Wouldn't you play the first 3 games of the series anyway? Isn't the system play the first 3 games of the road trip.
Thanks
yes thats correct Lippsman...what was meant is that if a win comes in either bet A,B or C do not reset and bet the 2nd set (games 4,5,6) as a new series....
0
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:
Wouldn't you play the first 3 games of the series anyway? Isn't the system play the first 3 games of the road trip.
Thanks
yes thats correct Lippsman...what was meant is that if a win comes in either bet A,B or C do not reset and bet the 2nd set (games 4,5,6) as a new series....
Thanks Gent, I appreciate your contribution. I was following a system last year that did well. It was the opposite, home stand of three games, filtered out by a 500 or better in their last ten. Playing the top 22 teams with the best home record from the previous year. The system went 66 and 1, also if you faded the bottom 8 home teams the system would have gone 96-2 total. I got it from covers I am sure it will surface again come hockey season. Can't remember who came up with it. I will research the JM system throwing in some filters to limit some of the losses. However, 91 and 3 is not so bad either. Also, does hockey have some sort of RPI ranking? If so then that could also be another filter. Again thanks for posting.
0
Thanks Gent, I appreciate your contribution. I was following a system last year that did well. It was the opposite, home stand of three games, filtered out by a 500 or better in their last ten. Playing the top 22 teams with the best home record from the previous year. The system went 66 and 1, also if you faded the bottom 8 home teams the system would have gone 96-2 total. I got it from covers I am sure it will surface again come hockey season. Can't remember who came up with it. I will research the JM system throwing in some filters to limit some of the losses. However, 91 and 3 is not so bad either. Also, does hockey have some sort of RPI ranking? If so then that could also be another filter. Again thanks for posting.
Thanks Gent, I appreciate your contribution. I was following a system last year that did well. It was the opposite, home stand of three games, filtered out by a 500 or better in their last ten. Playing the top 22 teams with the best home record from the previous year. The system went 66 and 1, also if you faded the bottom 8 home teams the system would have gone 96-2 total. I got it from covers I am sure it will surface again come hockey season. Can't remember who came up with it. I will research the JM system throwing in some filters to limit some of the losses. However, 91 and 3 is not so bad either. Also, does hockey have some sort of RPI ranking? If so then that could also be another filter. Again thanks for posting.
Isn't this the blackbelt system ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Putso:
Thanks Gent, I appreciate your contribution. I was following a system last year that did well. It was the opposite, home stand of three games, filtered out by a 500 or better in their last ten. Playing the top 22 teams with the best home record from the previous year. The system went 66 and 1, also if you faded the bottom 8 home teams the system would have gone 96-2 total. I got it from covers I am sure it will surface again come hockey season. Can't remember who came up with it. I will research the JM system throwing in some filters to limit some of the losses. However, 91 and 3 is not so bad either. Also, does hockey have some sort of RPI ranking? If so then that could also be another filter. Again thanks for posting.
Thanks Gent, I appreciate your contribution. I was following a system last year that did well. It was the opposite, home stand of three games, filtered out by a 500 or better in their last ten. Playing the top 22 teams with the best home record from the previous year. The system went 66 and 1, also if you faded the bottom 8 home teams the system would have gone 96-2 total. I got it from covers I am sure it will surface again come hockey season. Can't remember who came up with it. I will research the JM system throwing in some filters to limit some of the losses. However, 91 and 3 is not so bad either. Also, does hockey have some sort of RPI ranking? If so then that could also be another filter. Again thanks for posting.
Putso, let us know of the filters you come up with man!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Putso:
Thanks Gent, I appreciate your contribution. I was following a system last year that did well. It was the opposite, home stand of three games, filtered out by a 500 or better in their last ten. Playing the top 22 teams with the best home record from the previous year. The system went 66 and 1, also if you faded the bottom 8 home teams the system would have gone 96-2 total. I got it from covers I am sure it will surface again come hockey season. Can't remember who came up with it. I will research the JM system throwing in some filters to limit some of the losses. However, 91 and 3 is not so bad either. Also, does hockey have some sort of RPI ranking? If so then that could also be another filter. Again thanks for posting.
Not sure if its blackbelt or not. The only blackbelt component that I have is the MLB. Someone will start a thread close to the open of the season using this system. What is the NHL system from blackbelt all about?
0
Not sure if its blackbelt or not. The only blackbelt component that I have is the MLB. Someone will start a thread close to the open of the season using this system. What is the NHL system from blackbelt all about?
