How is it legal to pay a British intelligence officer $10 million+ to gather information from the Russian government on a presidential political opponent?
Explain to me why that isn't collusion?
How is it legal to pay a British intelligence officer $10 million+ to gather information from the Russian government on a presidential political opponent?
How is it legal to pay a British intelligence officer $10 million+ to gather information from the Russian government on a presidential political opponent?
Explain to me why that isn't collusion?
That's easy-
Because Democrats/libtards did it-
Collusion only occurs if your last name is Trump...
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
How is it legal to pay a British intelligence officer $10 million+ to gather information from the Russian government on a presidential political opponent?
Explain to me why that isn't collusion?
That's easy-
Because Democrats/libtards did it-
Collusion only occurs if your last name is Trump...
Russian government ---> Steele ----> Clinton Campaign
No collusion with Russia?
Because Steele is retired that makes him separate from the British government? Or do Democrats say his allegiance is with them, because they hired him, and not with the British government?
Is it ok/legal to collude with the British government?
Oh, then there's the Uranium One stuff.
It's not collusion because the money went
Clinton campaign ---> Lawyer ---> Steele ?
And the information went
Russian government ---> Steele ----> Clinton Campaign
No collusion with Russia?
Because Steele is retired that makes him separate from the British government? Or do Democrats say his allegiance is with them, because they hired him, and not with the British government?
Is it ok/legal to collude with the British government?
Hot Forum Topics
