Posted:
#751
Post Deleted
Don't let the book set the number
0
How embarrassing for Biden supporters.
Posted:
#756
@unplucked_gem
Nah with you every thing is gotcha, you seek every opportunity to trap and create drama. Your true colors are quite transparent so no need to try and disguise what you are doing it is quite obvious.
Discussion between members is rare here and unless the other party agrees with you it is razors out and knife in the back which is too bad but also easy to identify.
2
Posted:
#757
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@unplucked_gem Nah with you every thing is gotcha, you seek every opportunity to trap and create drama. Your true colors are quite transparent so no need to try and disguise what you are doing it is quite obvious. Discussion between members is rare here and unless the other party agrees with you it is razors out and knife in the back which is too bad but also easy to identify.
@unplucked_gem Nah with you every thing is gotcha, you seek every opportunity to trap and create drama. Your true colors are quite transparent so no need to try and disguise what you are doing it is quite obvious. Discussion between members is rare here and unless the other party agrees with you it is razors out and knife in the back which is too bad but also easy to identify.
Totally agree
He even got me yesterday in the NFL forum, making a post that appeared came from the rules of the website. Loves the drama
1
Posted:
#758
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@unplucked_gem Nah with you every thing is gotcha, you seek every opportunity to trap and create drama. Your true colors are quite transparent so no need to try and disguise what you are doing it is quite obvious. Discussion between members is rare here and unless the other party agrees with you it is razors out and knife in the back which is too bad but also easy to identify.
@unplucked_gem Nah with you every thing is gotcha, you seek every opportunity to trap and create drama. Your true colors are quite transparent so no need to try and disguise what you are doing it is quite obvious. Discussion between members is rare here and unless the other party agrees with you it is razors out and knife in the back which is too bad but also easy to identify.
2
Posted:
#761
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
@wallstreetcappers Sorry you feel that way. @cd329 C-Dog you were in violation of the guidelines, if even to mock them. Do you even know the rules and guidelines not that you ever get called on them.
@wallstreetcappers Sorry you feel that way. @cd329 C-Dog you were in violation of the guidelines, if even to mock them. Do you even know the rules and guidelines not that you ever get called on them.
Well for one i didnt say games were rigged and said the complete opposite. So you will have to show me where these rules were posted and specially where you said covers doesnt allow the word RIGGERS. Show me where that word is posted, which you wont be able to. You know if you spent the amount of time you spend on covers being a solid instigator, on something else, you might actually become a productive member of society.
As far as rules cause you think you own this web site and tell others what they can do, your quote about me not being called out on things is flat out comical, since i have been in the box more then you and most of the maga morons on this site. So you might want to get your facts straight. See i dont get sent to the box because you think i should, i get sent their by the mods. So buy covers and then you can ban me,until then stay in your own lane. Poster thats been here for 7 years telling a 20 plus year poster what they can post Dont forgot to say your prayers to your orange God tonight and wish for him to do great things for our country when he wakes up tomorrow. I would bet you got a trump statue sitting as Buddha
1
Posted:
#764
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
"until then stay in your own lane. Poster thats been here for 7 years telling a 20 plus year poster what they can post" There's quite a bit to unpack here slappy. 1) Using your infrastructure analogy, it's not my lane it's covers'. It was you that wandered outside of the established lane lines. I merely honked. You had the last clear chance of collision avoidance, but failed to yield and here we are. 2) I find it unbecoming to devalue input based on longevity. Someone said something about true colors being revealed. 3) 7 years isn't a short amount of time. In fact the now semi retired most prolific NFL handicapper here held his 7 years of winning as an attribute. 4) The 7 years vs. 20 years is consistent with the way your side operates insert Shumer vs. AOC. Want to lose another 5k on who wins that battle? 5) At this point I'm only willing to invest time here and not capital as covers is antiquated in both infrastructure and thought. However if I did, I'd still allow you to post which is a courtesy greater than you likely extend to me. Be well C-Dog.
W"until then stay in your own lane. Poster thats been here for 7 years telling a 20 plus year poster what they can post" There's quite a bit to unpack here slappy. 1) Using your infrastructure analogy, it's not my lane it's covers'. It was you that wandered outside of the established lane lines. I merely honked. You had the last clear chance of collision avoidance, but failed to yield and here we are. 2) I find it unbecoming to devalue input based on longevity. Someone said something about true colors being revealed. 3) 7 years isn't a short amount of time. In fact the now semi retired most prolific NFL handicapper here held his 7 years of winning as an attribute. 4) The 7 years vs. 20 years is consistent with the way your side operates insert Shumer vs. AOC. Want to lose another 5k on who wins that battle? 5) At this point I'm only willing to invest time here and not capital as covers is antiquated in both infrastructure and thought. However if I did, I'd still allow you to post which is a courtesy greater than you likely extend to me. Be well C-Dog.