You gotta like that. So do you buy the 3 points for each game or do you just play them as is ?
the system calls for buying 3 points - however it didnt seem to matter much in the nba last year since I began in jan 09 - there were about 5 games several of them [b] bets for that matter that you needed the points - but i think overall you would be up more without the juice
0
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:
You gotta like that. So do you buy the 3 points for each game or do you just play them as is ?
the system calls for buying 3 points - however it didnt seem to matter much in the nba last year since I began in jan 09 - there were about 5 games several of them [b] bets for that matter that you needed the points - but i think overall you would be up more without the juice
Not sure if its blackbelt or not. The only blackbelt component that I have is the MLB. Someone will start a thread close to the open of the season using this system. What is the NHL system from blackbelt all about?
I was talking just about MLB. I think Blackbelt is betting opposite of JM on the MLB and NBA wagers. It's got to be something a bit different than that though. But it seems that is what people are saying about it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Putso:
Not sure if its blackbelt or not. The only blackbelt component that I have is the MLB. Someone will start a thread close to the open of the season using this system. What is the NHL system from blackbelt all about?
I was talking just about MLB. I think Blackbelt is betting opposite of JM on the MLB and NBA wagers. It's got to be something a bit different than that though. But it seems that is what people are saying about it.
i've haven't posted in a while, but after reading through this post, i just couldn't stop myself. first, i have to applaud kong for dealing with these idiots.. if i were you i wouldn't waste my time. this msg is for all the idiots.. chicano, pdg.. etc.. please take this msg as advice rather than criticism because in all honesty i have no ill intent and i don't have any way of making money off of you unlike morrison. and this goes for sports betting in general, because frankly you guys don't seem to have much experience.
i bought into the morrison system at the end of 07-08 nba season. started baseball just fine.. i think we won 14, 15, 19 in a row? i forgot exactly.. but needless to say i was euphoric much like you guys.. and then we started to lose. at a certain point we lost 5 games. i went back to visit his website and realized he only tallied 3 losses so far in the season, so i emailed him and asked him about it, needless to say, he never replied to any of my emails ever again. the theory is simple.. because of the ridiculous amount that you lay, all it takes is 3 losses and you spend the rest of the season trying to break even. i'm sure with all systems it has its up side.. but in the end it's a waste of time and you'll realize what i mean after your first or second loss. if you ask any accomplished sports bettor.. they would not waste their time on this system because the risk is great and reward is little. you bet $100-1000 on every series and you walk away with 3-4k at the end of the season at best, that's if you had no losses. imagine the other way around where you lose 3 or 4 games or make that 6 for last years' baseball.. losing 3-4k. it would literally take me at least 5-10 years flatbetting $100 (betting very poorly) to lose that kind of money. it would really surprise me if morrison uses this system for himself, why even bother when he's making a good amount just for affiliating people to betus, where he gets a percentage of your deposit and a commission on all your bets. when i bought his system i remember i had to open an account with betus before i could even receive his system.. should've already known it was a scam, but i admit i was an idiot. i remember making my first deposit through phone under his "vip" group.. i deposited a $1000 and the guy immediately says to me 'that's it? only a $1000?" well..how much do you expect me to deposit? til this day, i never forgot that phone call.. they were trying to hustle me and they were being upfront about it.. almost like robbery in a sense.
i think someone mentioned it before, but when you sign up under morrison at betus.. the lines for games that fall under his system will be slightly different. therefore, if you buy points at betus it will would be no different than if you were to place a regular wager at another sports book (give or take a point).. only difference is that betus makes money off that extra juice.. and that's why this business has been profitable for both jm and betus. they can simply rebuy the wagers at better odds, and make a fat profit. i'm not sure if jm uses solely betus now, he probably expanded and added a few more bookies i'd imagine.
to be honest, if his system lost.. i would have no problem, but the fact that he had to lie about it, and reinvent a new system (which is exactly the same as his previous) everytime he loses... just gets on my nerves. and get this.. after losing the baseball season last year, he tried to make us buy his new v2 baseball the one he has now for an extra $199, which was no different than the one we were using except for the rpi bullshit. i checked the stats and redid the season with the rpi, and still we would've ended with 4 loses.. not the 0 that he claims, and that's with less games played.. meaning we would've had the same amount of loss or even greater. it's really surprising to me how many of you buy his extra systems and bs.. amazing! but, in many ways this scam has helped me because it lead me to invent my own baseball system which i'm proud to say has a solid winning percentage and good profit margin. so far i tripled the amount i had in my bankroll a month ago. i'm not sharing this one, because it's all mine! haha. thanks for reading guys.. hope this helps. i probably won't post again for a while.. so GL to all.
