Can you read? He said waiting for a line MOVE ? Moron
Yes when people are waiting for a LINE MOVE they usually have an idea of what they are looking for the line TO MOVE TO you friggin dickhead. There's no reason for you to friggin chime in with your retard comments when nobody addressed you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bucele:
Can you read? He said waiting for a line MOVE ? Moron
Yes when people are waiting for a LINE MOVE they usually have an idea of what they are looking for the line TO MOVE TO you friggin dickhead. There's no reason for you to friggin chime in with your retard comments when nobody addressed you.
I enjoy your posts. Just wondering as to your thoughts on the Raiders, and why you like them.
The Ravens have a good O-Line (even with the loss of Monroe), and should be able to run all over the Raiders. And with Nate Allen and Woodson likely both out, I don't see how this defense poses a threat to them. Then, on Raven's D-Line, yeah they lost Suggs, which is big; but, they are still solid all around; and especially facing a mediocre offense in the Raiders. I don't see this one being close.
Would love to hear your thoughts.
0
Hey Suuma,
I enjoy your posts. Just wondering as to your thoughts on the Raiders, and why you like them.
The Ravens have a good O-Line (even with the loss of Monroe), and should be able to run all over the Raiders. And with Nate Allen and Woodson likely both out, I don't see how this defense poses a threat to them. Then, on Raven's D-Line, yeah they lost Suggs, which is big; but, they are still solid all around; and especially facing a mediocre offense in the Raiders. I don't see this one being close.
I enjoy your posts. Just wondering as to your thoughts on the Raiders, and why you like them.
The Ravens have a good O-Line (even with the loss of Monroe), and should be able to run all over the Raiders. And with Nate Allen and Woodson likely both out, I don't see how this defense poses a threat to them. Then, on Raven's D-Line, yeah they lost Suggs, which is big; but, they are still solid all around; and especially facing a mediocre offense in the Raiders. I don't see this one being close.
Would love to hear your thoughts.
1. Ravens played a tough and physical game at Mile High at high temperatures. Their bodies were banged up so practicing shouldn't have been possible on Monday. They travelled dircetly to California and stayed at San Jose, so they are on a long trip now while the Raiders stayed at home the whole time after a lazy second half.
2. The Raiders have a decent pass rush now with Aldon Smith and the Ravens' offensive line got whipped. LT Eugene Monroe is a huge loss because his backup James Hurst is flat out terrible. He is an undrafted free agent from 2014 who was also terrible last season and allowed 10 pressures on 31 passing snaps against the Broncos. The Raiders are going to attack him with Mack, Smith and Edwards. Cannot see a clean pocket for Joe Flacco and a WR corps which is thin.
3. With the loss of Suggs, the Ravens are lacking pass rush as they are without three of their four best pass rushers from 2014 against a very decent pass-protecting offensive line from the Raiders. Amari Cooper has shown flashes and I expect a 100-yd game from him when Derek Carr has some time.
4. If the Ravens have a decent lead in the fourth quarter, they will definitely look ahead to the Bengals game and try to rest some starters, especially on front seven. Then you have the chance of a backdoor cover because this Raiders offensive line will give Carr a little field day just like they did at Seattle last season when they came back after being down 7-30 or so for the ATS cover.
Seeing a close game here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jbkizzle:
Hey Suuma,
I enjoy your posts. Just wondering as to your thoughts on the Raiders, and why you like them.
The Ravens have a good O-Line (even with the loss of Monroe), and should be able to run all over the Raiders. And with Nate Allen and Woodson likely both out, I don't see how this defense poses a threat to them. Then, on Raven's D-Line, yeah they lost Suggs, which is big; but, they are still solid all around; and especially facing a mediocre offense in the Raiders. I don't see this one being close.
Would love to hear your thoughts.
1. Ravens played a tough and physical game at Mile High at high temperatures. Their bodies were banged up so practicing shouldn't have been possible on Monday. They travelled dircetly to California and stayed at San Jose, so they are on a long trip now while the Raiders stayed at home the whole time after a lazy second half.