W
And here people thought you were/are the devil...a devil would not allow that dance. Amazing hospitality extended there.
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
1
Posted:
#765
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
"until then stay in your own lane. Poster thats been here for 7 years telling a 20 plus year poster what they can post" There's quite a bit to unpack here slappy. 1) Using your infrastructure analogy, it's not my lane it's covers'. It was you that wandered outside of the established lane lines. I merely honked. You had the last clear chance of collision avoidance, but failed to yield and here we are. 2) I find it unbecoming to devalue input based on longevity. Someone said something about true colors being revealed. 3) 7 years isn't a short amount of time. In fact the now semi retired most prolific NFL handicapper here held his 7 years of winning as an attribute. 4) The 7 years vs. 20 years is consistent with the way your side operates insert Shumer vs. AOC. Want to lose another 5k on who wins that battle? 5) At this point I'm only willing to invest time here and not capital as covers is antiquated in both infrastructure and thought. However if I did, I'd still allow you to post which is a courtesy greater than you likely extend to me. Be well C-Dog.
"until then stay in your own lane. Poster thats been here for 7 years telling a 20 plus year poster what they can post" There's quite a bit to unpack here slappy. 1) Using your infrastructure analogy, it's not my lane it's covers'. It was you that wandered outside of the established lane lines. I merely honked. You had the last clear chance of collision avoidance, but failed to yield and here we are. 2) I find it unbecoming to devalue input based on longevity. Someone said something about true colors being revealed. 3) 7 years isn't a short amount of time. In fact the now semi retired most prolific NFL handicapper here held his 7 years of winning as an attribute. 4) The 7 years vs. 20 years is consistent with the way your side operates insert Shumer vs. AOC. Want to lose another 5k on who wins that battle? 5) At this point I'm only willing to invest time here and not capital as covers is antiquated in both infrastructure and thought. However if I did, I'd still allow you to post which is a courtesy greater than you likely extend to me. Be well C-Dog.
Maybe your brain couldnt understand my post. A 7ear poster shouldnt be telling a 20 year poster what they can post, just like a 20 year poster shouldnt be telling a 7 year poster what they can post. This is a pretty simple concept, but for some reason you love to tell others what they can post. If you want to tell others what to post, buy the Covers web site then you can be the boss, until then just worry about what you post and not what others post. You have a serious i want to be in charge complex. I wonder where you got that from? Couldnt be your orange idol by any chance
? MAGA MORONS FAVORITE MOTTO IS "DO AS I SAY NOT AS I DO"
1
Posted:
#766
Oh and am still waiting to see a copy of the covers rules that i personally broke, cause i didnt say games were rigged. So i await the crickets running around.
Pretty sad, your on a gambling forum posting forum rules lolllllllllllllllllll. Got a little boss complex or is it more THE LITTLE MAN SYNDROME
1
Posted:
#768
Just like I keep waiting for you to find posts I made that I am a Trump lover or MAGA supporter....is that also a little man syndrome, as you suggest, or just you trying to antagonize and poke fun at with personal attacks, which actually are COVERS rules you are breaking but allowed to get away with
COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
3
Posted:
#770
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
Hilarious explanations https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-rep-brad-sherman-denies-viewing-pornography-flight-viral-photos-surface-online
Hilarious explanations https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-rep-brad-sherman-denies-viewing-pornography-flight-viral-photos-surface-online
am curious mr defender of sexual predators, was the guy looking at adult porn pictures or was he raping a 17 year old child on the plane, like matt gaetz and his buddies did at the house party, because she knew what she was doing.
Like i said before and will say it everytime, magas have some sick thoughts about what is right and wrong in society.
Does your computer have any porn on it?
0
Posted:
#773
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
Hilarious explanations https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-rep-brad-sherman-denies-viewing-pornography-flight-viral-photos-surface-online
Hilarious explanations https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-rep-brad-sherman-denies-viewing-pornography-flight-viral-photos-surface-online
at least Brad Sherman (D) seems knows what the difference is between Males and Females , what cannot be said about most Progressive Democrats 
The Pastor of Disaster
1
Posted:
#774
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
magas have some sick thoughts about what is right and wrong in society.
magas have some sick thoughts about what is right and wrong in society.
In cult of fascist leader, followers believe blindly in supremacy of authority rule. Leader is infallible and whatever he orders must be obeyed. This explains their distorted sense of morality.
0
Posted:
#775
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
magas have some sick thoughts about what is right and wrong in society.
magas have some sick thoughts about what is right and wrong in society.
---"Minor attracted person"
----Cross-dressing men reading to school children
---men in women's locker rooms
--men in women's sports
--providing needles to drug addicts and creating spaces where they can "shoot up".
--allowing homeless drug addicts to camp next elementry schools
--decrimminalizing drug possession
---defending and releasing criminal immigrants
The list goes on.........
1
Hot Forum Topics
