If not what i said above phil then that means you are an alias. Im calling you out. You have nothing positive for anyone go away. Im not defending anyone. I just think you are a fake.
0
If not what i said above phil then that means you are an alias. Im calling you out. You have nothing positive for anyone go away. Im not defending anyone. I just think you are a fake.
you all make too much sense. i've wondered many of these same questions myself about some of these people.
some of them are just a bunch of hypocrits. they call gh a drama queen which means nothing because he's admitted it, yet they always try to stir up shit and have a big orgy with each other over something as ridiculous as this. they can't wake up and smell the coffee and realize they haven't proved jack fuckin shit in close to a year. THEY ARE DRAMA QUEENS THEMSELVES.
the bottomline is gamehunter will never be going anywhere and these people need to suck it up and deal with it so he can get out of the box. this was meant to be a good post that worked towards geting gh out of the box but look what the hounds have turned it into.
btw should phil be canned? he's basically admitted he's an alias, likely cap or fish again like i told you he was the other night.
0
counselor coldmap cheddar
you all make too much sense. i've wondered many of these same questions myself about some of these people.
some of them are just a bunch of hypocrits. they call gh a drama queen which means nothing because he's admitted it, yet they always try to stir up shit and have a big orgy with each other over something as ridiculous as this. they can't wake up and smell the coffee and realize they haven't proved jack fuckin shit in close to a year. THEY ARE DRAMA QUEENS THEMSELVES.
the bottomline is gamehunter will never be going anywhere and these people need to suck it up and deal with it so he can get out of the box. this was meant to be a good post that worked towards geting gh out of the box but look what the hounds have turned it into.
btw should phil be canned? he's basically admitted he's an alias, likely cap or fish again like i told you he was the other night.
All this stuff is basic information and can be found if you searched around the internet and looked at the basics of capping, not just baseball. If you want to learn more then there are a lot better people to learn from then gamehunter.
Don't foget his write-ups are just copy and pastes from yahoo and espn. All he does is change a few words.
If you want to tail somebody there are a lot better cappers on here then gamehunter. Ask around, people will tell you the names. If you are willing to learn there are some real good people you can learn from. KOAJ has baseball discussions, Vanzack has some good stuff. He posted something good here in the box last week, and another good one he posted a while back is on the first page in the systems forum.
There is a shitload that gamehunter pretends he knows. Listening to him on some of these subjects is like a kid in elementary school trying to explain physics. All fluff and big words, but no idea. search around the internet for things like value betting, bankroll management, probability betting, the art of bookmaking, etc you will learn a lot more
For starters, I don't need any of the information Gamehunter just posted but there was a point and time when I did.
Yahoo and ESPN? Please show me an article on these sites where they delve into tips on capping baseball.
I've known about guys like Vanzack since I joined the forum two years ago. I am always indebted to their insight. But why kick another guy who is trying to offer advice too?
0
Quote Originally Posted by SecondAgain:
All this stuff is basic information and can be found if you searched around the internet and looked at the basics of capping, not just baseball. If you want to learn more then there are a lot better people to learn from then gamehunter.
Don't foget his write-ups are just copy and pastes from yahoo and espn. All he does is change a few words.
If you want to tail somebody there are a lot better cappers on here then gamehunter. Ask around, people will tell you the names. If you are willing to learn there are some real good people you can learn from. KOAJ has baseball discussions, Vanzack has some good stuff. He posted something good here in the box last week, and another good one he posted a while back is on the first page in the systems forum.
There is a shitload that gamehunter pretends he knows. Listening to him on some of these subjects is like a kid in elementary school trying to explain physics. All fluff and big words, but no idea. search around the internet for things like value betting, bankroll management, probability betting, the art of bookmaking, etc you will learn a lot more
For starters, I don't need any of the information Gamehunter just posted but there was a point and time when I did.
Yahoo and ESPN? Please show me an article on these sites where they delve into tips on capping baseball.
I've known about guys like Vanzack since I joined the forum two years ago. I am always indebted to their insight. But why kick another guy who is trying to offer advice too?
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I don't know; there's a lot of history I am not aware of. All I know is that Gamehunter seemed pretty helpful in baseball last year. I didn't tail him nor do I need to this year. I just don't get why there is so much animosity.
0
Sorry for the misunderstanding. I don't know; there's a lot of history I am not aware of. All I know is that Gamehunter seemed pretty helpful in baseball last year. I didn't tail him nor do I need to this year. I just don't get why there is so much animosity.
