Thanks for the bump
Looks like STL +156 is a play right now and will definitely be a play. However I'm not sure when we should place it or what type of line movement we can expect.
Looks like STL +156 is a play right now and will definitely be a play. However I'm not sure when we should place it or what type of line movement we can expect.
Ran a model on this that looked at all playoff series. Simple rules - bet the dog in series game 1. Bet the dog in series game 2 if they lost the first game.
Overall very positive numbers but has had down years, though the last one was followed by several nice up years.
Great work - looking forward to the upcoming playoffs
Record: 184-237 43.7%
Units: +22.2
ROI: 5.3%
2023: 8-11 -1.29u -6.8% ROI
2022: 11-6 +10.25u 59.7% ROI
2021: 10-14 +1.35u 5.6% ROI
2020: 10-12 +3.25u 14.8% ROI
2019: 20-19 +6.6u 16.9% ROI
2018: 12-12 +4.22u 17.6% ROI
2017: 10-14 -0.02u 0% ROI
2016: 10-8 +6.20u 34.4% ROI
Ran a model on this that looked at all playoff series. Simple rules - bet the dog in series game 1. Bet the dog in series game 2 if they lost the first game.
Overall very positive numbers but has had down years, though the last one was followed by several nice up years.
Great work - looking forward to the upcoming playoffs
Record: 184-237 43.7%
Units: +22.2
ROI: 5.3%
2023: 8-11 -1.29u -6.8% ROI
2022: 11-6 +10.25u 59.7% ROI
2021: 10-14 +1.35u 5.6% ROI
2020: 10-12 +3.25u 14.8% ROI
2019: 20-19 +6.6u 16.9% ROI
2018: 12-12 +4.22u 17.6% ROI
2017: 10-14 -0.02u 0% ROI
2016: 10-8 +6.20u 34.4% ROI
playoffs = 1 and ((series game = 1 and D) or (series game = 2 and p:L and D))
SDQL
did not do the 120 or better but that's an easy modification to
playoffs = 1 and ((series game = 1 and line >= 120) or (series game = 2 and p:L and p:line >= 120 and line >= 120))
which went 128-196 (39.5%) +0.88u 0.3% ROI
playoffs = 1 and ((series game = 1 and D) or (series game = 2 and p:L and D))
SDQL
did not do the 120 or better but that's an easy modification to
playoffs = 1 and ((series game = 1 and line >= 120) or (series game = 2 and p:L and p:line >= 120 and line >= 120))
which went 128-196 (39.5%) +0.88u 0.3% ROI
@emoltzan
As long as their is high confidence that the top line injury rule is not invoked, I think Lipps advice was to play the best line you can get. The system relied only upon taking the dog Game 1 with no injuries top 3, and ignored everything else.
@MrECapps
Lippsman's system I believe only applied to first two playoff rounds if I recall correctly - not sure if you can modify your query of your database. Very interesting data you've provided - thanks.
@emoltzan
As long as their is high confidence that the top line injury rule is not invoked, I think Lipps advice was to play the best line you can get. The system relied only upon taking the dog Game 1 with no injuries top 3, and ignored everything else.
@MrECapps
Lippsman's system I believe only applied to first two playoff rounds if I recall correctly - not sure if you can modify your query of your database. Very interesting data you've provided - thanks.
@dyamarik
So do we take STL now? I have +160 available
Pinnacle $1250 limits and 2.9% hold currently
+154/-175
Or did he typically wait till day of
Need an NHL line movement expert to weigh in (weeb)
Looks like they opened around +145 so WPG must've taken some steam
@dyamarik
So do we take STL now? I have +160 available
Pinnacle $1250 limits and 2.9% hold currently
+154/-175
Or did he typically wait till day of
Need an NHL line movement expert to weigh in (weeb)
Looks like they opened around +145 so WPG must've taken some steam
RIP Lippsman ?? Great to see this post bumped and remembered here on the hockey forum as well as his Avatar
You're dearly missed here brother and you will never be forgotten our King of the NHL
Mr Lippsman
RIP Lippsman ?? Great to see this post bumped and remembered here on the hockey forum as well as his Avatar
You're dearly missed here brother and you will never be forgotten our King of the NHL
Mr Lippsman
@dyamarik
Will look into the first two series only numbers later today if possible. Also note that the way I tested it, a team could have been a slight fav in game 1, lost that game, then come back as a dog in game 2 and for my test, that would be a play on. Not sure if Lippsman would have been on those.
