All Forums | Politics

The biggest speech of her life ...

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 406
Posts: 20
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #1
How do you feel HRC did in her acceptance speech?
What about Trump?

Is there anyone here capable of being biased in their assessment of their speeches?

Personally, I felt that HRC was uninspiring, as did most of those at the convention, and certainly Bill did, as he seemed to fall asleep.

Trump was more impassioned, and I felt did a much better job of engaging the viewers.

As per numerous fact-checking sites, both candidates were full of sh!t, but that is just politics as usual, so no need to discuss that.

Is there a single conservative who felt HRC's speech was better?
A single liberal who felt Trump's speech was better?

I will venture a guess that this thread will consist of my post and some crickets 
bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #2
that should obviously read "capable of being Unbiased ... "
bigreds daddy
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 5625
Posted: #3
IMO she is every bit as bad an orator as her husband and Barry are good.

She has to force what comes naturally to those two. Trump, is a notch below Mr Soetoro and Monicas former boyfriend...but he is way better than this pay for play queen.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 12254
Posted: #4
The good:  she hit the points she needed to hit; started out pretty well, but...

The bad: it was too long (they always are); she became more and more shrill as the speech went on; a little Hillary goes a long way; she'd have been well served to stick to 40 minutes with more smiling and less lecturing.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2002
Posts: 16806
Posted: #5
I can not bring myself to watch her give a speech. No opinion.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 35543
Posted: #6
Did anyone see a CNN poll right after Hillary gave her speech ?


CNN did a poll immediately following Trump's speech last week, it showed that people who watched the speech viewed it very favorably ..something like 74%.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #7

Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

Did anyone see a CNN poll right after Hillary gave her speech ?


CNN did a poll immediately following Trump's speech last week, it showed that people who watched the speech viewed it very favorably ..something like 74%.

Overall findings:

  • 71% of Clinton speech watchers had a "very positive" reaction to her speech, as opposed to 57% for Trump.
  • 82% of Clinton speech watchers believed her policies would move the country in the right direction, as opposed to 73% for Trump.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 35543
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

Overall findings:

  • 71% of Clinton speech watchers had a "very positive" reaction to her speech, as opposed to 57% for Trump.
  • 82% of Clinton speech watchers believed her policies would move the country in the right direction, as opposed to 73% for Trump.


.

No,, I didn't ask about overall finding ..it was what viewers told CNN in a poll immediately after Hillary's speech...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 4717
Posted: #9
Trumps speech had more viewers. Less people watched. Even less watched the creepy story of predator and rapist Billie bob and how he seduced Hillary----CREEEEEEEPY. Leftists hated it more, be ause it showed Hillary is what she is BECAUSE she hooked up with William the rising star and rapist.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35351
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by Relax_Dude:

Trumps speech had more viewers. Less people watched. Even less watched the creepy story of predator and rapist Billie bob and how he seduced Hillary----CREEEEEEEPY. Leftists hated it more, be ause it showed Hillary is what she is BECAUSE she hooked up with William the rising star and rapist.

Of course Trump would get more viewers....  the "Howard Stern" theory in effect...   People want to see what he'll say next.

Anyone catch his weird Town Hall speech today?   WTF was he talking about?   Dude is crazy.  Loves hearing and saying his own name
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #11

Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:



.

No,, I didn't ask about overall finding ..it was what viewers told CNN in a poll immediately after Hillary's speech...

This is from cnn

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 35543
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

This is from cnn


 You are correct ..I missed it...
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 6497
Posted: #13
A link for darkhorse12's comment #7:

https://politicalwire.com/2016/07/29/poll-finds-clintons-speech-was-more-effective/
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 35543
Posted: #14
CNBC -  Hillary Clinton did not make any major gaffes or glaring mistakes in her big speech to close the Democratic National Convention Thursday night. But by playing it extremely safe and leaving the nation with really only one clear message from the address — Donald Trump is bad — she has left the door wide open for Trump to win the election in November.

(skip)

Thursday night was Clinton's best chance to make the election at least partly about something other than Trump, and she blew it.



 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:

How do you feel HRC did in her acceptance speech?
What about Trump?

Is there anyone here capable of being biased in their assessment of their speeches?

Personally, I felt that HRC was uninspiring, as did most of those at the convention, and certainly Bill did, as he seemed to fall asleep.

Trump was more impassioned, and I felt did a much better job of engaging the viewers.

As per numerous fact-checking sites, both candidates were full of sh!t, but that is just politics as usual, so no need to discuss that.

Is there a single conservative who felt HRC's speech was better?
A single liberal who felt Trump's speech was better?

I will venture a guess that this thread will consist of my post and some crickets 

 

Read this with regard to the conventions.

It ain't pretty for the GOP...

 

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/conservatives-agree-dnc-was-disaster-for-gop

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 42786
Posted: #16
CNBC seems pro Trump as i watch it, bunch of anchors sound pulling for Trump. But they fail to realize Trump stands for protectionism which scares away business, and stock market fares much better in Democratic president years than GOP counterparts.    
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 35543
Posted: #17
Europa,

If,you only remember Rick Santelli's rant or Larry Kudlow's comments,, then I can understand your feeling about CBCN ,but it proved that is not the case during the 3rd Republican Presidential debate ,,,which they moderated..a host started the debate by asking Trump if his campaign was a comic book and later compared his ideas to a bird flying away..

Comment by President of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell who personally had endorsed Ted Cruz for President :

"The CNBC debate will go down in history as an encyclopedic example of liberal media bias on stage.  The audience roared its disdain for these so-called 'journalists,' and all of America heard it.  CNBC should be embarrassed for their pitiful display of partisan liberal media bias and apologize to the GOP candidates and the American people."



 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 42786
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

Europa,

If,you only remember Rick Santelli's rant or Larry Kudlow's comments,, then I can understand your feeling about CBCN ,but it proved that is not the case during the 3rd Republican Presidential debate ,,,which they moderated..a host started the debate by asking Trump if his campaign was a comic book and later compared his ideas to a bird flying away..

Comment by President of the Media Research Center, Brent Bozell who personally had endorsed Ted Cruz for President :

"The CNBC debate will go down in history as an encyclopedic example of liberal media bias on stage.  The audience roared its disdain for these so-called 'journalists,' and all of America heard it.  CNBC should be embarrassed for their pitiful display of partisan liberal media bias and apologize to the GOP candidates and the American people."




Other than Santelli or Kudlow, I can tell few anchors who are more of favoring Trump in CNBC.

But it's ok for them to back Trump, everyone has his or her choices on politics. i've voted for Bush and Obama, just point out CNBC has pro Trump bias from my perspective, i tell you that GOP will defeat HRC more likely with John Kasich rather than with Donald Trump.  
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 35543
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by Europa:


Other than Santelli or Kudlow, I can tell few anchors who are more of favoring Trump in CNBC.

But it's ok for them to back Trump, everyone has his or her choices on politics. i've voted for Bush and Obama, just point out CNBC has pro Trump bias from my perspective, i tell you that GOP will defeat HRC more likely with John Kasich rather than with Donald Trump.  


Kasich ?

John Kasich would have made Hillary a better Democrat VP than Tim Kaine..........
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 42786
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:



Kasich ?

John Kasich would have made Hillary a better Democrat VP than Tim Kaine..........

Kasich was beating HRC handily in the polls earlier in the year, but Trump wins big time in the GOP primary. No question, Trump is the heavy choice of many Republicans, will he prevail in the General Campaign? We shall see.   
All Forums | Politics
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.