
    Police are vilified and the criminals are victims.
    Keeping humans with penises from using the women’s restroom is considered hateful and bigoted.
    Socialism and communism is acceptable while capitalism and republicanism is condemned.
    Racism towards whites is acceptable but racism towards any other race is considered unacceptable.
    Patriotism is now considered bigoted and racist.
    The declaration of independence is now considered racist.
    The American flag is now considered racist.
    The star spangled banner is now considered racist.
    The pledge of allegiance is now considered racist and bigoted.

    This is why it should be illegal to vote for anyone but Trump. A vote for a democrat is racist, treasonous, anti-American, dangerous, and against morality.



    Money - you are on the money.

    I will elaborate... Our country's founders envisioned a true democracy.

    Votiing rights were exclusive to men who owned land... spcifically because land owners paid TAXES.

    There was no IRS back then, and they would barf at the thought of taxing economic activity... but I digress.

    If they were put into modern times, they would support voting right to ONLY THOSE THAT SUPPORT THE COMMONWEALTH.  Not those that feed off the commonwealth.  Put in simpler terms (some here need it to be dumbed down) only tax payers should vote.  Welfare recipients should not be allowed a vote.

    I agree with this.  This country would be much stronger if we all did.  Any deviation from this meaning allowing welfare recipients to vote is a step towards socialism and crony capitalism.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    A king is supreme ruler. That would be more Hillary and Obama’s style. Well, treason is punishable by death. A vote for the democrats is treasonous.

    I know your post was sarcastic but there is a lot of truth to it. Let me make it clear: I am for democracy. The thing is - The population is too stupid to vote. The founders never envisioned the majority of the American population would become mentally disabled.

    The founders could never envision an America where…......

    America’s enemies would be in positions of power in the US government.  
    Americans would burn and stomp on their own nations flag.
    The news and media is anti-American, pro-communist/pro-socialist propaganda 24/7.  
    Public schools and colleges are anti-American indoctrination camps.  
    Murderous and pedophilic Islam is praised and acceptable but Christianity is condemned.
    Sharia Law and Islam are advocated but the American way of life is condemned.
    Border laws are considered bigoted.
    Illegal aliens are allowed to vote, drive, get free education etc.  
    Illegal aliens wave another nations flag and openly protest on American soil and demand rights.
    Police are vilified and the criminals are victims.
    Keeping humans with penises from using the women’s restroom is considered hateful and bigoted.
    Socialism and communism is acceptable while capitalism and republicanism is condemned.
    Racism towards whites is acceptable but racism towards any other race is considered unacceptable.
    Patriotism is now considered bigoted and racist.
    The declaration of independence is now considered racist.
    The American flag is now considered racist.
    The star spangled banner is now considered racist.
    The pledge of allegiance is now considered racist and bigoted.

    This is why it should be illegal to vote for anyone but Trump. A vote for a democrat is racist, treasonous, anti-American, dangerous, and against morality.



    Money - you are on the money.

    I will elaborate... Our country's founders envisioned a true democracy.

    Votiing rights were exclusive to men who owned land... spcifically because land owners paid TAXES.

    There was no IRS back then, and they would barf at the thought of taxing economic activity... but I digress.

    If they were put into modern times, they would support voting right to ONLY THOSE THAT SUPPORT THE COMMONWEALTH.  Not those that feed off the commonwealth.  Put in simpler terms (some here need it to be dumbed down) only tax payers should vote.  Welfare recipients should not be allowed a vote.

    I agree with this.  This country would be much stronger if we all did.  Any deviation from this meaning allowing welfare recipients to vote is a step towards socialism and crony capitalism.


     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Jun. 4, 2016 - 12:16 AM ET #78

    Great post money! There needs to be more people like you and less people that cry about bailouts.
    Reply
    Great post money! There needs to be more people like you and less people that cry about bailouts.
     
    Relax_Dude
    Relax_Dude
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2014
    Posts: 4717
    Posted: Jun. 4, 2016 - 2:02 AM ET #79

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:

    I'm with you Money. Hopefully we can get Trump in the White House and then do away with these stupid elections. Just make Trump the Grand Supreme Leader of America and let him rule as long as he wants. Elections are stupid anyways and anyone that doesn't vote for Trump should just be shot on the spot. We don't need any trials for that. Just shoot them. Kim Jung Trump forever!!!!!TRUMP BABY!!!!! 
    A king is supreme ruler. That would be more Hillary and Obama’s style. Well, treason is punishable by death. A vote for the democrats is treasonous. I know your post was sarcastic but there is a lot of truth to it. Let me make it clear: I am for democracy. The thing is - The population is too stupid to vote. The founders never envisioned the majority of the American population would become mentally disabled. The founders could never envision an America where…......America’s enemies would be in positions of power in the US government.  Americans would burn and stomp on their own nations flag. The news and media is anti-American, pro-communist/pro-socialist propaganda 24/7.  Public schools and colleges are anti-American indoctrination camps.  Murderous and pedophilic Islam is praised and acceptable but Christianity is condemned. Sharia Law and Islam are advocated but the American way of life is condemned. Border laws are considered bigoted.Illegal aliens are allowed to vote, drive, get free education etc.  Illegal aliens wave another nations flag and openly protest on American soil and demand rights. Police are vilified and the criminals are victims.Keeping humans with penises from using the women’s restroom is considered hateful and bigoted. Socialism and communism is acceptable while capitalism and republicanism is condemned.Racism towards whites is acceptable but racism towards any other race is considered unacceptable. Patriotism is now considered bigoted and racist. The declaration of independence is now considered racist.The American flag is now considered racist.The star spangled banner is now considered racist. The pledge of allegiance is now considered racist and bigoted. This is why it should be illegal to vote for anyone but Trump. A vote for a democrat is racist, treasonous, anti-American, dangerous, and against morality.

