• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 1
      NFL Week 1
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Odds
      • Anytime TD Picks
      • Anytime Touchdown Grades
      • NFL ATS Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    Vegas had its worst week of the year last week. That's good for the right dog this week.

    «First Previous 123
    fadeORdie
    suuma
    scalabrine
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 6657
    Posts: 56
    «First Previous 123
     
    fadeORdie
    fadeORdie
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 3812
    Posted: Dec. 28, 2015 - 5:54 AM ET #51

    You are wrong suuma.
    Bookies do NOT want 50/50 action on all games.
    We are talking about a trillion dollar world-wide industry here. You really think they are content with raking in a few hundred thousand per game?

    Things are very different to how it was even a decade ago. With the advent of online betting and worldwide web of information Vegas has adapted to the betting strategies of the so called "sharps" and "squares". We know nothing about Vegas yet they know everything there is to know about us.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    You are wrong suuma.
    Bookies do NOT want 50/50 action on all games.
    We are talking about a trillion dollar world-wide industry here. You really think they are content with raking in a few hundred thousand per game?

    Things are very different to how it was even a decade ago. With the advent of online betting and worldwide web of information Vegas has adapted to the betting strategies of the so called "sharps" and "squares". We know nothing about Vegas yet they know everything there is to know about us.
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Dec. 28, 2015 - 6:20 AM ET #52

    Quote Originally Posted by fadeORdie:

    You are wrong suuma.
    Bookies do NOT want 50/50 action on all games.
    We are talking about a trillion dollar world-wide industry here. You really think they are content with raking in a few hundred thousand per game?

    Things are very different to how it was even a decade ago. With the advent of online betting and worldwide web of information Vegas has adapted to the betting strategies of the so called "sharps" and "squares". We know nothing about Vegas yet they know everything there is to know about us.


    No, you are wrong.

    Then tell me why all the offshores who take 1000 times more action than casinos in Vegas move their lines a hundred times back and forth on Sundays especially the closer you get to kickoff?! Why would they do that if they take a side? You cannot give me any reasons for that.

    Here are a couple examples from this week.

    1) The Vikes opened at -6.5 favs over the Giants at Pinnacle. The public had in mind that the Giants almost beat the unbeaten Panthers so the Giants got bet down to +6 and +5 due to early public money. As the week went on, the Vikes line got more action that's why it moved up to -6 and -6.5 where i stayed the whole Sunday. Prior to kickoff with all the people chasing on the favorite, the line went up to -7.

    Why the line moves when "Vegas" knows the winner would be Vikings by a large margin? According to your logic, oddsmakers would have set this line at Giants +7.5 to get uneven action on the Giants and never push it down to +7 or below 7 because they could just sit back and watch the split getting 80/20 in favor of the Giants. After late action on Vikings on Sunday the would push it to +8 or +8.5 then. But it would never settle at -7/-6.5 if they didn't take 50/50 action.

    2) The Lions opened at -8 favs over the Niners. The line got bet up to Lions -10 by the so called public money (more bets with less money). On Sunday bookies took heavy action on Niners that's why they moved it back to Lions -8.5. If they knew the Lions would win by 15, why would they move the line down to get more money on the Lions?? It was because they wanted EVEN action

    3) Saints opened at -3.5 and the line went to -2 on Sunday EVEN THOUGH Drew Brees was finally cleared to play. Why did the line move below the key number of 3 if "Vegas" knew it would be almost a blowout by the Saints? They moved it below 3 because they got UNEVEN action by Jaguars money and wanted EVEN action to collect their money.

    I cannot wait for your response. But it's likely going to be another hocus-pocus comment without any explanations.




    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by fadeORdie:

    You are wrong suuma.
    Bookies do NOT want 50/50 action on all games.
    We are talking about a trillion dollar world-wide industry here. You really think they are content with raking in a few hundred thousand per game?

    Things are very different to how it was even a decade ago. With the advent of online betting and worldwide web of information Vegas has adapted to the betting strategies of the so called "sharps" and "squares". We know nothing about Vegas yet they know everything there is to know about us.


