The guy is boxed and it serves zero purpose to bash Beets for this thread, especially someone with a massive history of repeated issues given several extra chances to enjoy the site.
Quote Originally Posted by lbcake:
OK, then I'll say it.
Comments?
Context is always lacking.
The guy is boxed and it serves zero purpose to bash Beets for this thread, especially someone with a massive history of repeated issues given several extra chances to enjoy the site.
The guy is boxed and it serves zero purpose to bash Beets for this thread, especially someone with a massive history of repeated issues given several extra chances to enjoy the site.
Wrong.
If anything served zero purpose, it was the first post in this thread.
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Context is always lacking.
The guy is boxed and it serves zero purpose to bash Beets for this thread, especially someone with a massive history of repeated issues given several extra chances to enjoy the site.
Wrong.
If anything served zero purpose, it was the first post in this thread.
The guy is boxed and it serves zero purpose to bash Beets for this thread, especially someone with a massive history of repeated issues given several extra chances to enjoy the site.
GG is on here only to bash losing picks(boxed or not). When is enough, enough. The manifesto is antiquated. Continual bumping of losing plays deserves harsher punishment. Someone should step up to the plate. Mendoza keeps flying out.
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Context is always lacking.
The guy is boxed and it serves zero purpose to bash Beets for this thread, especially someone with a massive history of repeated issues given several extra chances to enjoy the site.
GG is on here only to bash losing picks(boxed or not). When is enough, enough. The manifesto is antiquated. Continual bumping of losing plays deserves harsher punishment. Someone should step up to the plate. Mendoza keeps flying out.
GG is on here only to bash losing picks(boxed or not). When is enough, enough. The manifesto is antiquated. Continual bumping of losing plays deserves harsher punishment. Someone should step up to the plate. Mendoza keeps flying out.
Ignore him..simple solution.
I laugh when I hear people remembering the good ole days, hell the bashing that went on in the good old days makes the member in question seem like a moderate.
He is boxed, if you dont want to associate where he is, post in another forum.
How is bashing Beets helping exactly?
Quote Originally Posted by lbcake:
GG is on here only to bash losing picks(boxed or not). When is enough, enough. The manifesto is antiquated. Continual bumping of losing plays deserves harsher punishment. Someone should step up to the plate. Mendoza keeps flying out.
Ignore him..simple solution.
I laugh when I hear people remembering the good ole days, hell the bashing that went on in the good old days makes the member in question seem like a moderate.
He is boxed, if you dont want to associate where he is, post in another forum.
This seems like a classic case where both parties have a decent argument. This is where Id usually attempt to crack a joke.... but Im going to refrain this time in understanding of a moderately serious situation
This seems like a classic case where both parties have a decent argument. This is where Id usually attempt to crack a joke.... but Im going to refrain this time in understanding of a moderately serious situation
What GiGi does on this site … the fact that his sole purpose seems to be to bump any thread which contains a losing pick … is this not a bannable offense?
bigreds daddy
Wall … serious question …
What GiGi does on this site … the fact that his sole purpose seems to be to bump any thread which contains a losing pick … is this not a bannable offense?