12 amendment.
the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.
Ok. ... 2/3 of the state's... You still don't have president trump at best president pence. So that's the angle kick the can till March ...
Ignorance
This is ignorance that I am even entertaining the fact that Supreme court will even hear tgis case.
Can one state sue another over that states laws...???? No.
Will court hear this drivel no.
Will trumo win the electoral college. No.
Is BIDEN AND HARRIS TIME PEOPLE OF THE YEAR. Yes.
We keep it simple just for you detox.
You should be on Smarter Than a 5th Grader. Reading Comprehension 101? Each State gets 1 vote and a 2/3;s Quorum is needed for the vote to be valid. There are more Rep. votes for Pres. than Dem. votes in the H of Rep. And by the way the Senate votes for the choice of Pres. What school you go??????
Mean time Georgia Michigan Pennsylvania and Arizona file notions in response to texas.
First, the states stressed, Texas’ lawsuit does not fall within the narrow category of cases in which the Supreme Court should exercise its original jurisdiction. Among other things, the states noted, there is another forum to resolve these disputes, as evidenced by the fact that courts around the country have repeatedly considered and rejected similar claims about the 2020 election. And if the Supreme Court were to exercise its original jurisdiction here, the states warned, its docket would be flooded with election-law disputes every four years in perpetuity.
Second, the states told the justices, Texas’ lawsuit is not a viable case because (again, among other things) Texas does not have a legal right to sue, known as standing, because it cannot show that it has been injured. Georgia pushed back against the argument that Texas has standing because it has an interest in the election of the vice president, who casts the deciding vote in the Senate: Texas doesn’t have a special interest in the vice president’s vote, Georgia observed, but in any event its “speculation that the Vice President may one day cast a tie-breaking vote” is not enough to support a lawsuit. Indeed, Georgia notes, during his eight years as vice president, President-elect Joe Biden never cast a tie-breaking vote.
The four states were represented by their attorneys general and other state officials, but Georgia was also represented by several private lawyers, including a former law clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas and Joseph Hunt, who served as the assistant attorney general at the Department of Justice during the Trump administration.
Texas is likely to file a brief responding to the four states’ filings. There is no timetable for the justices to rule on Texas’ request, although they will probably act quickly.
Moot point. No way Supreme Court sniffs or hears this Texas case. It is weaker than the PA case they rejected in 10 seconds. 
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