    Yes! YOU GET IT! There are millions more like us. The "protesters" are now helping our cause.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:

    I'm with you Money. Hopefully we can get Trump in the White House and then do away with these stupid elections. Just make Trump the Grand Supreme Leader of America and let him rule as long as he wants. Elections are stupid anyways and anyone that doesn't vote for Trump should just be shot on the spot. We don't need any trials for that. Just shoot them. Kim Jung Trump forever!!!!!TRUMP BABY!!!!! 
    A king is supreme ruler. That would be more Hillary and Obama’s style. Well, treason is punishable by death. A vote for the democrats is treasonous. I know your post was sarcastic but there is a lot of truth to it. Let me make it clear: I am for democracy. The thing is - The population is too stupid to vote. The founders never envisioned the majority of the American population would become mentally disabled. The founders could never envision an America where…......America’s enemies would be in positions of power in the US government.  Americans would burn and stomp on their own nations flag. The news and media is anti-American, pro-communist/pro-socialist propaganda 24/7.  Public schools and colleges are anti-American indoctrination camps.  Murderous and pedophilic Islam is praised and acceptable but Christianity is condemned. Sharia Law and Islam are advocated but the American way of life is condemned. Border laws are considered bigoted.Illegal aliens are allowed to vote, drive, get free education etc.  Illegal aliens wave another nations flag and openly protest on American soil and demand rights. Police are vilified and the criminals are victims.Keeping humans with penises from using the women’s restroom is considered hateful and bigoted. Socialism and communism is acceptable while capitalism and republicanism is condemned.Racism towards whites is acceptable but racism towards any other race is considered unacceptable. Patriotism is now considered bigoted and racist. The declaration of independence is now considered racist.The American flag is now considered racist.The star spangled banner is now considered racist. The pledge of allegiance is now considered racist and bigoted. This is why it should be illegal to vote for anyone but Trump. A vote for a democrat is racist, treasonous, anti-American, dangerous, and against morality.

    Yes! YOU GET IT! There are millions more like us. The "protesters" are now helping our cause.
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jun. 5, 2016 - 9:31 PM ET #80

    SportsFan9698, I agree with you pretty much on everything about 90% of the time. I disagree with your view on welfare recipients not being allowed to vote though. Not all people on welfare are liberal democrats. There are millions of republican patriots that are in dire straits.

    Bowlslit and Relax_Dude

    Reply
    SportsFan9698, I agree with you pretty much on everything about 90% of the time. I disagree with your view on welfare recipients not being allowed to vote though. Not all people on welfare are liberal democrats. There are millions of republican patriots that are in dire straits.

    Bowlslit and Relax_Dude

     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jun. 6, 2016 - 10:50 AM ET #81

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Women: Decide For Yourselves
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzwMJAFWLtQ

    Here’s a synopsis of the video: "Over the past decade several states have passed laws that Open women's bathrooms locker rooms and shelters to anyone who identifies as a woman - including biological males. Many women have objected citing issues of privacy and safety. Their allies have dismissed these concerns they say that no woman would have anything to fear from those who call themselves trans-women. This film cover sheet is a small selection of violent and predatory men - all of whom would be allowed into women's most vulnerable spaces under the laws that are being passed around the country. Please watch and decide for yourself whether women have reason to be concerned."

    It’s not about creating a “safe zone.” It’s about people using the public bathroom that corresponds with the sex on their birth certificate.

    Morality is gone. A human with a penis going freely into women’s restrooms is acceptable, Sharia Law is acceptable, and pedophilia is acceptable by liberals. You liberals are insane.


    you didn't answer my questions, at all, but i expected that.  now when you say pedophilia is acceptable to liberals, can you give examples of liberals who are proven pedophiles and how they've been accepted?  and just so the terminology is clear, when i say pedophiles, i'm referring to people like hastert and duggar and some others https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1709387
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    Women: Decide For Yourselves
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzwMJAFWLtQ

    Here’s a synopsis of the video: "Over the past decade several states have passed laws that Open women's bathrooms locker rooms and shelters to anyone who identifies as a woman - including biological males. Many women have objected citing issues of privacy and safety. Their allies have dismissed these concerns they say that no woman would have anything to fear from those who call themselves trans-women. This film cover sheet is a small selection of violent and predatory men - all of whom would be allowed into women's most vulnerable spaces under the laws that are being passed around the country. Please watch and decide for yourself whether women have reason to be concerned."

    It’s not about creating a “safe zone.” It’s about people using the public bathroom that corresponds with the sex on their birth certificate.

    Morality is gone. A human with a penis going freely into women’s restrooms is acceptable, Sharia Law is acceptable, and pedophilia is acceptable by liberals. You liberals are insane.


    you didn't answer my questions, at all, but i expected that.  now when you say pedophilia is acceptable to liberals, can you give examples of liberals who are proven pedophiles and how they've been accepted?  and just so the terminology is clear, when i say pedophiles, i'm referring to people like hastert and duggar and some others https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1709387
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jun. 6, 2016 - 11:04 PM ET #82

    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:


    you didn't answer my questions, at all, but i expected that.  now when you say pedophilia is acceptable to liberals, can you give examples of liberals who are proven pedophiles and how they've been accepted?  and just so the terminology is clear, when i say pedophiles, i'm referring to people like hastert and duggar and some others https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1709387
    I did answer you. You just have comprehension problems. No surprise there. I expected it as well.

    https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_and_Pedophilia

    Not just liberals accept pedophilia, so do libertarians. The democrats and libertarians endorse the practice of pedophilic Islam and Sharia law and republican patriots condemn it.

    It looks like that list is you provided is fabricated.