Second, the main points of his writeups may be the same as ESPn and crew, but that's the same as any game writeup, it's hard to talk about something else other than the few brief main points of the game.
the main difference between his game writeups, the ones in this thread and the ones you wrote in your thread is that he and you expanded on those points, went indepth and added your own opinions. you continually call his writeups bullshit and tripe for simply expanding and adding his own views to basic points but you just got caught committing the ultimate act of hypocrisy in your thread by doing the exact same thing.
like i said i enjoyed the read and i actually recommend reading SecondAgain's ingame thread to anyone reading this thread who hasn't yet done so. it's just the hypocrisy that makes you look bad. next time try not to rip other peoples insightful posts when you do the exact same thing. i must say i was impressed with your post and i actually don't think you are a complete douchebag unless some of your cronkies and their pathetic attempts to defend you and rip on me. just watch the hypocrisy.
0
Second, the main points of his writeups may be the same as ESPn and crew, but that's the same as any game writeup, it's hard to talk about something else other than the few brief main points of the game.
the main difference between his game writeups, the ones in this thread and the ones you wrote in your thread is that he and you expanded on those points, went indepth and added your own opinions. you continually call his writeups bullshit and tripe for simply expanding and adding his own views to basic points but you just got caught committing the ultimate act of hypocrisy in your thread by doing the exact same thing.
like i said i enjoyed the read and i actually recommend reading SecondAgain's ingame thread to anyone reading this thread who hasn't yet done so. it's just the hypocrisy that makes you look bad. next time try not to rip other peoples insightful posts when you do the exact same thing. i must say i was impressed with your post and i actually don't think you are a complete douchebag unless some of your cronkies and their pathetic attempts to defend you and rip on me. just watch the hypocrisy.
I was referring to his game write-ups when i mentioned ESPN and Yahoo
gamehunter has a history in these parts. ask yourself why mods and ex-mods are laying in the boot also.
I have no problem with people giving advice, I wish there was a lot more of it. But gamehunter is not one who should be giving it
Comments like this make it how clear you guys are here just to cause trouble. Gamehunter was the #1 baseball handicapper on Covers last year. He posted everyday. Thousands of people read his threads daily. His record in baseball was totally accurate. If it wasn't, the countless people reading his threads including me would've stopped reading. The guy won +140 units betting less than 1.5 units a game. If you want to bash him because you don't like him, good for you. But to offer that Gamehunter shouldn't be giving advice on handicapping baseball IS THE STUPIDEST THINGS I'VE READ AT COVERS. The funny thing is if one of your chronies like Vanzack wrote the exact same essay on Baseball Handicapping above, you would be licking his nuts and singing his praises, but because Gamehunter wrote it, you show how stupid you are by saying the guy that posted the best profit in baseball last year on Covers should not be giving advice. Spare us your drama!
0
Quote Originally Posted by SecondAgain:
I was referring to his game write-ups when i mentioned ESPN and Yahoo
gamehunter has a history in these parts. ask yourself why mods and ex-mods are laying in the boot also.
I have no problem with people giving advice, I wish there was a lot more of it. But gamehunter is not one who should be giving it
Comments like this make it how clear you guys are here just to cause trouble. Gamehunter was the #1 baseball handicapper on Covers last year. He posted everyday. Thousands of people read his threads daily. His record in baseball was totally accurate. If it wasn't, the countless people reading his threads including me would've stopped reading. The guy won +140 units betting less than 1.5 units a game. If you want to bash him because you don't like him, good for you. But to offer that Gamehunter shouldn't be giving advice on handicapping baseball IS THE STUPIDEST THINGS I'VE READ AT COVERS. The funny thing is if one of your chronies like Vanzack wrote the exact same essay on Baseball Handicapping above, you would be licking his nuts and singing his praises, but because Gamehunter wrote it, you show how stupid you are by saying the guy that posted the best profit in baseball last year on Covers should not be giving advice. Spare us your drama!
Gamehunter was the #1 baseball handicapper on Covers last year.
This is untrue. Not even close.
He posted everyday.
This is true.
Thousands of people read his threads daily.
Untrue. His threads had thousands of views, but usually less than 100 posts. Active threads do not have a 20/1 ratio. F5 got the name F5 because he loved the F5 key.
His record in baseball was totally accurate.
I never verified his record to be sure. I will give him the benefit of the doubt.
If it wasn't, the countless people reading his threads including me would've stopped reading.
Countless people did stop reading. He was about break even from May to the end of the season.
The guy won +140 units betting less than 1.5 units a game.
