I told you all that Trump would take the GOP - 95% of you said no freaking way - DONE
I also told you that the DNC is the party in real trouble... in trouble of a contested convention. You all laughed and mocked. Well you can start to see now that will NOT happen in the DNC, but you can also see that if the FBI has ANYTHING bad to say about HRC she will NOT be the candidate and the DNC will have a contested convention (the party bosses will never allow Bernie to be the guy)
Are you hearing me now?
Hey mods, this is a political discussion... despite how much you are annoyed with the politics. If you feel you must move it to the box like my last thread, so be it. I will simply make the box the politics forum like I did once before. Your choice
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I told you all that Trump would take the GOP - 95% of you said no freaking way - DONE
I also told you that the DNC is the party in real trouble... in trouble of a contested convention. You all laughed and mocked. Well you can start to see now that will NOT happen in the DNC, but you can also see that if the FBI has ANYTHING bad to say about HRC she will NOT be the candidate and the DNC will have a contested convention (the party bosses will never allow Bernie to be the guy)
Are you hearing me now?
Hey mods, this is a political discussion... despite how much you are annoyed with the politics. If you feel you must move it to the box like my last thread, so be it. I will simply make the box the politics forum like I did once before. Your choice
WSC - I knew it was you, but thank you for being a man and admitting it.
There is nothing combative about my tone or my posts. You simply don't like me so you take exception. Go back and read my last post you threw in the box and try to make any distinguishable characteristic about that post to 1000's in this forum.
You cannot and you will not. Then return it to the rightful place - the political forum.
I am a conservative. I want Trump to beat Hillary. That is the other side. You should learn to appreciate this, it is the democratic process. Boxing me or my threads will do nothing to stop that.
That is all I have to say on this subject.
WSC - I knew it was you, but thank you for being a man and admitting it.
There is nothing combative about my tone or my posts. You simply don't like me so you take exception. Go back and read my last post you threw in the box and try to make any distinguishable characteristic about that post to 1000's in this forum.
You cannot and you will not. Then return it to the rightful place - the political forum.
I am a conservative. I want Trump to beat Hillary. That is the other side. You should learn to appreciate this, it is the democratic process. Boxing me or my threads will do nothing to stop that.
sportsfan me and you have gotten this right since day 1. Like you said 95% of people couldnt fathom trump being the nominee and were too blinded to see that it was practically inevitable.
Now we can finally take a breath and say we got this one right. Congrats
We knew it since the beginning
sportsfan me and you have gotten this right since day 1. Like you said 95% of people couldnt fathom trump being the nominee and were too blinded to see that it was practically inevitable.
Now we can finally take a breath and say we got this one right. Congrats
WSC - I knew it was you, but thank you for being a man and admitting it.
There is nothing combative about my tone or my posts. You simply don't like me so you take exception. Go back and read my last post you threw in the box and try to make any distinguishable characteristic about that post to 1000's in this forum.
You cannot and you will not. Then return it to the rightful place - the political forum.
I am a conservative. I want Trump to beat Hillary. That is the other side. You should learn to appreciate this, it is the democratic process. Boxing me or my threads will do nothing to stop that.
That is all I have to say on this subject.
Glad you're not combative.
Quote Originally Posted by SportsFan9698:
WSC - I knew it was you, but thank you for being a man and admitting it.
There is nothing combative about my tone or my posts. You simply don't like me so you take exception. Go back and read my last post you threw in the box and try to make any distinguishable characteristic about that post to 1000's in this forum.
You cannot and you will not. Then return it to the rightful place - the political forum.
I am a conservative. I want Trump to beat Hillary. That is the other side. You should learn to appreciate this, it is the democratic process. Boxing me or my threads will do nothing to stop that.
These SHEEPLE would rather have a mild mannered George Dubbya conservative telling us we get along with Muslims and take pictures with an imam at a mosque in DC, then bomb and kill over one million Muslims (modern warfare does not distinguish civilians from combatants) and this to get rid of the radical Islamists , and use up all the cruise missiles, "mission accomplished"; Yes, it's "true conservatism" to use our troops and weapons to fight a war to benefit ISRAEL and the neocons that forced Bush into it after the WTC collapse--this conservative who speaks in a southern gentleman drawl but commits war crimes is more forgive able than someone who says we should step back and ban Muslims until we figure out who they are. "OMG he OFFENDED the Muslims! Ban him! How dare he do that! Jeb would ever do that! Trump is evil! What happened to our honorable conservatism?