    There is a democrat list too.
    https://www.conservative21.com/Media/The_List.txt

    "Note: This list only includes Presidents, Senators, Congressman, Mayors, Governors, Attorney Generals, and Judges that have either confessed or been charged with a crime. Unlike other lists created by Democrats showing Republicans, we have a very strict requirement that the individuals in question have either confessed or been convicted of a crime. More specifically, this list does not include duplicates, fake names, and fake individuals. All situations listed in this document have been independently verified for their accuracy and truth. This list does not contain home-makers, protestors, religious individuals, political activists, stay-at-home-moms, and people who simply vote for a particular party like most anti-Republican lists created by Democrats do."


    I don't get why criminal behavior that's self motivated by their own perverted minds was brought up? If Jesus Christ was a pedophile rapist killer and the bible endorsed pedophilia like the Quran, then I'd get it. I'm shaking my head at how the discussion was diverted to this topic but I'll go along with it.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:


    you didn't answer my questions, at all, but i expected that.  now when you say pedophilia is acceptable to liberals, can you give examples of liberals who are proven pedophiles and how they've been accepted?  and just so the terminology is clear, when i say pedophiles, i'm referring to people like hastert and duggar and some others https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x1709387
    I did answer you. You just have comprehension problems. No surprise there. I expected it as well.

    https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_and_Pedophilia

    Not just liberals accept pedophilia, so do libertarians. The democrats and libertarians endorse the practice of pedophilic Islam and Sharia law and republican patriots condemn it.

    It looks like that list is you provided is fabricated.

    There is a democrat list too.
    https://www.conservative21.com/Media/The_List.txt

    "Note: This list only includes Presidents, Senators, Congressman, Mayors, Governors, Attorney Generals, and Judges that have either confessed or been charged with a crime. Unlike other lists created by Democrats showing Republicans, we have a very strict requirement that the individuals in question have either confessed or been convicted of a crime. More specifically, this list does not include duplicates, fake names, and fake individuals. All situations listed in this document have been independently verified for their accuracy and truth. This list does not contain home-makers, protestors, religious individuals, political activists, stay-at-home-moms, and people who simply vote for a particular party like most anti-Republican lists created by Democrats do."


    I don't get why criminal behavior that's self motivated by their own perverted minds was brought up? If Jesus Christ was a pedophile rapist killer and the bible endorsed pedophilia like the Quran, then I'd get it. I'm shaking my head at how the discussion was diverted to this topic but I'll go along with it.

     
    1129ken
    1129ken
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 2674
    Posted: Jun. 7, 2016 - 12:22 AM ET #83

    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

    Topic: This is gonna sound crazy but it is a serious question.

    Are people who support Trump inferior human beings?


    Only a arrogant and pretentious person would call it a serious question and then claim,,that they are serious about asking the question..just more of the left-wing hyperbole,, that we see on this forum daily..


    A new low, which is really saying something for a forum that has become known for being intolerant of people who may not support the Covers official point of view. There was a time when you would be boxed on Covers for generalizing about the inferiority of people because of their beliefs. Now, this type of intolerant and ignorant suggestion is met with support from so-called moderators.

    Sad. Very sad.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

    Topic: This is gonna sound crazy but it is a serious question.

    Are people who support Trump inferior human beings?


    Only a arrogant and pretentious person would call it a serious question and then claim,,that they are serious about asking the question..just more of the left-wing hyperbole,, that we see on this forum daily..


    A new low, which is really saying something for a forum that has become known for being intolerant of people who may not support the Covers official point of view. There was a time when you would be boxed on Covers for generalizing about the inferiority of people because of their beliefs. Now, this type of intolerant and ignorant suggestion is met with support from so-called moderators.

    Sad. Very sad.
     
    canovsp
    canovsp
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2009
    Posts: 5755
    Posted: Jun. 7, 2016 - 11:03 AM ET #84

    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


    This is another topic that I have been meaning to post about. Why has this become such a hot button issue? Are we really worried about transgenders? Aren't there bigger issues to worry about. Stats show, and it should come as no surprise to any of us, that transgender people are not the threats to children etc. 

    For the most part it is older white males. I saw a stat the other day (I do not remember the numbers) about how much more common and how many acts of sexual nature on children there have been from white males affiliated with any church compared to transgender people.

    This seems like a non-issue that has become one just to rile up some people

    I'm actually starting to think this is getting comical. The other day a transgender (male who identifies as a female) just won a track meet. He/she showed them little biatches.

    I can't wait for Jason Day or Rory McElroy to start identifying as a woman. They'll be able to hit the greens from the ladies tees on par 5's.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


    This is another topic that I have been meaning to post about. Why has this become such a hot button issue? Are we really worried about transgenders? Aren't there bigger issues to worry about. Stats show, and it should come as no surprise to any of us, that transgender people are not the threats to children etc. 

    For the most part it is older white males. I saw a stat the other day (I do not remember the numbers) about how much more common and how many acts of sexual nature on children there have been from white males affiliated with any church compared to transgender people.

    This seems like a non-issue that has become one just to rile up some people

    I'm actually starting to think this is getting comical. The other day a transgender (male who identifies as a female) just won a track meet. He/she showed them little biatches.

    I can't wait for Jason Day or Rory McElroy to start identifying as a woman. They'll be able to hit the greens from the ladies tees on par 5's.

     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jun. 7, 2016 - 11:33 AM ET #85

    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    I did answer you. You just have comprehension problems. No surprise there. I expected it as well.

    https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_and_Pedophilia

    Not just liberals accept pedophilia, so do libertarians. The democrats and libertarians endorse the practice of pedophilic Islam and Sharia law and republican patriots condemn it.

    It looks like that list is you provided is fabricated.