0
i've haven't posted in a while, but after reading through this post, i just couldn't stop myself. first, i have to applaud kong for dealing with these idiots.. if i were you i wouldn't waste my time. this msg is for all the idiots.. chicano, pdg.. etc.. please take this msg as advice rather than criticism because in all honesty i have no ill intent and i don't have any way of making money off of you unlike morrison. and this goes for sports betting in general, because frankly you guys don't seem to have much experience.
i bought into the morrison system at the end of 07-08 nba season. started baseball just fine.. i think we won 14, 15, 19 in a row? i forgot exactly.. but needless to say i was euphoric much like you guys.. and then we started to lose. at a certain point we lost 5 games. i went back to visit his website and realized he only tallied 3 losses so far in the season, so i emailed him and asked him about it, needless to say, he never replied to any of my emails ever again. the theory is simple.. because of the ridiculous amount that you lay, all it takes is 3 losses and you spend the rest of the season trying to break even. i'm sure with all systems it has its up side.. but in the end it's a waste of time and you'll realize what i mean after your first or second loss. if you ask any accomplished sports bettor.. they would not waste their time on this system because the risk is great and reward is little. you bet $100-1000 on every series and you walk away with 3-4k at the end of the season at best, that's if you had no losses. imagine the other way around where you lose 3 or 4 games or make that 6 for last years' baseball.. losing 3-4k. it would literally take me at least 5-10 years flatbetting $100 (betting very poorly) to lose that kind of money. it would really surprise me if morrison uses this system for himself, why even bother when he's making a good amount just for affiliating people to betus, where he gets a percentage of your deposit and a commission on all your bets. when i bought his system i remember i had to open an account with betus before i could even receive his system.. should've already known it was a scam, but i admit i was an idiot. i remember making my first deposit through phone under his "vip" group.. i deposited a $1000 and the guy immediately says to me 'that's it? only a $1000?" well..how much do you expect me to deposit? til this day, i never forgot that phone call.. they were trying to hustle me and they were being upfront about it.. almost like robbery in a sense.
i think someone mentioned it before, but when you sign up under morrison at betus.. the lines for games that fall under his system will be slightly different. therefore, if you buy points at betus it will would be no different than if you were to place a regular wager at another sports book (give or take a point).. only difference is that betus makes money off that extra juice.. and that's why this business has been profitable for both jm and betus. they can simply rebuy the wagers at better odds, and make a fat profit. i'm not sure if jm uses solely betus now, he probably expanded and added a few more bookies i'd imagine.
to be honest, if his system lost.. i would have no problem, but the fact that he had to lie about it, and reinvent a new system (which is exactly the same as his previous) everytime he loses... just gets on my nerves. and get this.. after losing the baseball season last year, he tried to make us buy his new v2 baseball the one he has now for an extra $199, which was no different than the one we were using except for the rpi bullshit. i checked the stats and redid the season with the rpi, and still we would've ended with 4 loses.. not the 0 that he claims, and that's with less games played.. meaning we would've had the same amount of loss or even greater. it's really surprising to me how many of you buy his extra systems and bs.. amazing! but, in many ways this scam has helped me because it lead me to invent my own baseball system which i'm proud to say has a solid winning percentage and good profit margin. so far i tripled the amount i had in my bankroll a month ago. i'm not sharing this one, because it's all mine! haha. thanks for reading guys.. hope this helps. i probably won't post again for a while.. so GL to all.
Wow! There's nothing like the feeling of confidence I get after reading one of JM's former customer's comments. Makes me wish I was just a little more diligent finding out about this whole thing before I bought into it. Actually, there is nothing I read that would have prevented me from buying the system, but I sure wouldn't have funded my account at BetUS with nearly as much as I did. Now I'm stuck at BetUS until either 1) I roll over the required amount or 2) I go tits up.
Thanks for the post. As a JM customer everything you said rings true. I wish you continued success with "your" new system. Make a million!
0
Wow! There's nothing like the feeling of confidence I get after reading one of JM's former customer's comments. Makes me wish I was just a little more diligent finding out about this whole thing before I bought into it. Actually, there is nothing I read that would have prevented me from buying the system, but I sure wouldn't have funded my account at BetUS with nearly as much as I did. Now I'm stuck at BetUS until either 1) I roll over the required amount or 2) I go tits up.