These SHEEPLE would rather have a mild mannered George Dubbya conservative telling us we get along with Muslims and take pictures with an imam at a mosque in DC, then bomb and kill over one million Muslims (modern warfare does not distinguish civilians from combatants) and this to get rid of the radical Islamists , and use up all the cruise missiles, "mission accomplished"; Yes, it's "true conservatism" to use our troops and weapons to fight a war to benefit ISRAEL and the neocons that forced Bush into it after the WTC collapse--this conservative who speaks in a southern gentleman drawl but commits war crimes is more forgive able than someone who says we should step back and ban Muslims until we figure out who they are. "OMG he OFFENDED the Muslims! Ban him! How dare he do that! Jeb would ever do that! Trump is evil! What happened to our honorable conservatism?
Reminds me of the richarda alias that makes GOP conservatives look like emotional angry racist bigots. Kinda like what trump has done.Today is the day consevatism officially died.
You truly are a simpleton. Trump has already said (and it makes perfect political sense if you're trying to get elected) that he deliberately @created space" between he and the other 17 competitors by being the "farthest to the right of any of them"--and you have to do that before the first Super Tursday in SEC country. He has not repeated those open thoughts about "we seem to be getting all the bad guys from Mexico, a lot of rapists..." And other shock talk rhetoric. Bottom line is it worked. He is always selling. Fact is, if you want to protect your culture and defend yourself from another religion that has it written in their Bible to kill you--you will chances are, be labeled a bigot or racist. Second fact is that Trumps businesses employ thousands, and there are representations of minorities and women in all executive levels. Your brain, and those of other SHEEPLE are stuck in the rhetoric of the past, and won't let it go. It is beyond annoying to deal with SHEEPLE like you.
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
Reminds me of the richarda alias that makes GOP conservatives look like emotional angry racist bigots. Kinda like what trump has done.Today is the day consevatism officially died.
You truly are a simpleton. Trump has already said (and it makes perfect political sense if you're trying to get elected) that he deliberately @created space" between he and the other 17 competitors by being the "farthest to the right of any of them"--and you have to do that before the first Super Tursday in SEC country. He has not repeated those open thoughts about "we seem to be getting all the bad guys from Mexico, a lot of rapists..." And other shock talk rhetoric. Bottom line is it worked. He is always selling. Fact is, if you want to protect your culture and defend yourself from another religion that has it written in their Bible to kill you--you will chances are, be labeled a bigot or racist. Second fact is that Trumps businesses employ thousands, and there are representations of minorities and women in all executive levels. Your brain, and those of other SHEEPLE are stuck in the rhetoric of the past, and won't let it go. It is beyond annoying to deal with SHEEPLE like you.
WSC - I knew it was you, but thank you for being a man and admitting it.
There is nothing combative about my tone or my posts. You simply don't like me so you take exception. Go back and read my last post you threw in the box and try to make any distinguishable characteristic about that post to 1000's in this forum.
You cannot and you will not. Then return it to the rightful place - the political forum.
I am a conservative. I want Trump to beat Hillary. That is the other side. You should learn to appreciate this, it is the democratic process. Boxing me or my threads will do nothing to stop that.
That is all I have to say on this subject.
The number of threads that bash HRC or Dems far outnumber those that bash Trump. If the moderation in this forum was political, Zelo's threads would always be in the box.
Your thread was designed for fighting, not debating. If Wall didn't move it, I would have.
What if you simply created a thread discussing why you felt that Trump was the Republican choice (congrats on your bet), why he will be the next President and support it with facts, figures, and data (for a good example, see Van's thread).
Quote Originally Posted by SportsFan9698:
WSC - I knew it was you, but thank you for being a man and admitting it.
There is nothing combative about my tone or my posts. You simply don't like me so you take exception. Go back and read my last post you threw in the box and try to make any distinguishable characteristic about that post to 1000's in this forum.
You cannot and you will not. Then return it to the rightful place - the political forum.
I am a conservative. I want Trump to beat Hillary. That is the other side. You should learn to appreciate this, it is the democratic process. Boxing me or my threads will do nothing to stop that.
That is all I have to say on this subject.
The number of threads that bash HRC or Dems far outnumber those that bash Trump. If the moderation in this forum was political, Zelo's threads would always be in the box.
Your thread was designed for fighting, not debating. If Wall didn't move it, I would have.
What if you simply created a thread discussing why you felt that Trump was the Republican choice (congrats on your bet), why he will be the next President and support it with facts, figures, and data (for a good example, see Van's thread).
I am annoyed with your constant combative style of posting.
If you want to discuss, we welcome that..but you seem unable to have a civil, respectful conversation.
If this thread turns into your normal style I will also move this one.
You embarrass your political affiliation acting so immaturely.
I will also attest to SportsFan9698's incivility. He referred to me as "Dog Breath" and "Dog Shxt." The choices he makes reveal both the intellectual paucity of his positions and the content of his character.
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
I am annoyed with your constant combative style of posting.
