2. You get both protective (good) and non-protective (neutral) or possibly enhancing (very bad), antibodies.
3. The protective antibodies are enough to prevent you from getting seriously sick or dying. We all cheer, and all appears to be well in the world. The results look good -- for a while.
4. Over time the antibody titer wanes. Now you don't have enough neutralizing antibodies but still have some of the bad ones which, if you get infected, make it materially more-likely the infection will kill you.
5. Then in comes the nice pharma dude who tells you to take this booster shot, which by the way isn't free and for which the price goes up every year, irrespective of the side effects which are real and remain (and might kill or seriously disable, and which risk you must accept every year forever into the future), or you're very likely to die because the virus is still out there and all you have are the bad antibodies that make an infection worse. While those too will wane over time it may take years before you're back to where you started before the stab in terms of risk."
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Study by Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York
Any experts? What do you think? Now that they are trying to inject this into children we have to fight back hard.
2. You get both protective (good) and non-protective (neutral) or possibly enhancing (very bad), antibodies.
3. The protective antibodies are enough to prevent you from getting seriously sick or dying. We all cheer, and all appears to be well in the world. The results look good -- for a while.
4. Over time the antibody titer wanes. Now you don't have enough neutralizing antibodies but still have some of the bad ones which, if you get infected, make it materially more-likely the infection will kill you.
5. Then in comes the nice pharma dude who tells you to take this booster shot, which by the way isn't free and for which the price goes up every year, irrespective of the side effects which are real and remain (and might kill or seriously disable, and which risk you must accept every year forever into the future), or you're very likely to die because the virus is still out there and all you have are the bad antibodies that make an infection worse. While those too will wane over time it may take years before you're back to where you started before the stab in terms of risk."
Study by Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York Any experts? What do you think? Now that they are trying to inject this into children we have to fight back hard. https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242430 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.07.21253098v2 "1. You take the shot. 2. You get both protective (good) and non-protective (neutral) or possibly enhancing (very bad), antibodies. 3. The protective antibodies are enough to prevent you from getting seriously sick or dying. We all cheer, and all appears to be well in the world. The results look good -- for a while. 4. Over time the antibody titer wanes. Now you don't have enough neutralizing antibodies but still have some of the bad ones which, if you get infected, make it materially more-likely the infection will kill you. 5. Then in comes the nice pharma dude who tells you to take this booster shot, which by the way isn't free and for which the price goes up every year, irrespective of the side effects which are real and remain (and might kill or seriously disable, and which risk you must accept every year forever into the future), or you're very likely to die because the virus is still out there and all you have are the bad antibodies that make an infection worse. While those too will wane over time it may take years before you're back to where you started before the stab in terms of risk."
how does anything prove it might kill us ?
this is not logical
suggests it might kill us , maybe
but prove it might kill us ?? makes no sense
open heart surgery proves u might die
golfing on a cloudy day proves u might die
swimming in 4' deep ocean water only 40 yds offshore proves u could die
driving a car proves u might die in a bad collision
people have died in a dentists chair for a routine filling proving going to a dentist might kill u
my pt is please b more specific
"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
Quote Originally Posted by JB70:
Study by Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York Any experts? What do you think? Now that they are trying to inject this into children we have to fight back hard. https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242430 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.07.21253098v2 "1. You take the shot. 2. You get both protective (good) and non-protective (neutral) or possibly enhancing (very bad), antibodies. 3. The protective antibodies are enough to prevent you from getting seriously sick or dying. We all cheer, and all appears to be well in the world. The results look good -- for a while. 4. Over time the antibody titer wanes. Now you don't have enough neutralizing antibodies but still have some of the bad ones which, if you get infected, make it materially more-likely the infection will kill you. 5. Then in comes the nice pharma dude who tells you to take this booster shot, which by the way isn't free and for which the price goes up every year, irrespective of the side effects which are real and remain (and might kill or seriously disable, and which risk you must accept every year forever into the future), or you're very likely to die because the virus is still out there and all you have are the bad antibodies that make an infection worse. While those too will wane over time it may take years before you're back to where you started before the stab in terms of risk."
how does anything prove it might kill us ?
this is not logical
suggests it might kill us , maybe
but prove it might kill us ?? makes no sense
open heart surgery proves u might die
golfing on a cloudy day proves u might die
swimming in 4' deep ocean water only 40 yds offshore proves u could die
driving a car proves u might die in a bad collision
people have died in a dentists chair for a routine filling proving going to a dentist might kill u
Let's face the facts you as a mortal human being walk through this valley in the shadow of death... it doesn't mean life isn't worth living... it's just not a permanent frame for your soul.... And thank god for that... when I reach 150 can't walk talk drooling let me go.....
As life I believe van I emphasise this enough I believe death is a temporal arrangement as to another vessel our soul is poured and occupies until it's electronic biometric hardware is unravelled....
You can die of Jay walking.....
Let's face the facts you as a mortal human being walk through this valley in the shadow of death... it doesn't mean life isn't worth living... it's just not a permanent frame for your soul.... And thank god for that... when I reach 150 can't walk talk drooling let me go.....
As life I believe van I emphasise this enough I believe death is a temporal arrangement as to another vessel our soul is poured and occupies until it's electronic biometric hardware is unravelled....
Why should we not listen to professors like these? Is this professor completely wrong? I have seen many doctors and scientists who warn but they are silenced.
I have no idea what is true.
Here is a professor also warning for over reaction in the immune system. The first half of the video are good news.
Why should we not listen to professors like these? Is this professor completely wrong? I have seen many doctors and scientists who warn but they are silenced.
ImmunizeBC reveals "antibody dependent enhancement" isn't a concern for covid vaccines. Although ADE is theoretically possible in lab animals, human trials show vaccines don't increase risk of illness after previous infection or vaccination. According to wikipedia, no incident has been observed in clinical trials.
ImmunizeBC reveals "antibody dependent enhancement" isn't a concern for covid vaccines. Although ADE is theoretically possible in lab animals, human trials show vaccines don't increase risk of illness after previous infection or vaccination. According to wikipedia, no incident has been observed in clinical trials.
Hot Forum Topics