2. The Raiders have a decent pass rush now with Aldon Smith and the Ravens' offensive line got whipped. LT Eugene Monroe is a huge loss because his backup James Hurst is flat out terrible. He is an undrafted free agent from 2014 who was also terrible last season and allowed 10 pressures on 31 passing snaps against the Broncos. The Raiders are going to attack him with Mack, Smith and Edwards. Cannot see a clean pocket for Joe Flacco and a WR corps which is thin.
3. With the loss of Suggs, the Ravens are lacking pass rush as they are without three of their four best pass rushers from 2014 against a very decent pass-protecting offensive line from the Raiders. Amari Cooper has shown flashes and I expect a 100-yd game from him when Derek Carr has some time.
4. If the Ravens have a decent lead in the fourth quarter, they will definitely look ahead to the Bengals game and try to rest some starters, especially on front seven. Then you have the chance of a backdoor cover because this Raiders offensive line will give Carr a little field day just like they did at Seattle last season when they came back after being down 7-30 or so for the ATS cover.
Final Sunday card: Tampa Bay Bucs @ New Orleans Saints Over 47 -108 St. Louis Rams -3 -110 Cincinnati Bengals -3 -108 Miami Dolphins -6 -108 Oakland Raiders +6 -104
Good luck everybody
0
Final Sunday card: Tampa Bay Bucs @ New Orleans Saints Over 47 -108 St. Louis Rams -3 -110 Cincinnati Bengals -3 -108 Miami Dolphins -6 -108 Oakland Raiders +6 -104
Every year you get the raider fan thinking they are gonna cover a 7 point spread ,rarely do they really think they can win but the love usually don't fade to week 4" Ravens still a top 5 team , with a top 5 QB will not be as sloppy as last week ,which even playing like that they beat the Raiders The team stayed out west from the Denver game just To show you how important it is that they win this game and not go down 0.-2, To the Ravens come out fast Take 1 st half -4. And game -7. Suggs out would make a bigger impact if they were in zGB. Not Oakland. Ravens. 31. -17
Rams -3. Can't believe that people bet these lines early especially -3.5 ,anyway this line should be 6 the notion that they will not be up for this game because of last weeks big win ,a Jeff Fisher team no less who is better at every facet of the game than Wash. Is crazy. Rams win 24-16
Chargers can score period. They are a better team slightly than Cincy. I only this like the Buff game is a coin flip. That's why I love the over in Cincy ,I can see a 30-28 game either way. Lean is with the Chargers not to lose a 4th time to them
Buff. Over. There will be some fluke plays some weird Scores that push this over. Buff has a shot to really prove something. Gl to the bills.
0
Every year you get the raider fan thinking they are gonna cover a 7 point spread ,rarely do they really think they can win but the love usually don't fade to week 4" Ravens still a top 5 team , with a top 5 QB will not be as sloppy as last week ,which even playing like that they beat the Raiders The team stayed out west from the Denver game just To show you how important it is that they win this game and not go down 0.-2, To the Ravens come out fast Take 1 st half -4. And game -7. Suggs out would make a bigger impact if they were in zGB. Not Oakland. Ravens. 31. -17
Rams -3. Can't believe that people bet these lines early especially -3.5 ,anyway this line should be 6 the notion that they will not be up for this game because of last weeks big win ,a Jeff Fisher team no less who is better at every facet of the game than Wash. Is crazy. Rams win 24-16
Chargers can score period. They are a better team slightly than Cincy. I only this like the Buff game is a coin flip. That's why I love the over in Cincy ,I can see a 30-28 game either way. Lean is with the Chargers not to lose a 4th time to them
Buff. Over. There will be some fluke plays some weird Scores that push this over. Buff has a shot to really prove something. Gl to the bills.
Summa, please expound on the Bengals play..they have been a bad team as favorites many times at home, especially vs. the Chargers who even won a playoff game there 2 years ago..Dalton can't handle prosperity very well or pass rushes...not that SD's rush is huge but good enough...
0
Summa, please expound on the Bengals play..they have been a bad team as favorites many times at home, especially vs. the Chargers who even won a playoff game there 2 years ago..Dalton can't handle prosperity very well or pass rushes...not that SD's rush is huge but good enough...