If you want to discuss, we welcome that..but you seem unable to have a civil, respectful conversation.
If this thread turns into your normal style I will also move this one.
You embarrass your political affiliation acting so immaturely.
I will also attest to SportsFan9698's incivility. He referred to me as "Dog Breath" and "Dog Shxt." The choices he makes reveal both the intellectual paucity of his positions and the content of his character.
I will also attest to SportsFan9698's incivility. He referred to me as "Dog Breath" and "Dog Shxt." The choices he makes reveal both the intellectual paucity of his positions and the content of his character.
Not to mention that he left the site saying how unfair it was to him, then he comes back and begins calling me a welcher for a wager we made before he took his ball and went home.... His lack of character shines through in every post.
He has a lot of Trump in him.... argumentative, unable to accept criticism, resorts to name calling when questioned, pretends that things didn't happen or weren't said when the evidence is clear as day..... I see why he supports him so feverishly.
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
I will also attest to SportsFan9698's incivility. He referred to me as "Dog Breath" and "Dog Shxt." The choices he makes reveal both the intellectual paucity of his positions and the content of his character.
Not to mention that he left the site saying how unfair it was to him, then he comes back and begins calling me a welcher for a wager we made before he took his ball and went home.... His lack of character shines through in every post.
He has a lot of Trump in him.... argumentative, unable to accept criticism, resorts to name calling when questioned, pretends that things didn't happen or weren't said when the evidence is clear as day..... I see why he supports him so feverishly.
You truly are a simpleton. Trump has already said (and it makes perfect political sense if you're trying to get elected) that he deliberately @created space" between he and the other 17 competitors by being the "farthest to the right of any of them"--and you have to do that before the first Super Tursday in SEC country. He has not repeated those open thoughts about "we seem to be getting all the bad guys from Mexico, a lot of rapists..." And other shock talk rhetoric. Bottom line is it worked. He is always selling. Fact is, if you want to protect your culture and defend yourself from another religion that has it written in their Bible to kill you--you will chances are, be labeled a bigot or racist. Second fact is that Trumps businesses employ thousands, and there are representations of minorities and women in all executive levels. Your brain, and those of other SHEEPLE are stuck in the rhetoric of the past, and won't let it go. It is beyond annoying to deal with SHEEPLE like you.
Wow, just wow
Quote Originally Posted by Relax_Dude:
You truly are a simpleton. Trump has already said (and it makes perfect political sense if you're trying to get elected) that he deliberately @created space" between he and the other 17 competitors by being the "farthest to the right of any of them"--and you have to do that before the first Super Tursday in SEC country. He has not repeated those open thoughts about "we seem to be getting all the bad guys from Mexico, a lot of rapists..." And other shock talk rhetoric. Bottom line is it worked. He is always selling. Fact is, if you want to protect your culture and defend yourself from another religion that has it written in their Bible to kill you--you will chances are, be labeled a bigot or racist. Second fact is that Trumps businesses employ thousands, and there are representations of minorities and women in all executive levels. Your brain, and those of other SHEEPLE are stuck in the rhetoric of the past, and won't let it go. It is beyond annoying to deal with SHEEPLE like you.
He has a lot of Trump in him.... argumentative, unable to accept criticism, resorts to name calling when questioned, pretends that things didn't happen or weren't said when the evidence is clear as day..... I see why he supports him so feverishly.
That is an astute analysis.
I like fervid arguments, but without the temper tantrums and insults. I love watching The McLaughlin Group and Shields and Brooks. I wish the Covers confrontations were more like theirs: civil and intellectual.
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
He has a lot of Trump in him.... argumentative, unable to accept criticism, resorts to name calling when questioned, pretends that things didn't happen or weren't said when the evidence is clear as day..... I see why he supports him so feverishly.
That is an astute analysis.
I like fervid arguments, but without the temper tantrums and insults. I love watching The McLaughlin Group and Shields and Brooks. I wish the Covers confrontations were more like theirs: civil and intellectual.
Not to mention that he left the site saying how unfair it was to him, then he comes back and begins calling me a welcher for a wager we made before he took his ball and went home.... His lack of character shines through in every post.
He has a lot of Trump in him.... argumentative, unable to accept criticism, resorts to name calling when questioned, pretends that things didn't happen or weren't said when the evidence is clear as day..... I see why he supports him so feverishly.
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Not to mention that he left the site saying how unfair it was to him, then he comes back and begins calling me a welcher for a wager we made before he took his ball and went home.... His lack of character shines through in every post.
He has a lot of Trump in him.... argumentative, unable to accept criticism, resorts to name calling when questioned, pretends that things didn't happen or weren't said when the evidence is clear as day..... I see why he supports him so feverishly.