Thanks for the post. As a JM customer everything you said rings true. I wish you continued success with "your" new system. Make a million!
wow - thanks for the kind words - i can see why you are so upset with john - you win 15-19 series in a row in baseball and then lose 5-6 - based on chasing (like I currently do) that would wipe out pretty much any bankroll. then john sells an upgrade to his mlb system which is currently 20-0 - but before this you had to endure an entire, grueling NBA season without witnessing any series losses under his system (or i guess just 1 with sacramento) so that's 79 straight in NBA and 20 in MLB - I am not sure if I would be more upset with the fact that I just lost my entire bankroll or have to watch john go on a very impressive winning streak of almost 100 straight series victories (and didnt take advantage of this when you had the information all along). thankfully i can't and hopefully won't ever appreciate where you are coming from there - only thing i guess we have in common is the 'euphoria' from winning - yours came from winning 19 in a row and mine from 65 in a row. i wish you well with your new system - i think i have learned from this forum is that the labourchere money management method would be better than chasing - some of those [C] bets really intensified the pucker factor if you know what i mean- maybe for you - just wait and chase bet any [b] and [c] bets with his system - maybe you can win some of those 5-6 losses he had last year and ride this hot streak
take care
0
maitr3
wow - thanks for the kind words - i can see why you are so upset with john - you win 15-19 series in a row in baseball and then lose 5-6 - based on chasing (like I currently do) that would wipe out pretty much any bankroll. then john sells an upgrade to his mlb system which is currently 20-0 - but before this you had to endure an entire, grueling NBA season without witnessing any series losses under his system (or i guess just 1 with sacramento) so that's 79 straight in NBA and 20 in MLB - I am not sure if I would be more upset with the fact that I just lost my entire bankroll or have to watch john go on a very impressive winning streak of almost 100 straight series victories (and didnt take advantage of this when you had the information all along). thankfully i can't and hopefully won't ever appreciate where you are coming from there - only thing i guess we have in common is the 'euphoria' from winning - yours came from winning 19 in a row and mine from 65 in a row. i wish you well with your new system - i think i have learned from this forum is that the labourchere money management method would be better than chasing - some of those [C] bets really intensified the pucker factor if you know what i mean- maybe for you - just wait and chase bet any [b] and [c] bets with his system - maybe you can win some of those 5-6 losses he had last year and ride this hot streak
Morrison must be evolving because I told him I wasn't opening an account at BetUS and he still sent me the system. And as far as not personally attacking anyone, then calling them idiots in the same paragraph, that makes sense.
0
Morrison must be evolving because I told him I wasn't opening an account at BetUS and he still sent me the system. And as far as not personally attacking anyone, then calling them idiots in the same paragraph, that makes sense.
Man you guys just have to remember it is all about money management. Never use the Martingale system with these plays. I know thats what Morrison wants, but trust me it is bad news. It takes 2-3 losses in a season to wipe out all of your winnings.
The Labouchere method is the only "safe" way to profit using these systems. As long as your overall wagers win 39% of the time, you will profit. By using the NBA system and MLB systems(V1 and V2) as you guys know, the bets are usually won in the A or B games. That leaves us with great profits every season. My good friend PSIC taught it to me a couple years ago, and I have profited ever since.
Hey I'm just trying to look out for my homies, after all we are all here to make money betting sports.
0
Man you guys just have to remember it is all about money management. Never use the Martingale system with these plays. I know thats what Morrison wants, but trust me it is bad news. It takes 2-3 losses in a season to wipe out all of your winnings.
The Labouchere method is the only "safe" way to profit using these systems. As long as your overall wagers win 39% of the time, you will profit. By using the NBA system and MLB systems(V1 and V2) as you guys know, the bets are usually won in the A or B games. That leaves us with great profits every season. My good friend PSIC taught it to me a couple years ago, and I have profited ever since.
Hey I'm just trying to look out for my homies, after all we are all here to make money betting sports.
Man you guys just have to remember it is all about money management. Never use the Martingale system with these plays. I know thats what Morrison wants, but trust me it is bad news. It takes 2-3 losses in a season to wipe out all of your winnings.
The Labouchere method is the only "safe" way to profit using these systems. As long as your overall wagers win 39% of the time, you will profit. By using the NBA system and MLB systems(V1 and V2) as you guys know, the bets are usually won in the A or B games. That leaves us with great profits every season. My good friend PSIC taught it to me a couple years ago, and I have profited ever since.
