Yes 2nd, yawn, Obama gets some credit for added jobs, but are low paying Walmart positions, the type of jobs you want to add? Really?Should the basis of the US economy be low end service sector jobs? How about some fast foods jobs while we're at it? The point is that AGAIN there was a net job loss for the month. Of course, some positions were added, but more were lost. Unemployment is getting worse, incomes are down, consumer spending down, despite profligate spending by obama........not so good. Please explain without blaming Bush. It's about time for the Great Apologizer to stop whimpering to the world and accept some responsibility in this country.
0
Yes 2nd, yawn, Obama gets some credit for added jobs, but are low paying Walmart positions, the type of jobs you want to add? Really?Should the basis of the US economy be low end service sector jobs? How about some fast foods jobs while we're at it? The point is that AGAIN there was a net job loss for the month. Of course, some positions were added, but more were lost. Unemployment is getting worse, incomes are down, consumer spending down, despite profligate spending by obama........not so good. Please explain without blaming Bush. It's about time for the Great Apologizer to stop whimpering to the world and accept some responsibility in this country.
Yes 2nd, yawn, Obama gets some credit for added jobs, but are low paying Walmart positions, the type of jobs you want to add? Really?Should the basis of the US economy be low end service sector jobs? How about some fast foods jobs while we're at it? The point is that AGAIN there was a net job loss for the month. Of course, some positions were added, but more were lost. Unemployment is getting worse, incomes are down, consumer spending down, despite profligate spending by obama........not so good. Please explain without blaming Bush. It's about time for the Great Apologizer to stop whimpering to the world and accept some responsibility in this country.
I know you are not the sharpest tool in the shed, but I was pointing out the hypocrisy in moes posts.
and the statistics are not bias towards any level of job, whether they are "low end service sector jobs", or white collar execitive jobs, so thanks for pointing that out
I understand unemployment is getting worse. Everytime the rate is compared to the Reagan years I get fearful.
and I absolutely love how you wipe the slate clean on Bush, It was you and the other stooges that were blaming Clinton for this mess as recent as November, 8 years after he left office, but Bush is blameless a couple of months later. If you were any more clueless you would be moe
And please highlight were I was praising Obama for todays numbers. I wont hold my breath for you to provide it though. You can save face now by admitting you were lying
also, you have ignored my questions on la raza. I didn't expect an intelligent reply, but at least humour me
thanks for playing, shemp
0
Quote Originally Posted by esplanade:
Yes 2nd, yawn, Obama gets some credit for added jobs, but are low paying Walmart positions, the type of jobs you want to add? Really?Should the basis of the US economy be low end service sector jobs? How about some fast foods jobs while we're at it? The point is that AGAIN there was a net job loss for the month. Of course, some positions were added, but more were lost. Unemployment is getting worse, incomes are down, consumer spending down, despite profligate spending by obama........not so good. Please explain without blaming Bush. It's about time for the Great Apologizer to stop whimpering to the world and accept some responsibility in this country.
I know you are not the sharpest tool in the shed, but I was pointing out the hypocrisy in moes posts.
and the statistics are not bias towards any level of job, whether they are "low end service sector jobs", or white collar execitive jobs, so thanks for pointing that out
I understand unemployment is getting worse. Everytime the rate is compared to the Reagan years I get fearful.
and I absolutely love how you wipe the slate clean on Bush, It was you and the other stooges that were blaming Clinton for this mess as recent as November, 8 years after he left office, but Bush is blameless a couple of months later. If you were any more clueless you would be moe
And please highlight were I was praising Obama for todays numbers. I wont hold my breath for you to provide it though. You can save face now by admitting you were lying
also, you have ignored my questions on la raza. I didn't expect an intelligent reply, but at least humour me
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
