MrBator got boxed...? Honestly..? For what..?
| Hockey - Wednesday, June 15, 2011 Boston Bruins Spread |
+1½ (-270) | Game | OK | |
| Baseball - Thursday, June 16, 2011 Philadelphia Phillies Money Line J Vazquez -R Must Start C Lee -L Must Start |
(-225) | Game | OK | |
| Hockey - Wednesday, June 15, 2011 Boston Bruins Spread |
+1½ (-270) | Game | OK | |
| Baseball - Thursday, June 16, 2011 Philadelphia Phillies Money Line J Vazquez -R Must Start C Lee -L Must Start |
(-225) | Game | OK | |
Bator you do know that in the 15 previous game 7's only 1 has gone over 5 goals right?
Yes. By now everyone knows that.
Bator you do know that in the 15 previous game 7's only 1 has gone over 5 goals right?
Yes. By now everyone knows that.
Bator you do know that in the 15 previous game 7's only 1 has gone over 5 goals right?
That is a daunting stat, but my risk on the over is only 3 units. I care about one of those units, though, because it's hooked up to the Bruins at a glittering +140. The same book where I bet that parlay now has the Bruins +110.
Bator you do know that in the 15 previous game 7's only 1 has gone over 5 goals right?
That is a daunting stat, but my risk on the over is only 3 units. I care about one of those units, though, because it's hooked up to the Bruins at a glittering +140. The same book where I bet that parlay now has the Bruins +110.
That is a daunting stat, but my risk on the over is only 3 units. I care about one of those units, though, because it's hooked up to the Bruins at a glittering +140. The same book where I bet that parlay now has the Bruins +110.
gl yeah the line has been plummeting. +118 at the greek right now
That is a daunting stat, but my risk on the over is only 3 units. I care about one of those units, though, because it's hooked up to the Bruins at a glittering +140. The same book where I bet that parlay now has the Bruins +110.
gl yeah the line has been plummeting. +118 at the greek right now
I added the Bruins +1.5 -235 along with nickel limit bets on the Bruins team total over 2.5 +125 and the Canucks team total under 2.5 +105.
I just ditched that with Vancouver -1.5 +235 at the same book.
I added the Bruins +1.5 -235 along with nickel limit bets on the Bruins team total over 2.5 +125 and the Canucks team total under 2.5 +105.
I just ditched that with Vancouver -1.5 +235 at the same book.
I added the Bruins +1.5 -235 along with nickel limit bets on the Bruins team total over 2.5 +125 and the Canucks team total under 2.5 +105.
I just ditched that with Vancouver -1.5 +235 at the same book.
I added the Bruins +1.5 -235 along with nickel limit bets on the Bruins team total over 2.5 +125 and the Canucks team total under 2.5 +105.
I just ditched that with Vancouver -1.5 +235 at the same book.
That is a daunting stat, but my risk on the over is only 3 units. I care about one of those units, though, because it's hooked up to the Bruins at a glittering +140. The same book where I bet that parlay now has the Bruins +110.
Now it's up to 5 units at over 5 +115.
That is a daunting stat, but my risk on the over is only 3 units. I care about one of those units, though, because it's hooked up to the Bruins at a glittering +140. The same book where I bet that parlay now has the Bruins +110.
Now it's up to 5 units at over 5 +115.
My ratio is more like 19 to 1. My sub. 500 lifetime record with overs just got worse.
![]()
My ratio is more like 19 to 1. My sub. 500 lifetime record with overs just got worse.
![]()
I removed one word to make this sound right:
The books in Vegas, which always stupidly overreact to square money, closed under 5 -140 or -145. Meanwhile, the offshore books, who - unlike the wussy Las Vegas sportsbooks - know what the hell they're doing, closed under 5 -115 or -120. All of which means that Tim Thomas was so good in goal for the Bruins that he had plenty left over to drag the under squares across the finish line with him. Timmy Thomas was my buddy for much of that game but by the 3rd period he had become my enemy.
I removed one word to make this sound right:
The books in Vegas, which always stupidly overreact to square money, closed under 5 -140 or -145. Meanwhile, the offshore books, who - unlike the wussy Las Vegas sportsbooks - know what the hell they're doing, closed under 5 -115 or -120. All of which means that Tim Thomas was so good in goal for the Bruins that he had plenty left over to drag the under squares across the finish line with him. Timmy Thomas was my buddy for much of that game but by the 3rd period he had become my enemy.
Yes, us 'squares' cashed.
No matter how you spin it - under(or no bet) was the play.
Depends what price under bettors got. Under 5 -115.......okay bet. Under 5 -125 and up........yer a turrrible gambler.
Yes, us 'squares' cashed.
No matter how you spin it - under(or no bet) was the play.
Depends what price under bettors got. Under 5 -115.......okay bet. Under 5 -125 and up........yer a turrrible gambler.
Depends what price under bettors got. Under 5 -115.......okay bet. Under 5 -125 and up........yer a turrrible gambler.
I don't live in your climate. I don't have to worry about excessive vig storms.
Depends what price under bettors got. Under 5 -115.......okay bet. Under 5 -125 and up........yer a turrrible gambler.
I don't live in your climate. I don't have to worry about excessive vig storms.
Mr Bator knows hockey too
Mr Bator knows hockey too
Hot Forum Topics
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 264,965
- Saturday 09/26/2026 513
- All About streak Survivor! 5,909
- POY: Clemson +1 at Cal 6,375
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 28,228
- Saturday Football 11,242
- ***Macwesties * Sat. Sept. 26, 2026 * Week #4 * NCAAF College Football Plays*** 5,233
- **$$$ MD Saturday 9/26 $$$** 6,392
- Tenn Sucks so bad 518
- Public Indicator Calculations 2026 16,536
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