    There is a democrat list too.
    https://www.conservative21.com/Media/The_List.txt

    "Note: This list only includes Presidents, Senators, Congressman, Mayors, Governors, Attorney Generals, and Judges that have either confessed or been charged with a crime. Unlike other lists created by Democrats showing Republicans, we have a very strict requirement that the individuals in question have either confessed or been convicted of a crime. More specifically, this list does not include duplicates, fake names, and fake individuals. All situations listed in this document have been independently verified for their accuracy and truth. This list does not contain home-makers, protestors, religious individuals, political activists, stay-at-home-moms, and people who simply vote for a particular party like most anti-Republican lists created by Democrats do."


    I don't get why criminal behavior that's self motivated by their own perverted minds was brought up? If Jesus Christ was a pedophile rapist killer and the bible endorsed pedophilia like the Quran, then I'd get it. I'm shaking my head at how the discussion was diverted to this topic but I'll go along with it.



    i guess i do have comprehension problems because my questions were about proven cases of transgender people committing sexual assults in bathrooms and how these laws would stop that. 

    you started blathering on about muslims and islam and the quran, which is another group foxnews tells you to piss your pants over, but that's fine.  i don't see how that answers the questions.  anyway, maybe it's me, but i'll post them again in case you have some answers.

    1. what evidence is there that transgender people have been committing crimes in public bathrooms.  in all my time in criminal law, i've never seen it.  but maybe i'm missing something.

    2. even if transgender people were inclined to commit crimes in public bathrooms, what evidence is there that creating a safe zone with these laws like NC passed would do anything to deter them?

    3.  this has nothing to do with the safety of women.  if republicans cared about the safety of women, you know what they might try to fix which actually is related to that issue?  there is a backlog of rape kits that just sit around and never get tested in many states including NC.  why not get them tested and try to get some actual rapists off of the street?
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by MoneySRH:

    I did answer you. You just have comprehension problems. No surprise there. I expected it as well.

    https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_and_Pedophilia

    Not just liberals accept pedophilia, so do libertarians. The democrats and libertarians endorse the practice of pedophilic Islam and Sharia law and republican patriots condemn it.

    It looks like that list is you provided is fabricated.

    There is a democrat list too.
    https://www.conservative21.com/Media/The_List.txt

    "Note: This list only includes Presidents, Senators, Congressman, Mayors, Governors, Attorney Generals, and Judges that have either confessed or been charged with a crime. Unlike other lists created by Democrats showing Republicans, we have a very strict requirement that the individuals in question have either confessed or been convicted of a crime. More specifically, this list does not include duplicates, fake names, and fake individuals. All situations listed in this document have been independently verified for their accuracy and truth. This list does not contain home-makers, protestors, religious individuals, political activists, stay-at-home-moms, and people who simply vote for a particular party like most anti-Republican lists created by Democrats do."


    I don't get why criminal behavior that's self motivated by their own perverted minds was brought up? If Jesus Christ was a pedophile rapist killer and the bible endorsed pedophilia like the Quran, then I'd get it. I'm shaking my head at how the discussion was diverted to this topic but I'll go along with it.



    i guess i do have comprehension problems because my questions were about proven cases of transgender people committing sexual assults in bathrooms and how these laws would stop that. 

    you started blathering on about muslims and islam and the quran, which is another group foxnews tells you to piss your pants over, but that's fine.  i don't see how that answers the questions.  anyway, maybe it's me, but i'll post them again in case you have some answers.

    1. what evidence is there that transgender people have been committing crimes in public bathrooms.  in all my time in criminal law, i've never seen it.  but maybe i'm missing something.

    2. even if transgender people were inclined to commit crimes in public bathrooms, what evidence is there that creating a safe zone with these laws like NC passed would do anything to deter them?

    3.  this has nothing to do with the safety of women.  if republicans cared about the safety of women, you know what they might try to fix which actually is related to that issue?  there is a backlog of rape kits that just sit around and never get tested in many states including NC.  why not get them tested and try to get some actual rapists off of the street?
     
    mattbrot
    mattbrot
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 6840
    Posted: Jun. 7, 2016 - 12:21 PM ET #86

    Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:

    I'm actually starting to think this is getting comical. The other day a transgender (male who identifies as a female) just won a track meet. He/she showed them little biatches.

    I can't wait for Jason Day or Rory McElroy to start identifying as a woman. They'll be able to hit the greens from the ladies tees on par 5's.


    haha. yup that would be a problem.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:

    I'm actually starting to think this is getting comical. The other day a transgender (male who identifies as a female) just won a track meet. He/she showed them little biatches.

    I can't wait for Jason Day or Rory McElroy to start identifying as a woman. They'll be able to hit the greens from the ladies tees on par 5's.


    haha. yup that would be a problem.
     
    mattbrot
    mattbrot
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 6840
    Posted: Jun. 7, 2016 - 12:52 PM ET #87

    Quote Originally Posted by 1129ken:



    A new low, which is really saying something for a forum that has become known for being intolerant of people who may not support the Covers official point of view. There was a time when you would be boxed on Covers for generalizing about the inferiority of people because of their beliefs. Now, this type of intolerant and ignorant suggestion is met with support from so-called moderators.

    Sad. Very sad.

    Haha. Ok. So lets see here.

    We are ok with a presidential candidate who says all of the things he has said. Has silly childhood nicknames for his opponents, calls some women fat and pigs, refers to the size of his "member", comments on the looks of his opponents, talks about a womans period in a derogatory fashion, calls most mexicans criminals and rapists, says that an American born judge of mexican heritage is not fit to see his case... and the list is endless but you get the point. And then doubles and triples down on these issues. Heck we even call that "Honor and accountability".

    Yet you get offended by some silly comment that I make in this thread.

