Posted:
#26
no pucku its including the games u win with your 2 pts buy
U Must Win 61% of your games buying 2 pts per game!Anyone wanna dispute now?
Posted:
#27
Here we go again. heads going at it! ONce again Pucku27 does what he does and thats it..
jwheels86 THanks that info the other day Never got to tell you thank you with the ML bet on that OK. I had a brain fart. Love info like that. It totally slipped my mind. GL Homie
KEEP THE PEACE!!!
jwheels86 THanks that info the other day Never got to tell you thank you with the ML bet on that OK. I had a brain fart. Love info like that. It totally slipped my mind. GL Homie
KEEP THE PEACE!!!
"Genius alert! Genius alert!" 
Posted:
#33
Quote Originally Posted by landis1717:
if you morons follow puck at all you'd know this guys huge plays spit out more winners than anyone. and i believe he hit a huge play buying points on mizzou tonight the fact is don't worry about other guys no need to come on here bashing a guy when you're already a joke around here
if you morons follow puck at all you'd know this guys huge plays spit out more winners than anyone. and i believe he hit a huge play buying points on mizzou tonight
the fact is don't worry about other guys no need to come on here bashing a guy when you're already a joke around here Exactly, bashing a fellow bettor period is just pathetic.
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by pucku27:
WHAT THE % WHEN YOU WIN AGAME YOU SHOULD OF LOSTED ?????? YOUR 61 % IS IF YOU NEVER WIN AGAME BUYING 2 POINTS
WHAT THE % WHEN YOU WIN AGAME YOU SHOULD OF LOSTED ?????? YOUR 61 % IS IF YOU NEVER WIN AGAME BUYING 2 POINTS
Buying points is expensive, BUt pucku has a good winnning percentage nonetheless. i can understand buying one point, but 2 will cost you on average -170. Which means you have to almost win 2/1 just to break even.
Posted:
#35
I don't see anybody bashing...I just see people pointing out facts about buying points and having to pay -150 juice on every bet you make. 61% is exactly the right figure, that's what it would take just to make a miniscule profit...paying -150 and hitting 60% is EXACTLY breaking even (see my earlier post in this thread for the math).
Posted:
#36
Quote Originally Posted by jetspree:
Buying points is expensive, BUt pucku has a good winnning percentage nonetheless. i can understand buying one point, but 2 will cost you on average -170. Which means you have to almost win 2/1 just to break even.
ITS -150 I THINK IN THE TOURNAMENT I AM 11-3 IN GAMES THAT I B2 POINTS, AND 2 OF THOSE WINS WOULD OF BEEN LOSER
Buying points is expensive, BUt pucku has a good winnning percentage nonetheless. i can understand buying one point, but 2 will cost you on average -170. Which means you have to almost win 2/1 just to break even.
Posted:
#38
Quote Originally Posted by L8kersFan74:
ITS NOT EVERY BET I MAKE I don't see anybody bashing...I just see people pointing out facts about buying points and having to pay -150 juice on every bet you make. 61% is exactly the right figure, that's what it would take just to make a miniscule profit...paying -150 and hitting 60% is EXACTLY breaking even (see my earlier post in this thread for the math).
MAYBE 15 OUT OF 50 GAMES IN THE TOURNAMENT
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by pucku27:
THATS IT I WILL NEVER SAY ANYTHING AGAIN ABOUT IT AGAIN I ITS MY MONEY AND IF I FEEL LIKE GIVEN IT AWAY TO THE BOOKS I WILL .
ITS MY MONEY AND IF I FEEL LIKE GIVEN IT AWAY TO THE BOOKS I WILL . I want to make it clear that I have nothing against you personally...I think what would appease the others here on the forum would be for you to keep track of your + or - UNITS with your strategy. If you start keeping track of your UNITS I think it will end this kind of talk.
Posted:
#46
why the fuck do you tools feel the need to run the guy off. did he point a gun at your head and tell u to buy 2 points. this site is chock-ful of losers. not losers in sports wagering but losers in life and how to treat one another. you fuckheads make me sick.
the biggest toolshed is the guy who feels the need to start a thread to bag on a guy who posts his picks w/ the intention of helping others make $$$. get a life redpanda.
Posted:
#49
Panda and Pucku have similarities and differences.
The similarities...
BOTH gain a ton of attention around here.
The differences....
-Puck gains attention simply by posting his bets and winning games without the bs drama.
-Never tells people to follow him, and never says shit about being the best.
-Panda gains attention by posting bonehead retarded comments on a daily basis. Clearly panda did not receive enough attention as a child, and turns to covers to get what he did not receive as a kid.
-Constantly saying how good he is, and asking people to follow his picks, while being a mediocre capper AT BEST.
-Ultimately gives new meaning to the word "attention person."
The similarities...
BOTH gain a ton of attention around here.
The differences....
-Puck gains attention simply by posting his bets and winning games without the bs drama.
-Never tells people to follow him, and never says shit about being the best.
-Panda gains attention by posting bonehead retarded comments on a daily basis. Clearly panda did not receive enough attention as a child, and turns to covers to get what he did not receive as a kid.
-Constantly saying how good he is, and asking people to follow his picks, while being a mediocre capper AT BEST.
-Ultimately gives new meaning to the word "attention person."
Posted:
#50
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
Panda and Pucku have similarities and differences.
The similarities...
BOTH gain a ton of attention around here.
The differences....
-Puck gains attention simply by posting his bets and winning games without the bs drama.
-Never tells people to follow him, and never says shit about being the best.
-Panda gains attention by posting bonehead retarded comments on a daily basis. Clearly panda did not receive enough attention as a child, and turns to covers to get what he did not receive as a kid.
-Constantly saying how good he is, and asking people to follow his picks, while being a mediocre capper AT BEST.
-Ultimately gives new meaning to the word "attention person."
Panda and Pucku have similarities and differences.
The similarities...
BOTH gain a ton of attention around here.
The differences....
-Puck gains attention simply by posting his bets and winning games without the bs drama.
-Never tells people to follow him, and never says shit about being the best.
-Panda gains attention by posting bonehead retarded comments on a daily basis. Clearly panda did not receive enough attention as a child, and turns to covers to get what he did not receive as a kid.
-Constantly saying how good he is, and asking people to follow his picks, while being a mediocre capper AT BEST.
-Ultimately gives new meaning to the word "attention person."
how bout the dude that was talkin shit after the Wiscy FSU game to us??
Whats the sum up on me? 
Hot Forum Topics
