Here are my initial plays. Looking at a couple others (primarily team totals which haven’t posted yet at my book). I will post additional plays on this thread.
Hofstra +13.5 (-115) 1.15 Units
Hofstra has an efficient offense (89/365) and excellent guard play. Bama Defense is 362/365 in turnovers forced. Hofstra is 29/365 in 3 PT %, against a Bama D ranked 156/365 in 3 PT Defense. Hofstra guards will perform well here and keep this one close. Hofstra also rebounds well on offense (51/365) vs a Bama D ranked 293/365 on the glass. Alabama Offense is elite, but don’t sleep on Hofstra D - ranked 10/365 in effective FG %. A small ML play on Hofstra may also be warranted.
High Point +12.5 (-110) 1.1 units
High Point has won 14 straight (nations longest win streak). They take great care of the ball (5/365 in Turnover %). Wisconsin D is 323/365 in turnovers forced. High Point will get looks (48/365) in Effective FG %. Wisconsin D is 179/365 in Defensive Effective FG %. Wisconsin has been great from deep, and High Point 3 Pt defense is strong, ranked 64/365. High Point’s lack of turnovers and perimeter defense will keep the Badgers from running away with this one.
Saint Louis +2.5 (-110) 1.1 Units
STL has been on a “slide” but still holds a 3/365 in Effective FG % and is 2/365 in 3 PT %. STL offensive efficiency is ranked 51/365 vs Georgia D ranked 80/365. Georgia is 336/365 in rebounding. STL Defense is 5/365 in 2 PT %, which is where Georgia typically thrives on offense.
Clemson / Iowa - UNDER 131.5 (-110) 1.1 units
Clemson Adjusted Tempo is 64.2 (333/365) vs Iowa 63.0 (357/365). Both Defenses are top 30 in D1. Iowa offense is ranked 359/365 in Time of Possession vs Clemson D ranked 359/365 in defensive TOP. Both D’s are strong on the glass, and will limit second chance opportunities.
Embrace the Grind
4
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
60-41
+12.65 units
Here are my initial plays. Looking at a couple others (primarily team totals which haven’t posted yet at my book). I will post additional plays on this thread.
Hofstra +13.5 (-115) 1.15 Units
Hofstra has an efficient offense (89/365) and excellent guard play. Bama Defense is 362/365 in turnovers forced. Hofstra is 29/365 in 3 PT %, against a Bama D ranked 156/365 in 3 PT Defense. Hofstra guards will perform well here and keep this one close. Hofstra also rebounds well on offense (51/365) vs a Bama D ranked 293/365 on the glass. Alabama Offense is elite, but don’t sleep on Hofstra D - ranked 10/365 in effective FG %. A small ML play on Hofstra may also be warranted.
High Point +12.5 (-110) 1.1 units
High Point has won 14 straight (nations longest win streak). They take great care of the ball (5/365 in Turnover %). Wisconsin D is 323/365 in turnovers forced. High Point will get looks (48/365) in Effective FG %. Wisconsin D is 179/365 in Defensive Effective FG %. Wisconsin has been great from deep, and High Point 3 Pt defense is strong, ranked 64/365. High Point’s lack of turnovers and perimeter defense will keep the Badgers from running away with this one.
Saint Louis +2.5 (-110) 1.1 Units
STL has been on a “slide” but still holds a 3/365 in Effective FG % and is 2/365 in 3 PT %. STL offensive efficiency is ranked 51/365 vs Georgia D ranked 80/365. Georgia is 336/365 in rebounding. STL Defense is 5/365 in 2 PT %, which is where Georgia typically thrives on offense.
Clemson / Iowa - UNDER 131.5 (-110) 1.1 units
Clemson Adjusted Tempo is 64.2 (333/365) vs Iowa 63.0 (357/365). Both Defenses are top 30 in D1. Iowa offense is ranked 359/365 in Time of Possession vs Clemson D ranked 359/365 in defensive TOP. Both D’s are strong on the glass, and will limit second chance opportunities.
NIU Adj Tempo of 62.3 (363/365) vs a Johnnies D ranked 12/365. NIU is 346/365 in offense rebounding and the lack of second chances will be their kryptonite here. The best D NIU has faced this year was UC Irvine and scored 63 in regulation.
Embrace the Grind
0
N Iowa - Team Total - UNDER 60.5 (-110)
NIU Adj Tempo of 62.3 (363/365) vs a Johnnies D ranked 12/365. NIU is 346/365 in offense rebounding and the lack of second chances will be their kryptonite here. The best D NIU has faced this year was UC Irvine and scored 63 in regulation.
1 pause for me, Bama is the biggest wildcard you can find - can put up 100+ without blinking but can also end up in the mid 70's. So bad on defense but very athletic and can really put pressure on you to keep up when they are making their shots.
Don't know if Hofstra has the horses especially down low, but I'll be pulling for you!
Good Fortune in the Tourney!
0
@Floridaman
Love the initial looks you have here FM.
1 pause for me, Bama is the biggest wildcard you can find - can put up 100+ without blinking but can also end up in the mid 70's. So bad on defense but very athletic and can really put pressure on you to keep up when they are making their shots.
Don't know if Hofstra has the horses especially down low, but I'll be pulling for you!
Floridaman----I like that Clemson/Iowa U131 as well, but I think I'm gonna wait and see the 1st H line.....should be 61ish.....hard to see these teams getting to 30 each with jitters and both on neutral court.....should be a close game which always brings the possibility of fouling/free throws or OT.....
Looking at STL/UGA.....Billikens play sound ball like you pointed out, so I dont think they wanna get in a streetball game.....total at 170.5 seems pretty high as has both teams in the 80s....thats gonna require a pretty high fg% from both squads
Great stuff sir
0
Floridaman----I like that Clemson/Iowa U131 as well, but I think I'm gonna wait and see the 1st H line.....should be 61ish.....hard to see these teams getting to 30 each with jitters and both on neutral court.....should be a close game which always brings the possibility of fouling/free throws or OT.....
Looking at STL/UGA.....Billikens play sound ball like you pointed out, so I dont think they wanna get in a streetball game.....total at 170.5 seems pretty high as has both teams in the 80s....thats gonna require a pretty high fg% from both squads
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.