    How ironic.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by 1129ken:



    A new low, which is really saying something for a forum that has become known for being intolerant of people who may not support the Covers official point of view. There was a time when you would be boxed on Covers for generalizing about the inferiority of people because of their beliefs. Now, this type of intolerant and ignorant suggestion is met with support from so-called moderators.

    Sad. Very sad.

    Haha. Ok. So lets see here.

    We are ok with a presidential candidate who says all of the things he has said. Has silly childhood nicknames for his opponents, calls some women fat and pigs, refers to the size of his "member", comments on the looks of his opponents, talks about a womans period in a derogatory fashion, calls most mexicans criminals and rapists, says that an American born judge of mexican heritage is not fit to see his case... and the list is endless but you get the point. And then doubles and triples down on these issues. Heck we even call that "Honor and accountability".

    Yet you get offended by some silly comment that I make in this thread.

    How ironic.
     
    MoneySRH
    MoneySRH
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 8480
    Posted: Jun. 7, 2016 - 1:20 PM ET #88

    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:



    i guess i do have comprehension problems because my questions were about proven cases of transgender people committing sexual assults in bathrooms and how these laws would stop that. 

    you started blathering on about muslims and islam and the quran, which is another group foxnews tells you to piss your pants over, but that's fine.  i don't see how that answers the questions.  anyway, maybe it's me, but i'll post them again in case you have some answers.

    1. what evidence is there that transgender people have been committing crimes in public bathrooms.  in all my time in criminal law, i've never seen it.  but maybe i'm missing something.

    2. even if transgender people were inclined to commit crimes in public bathrooms, what evidence is there that creating a safe zone with these laws like NC passed would do anything to deter them?

    3.  this has nothing to do with the safety of women.  if republicans cared about the safety of women, you know what they might try to fix which actually is related to that issue?  there is a backlog of rape kits that just sit around and never get tested in many states including NC.  why not get them tested and try to get some actual rapists off of the street?
    1. Police don’t document transgender criminals. There’s not a box that says “transgender” to select on forms. Whatever the ID/license says is what the officer selects. Republicans would’ve never pursued this cause if it wasn’t for the crazy transgender agenda being shoved down the throats of the American people. Once republicans were made aware that crazy democrats were pushing for people with penises to be allowed unrestricted access to women’s restrooms the fight was on to stop it. The truth is who knows how much crimes is committed by so called "transgender" people. All that can be done is to keep people with penises out of women's restrooms because the evidence is clear that people with penises do target women in women's changing rooms, locker rooms, and bathrooms. That's a fact.   

    2. Like I already said - It’s not about creating a “safe zone.” It’s about people using the public bathroom that corresponds with the sex on their birth certificate.

    3. From what I’ve read on the issue - Its politics and serious budget problems and the incompetence of government on all levels that’s responsible.

    Your heartless attitude is exactly why I left the democratic party and abandoned libertarianism. Don't think I didn't notice that you completely glossed over the evidence that exposes pedophilic islam for what it is. The practice is just a front for sexual predators, slave owners, and killers.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:



    i guess i do have comprehension problems because my questions were about proven cases of transgender people committing sexual assults in bathrooms and how these laws would stop that. 

    you started blathering on about muslims and islam and the quran, which is another group foxnews tells you to piss your pants over, but that's fine.  i don't see how that answers the questions.  anyway, maybe it's me, but i'll post them again in case you have some answers.

    1. what evidence is there that transgender people have been committing crimes in public bathrooms.  in all my time in criminal law, i've never seen it.  but maybe i'm missing something.

    2. even if transgender people were inclined to commit crimes in public bathrooms, what evidence is there that creating a safe zone with these laws like NC passed would do anything to deter them?

    3.  this has nothing to do with the safety of women.  if republicans cared about the safety of women, you know what they might try to fix which actually is related to that issue?  there is a backlog of rape kits that just sit around and never get tested in many states including NC.  why not get them tested and try to get some actual rapists off of the street?
    1. Police don’t document transgender criminals. There’s not a box that says “transgender” to select on forms. Whatever the ID/license says is what the officer selects. Republicans would’ve never pursued this cause if it wasn’t for the crazy transgender agenda being shoved down the throats of the American people. Once republicans were made aware that crazy democrats were pushing for people with penises to be allowed unrestricted access to women’s restrooms the fight was on to stop it. The truth is who knows how much crimes is committed by so called "transgender" people. All that can be done is to keep people with penises out of women's restrooms because the evidence is clear that people with penises do target women in women's changing rooms, locker rooms, and bathrooms. That's a fact.   

    2. Like I already said - It’s not about creating a “safe zone.” It’s about people using the public bathroom that corresponds with the sex on their birth certificate.

    3. From what I’ve read on the issue - Its politics and serious budget problems and the incompetence of government on all levels that’s responsible.

    Your heartless attitude is exactly why I left the democratic party and abandoned libertarianism. Don't think I didn't notice that you completely glossed over the evidence that exposes pedophilic islam for what it is. The practice is just a front for sexual predators, slave owners, and killers.

     
    ClubDirt
    ClubDirt
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2003
    Posts: 28196
    Posted: Jun. 7, 2016 - 3:17 PM ET #89

    1.  So, no evidence then.  surely, the way the media love to report about happy people and transgender, if there was any sort of major issue with transgender people causing problems or committing crimes in bathrooms, there'd be some stories about it.  and definitely if it was such a problem that rightwingers need big government to protect them from transgender people, you'd be able to find some media attention.  but no.

    2. call it what you want, but when big government creates laws dealing with bathroom etiquette without any indication it's a problem that needs to be addressed, to me it's looks like a safe zone for scared rightwingers who look to the gov't for protection from pretend boogeymen. otherwise, no real conservative in his right mind would want big government creating more laws addressing this nonsense.