I think he finished up like 110. He was up like 90 in mid-May. He finished other sports down about 50. So he won 60 units in 2007 and he was - for 11 months out of the year. He had a sensational April. Super. Not worth all the shit he puts the mods through. Not a reason to have an attitude about everything. He's really not that great of a capper. He had a hot month. We've all had hot months. Not a reason to have an attitude about everything. He got boxed because Helmut and I went in his thread and basically said let's be friends. He wants to dictate who can go into his threads. Then the mods tell him he has to post in the P-Box and be a productive member of society to get out. He goes into hiding and then bitches he's still locked up. Then he accidentally posts with an alias, goofy bastard he is. I don't want him bringing his drama and nut sucklers into the Box anyway. I wish they'd ban or free him. Fuck him.
0
Gamehunter was the #1 baseball handicapper on Covers last year.
This is untrue. Not even close.
He posted everyday.
This is true.
Thousands of people read his threads daily.
Untrue. His threads had thousands of views, but usually less than 100 posts. Active threads do not have a 20/1 ratio. F5 got the name F5 because he loved the F5 key.
His record in baseball was totally accurate.
I never verified his record to be sure. I will give him the benefit of the doubt.
If it wasn't, the countless people reading his threads including me would've stopped reading.
Countless people did stop reading. He was about break even from May to the end of the season.
The guy won +140 units betting less than 1.5 units a game.
I think he finished up like 110. He was up like 90 in mid-May. He finished other sports down about 50. So he won 60 units in 2007 and he was - for 11 months out of the year. He had a sensational April. Super. Not worth all the shit he puts the mods through. Not a reason to have an attitude about everything. He's really not that great of a capper. He had a hot month. We've all had hot months. Not a reason to have an attitude about everything. He got boxed because Helmut and I went in his thread and basically said let's be friends. He wants to dictate who can go into his threads. Then the mods tell him he has to post in the P-Box and be a productive member of society to get out. He goes into hiding and then bitches he's still locked up. Then he accidentally posts with an alias, goofy bastard he is. I don't want him bringing his drama and nut sucklers into the Box anyway. I wish they'd ban or free him. Fuck him.
The funny thing is if one of your chronies like Vanzack wrote the exact same essay on Baseball Handicapping above, you would be licking his nuts and singing his praises
Van's shit is much more technical. I know this because I have trouble understanding anything he's talking about. F5 writes like a children's book. Cat in the Hat. Easy for FE to follow. I won't learn anything, but I won't get lost in the words either.
0
The funny thing is if one of your chronies like Vanzack wrote the exact same essay on Baseball Handicapping above, you would be licking his nuts and singing his praises
Van's shit is much more technical. I know this because I have trouble understanding anything he's talking about. F5 writes like a children's book. Cat in the Hat. Easy for FE to follow. I won't learn anything, but I won't get lost in the words either.
HAHAHA, you guys lose all credibility when you guys say he's a lousy capper. If you want to hate him for whatever reasons you have, that's fine, but at least admit he was a good capper and people might take you guys seriously.
0
HAHAHA, you guys lose all credibility when you guys say he's a lousy capper. If you want to hate him for whatever reasons you have, that's fine, but at least admit he was a good capper and people might take you guys seriously.
You guys just love making stuff up. I read his threads last year. Gamehunter was up +140 units for the season not the 110 you claim. You say he was up 90 units in mid-May when in fact he was up around 30. He had an amazing run in June, July and August where he won like 130 units in three months. The only month he lost in was September when he dropped about 20. Your statement that, "Countless people did stop reading. He was about break even from May to the end of the season," couldn't be further from the truth. His threads got 6000 views a day up to the end in baseball and he won 110 units from May to the end of the season. Your math is only off by 110 units.
Here's another one of your quotes that shows how stupid you are. "His threads had thousands of views, but usually less than 100 posts. Active threads do not have a 20/1 ratio." I looked back at the most viewed thread in CBB yesterday. Stuckey had over 18,500 views and 162 posts. That's a ratio of over 114/1. According to you, active threads do not have ratios of over 20/1. To reach a 20/1 ratio, Stuckey's thread would need another 800 posts. So does that mean Stuckey was hitting the F5 key thousands of times or do you just type stupid shit without thinking?
I said Gamehunter was the #1 BASEBALL handicapper at Covers. A majority of normal people in the baseball forum would agree with that. You bring up other sports. What does that have to do with my statement? Meanwhile, he won in CFB and CBB and lost in the NFL and NBA. So he wasn't good in two other sports. Should we attack everyone at Covers who loses in a sport. If so 95% of the posters should be attacked.
