Posted:
#1
Good intel identified his location & the order was given to strike.
I don't know where we go from here but I'm glad he's no longer a threat to the US.
Missile Strike Kills Iranian General Solemani
maga 
Posted:
#7
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
The reaction in the stock market tomorrow will be very interesting.
Just the mega rich getting richerThe reaction in the stock market tomorrow will be very interesting.
Instead of attacking the rich, why not "participate" in the stock market and become more wealthy yourself ?
Besides, Anyone that has a retirement account at work is highly likely invested in stocks... so why are we attacking the rich again??
Posted:
#10
We only need to know that this Iranian militant leader was responsible for the killing of hundreds of American Soldiers in the Iraq War.. and this rocket attack that killed him took place in .... Iraq ? What was he doing in Baghdad ? Up to no good is what...
As Trump correctly said, his death was long overdue before he committed any further atrocity. 
Posted:
#14
Just more liberal bellyaching. First they blame Trump for not doing anything/enough about Iranian aggression. Then they blame him for the embassy attack. Then they say it will be his Benghazi.
Then when he acts and does something — they refuse to give him credit.
This was one of the most dangerous men around, leading one of the most dangerous groups of terrorists. I mean they really, really have had it in for USA and Israel before Trump was ever on the scene. Nothing new here. These folks only relate to force. They are not dumb — but they will try to see how far they can push us. Obviously, not Obama now, but Trump.
Liberals can at least give him credit for doing something to take out one of the most dangerous guys around. First thing they want to do is complain they weren’t ‘informed’ about the decision ahead of time. Not too hard to figure out how they would have acted then. Ridiculous to me. They just hate Trump, period; not just disagree with him but hate him.
Posted:
#15
"If I were president, I definitely would have let things play out." "Sending American troops to protect American lives seems a little hasty. What if you need to get a little shut-eye or recharge in your lizard person spawning chamber for a few hours?"
"I would have slept on it first."
-Hillary Clinton, 1/1/2020
Posted:
#16
Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:
Just more liberal bellyaching. First they blame Trump for not doing anything/enough about Iranian aggression. Then they blame him for the embassy attack. Then they say it will be his Benghazi. Then when he acts and does something — they refuse to give him credit. This was one of the most dangerous men around, leading one of the most dangerous groups of terrorists. I mean they really, really have had it in for USA and Israel before Trump was ever on the scene. Nothing new here. These folks only relate to force. They are not dumb — but they will try to see how far they can push us. Obviously, not Obama now, but Trump. Liberals can at least give him credit for doing something to take out one of the most dangerous guys around. First thing they want to do is complain they weren’t ‘informed’ about the decision ahead of time. Not too hard to figure out how they would have acted then. Ridiculous to me. They just hate Trump, period; not just disagree with him but hate him.
Just more liberal bellyaching. First they blame Trump for not doing anything/enough about Iranian aggression. Then they blame him for the embassy attack. Then they say it will be his Benghazi. Then when he acts and does something — they refuse to give him credit. This was one of the most dangerous men around, leading one of the most dangerous groups of terrorists. I mean they really, really have had it in for USA and Israel before Trump was ever on the scene. Nothing new here. These folks only relate to force. They are not dumb — but they will try to see how far they can push us. Obviously, not Obama now, but Trump. Liberals can at least give him credit for doing something to take out one of the most dangerous guys around. First thing they want to do is complain they weren’t ‘informed’ about the decision ahead of time. Not too hard to figure out how they would have acted then. Ridiculous to me. They just hate Trump, period; not just disagree with him but hate him.
He's a liar and can't be trusted.
Posted:
#17
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:
Just the mega rich getting richer
Just the mega rich getting richer
Instead of attacking the rich, why not "participate" in the stock market and become more wealthy yourself ?
Besides, Anyone that has a retirement account at work is highly likely invested in stocks... so why are we attacking the rich again??
The Richest 20% own 93.3 % of the Stocks ...
Banks in America $34 Billion on overdraft charges in 2017..
Greedy corporations like Johnson & Johnson's have been knowingly putting cancer in numerous products for 40+ years and only pay a small fine ......
The Mega Rich are Scum ....Maybe 2 % of them are good people
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
Posted:
#18
https://www.businessinsider.com/old-trump-tweets-emerge-claim-obama-wanted-war-iran-2020-1
- In 2011 and 2012, Donald Trump repeatedly accused President Barack Obama of seeking war with Iran to help win the 2012 presidential election.
- "In order to get elected, @BarackObama will start a war with Iran," Trump tweeted in 2011, years before he began his own presidential campaign.
- On Thursday, Trump ordered the killing of Qassem Soleimani, a top Iranian military commander who was one of the most powerful men in the Middle East.
- The assassination came with Trump's approval rating mired at 42% and with him facing removal from office through impeachment in a US election year.
Posted:
#19
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">In order to get elected, <a href="https://twitter.com/BarackObama?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BarackObama</a> will start a war with Iran.</p>— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) <a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/141604554855825408?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 29, 2011</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Posted:
#21
“Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective. So the only way he figures that he's going to get reelected — and as sure as you're sitting there — is to start a war with Iran.”
https://twitter.com/i/status/1212928617518419968
Did Trump negotiate with Iran ?
Nuclear deal ?
what a joke !
Posted:
#22
He can't be trusted. He has regularly insulted our allies & they will not shed blood for this American president.
He's surrounded by "yes" men/women & that is pretty farking scary.
We are not safer today than we were yesterday.
He had many opportunities to get the General, so why now? I'm not buying Americans were in immediate danger. George W & President O both had the chance to take out Soleimani but both president knew it wasn't worth what Iran will do in retaliation.
He's a dangerous impulsive POS.
Tonight instead of being in Washington, he's having dinner with a Koch brother here in Florida.
Posted:
#24
Without congress approval, Trump's illegal assassination is a reckless gamble that has sparked international condemnation. Dubious claim that this attack prevents imminent war. The fact that the state department issues a statement saying all Americans should leave the middle east proves that this attack made the US less safe. In previous election, Trump campaigned on winding down on foreign wars. Instead more troops are send in. Since pulling out of Iran nuclear deal, everything the Trump administration has done has escalated conflicts according to Quincy institute for responsible statecraft.
Hot Forum Topics