    3. maybe so, but if republicans really wanted to protect women, as you stated earlier, this would be much better place to start, with actual reports of rape and actual evidence collected by the police, which in many state just sit in a room collecting dust while possible rapists walk.

    call me heartless all you want.  i just don't want big government getting bigger and making more laws to address nonissues just to appease religious fanatics and  rightwingers scared of their shadows.

    i glossed over islam because it has nothing to do with these transgender bathroom laws.  we already have laws making child molestation illegal.  if muslims are breaking them, then they should be punished accordingly, just like anyone else.
    Reply
    1.  So, no evidence then.  surely, the way the media love to report about happy people and transgender, if there was any sort of major issue with transgender people causing problems or committing crimes in bathrooms, there'd be some stories about it.  and definitely if it was such a problem that rightwingers need big government to protect them from transgender people, you'd be able to find some media attention.  but no.

    2. call it what you want, but when big government creates laws dealing with bathroom etiquette without any indication it's a problem that needs to be addressed, to me it's looks like a safe zone for scared rightwingers who look to the gov't for protection from pretend boogeymen. otherwise, no real conservative in his right mind would want big government creating more laws addressing this nonsense.

    3. maybe so, but if republicans really wanted to protect women, as you stated earlier, this would be much better place to start, with actual reports of rape and actual evidence collected by the police, which in many state just sit in a room collecting dust while possible rapists walk.

    call me heartless all you want.  i just don't want big government getting bigger and making more laws to address nonissues just to appease religious fanatics and  rightwingers scared of their shadows.

    i glossed over islam because it has nothing to do with these transgender bathroom laws.  we already have laws making child molestation illegal.  if muslims are breaking them, then they should be punished accordingly, just like anyone else.
     
    1129ken
    1129ken
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 2674
    Posted: Jun. 7, 2016 - 7:53 PM ET #90

    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


    Haha. Ok. So lets see here.

    We are ok with a presidential candidate who says all of the things he has said. Has silly childhood nicknames for his opponents, calls some women fat and pigs, refers to the size of his "member", comments on the looks of his opponents, talks about a womans period in a derogatory fashion, calls most mexicans criminals and rapists, says that an American born judge of mexican heritage is not fit to see his case... and the list is endless but you get the point. And then doubles and triples down on these issues. Heck we even call that "Honor and accountability".

    Yet you get offended by some silly comment that I make in this thread.

    How ironic.


    Deflect. Deflect. Deflect.

     I did not ONCE criticize your opinion on Trump, although this entire post tries to suggest otherwise. I stated my belief that you're a bigot,  willing to demonize as "inferior people" those who hold opinions different from yours. If you're going to address my comment, do so. You know you can't, because your post was ignorant, condescending and indefensible. Period. Give it up. You look bad enough already.

    Pure phony wolf masquerading in non-partisan clothing. You can't sell that to a single thinking person.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:


    Haha. Ok. So lets see here.

    We are ok with a presidential candidate who says all of the things he has said. Has silly childhood nicknames for his opponents, calls some women fat and pigs, refers to the size of his "member", comments on the looks of his opponents, talks about a womans period in a derogatory fashion, calls most mexicans criminals and rapists, says that an American born judge of mexican heritage is not fit to see his case... and the list is endless but you get the point. And then doubles and triples down on these issues. Heck we even call that "Honor and accountability".

    Yet you get offended by some silly comment that I make in this thread.

    How ironic.


    Deflect. Deflect. Deflect.

     I did not ONCE criticize your opinion on Trump, although this entire post tries to suggest otherwise. I stated my belief that you're a bigot,  willing to demonize as "inferior people" those who hold opinions different from yours. If you're going to address my comment, do so. You know you can't, because your post was ignorant, condescending and indefensible. Period. Give it up. You look bad enough already.

    Pure phony wolf masquerading in non-partisan clothing. You can't sell that to a single thinking person.


     
    Skulnik
    Skulnik
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 71
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2016 - 12:52 AM ET #91

    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:

    I am a well established non-partisan independent who would like to ask the following.

    Are people who support Trump inferior human beings? It sounds harsh but I am serious here. And I think they are. People who I do not care to associate with or certainly would not like my young daughter to be around. J

    They do not appear to have much critical thinking ability or ability to see a few feet in front of their nose. To support a bigoted egomaniac is puzzling.

    Probably safer with a Trump supporter than a family member?

    I truely think they are inferior human beings and as such their votes should only count for a .3 vote.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:

    I am a well established non-partisan independent who would like to ask the following.

    Are people who support Trump inferior human beings? It sounds harsh but I am serious here. And I think they are. People who I do not care to associate with or certainly would not like my young daughter to be around. J

    They do not appear to have much critical thinking ability or ability to see a few feet in front of their nose. To support a bigoted egomaniac is puzzling.

    Probably safer with a Trump supporter than a family member?

    I truely think they are inferior human beings and as such their votes should only count for a .3 vote.

     
    Skulnik
    Skulnik
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 71
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2016 - 12:55 AM ET #92

    [Quote: Originally Posted by mattbrot] I am a well established non-partisan independent who would like to ask the following.

    Are people who support Trump inferior human beings? It sounds harsh but I am serious here. And I think they are. People who I do not care to associate with or certainly would not like my young daughter to be around. J

    They do not appear to have much critical thinking ability or ability to see a few feet in front of their nose. To support a bigoted egomaniac is puzzling.

    I truely think they are inferior human beings and as such their votes should only count for a .3 vote.

    [/Quote

    Probably safer with a Trump supporter than your family?

    Reply

    [Quote: Originally Posted by mattbrot] I am a well established non-partisan independent who would like to ask the following.