When you say you went into his threads to be his friends sounds like you are in kindergarten. You guys have called him every name in the book and attacked him for everything. Yet you want people to believe you were trying to be his friend when everyone can clearly see the sarcasm. Give us a break. Covers has a rule about aliases and I believe you get banned if you are using them. If your theories are true, then why is Gamehunter not banned? The guy does a lot more for this site than you that's for sure. Maybe Gamehunter made things work by fighting back after you guys provoked him but the baseball forum is a lot better with him in it. Move on already.
0
Football Expert,
You guys just love making stuff up. I read his threads last year. Gamehunter was up +140 units for the season not the 110 you claim. You say he was up 90 units in mid-May when in fact he was up around 30. He had an amazing run in June, July and August where he won like 130 units in three months. The only month he lost in was September when he dropped about 20. Your statement that, "Countless people did stop reading. He was about break even from May to the end of the season," couldn't be further from the truth. His threads got 6000 views a day up to the end in baseball and he won 110 units from May to the end of the season. Your math is only off by 110 units.
Here's another one of your quotes that shows how stupid you are. "His threads had thousands of views, but usually less than 100 posts. Active threads do not have a 20/1 ratio." I looked back at the most viewed thread in CBB yesterday. Stuckey had over 18,500 views and 162 posts. That's a ratio of over 114/1. According to you, active threads do not have ratios of over 20/1. To reach a 20/1 ratio, Stuckey's thread would need another 800 posts. So does that mean Stuckey was hitting the F5 key thousands of times or do you just type stupid shit without thinking?
I said Gamehunter was the #1 BASEBALL handicapper at Covers. A majority of normal people in the baseball forum would agree with that. You bring up other sports. What does that have to do with my statement? Meanwhile, he won in CFB and CBB and lost in the NFL and NBA. So he wasn't good in two other sports. Should we attack everyone at Covers who loses in a sport. If so 95% of the posters should be attacked.
When you say you went into his threads to be his friends sounds like you are in kindergarten. You guys have called him every name in the book and attacked him for everything. Yet you want people to believe you were trying to be his friend when everyone can clearly see the sarcasm. Give us a break. Covers has a rule about aliases and I believe you get banned if you are using them. If your theories are true, then why is Gamehunter not banned? The guy does a lot more for this site than you that's for sure. Maybe Gamehunter made things work by fighting back after you guys provoked him but the baseball forum is a lot better with him in it. Move on already.
GH ma men :) He is above you. I got several mails from him. In one of
them was exactly this what there was he wrote in this subject
I laugh from people which they write after 30 replies daily here like Football_Expert or Weezy, this is deplorable.
I now only wait when you will write that I am alias.
Weezy, Football Expert and rest deplorable ass-holes go away from the computer.
GameHunter
0
GH ma men :) He is above you. I got several mails from him. In one of
them was exactly this what there was he wrote in this subject
I laugh from people which they write after 30 replies daily here like Football_Expert or Weezy, this is deplorable.
I now only wait when you will write that I am alias.
Weezy, Football Expert and rest deplorable ass-holes go away from the computer.
How pathetic is it that in this one thread, you have already made 50 posts bashing Gamehunter, Andarmac, me and anyone who supports Gamehunter. If you make 65 more posts in this thread soon FE, this thread will get under the 20/1 ratio of views to posts that you say is the norm at Covers according to your research. I'm still interested in your explanation of how Stuckey's thread Friday has a 114/1 ratio of views to posts but you state that active threads have a ratio of less than 20/1 at Covers. I guess your stupidity just proves the point that anything you type has no real value or support. Keep up the great work. You are pathetic.
0
Football Expert-
How pathetic is it that in this one thread, you have already made 50 posts bashing Gamehunter, Andarmac, me and anyone who supports Gamehunter. If you make 65 more posts in this thread soon FE, this thread will get under the 20/1 ratio of views to posts that you say is the norm at Covers according to your research. I'm still interested in your explanation of how Stuckey's thread Friday has a 114/1 ratio of views to posts but you state that active threads have a ratio of less than 20/1 at Covers. I guess your stupidity just proves the point that anything you type has no real value or support. Keep up the great work. You are pathetic.
counselor
. 
Established in 1995,
Im calling you out. You have nothing positive for anyone go away. Im not defending anyone. I just think you are a fake.
TrojanMan 
Hot Forum Topics