@dyamarik
Will look into the first two series only numbers later today if possible. Also note that the way I tested it, a team could have been a slight fav in game 1, lost that game, then come back as a dog in game 2 and for my test, that would be a play on. Not sure if Lippsman would have been on those.
Didn't have data on which playoff round but managed a rough estimate by adding that the team's game 9 games ago was NOT a playoff game.
playoffs = 1 and ((series game = 1 and line >= 120) or (series game = 2 and p:L and p:line >= 120 and line >= 120)) and ppppppppp:playoffs = 0
110-153 (41.8%) +16.91u +6.4% ROI
Didn't have data on which playoff round but managed a rough estimate by adding that the team's game 9 games ago was NOT a playoff game.
playoffs = 1 and ((series game = 1 and line >= 120) or (series game = 2 and p:L and p:line >= 120 and line >= 120)) and ppppppppp:playoffs = 0
110-153 (41.8%) +16.91u +6.4% ROI
@emoltzan
Lipps System only had 4 req'ts:
1. bet dog in game 1 if rules 3 & 4 below apply
2. bet dog again in game 2 if dog lost Game 1 and still meets rule 3 & 4
3. dogs have to be +120 or more
4. the no injury to top Fwd Line rule
In his system, waiting for better odds would likely be encouraged, b/c the fundamental angle is to bet +120 or higher to reduce the win % needed to make a profit.
At +120 or better, your implied odds win % is 45.5%, so if you win 46% or more of your bets, you guarantee a profit (assuming that every game was exactly at +120 odds). If you throw in higher odds, that drives down the win % needed to make a profit.
I already took STL at +160, as I think the market has stabilized in the +155 to +160 range. If I find something better, and that book allows me to cancel the +160 wager, that is what I will do, and grab the better line. Not a lot of books do that without a penalty.
@emoltzan
Lipps System only had 4 req'ts:
1. bet dog in game 1 if rules 3 & 4 below apply
2. bet dog again in game 2 if dog lost Game 1 and still meets rule 3 & 4
3. dogs have to be +120 or more
4. the no injury to top Fwd Line rule
In his system, waiting for better odds would likely be encouraged, b/c the fundamental angle is to bet +120 or higher to reduce the win % needed to make a profit.
At +120 or better, your implied odds win % is 45.5%, so if you win 46% or more of your bets, you guarantee a profit (assuming that every game was exactly at +120 odds). If you throw in higher odds, that drives down the win % needed to make a profit.
I already took STL at +160, as I think the market has stabilized in the +155 to +160 range. If I find something better, and that book allows me to cancel the +160 wager, that is what I will do, and grab the better line. Not a lot of books do that without a penalty.
@dyamarik
Right I'm we'll aware of odds and implied probability for break-even etc. I was more curious if we expect it to move a certain way, but that of course is a skill that's not dialed or one would always beat the closing line lol. But anyway yeah, I had 160 available yesterday but I think 157 now. I was also more so curious how early Lipp would be these typically.
@dyamarik
Right I'm we'll aware of odds and implied probability for break-even etc. I was more curious if we expect it to move a certain way, but that of course is a skill that's not dialed or one would always beat the closing line lol. But anyway yeah, I had 160 available yesterday but I think 157 now. I was also more so curious how early Lipp would be these typically.
That would work as well! I don't imagine they'll move much further.
Currently I have:
STL +170
DAL +122
Just need 1!
That would work as well! I don't imagine they'll move much further.
Currently I have:
STL +170
DAL +122
Just need 1!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.