https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/trump-news-live-biden-update-election-b1758955.html.
Rudy The hot mess Guilianni. Case is in trouble.
Top Trump campaign officials tell Axios the legal team's biggest problem is that it doesn't have a clear strategy. Thursday's news conference meltdown is Exhibit A.
- The campaign still has a daily conference call with communications director Tim Murtaugh, battleground director Nick Trainer and lawyers Matt Morgan, Justin Clark and Ellis. Kushner joins occasionally.
- Giuliani and Powell aren't invited.
The near-universal opinion: In his efforts to “help,” Giuliani could not have done more harm to Trump
Top Trump campaign officials tell Axios the legal team's biggest problem is that it doesn't have a clear strategy. Thursday's news conference meltdown is Exhibit A.
- The campaign still has a daily conference call with communications director Tim Murtaugh, battleground director Nick Trainer and lawyers Matt Morgan, Justin Clark and Ellis. Kushner joins occasionally.
- Giuliani and Powell aren't invited.
The near-universal opinion: In his efforts to “help,” Giuliani could not have done more harm to Trump
I e.
In other words, Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated. One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more. At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, I grant Defendants’ motions and dismiss Plaintiffs’ action with prejudice.
I e.
In other words, Plaintiffs ask this Court to disenfranchise almost seven million voters. This Court has been unable to find any case in which a plaintiff has sought such a drastic remedy in the contest of an election, in terms of the sheer volume of votes asked to be invalidated. One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more. At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Therefore, I grant Defendants’ motions and dismiss Plaintiffs’ action with prejudice.
It seems like DJT is retroactively questioning a general system that's been fine for thousands of elections over past decades.
Like maga types should be within 4 feet of the election counters... Gimme a break. Was this an issue in South Florida? I didn't think so
It seems like DJT is retroactively questioning a general system that's been fine for thousands of elections over past decades.
Like maga types should be within 4 feet of the election counters... Gimme a break. Was this an issue in South Florida? I didn't think so
@jimrockford22
It seems like DJT is retroactively questioning a general system that's been fine for thousands of elections over past decades. Like maga types should be within 4 feet of the election counters... Gimme a break. Was this an issue in South Florida? I didn't think so
Has any other candidate had these issues? Another NO
@jimrockford22
It seems like DJT is retroactively questioning a general system that's been fine for thousands of elections over past decades. Like maga types should be within 4 feet of the election counters... Gimme a break. Was this an issue in South Florida? I didn't think so
Has any other candidate had these issues? Another NO
Hot Forum Topics
- Claiming Prizes 57,811
- Wednesday 10/21/2026 970
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,682
- I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 61,607
- PART DEUX 153
- Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,323
- NFL THREAD * 151 * 26,139
- Lies, Inaccuracies & Stupidity 33,176
- NCAA WEEK 7 *** Railroad to Paradise *** 14,665
- I Thought Trump Campaigned on Lowering Prices!?!? 32,434
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