    Are people who support Trump inferior human beings? It sounds harsh but I am serious here. And I think they are. People who I do not care to associate with or certainly would not like my young daughter to be around. J

    They do not appear to have much critical thinking ability or ability to see a few feet in front of their nose. To support a bigoted egomaniac is puzzling.

    I truely think they are inferior human beings and as such their votes should only count for a .3 vote.

    [/Quote

    Probably safer with a Trump supporter than your family?

     
    mattbrot
    mattbrot
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 6840
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2016 - 9:35 AM ET #93

    Quote Originally Posted by 1129ken:



    Deflect. Deflect. Deflect.

     I did not ONCE criticize your opinion on Trump, although this entire post tries to suggest otherwise. I stated my belief that you're a bigot,  willing to demonize as "inferior people" those who hold opinions different from yours. If you're going to address my comment, do so. You know you can't, because your post was ignorant, condescending and indefensible. Period. Give it up. You look bad enough already.

    Pure phony wolf masquerading in non-partisan clothing. You can't sell that to a single thinking person.




    I think that we overuse the term deflect. How is this deflection? You made a post and I responded. That is not deflection. As I said in my response I find it ironic how we (the global we not just you) are ok with Trump and all of his antics as a presidential candidate yet we get offended by a comment that I make on here.

    And for what it is worth I stand by my original comments. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by 1129ken:



    Deflect. Deflect. Deflect.

     I did not ONCE criticize your opinion on Trump, although this entire post tries to suggest otherwise. I stated my belief that you're a bigot,  willing to demonize as "inferior people" those who hold opinions different from yours. If you're going to address my comment, do so. You know you can't, because your post was ignorant, condescending and indefensible. Period. Give it up. You look bad enough already.

    Pure phony wolf masquerading in non-partisan clothing. You can't sell that to a single thinking person.




    I think that we overuse the term deflect. How is this deflection? You made a post and I responded. That is not deflection. As I said in my response I find it ironic how we (the global we not just you) are ok with Trump and all of his antics as a presidential candidate yet we get offended by a comment that I make on here.

    And for what it is worth I stand by my original comments. 
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2016 - 10:38 AM ET #94

    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:



    I think that we overuse the term deflect. How is this deflection? You made a post and I responded. That is not deflection. As I said in my response I find it ironic how we (the global we not just you) are ok with Trump and all of his antics as a presidential candidate yet we get offended by a comment that I make on here.

    And for what it is worth I stand by my original comments. 

    I actually agree with both sides of this argument. Although, in this case I think it's hypocritical to say Trump supporters are stupid, when HRC supporters in my view are even more so.

    For one, if HRC becomes the first woman to be elected POTUS it will be a travesty of justice. NO WAY IN HELL A WOMAN LIKE HER DESERVES THAT HONOR IN OUR HISTORY BOOKS.

    That's besides the point that Bills penis would be back in the White House which is another injustice and embarrassment.

    You Liberals need to ask more of your elected officials. I get it, both sides have elected despicable persons but there is a difference...conservative constituents don't overlook the transgressions like the Liberals do.

    JFK and Marilyn Monroe. TFK and Mary Joe K. Bill Clintion and Monica, and Sally, and Tammy...etc.




    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:



    I think that we overuse the term deflect. How is this deflection? You made a post and I responded. That is not deflection. As I said in my response I find it ironic how we (the global we not just you) are ok with Trump and all of his antics as a presidential candidate yet we get offended by a comment that I make on here.

    And for what it is worth I stand by my original comments. 

    I actually agree with both sides of this argument. Although, in this case I think it's hypocritical to say Trump supporters are stupid, when HRC supporters in my view are even more so.

    For one, if HRC becomes the first woman to be elected POTUS it will be a travesty of justice. NO WAY IN HELL A WOMAN LIKE HER DESERVES THAT HONOR IN OUR HISTORY BOOKS.

    That's besides the point that Bills penis would be back in the White House which is another injustice and embarrassment.

    You Liberals need to ask more of your elected officials. I get it, both sides have elected despicable persons but there is a difference...conservative constituents don't overlook the transgressions like the Liberals do.

    JFK and Marilyn Monroe. TFK and Mary Joe K. Bill Clintion and Monica, and Sally, and Tammy...etc.




     
    1129ken
    1129ken
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 2674
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2016 - 6:03 PM ET #95

    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:



    I think that we overuse the term deflect. How is this deflection? You made a post and I responded. That is not deflection. As I said in my response I find it ironic how we (the global we not just you) are ok with Trump and all of his antics as a presidential candidate yet we get offended by a comment that I make on here.

    And for what it is worth I stand by my original comments. 


    Again, my comment was NOT about Trump. You're attempting to deflect attention away from your condescending bigotry. I could care less about your view of Trump and I offered no opinion of him.

    You stand by your original opinion that others who don't agree with you are inferior human beings. Good for you !  You're just as bad as the Grand Wizards of the Klan.

    Bigot.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:



    I think that we overuse the term deflect. How is this deflection? You made a post and I responded. That is not deflection. As I said in my response I find it ironic how we (the global we not just you) are ok with Trump and all of his antics as a presidential candidate yet we get offended by a comment that I make on here.

    And for what it is worth I stand by my original comments. 


    Again, my comment was NOT about Trump. You're attempting to deflect attention away from your condescending bigotry. I could care less about your view of Trump and I offered no opinion of him.

    You stand by your original opinion that others who don't agree with you are inferior human beings. Good for you !  You're just as bad as the Grand Wizards of the Klan.

    Bigot.
     
    Ktrain
    Ktrain
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 6580
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2016 - 8:11 PM ET #96

    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


    I actually agree with both sides of this argument. Although, in this case I think it's hypocritical to say Trump supporters are stupid, when HRC supporters in my view are even more so.