    No, you are wrong.

    Then tell me why all the offshores who take 1000 times more action than casinos in Vegas move their lines a hundred times back and forth on Sundays especially the closer you get to kickoff?! Why would they do that if they take a side? You cannot give me any reasons for that.

    Here are a couple examples from this week.

    1) The Vikes opened at -6.5 favs over the Giants at Pinnacle. The public had in mind that the Giants almost beat the unbeaten Panthers so the Giants got bet down to +6 and +5 due to early public money. As the week went on, the Vikes line got more action that's why it moved up to -6 and -6.5 where i stayed the whole Sunday. Prior to kickoff with all the people chasing on the favorite, the line went up to -7.

    Why the line moves when "Vegas" knows the winner would be Vikings by a large margin? According to your logic, oddsmakers would have set this line at Giants +7.5 to get uneven action on the Giants and never push it down to +7 or below 7 because they could just sit back and watch the split getting 80/20 in favor of the Giants. After late action on Vikings on Sunday the would push it to +8 or +8.5 then. But it would never settle at -7/-6.5 if they didn't take 50/50 action.

    2) The Lions opened at -8 favs over the Niners. The line got bet up to Lions -10 by the so called public money (more bets with less money). On Sunday bookies took heavy action on Niners that's why they moved it back to Lions -8.5. If they knew the Lions would win by 15, why would they move the line down to get more money on the Lions?? It was because they wanted EVEN action

    3) Saints opened at -3.5 and the line went to -2 on Sunday EVEN THOUGH Drew Brees was finally cleared to play. Why did the line move below the key number of 3 if "Vegas" knew it would be almost a blowout by the Saints? They moved it below 3 because they got UNEVEN action by Jaguars money and wanted EVEN action to collect their money.

    I cannot wait for your response. But it's likely going to be another hocus-pocus comment without any explanations.




     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Dec. 28, 2015 - 8:16 AM ET #53

    Quote Originally Posted by suuma:



    No, you are wrong.

    Then tell me why all the offshores who take 1000 times more action than casinos in Vegas move their lines a hundred times back and forth on Sundays especially the closer you get to kickoff?! Why would they do that if they take a side? You cannot give me any reasons for that.

    Here are a couple examples from this week.

    1) The Vikes opened at -6.5 favs over the Giants at Pinnacle. The public had in mind that the Giants almost beat the unbeaten Panthers so the Giants got bet down to +6 and +5 due to early public money. As the week went on, the Vikes line got more action that's why it moved up to -6 and -6.5 where i stayed the whole Sunday. Prior to kickoff with all the people chasing on the favorite, the line went up to -7.

    Why the line moves when "Vegas" knows the winner would be Vikings by a large margin? According to your logic, oddsmakers would have set this line at Giants +7.5 to get uneven action on the Giants and never push it down to +7 or below 7 because they could just sit back and watch the split getting 80/20 in favor of the Giants. After late action on Vikings on Sunday the would push it to +8 or +8.5 then. But it would never settle at -7/-6.5 if they didn't take 50/50 action.

    2) The Lions opened at -8 favs over the Niners. The line got bet up to Lions -10 by the so called public money (more bets with less money). On Sunday bookies took heavy action on Niners that's why they moved it back to Lions -8.5. If they knew the Lions would win by 15, why would they move the line down to get more money on the Lions?? It was because they wanted EVEN action

    3) Saints opened at -3.5 and the line went to -2 on Sunday EVEN THOUGH Drew Brees was finally cleared to play. Why did the line move below the key number of 3 if "Vegas" knew it would be almost a blowout by the Saints? They moved it below 3 because they got UNEVEN action by Jaguars money and wanted EVEN action to collect their money.

    I cannot wait for your response. But it's likely going to be another hocus-pocus comment without any explanations.





    Wait a minute Suuma, I love ya but you are going down a rabbit hole here.

    Web based betting is a new phenomenon in the gambling world.

    We cannot sit here and say 5Dimes and Pinnacle rule the gambling day when it comes to talking about line movements.