Hey I'm just trying to look out for my homies, after all we are all here to make money betting sports.
[/Quote
You got a link or where should I go to see this LABOUCHERE strategy ??????
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by KongKiller]
Man you guys just have to remember it is all about money management. Never use the Martingale system with these plays. I know thats what Morrison wants, but trust me it is bad news. It takes 2-3 losses in a season to wipe out all of your winnings.
The Labouchere method is the only "safe" way to profit using these systems. As long as your overall wagers win 39% of the time, you will profit. By using the NBA system and MLB systems(V1 and V2) as you guys know, the bets are usually won in the A or B games. That leaves us with great profits every season. My good friend PSIC taught it to me a couple years ago, and I have profited ever since.
Hey I'm just trying to look out for my homies, after all we are all here to make money betting sports.
[/Quote
You got a link or where should I go to see this LABOUCHERE strategy ??????
I appreciate the turn this thread has taken. Like his tactics or not, The Morrison system pics a lot of winners. The weak link in the system is money management, i.e. one loss at the "C" level can be devastating and more losses at that level can be down right disastrous.
The labourchere money management system, as tweaked in the above link, looks like a very solid fit for the John Morrison system by substituting money management strategies. I will be looking at the labourchere money management system as outlined in the above link very closely.
For those of you keeping score at home, 2 "unofficial" (ie. the rpi was greater than .01) John Morrison system wins yesterday. The Reds on a "B" bet and the Royals (run line) on an "A" bet.
0
I appreciate the turn this thread has taken. Like his tactics or not, The Morrison system pics a lot of winners. The weak link in the system is money management, i.e. one loss at the "C" level can be devastating and more losses at that level can be down right disastrous.
The labourchere money management system, as tweaked in the above link, looks like a very solid fit for the John Morrison system by substituting money management strategies. I will be looking at the labourchere money management system as outlined in the above link very closely.
For those of you keeping score at home, 2 "unofficial" (ie. the rpi was greater than .01) John Morrison system wins yesterday. The Reds on a "B" bet and the Royals (run line) on an "A" bet.
If you use the labourchere money management you will never have to worry about losing a series. I have never been successful at gambling until I used the Morrison System with the labourchere management. I used it last nba season and current mlb season.
The problem with the Morrison System is the money management. Use the labourchere money management and you fixed the problem. Simple.
0
Quote Originally Posted by chicano1:
MAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thats some damn goooooooooood info there
yeah clicking on it worked
thats the 1st time that I have read that system
I LIKE IT !!!
THANKS STAXXX
If you use the labourchere money management you will never have to worry about losing a series. I have never been successful at gambling until I used the Morrison System with the labourchere management. I used it last nba season and current mlb season.
The problem with the Morrison System is the money management. Use the labourchere money management and you fixed the problem. Simple.
If you use the labourchere money management you will never have to worry about losing a series. I have never been successful at gambling until I used the Morrison System with the labourchere management. I used it last nba season and current mlb season.
The problem with the Morrison System is the money management. Use the labourchere money management and you fixed the problem. Simple.
SOUNDS LIKE A WINNING COMBINATION TO ME !!!!!!!!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by trojanman55:
If you use the labourchere money management you will never have to worry about losing a series. I have never been successful at gambling until I used the Morrison System with the labourchere management. I used it last nba season and current mlb season.
The problem with the Morrison System is the money management. Use the labourchere money management and you fixed the problem. Simple.
SOUNDS LIKE A WINNING COMBINATION TO ME !!!!!!!!!!!!
What do you guys do when using the method when your [b] or [c] bets don't cover each other....
Let's take this line... 10..10..10..10 Odds @ -150 Risk 20 to win 13.33 LOSS [b] Odds @ -170 Risk 30 to win 17.64 WIN
This results in a SERIES win, but you are still down money? Have you guys found a solution for this? I figured any dog wins would clear this up, however, under the JM system there are no underdogs.
Help!
0
What do you guys do when using the method when your [b] or [c] bets don't cover each other....
Let's take this line... 10..10..10..10 Odds @ -150 Risk 20 to win 13.33 LOSS [b] Odds @ -170 Risk 30 to win 17.64 WIN
This results in a SERIES win, but you are still down money? Have you guys found a solution for this? I figured any dog wins would clear this up, however, under the JM system there are no underdogs.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