    For one, if HRC becomes the first woman to be elected POTUS it will be a travesty of justice. NO WAY IN HELL A WOMAN LIKE HER DESERVES THAT HONOR IN OUR HISTORY BOOKS.

    That's besides the point that Bills penis would be back in the White House which is another injustice and embarrassment.

    You Liberals need to ask more of your elected officials. I get it, both sides have elected despicable persons but there is a difference...conservative constituents don't overlook the transgressions like the Liberals do.

    JFK and Marilyn Monroe. TFK and Mary Joe K. Bill Clintion and Monica, and Sally, and Tammy...etc.






    Do you really care if politicians have extra marital affairs if they are doing a good job? I honestly could care less if any politician, whether they be a D or an R, fools around on their spouse, so long as they are doing a good job. There have been plenty of politicians from all sides of the spectrum that have been caught cheating on their wives. 

    If Trump was able to turn the economy around and create stability in the Middle East and improve the lives of most Americans, then I could honestly care less if he wanted to celebrate by banging half of the Miss USA contestants. Hell I'd even vote for him next time around. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


    I actually agree with both sides of this argument. Although, in this case I think it's hypocritical to say Trump supporters are stupid, when HRC supporters in my view are even more so.

    For one, if HRC becomes the first woman to be elected POTUS it will be a travesty of justice. NO WAY IN HELL A WOMAN LIKE HER DESERVES THAT HONOR IN OUR HISTORY BOOKS.

    That's besides the point that Bills penis would be back in the White House which is another injustice and embarrassment.

    You Liberals need to ask more of your elected officials. I get it, both sides have elected despicable persons but there is a difference...conservative constituents don't overlook the transgressions like the Liberals do.

    JFK and Marilyn Monroe. TFK and Mary Joe K. Bill Clintion and Monica, and Sally, and Tammy...etc.






    Do you really care if politicians have extra marital affairs if they are doing a good job? I honestly could care less if any politician, whether they be a D or an R, fools around on their spouse, so long as they are doing a good job. There have been plenty of politicians from all sides of the spectrum that have been caught cheating on their wives. 

    If Trump was able to turn the economy around and create stability in the Middle East and improve the lives of most Americans, then I could honestly care less if he wanted to celebrate by banging half of the Miss USA contestants. Hell I'd even vote for him next time around. 
     
    bowlslit
    bowlslit
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 5625
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2016 - 9:46 PM ET #97

    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:



    Do you really care if politicians have extra marital affairs if they are doing a good job? I honestly could care less if any politician, whether they be a D or an R, fools around on their spouse, so long as they are doing a good job. There have been plenty of politicians from all sides of the spectrum that have been caught cheating on their wives. 

    If Trump was able to turn the economy around and create stability in the Middle East and improve the lives of most Americans, then I could honestly care less if he wanted to celebrate by banging half of the Miss USA contestants. Hell I'd even vote for him next time around. 

    You do realize that adultery is against the law in most states? 

    I do want my elected political figures to not only obey the law, but be examples of good hearted people.

    Being unfaithful is in my view the biggest lie a person could tell. 

    Also remember that it's not just the transgression itself, it's also the cover up.

    The cover up can be just as bad as the act itself.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:



    Do you really care if politicians have extra marital affairs if they are doing a good job? I honestly could care less if any politician, whether they be a D or an R, fools around on their spouse, so long as they are doing a good job. There have been plenty of politicians from all sides of the spectrum that have been caught cheating on their wives. 

    If Trump was able to turn the economy around and create stability in the Middle East and improve the lives of most Americans, then I could honestly care less if he wanted to celebrate by banging half of the Miss USA contestants. Hell I'd even vote for him next time around. 

    You do realize that adultery is against the law in most states? 

    I do want my elected political figures to not only obey the law, but be examples of good hearted people.

    Being unfaithful is in my view the biggest lie a person could tell. 

    Also remember that it's not just the transgression itself, it's also the cover up.

    The cover up can be just as bad as the act itself.
     
    shiek
    shiek
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 1404
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2016 - 10:01 PM ET #98

    Where r these states where adultery is illegal
    Reply
    Where r these states where adultery is illegal
     
    1129ken
    1129ken
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 2674
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2016 - 11:31 PM ET #99

    Quote Originally Posted by shiek:

    Where r these states where adultery is illegal



    This would be a good thing to know.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by shiek:

    Where r these states where adultery is illegal



    This would be a good thing to know.
     
     
    Ktrain
    Ktrain
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 6580
    Posted: Jun. 8, 2016 - 11:51 PM ET #100

    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


    You do realize that adultery is against the law in most states? 

    I do want my elected political figures to not only obey the law, but be examples of good hearted people.

    Being unfaithful is in my view the biggest lie a person could tell. 

    Also remember that it's not just the transgression itself, it's also the cover up.

    The cover up can be just as bad as the act itself.

    Didn't Donald Trump once have an affair? 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:


    You do realize that adultery is against the law in most states? 

    I do want my elected political figures to not only obey the law, but be examples of good hearted people.

    Being unfaithful is in my view the biggest lie a person could tell. 

    Also remember that it's not just the transgression itself, it's also the cover up.

    The cover up can be just as bad as the act itself.

    Didn't Donald Trump once have an affair? 
    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 456 ... 567 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Patriots vs Bears in-game live TNF 1,965
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 109,725
    • Friday 10/23/2026 520
    • Thursday 10/22/2026 941
    • Thursday”s POD 2,983
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 27,116
    • Week 8 Money 8,091
    • Republicans push back against the lunatic Trump and his team of liars. 23,327
    • MLB World Series game 1: Keep Riding The Rays 1,342
    • PART DEUX 123

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.