    What about all the casinos on the Vegas strip who do not move their lines? We can observe them and talk about them and how they react with their money and their line movements. They do not have the time, nor the freedom to move lines instantly like 5Dimes does.

    Also, they don't take the betting maxes Vegas does. Their limits are far higher and that may actually warrant a line move.

    If they see huge sharp money battering a line over and over, they will move it.

    Now I want to say this definitively as I have before, a well-known and respected Vegas director of gaming in Bob Scucci has said time and time and time again that he will not come off certain numbers even if he has huge liability on one side. If you call him a liar than why debate further???

    What were his reasons?

    Something many here have said a million times:

    He knows who the sharp bettors are and moves lines with sharp money. He even knows who the sharp runners are.

    Also, he WANTS a certain side (yes, the clichéd sharp side if you can believe it). If he sees one side as legitimate based on sharp money and whoever else he consults with, he will stay on that side even if the money is wildly unbalanced to one side.

    It is that second point that gives US the cappers not in the know what we need as a major clue to take a side where we are not 100% familiar with both sides.

    I have capped a hundred Knicks games and Giants and COMPLETELY ignored consensus or cash flow on a game. IT CAN BE IGNORED if the cap is strong enough.

    If it is not, and with many games it is not since we cannot specialize in all teams over all sports, we can use consensus responsibly (not just checking this site's consensus for 2 seconds but verifying it over many legitimate sources) to pick a side.


    Money can move and shake offshore but that is a different animal and I can pretty much assure you on a grander scale, the online sites do not seek out 50/50 money either on certain games.

    In Vegas I can definitely say without question that BOOKS DO NOT ALWAYS WANT 50/50 action just to attain a vig. That is impossible and it is impossible with the rush of money to even come close at times.

    You have your examples above.





    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by suuma:



    No, you are wrong.

    Then tell me why all the offshores who take 1000 times more action than casinos in Vegas move their lines a hundred times back and forth on Sundays especially the closer you get to kickoff?! Why would they do that if they take a side? You cannot give me any reasons for that.

    Here are a couple examples from this week.

    1) The Vikes opened at -6.5 favs over the Giants at Pinnacle. The public had in mind that the Giants almost beat the unbeaten Panthers so the Giants got bet down to +6 and +5 due to early public money. As the week went on, the Vikes line got more action that's why it moved up to -6 and -6.5 where i stayed the whole Sunday. Prior to kickoff with all the people chasing on the favorite, the line went up to -7.

    Why the line moves when "Vegas" knows the winner would be Vikings by a large margin? According to your logic, oddsmakers would have set this line at Giants +7.5 to get uneven action on the Giants and never push it down to +7 or below 7 because they could just sit back and watch the split getting 80/20 in favor of the Giants. After late action on Vikings on Sunday the would push it to +8 or +8.5 then. But it would never settle at -7/-6.5 if they didn't take 50/50 action.

    2) The Lions opened at -8 favs over the Niners. The line got bet up to Lions -10 by the so called public money (more bets with less money). On Sunday bookies took heavy action on Niners that's why they moved it back to Lions -8.5. If they knew the Lions would win by 15, why would they move the line down to get more money on the Lions?? It was because they wanted EVEN action

    3) Saints opened at -3.5 and the line went to -2 on Sunday EVEN THOUGH Drew Brees was finally cleared to play. Why did the line move below the key number of 3 if "Vegas" knew it would be almost a blowout by the Saints? They moved it below 3 because they got UNEVEN action by Jaguars money and wanted EVEN action to collect their money.

    I cannot wait for your response. But it's likely going to be another hocus-pocus comment without any explanations.





    Wait a minute Suuma, I love ya but you are going down a rabbit hole here.

    Web based betting is a new phenomenon in the gambling world.

    We cannot sit here and say 5Dimes and Pinnacle rule the gambling day when it comes to talking about line movements.

    What about all the casinos on the Vegas strip who do not move their lines? We can observe them and talk about them and how they react with their money and their line movements. They do not have the time, nor the freedom to move lines instantly like 5Dimes does.

