Round One was another clunker. Round Two is not offering much in the way of options on the Split so far, but we have seen lines move 10-15 cents, so maybe by puck drop...
If Jets win tonight, Dallas likely greater than +120 but Robertson still a ? so we'll see...
People who can afford to gamble don't need money, and those who need money can't afford to
0
Round One was another clunker. Round Two is not offering much in the way of options on the Split so far, but we have seen lines move 10-15 cents, so maybe by puck drop...
If Jets win tonight, Dallas likely greater than +120 but Robertson still a ? so we'll see...
+120 was the odds Lippsman used. I think he was somewhat arbitrarily setting a +odds number so that 40-45% success guarantees a profit. I can't remember if it was anything more than a number so as to try and still win even if you can't make 50% success. In a series where both teams are so evenly matched (Mild Stars) I will likely play it and hope I grab Game 1 win. If not, then Mild might even become dogs, and Game 2 W clears the Ledger.
People who can afford to gamble don't need money, and those who need money can't afford to
0
@coverit5
+120 was the odds Lippsman used. I think he was somewhat arbitrarily setting a +odds number so that 40-45% success guarantees a profit. I can't remember if it was anything more than a number so as to try and still win even if you can't make 50% success. In a series where both teams are so evenly matched (Mild Stars) I will likely play it and hope I grab Game 1 win. If not, then Mild might even become dogs, and Game 2 W clears the Ledger.