No surprise about Trump winning Republican nomination because he has been the favorite since 2015. However Clinton is still a strong favorite for Presidential election in gambling markets which have proven to be more reliable than public polls in predicting election results especially in final week before election.
No surprise about Trump winning Republican nomination because he has been the favorite since 2015. However Clinton is still a strong favorite for Presidential election in gambling markets which have proven to be more reliable than public polls in predicting election results especially in final week before election.
And she he is wrong will never man up and take personal respsonsibility and accountability. But because he is wrong so often he will make a whole thread trying to overcompensate for being wrong all the time and try way too hard.
You have to understand how insecure and sad a person like this.
He's he kinda of guy that will do just that.
And she he is wrong will never man up and take personal respsonsibility and accountability. But because he is wrong so often he will make a whole thread trying to overcompensate for being wrong all the time and try way too hard.
You have to understand how insecure and sad a person like this.
Not to mention that he left the site saying how unfair it was to him, then he comes back and begins calling me a welcher for a wager we made before he took his ball and went home.... His lack of character shines through in every post.
He has a lot of Trump in him.... argumentative, unable to accept criticism, resorts to name calling when questioned, pretends that things didn't happen or weren't said when the evidence is clear as day..... I see why he supports him so feverishly.
a welch is a welch that's a welch..I happened to read the thread that you clearly made a wager with SportsFan9698 and LOST; so now you explain in two paragraphs why it's okay to welch on a bet based upon the fact of who the bet is made with, and the shortcomings that are attached to a 'screen name' in a Covers forum? you're a welcher, accept it, stop making excuses as to why you don't pay up (an Avatar) I'm sure it would have been a whole new ballgame had you WON...think about it...nobody who gambles respects a WELCHER...they usually end up getting their azz kicked...
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Not to mention that he left the site saying how unfair it was to him, then he comes back and begins calling me a welcher for a wager we made before he took his ball and went home.... His lack of character shines through in every post.
He has a lot of Trump in him.... argumentative, unable to accept criticism, resorts to name calling when questioned, pretends that things didn't happen or weren't said when the evidence is clear as day..... I see why he supports him so feverishly.
a welch is a welch that's a welch..I happened to read the thread that you clearly made a wager with SportsFan9698 and LOST; so now you explain in two paragraphs why it's okay to welch on a bet based upon the fact of who the bet is made with, and the shortcomings that are attached to a 'screen name' in a Covers forum? you're a welcher, accept it, stop making excuses as to why you don't pay up (an Avatar) I'm sure it would have been a whole new ballgame had you WON...think about it...nobody who gambles respects a WELCHER...they usually end up getting their azz kicked...
a welch is a welch that's a welch..I happened to read the thread that you clearly made a wager with SportsFan9698 and LOST; so now you explain in two paragraphs why it's okay to welch on a bet based upon the fact of who the bet is made with, and the shortcomings that are attached to a 'screen name' in a Covers forum? you're a welcher, accept it, stop making excuses as to why you don't pay up (an Avatar) I'm sure it would have been a whole new ballgame had you WON...think about it...nobody who gambles respects a WELCHER...they usually end up getting their azz kicked...
Read it again. The wager is about the Presidential election. Check your facts before you come at me.
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
a welch is a welch that's a welch..I happened to read the thread that you clearly made a wager with SportsFan9698 and LOST; so now you explain in two paragraphs why it's okay to welch on a bet based upon the fact of who the bet is made with, and the shortcomings that are attached to a 'screen name' in a Covers forum? you're a welcher, accept it, stop making excuses as to why you don't pay up (an Avatar) I'm sure it would have been a whole new ballgame had you WON...think about it...nobody who gambles respects a WELCHER...they usually end up getting their azz kicked...
Read it again. The wager is about the Presidential election. Check your facts before you come at me.
a welch is a welch that's a welch..I happened to read the thread that you clearly made a wager with SportsFan9698 and LOST; so now you explain in two paragraphs why it's okay to welch on a bet based upon the fact of who the bet is made with, and the shortcomings that are attached to a 'screen name' in a Covers forum? you're a welcher, accept it, stop making excuses as to why you don't pay up (an Avatar) I'm sure it would have been a whole new ballgame had you WON...think about it...nobody who gambles respects a WELCHER...they usually end up getting their azz kicked...
a welch is a welch that's a welch..I happened to read the thread that you clearly made a wager with SportsFan9698 and LOST; so now you explain in two paragraphs why it's okay to welch on a bet based upon the fact of who the bet is made with, and the shortcomings that are attached to a 'screen name' in a Covers forum? you're a welcher, accept it, stop making excuses as to why you don't pay up (an Avatar) I'm sure it would have been a whole new ballgame had you WON...think about it...nobody who gambles respects a WELCHER...they usually end up getting their azz kicked...