    Also, they don't take the betting maxes Vegas does. Their limits are far higher and that may actually warrant a line move.

    If they see huge sharp money battering a line over and over, they will move it.

    Now I want to say this definitively as I have before, a well-known and respected Vegas director of gaming in Bob Scucci has said time and time and time again that he will not come off certain numbers even if he has huge liability on one side. If you call him a liar than why debate further???

    What were his reasons?

    Something many here have said a million times:

    He knows who the sharp bettors are and moves lines with sharp money. He even knows who the sharp runners are.

    Also, he WANTS a certain side (yes, the clichéd sharp side if you can believe it). If he sees one side as legitimate based on sharp money and whoever else he consults with, he will stay on that side even if the money is wildly unbalanced to one side.

    It is that second point that gives US the cappers not in the know what we need as a major clue to take a side where we are not 100% familiar with both sides.

    I have capped a hundred Knicks games and Giants and COMPLETELY ignored consensus or cash flow on a game. IT CAN BE IGNORED if the cap is strong enough.

    If it is not, and with many games it is not since we cannot specialize in all teams over all sports, we can use consensus responsibly (not just checking this site's consensus for 2 seconds but verifying it over many legitimate sources) to pick a side.


    Money can move and shake offshore but that is a different animal and I can pretty much assure you on a grander scale, the online sites do not seek out 50/50 money either on certain games.

    In Vegas I can definitely say without question that BOOKS DO NOT ALWAYS WANT 50/50 action just to attain a vig. That is impossible and it is impossible with the rush of money to even come close at times.

    You have your examples above.





     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Dec. 28, 2015 - 8:25 AM ET #54

    Quote Originally Posted by BetFriends:


    Because Bob Scucci has no reason to lie to casual bettors to make sure they keep coming back to bet games? 'Vegas' doesn't care what side you're on. If too much money is one side, they're not STUCK ON ONE GAME, genius. Their books are balanced over many games, many weeks.

    I think I'll stick to following the guys who DON'T believe this garbage, because their records are better than yours. Respectfully, I suggest people ignore what you have to say about hocus pocus Vegas moves and instead listen only to what you have to say about games.. which is usually spot on. Where you start confusing yourself is when you believe the bullcrap that goes on about lines and consensus charts.

    You are not calling a the Director of Boyd gaming who has done these podcasts for years and confirmed that the books do not want 50/50 action on all games and will not move a line to get it a liar are you?

    You don't believe it's all a ruse do you? That he'd tell the same lie week after week after week for YEARS on an ESPN podcast with millions and millions of listens just to get public money into his establishment? That's a pretty elaborate lie and he better not get tripped up along the way or his job title will have pretty significant smear on it don't you think (if he even has the job after that).

    This is not some Joe Schmo in his basement doing a podcast after he plays World of Warcraft. This is the Director of Boyd gaming.

    If you believe he is a liar, then so be it.

    Again, and I say this definitively, the clichéd consensus tool CAN be used IN your cap of a game. It shouldn't be YOUR ONLY tool. It can also be COMPLETLEY ignored.

    I didn't even look at consensus on SMU vs. Tulane, a game that was never in doubt. Capped it from top to bottom without it.

    But for the many other games we play it can be used. IT IS NOT full-proof but it is not invalid or 'hocus-pocus' either.




    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by BetFriends:


    Because Bob Scucci has no reason to lie to casual bettors to make sure they keep coming back to bet games? 'Vegas' doesn't care what side you're on. If too much money is one side, they're not STUCK ON ONE GAME, genius. Their books are balanced over many games, many weeks.

    I think I'll stick to following the guys who DON'T believe this garbage, because their records are better than yours. Respectfully, I suggest people ignore what you have to say about hocus pocus Vegas moves and instead listen only to what you have to say about games.. which is usually spot on. Where you start confusing yourself is when you believe the bullcrap that goes on about lines and consensus charts.

    You are not calling a the Director of Boyd gaming who has done these podcasts for years and confirmed that the books do not want 50/50 action on all games and will not move a line to get it a liar are you?

    You don't believe it's all a ruse do you? That he'd tell the same lie week after week after week for YEARS on an ESPN podcast with millions and millions of listens just to get public money into his establishment? That's a pretty elaborate lie and he better not get tripped up along the way or his job title will have pretty significant smear on it don't you think (if he even has the job after that).

    This is not some Joe Schmo in his basement doing a podcast after he plays World of Warcraft. This is the Director of Boyd gaming.

    If you believe he is a liar, then so be it.

    Again, and I say this definitively, the clichéd consensus tool CAN be used IN your cap of a game. It shouldn't be YOUR ONLY tool. It can also be COMPLETLEY ignored.

    I didn't even look at consensus on SMU vs. Tulane, a game that was never in doubt. Capped it from top to bottom without it.

    But for the many other games we play it can be used. IT IS NOT full-proof but it is not invalid or 'hocus-pocus' either.




     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Dec. 28, 2015 - 8:27 AM ET #55

    ....CONTINUED From post #53

    Here's mine.

    ATL opened at -7 after getting DESTROYED 38-0 last game. They were DESTROYED by CAR the game before that as well. They were not even competitive in either game.

    Now Vegas says -7 is a good number.

    The public will bet the undefeated Panthers at -7 -8 -9 and even -10.

    An undefeated team vs. one of the biggest underachievers this year.

    The public salivates for this game.

    Do you know how much the line moved? Almost not at all. On some sites it hit -7.5 for an hour and actually spent more time at -6.5! What a surprise!

    Does anyone here actually believe the majority of the public or MORE Falcon money drove that line down???

    The public has their favorites and that doesn't change. They bet the Pats ALL the time. They bet the Steelers. They even have their sucky darlings in the Giants and Eagles.

    The Panther money in that game was of course was confirmed by a director of gaming in Vegas but I know you don't find that as legitimate for some reason even though he has publicly stated such things FOR YEARS.

    Now why would that line stay at -7?

    As the public batters the Panthers, the sharps see value in the +7 and if it goes to +7.5, a key number obviously, the sharps will get in and start putting max bets all over the Falcons.

    So the books WANT liability on the Panthers and they DO NOT WANT balanced action from the sharps hitting the other side. Anyhow, the sharps could never match public money. Squares build the Eiffel Towers and sky high water fountains in Vegas (well they do that at the slots and tables but that's another story).

    The bottom line is that the books WANT uneven action on sides of their preference. Once they want that, we have a MAJOR clue as to what side WE want without EVEN CAPPING THE GAME (the entire point of this post).

    The lines will never be 50/50 and sometimes not even close so the books need a side 'for their lungs' as Chad Millman calls it.

    Of course, you can believe he's a liar, she's a liar, I'm a liar and reading consensus responsibly isn't a good resource and that is your prerogative.

    You are still a first rate capper.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    ....CONTINUED From post #53

    Here's mine.

    ATL opened at -7 after getting DESTROYED 38-0 last game. They were DESTROYED by CAR the game before that as well. They were not even competitive in either game.

    Now Vegas says -7 is a good number.

    The public will bet the undefeated Panthers at -7 -8 -9 and even -10.

    An undefeated team vs. one of the biggest underachievers this year.

    The public salivates for this game.

    Do you know how much the line moved? Almost not at all. On some sites it hit -7.5 for an hour and actually spent more time at -6.5! What a surprise!

    Does anyone here actually believe the majority of the public or MORE Falcon money drove that line down???

    The public has their favorites and that doesn't change. They bet the Pats ALL the time. They bet the Steelers. They even have their sucky darlings in the Giants and Eagles.

    The Panther money in that game was of course was confirmed by a director of gaming in Vegas but I know you don't find that as legitimate for some reason even though he has publicly stated such things FOR YEARS.

    Now why would that line stay at -7?

    As the public batters the Panthers, the sharps see value in the +7 and if it goes to +7.5, a key number obviously, the sharps will get in and start putting max bets all over the Falcons.

    So the books WANT liability on the Panthers and they DO NOT WANT balanced action from the sharps hitting the other side. Anyhow, the sharps could never match public money. Squares build the Eiffel Towers and sky high water fountains in Vegas (well they do that at the slots and tables but that's another story).

    The bottom line is that the books WANT uneven action on sides of their preference. Once they want that, we have a MAJOR clue as to what side WE want without EVEN CAPPING THE GAME (the entire point of this post).

    The lines will never be 50/50 and sometimes not even close so the books need a side 'for their lungs' as Chad Millman calls it.

    Of course, you can believe he's a liar, she's a liar, I'm a liar and reading consensus responsibly isn't a good resource and that is your prerogative.

    You are still a first rate capper.
     
     
    suuma
    suuma
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2010
    Posts: 4455
    Posted: Dec. 28, 2015 - 9:05 AM ET #56

    Scal, I guess we have still some miscommunication here.

    1) I've once read that Bob Scucci said his Boyd Gaming shares about 15% of the money bet in Vegas. I don't say he is necessarily a liar, but why should I care about 15% bet in Vegas by some "sharps" and tourists? I am talking about offshores. And I won't believe that big offshores take sides until I see it black on white.

    2) My intention is that even if some casino managers in Vegas take uneven action, it doesn't have any effect on the outcome of the game like a lot of guys imply with their rigged/fixed stuff. Public perception can tell you how lines move (I've learned it this season, but not necessarily by looking at consensus numbers) and it gives you a lot of value on certain games like "public perception versus reality" but at the end it doesn't matter where the sharps or Joe Publics in the world are on. If you cap the matchup and spot right, you will be fine. The record of true cappers who call public perception "bullsh*t" prove my case.

    Your ATL/CAR examples as well as mine show one thing: In the long run the teams with the better matchups cover their spreads. Sometimes you have to cap the spot and in rare cases you suffer from bad turnover luck (DEN at KC). But in the long run the matchup wins.   It doesn't matter who the public is on.

    Or why are the best 7 ATS teams holding a playoff-ticket at the moment? Panthers, Jets, Broncos, Packers, Cardinals, Vikings and the Bengals are 67% ATS according to this site.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Scal, I guess we have still some miscommunication here.

    1) I've once read that Bob Scucci said his Boyd Gaming shares about 15% of the money bet in Vegas. I don't say he is necessarily a liar, but why should I care about 15% bet in Vegas by some "sharps" and tourists? I am talking about offshores. And I won't believe that big offshores take sides until I see it black on white.

    2) My intention is that even if some casino managers in Vegas take uneven action, it doesn't have any effect on the outcome of the game like a lot of guys imply with their rigged/fixed stuff. Public perception can tell you how lines move (I've learned it this season, but not necessarily by looking at consensus numbers) and it gives you a lot of value on certain games like "public perception versus reality" but at the end it doesn't matter where the sharps or Joe Publics in the world are on. If you cap the matchup and spot right, you will be fine. The record of true cappers who call public perception "bullsh*t" prove my case.

    Your ATL/CAR examples as well as mine show one thing: In the long run the teams with the better matchups cover their spreads. Sometimes you have to cap the spot and in rare cases you suffer from bad turnover luck (DEN at KC). But in the long run the matchup wins.   It doesn't matter who the public is on.

    Or why are the best 7 ATS teams holding a playoff-ticket at the moment? Panthers, Jets, Broncos, Packers, Cardinals, Vikings and the Bengals are 67% ATS according to this site.


    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    «First Previous 123

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 446,705 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 256,190 Covers arrow
    • Saturday 09/12/2026 721 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 232 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 57,602 Covers arrow
    • Anyone Tracking Scoring Drought System? 27,854 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,331 Covers arrow
    • 9/11 Fast Cash Five 🤑🤑?? 7,245 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 18,420 Covers arrow
    • ***Macwesties * Sat. Sept. 12, 2026 * NCAAF * Week #2 * College Football Plays*** 2,802 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.