Waiting really crushed me... should've known sharps would pound oak this morning. Not sure I can play +5 might have to pass.. could've had 6.5 yesterday... don't think this one is coming back.. getting smoked down to 4.5 some shops
0
Waiting really crushed me... should've known sharps would pound oak this morning. Not sure I can play +5 might have to pass.. could've had 6.5 yesterday... don't think this one is coming back.. getting smoked down to 4.5 some shops
Summa, please expound on the Bengals play..they have been a bad team as favorites many times at home, especially vs. the Chargers who even won a playoff game there 2 years ago..Dalton can't handle prosperity very well or pass rushes...not that SD's rush is huge but good enough...
Hoya, this line says the teams would be equal on a neutral field and that's not true. The Bengals are a better team and later in the season this spread would be in the range of 4-6. The Chargers have weaknesses that play directly into the strengths of Cincy. The Lions could have easily scored 35 points last week as they were easily moving the ball. Three of their drives were killed because Eric Ebron (who had a lot of space) dropped an easy first down and their Tackles didn't pick up obvious blitzes. This Chargers front seven is weak and the Bengals have a top-3 OL in the league. Flowers, Verrett and Weddle are quality players but they don't come to play because of their front seven. If they try to contain AJ Green, Dalton will torch them with throws to Eifert. The Chargers have a very weak right side on OL with Fluker out. C Chris Watt looked horrible last week, Barksdale is one of the worst RTs in the league and Chris Hairston is by no means an upgrade over Fluker. They will struggle to run the ball and will have matchup problems with Geno Atkins who looks like the old one. I can easily see Rivers throw another two picks today under pressure.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:
Summa, please expound on the Bengals play..they have been a bad team as favorites many times at home, especially vs. the Chargers who even won a playoff game there 2 years ago..Dalton can't handle prosperity very well or pass rushes...not that SD's rush is huge but good enough...
Hoya, this line says the teams would be equal on a neutral field and that's not true. The Bengals are a better team and later in the season this spread would be in the range of 4-6. The Chargers have weaknesses that play directly into the strengths of Cincy. The Lions could have easily scored 35 points last week as they were easily moving the ball. Three of their drives were killed because Eric Ebron (who had a lot of space) dropped an easy first down and their Tackles didn't pick up obvious blitzes. This Chargers front seven is weak and the Bengals have a top-3 OL in the league. Flowers, Verrett and Weddle are quality players but they don't come to play because of their front seven. If they try to contain AJ Green, Dalton will torch them with throws to Eifert. The Chargers have a very weak right side on OL with Fluker out. C Chris Watt looked horrible last week, Barksdale is one of the worst RTs in the league and Chris Hairston is by no means an upgrade over Fluker. They will struggle to run the ball and will have matchup problems with Geno Atkins who looks like the old one. I can easily see Rivers throw another two picks today under pressure.
I love the front line break downs... football games are won at the line of scrimmage! This gets overlooked to often and is one of reasons i enjoy reading your posts.. I never saw someone breakdown O lines so accurately.. Good work
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Hoya, this line says the teams would be equal on a neutral field and that's not true. The Bengals are a better team and later in the season this spread would be in the range of 4-6. The Chargers have weaknesses that play directly into the strengths of Cincy. The Lions could have easily scored 35 points last week as they were easily moving the ball. Three of their drives were killed because Eric Ebron (who had a lot of space) dropped an easy first down and their Tackles didn't pick up obvious blitzes. This Chargers front seven is weak and the Bengals have a top-3 OL in the league. Flowers, Verrett and Weddle are quality players but they don't come to play because of their front seven. If they try to contain AJ Green, Dalton will torch them with throws to Eifert. The Chargers have a very weak right side on OL with Fluker out. C Chris Watt looked horrible last week, Barksdale is one of the worst RTs in the league and Chris Hairston is by no means an upgrade over Fluker. They will struggle to run the ball and will have matchup problems with Geno Atkins who looks like the old one. I can easily see Rivers throw another two picks today under pressure.
0
I love the front line break downs... football games are won at the line of scrimmage! This gets overlooked to often and is one of reasons i enjoy reading your posts.. I never saw someone breakdown O lines so accurately.. Good work
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Hoya, this line says the teams would be equal on a neutral field and that's not true. The Bengals are a better team and later in the season this spread would be in the range of 4-6. The Chargers have weaknesses that play directly into the strengths of Cincy. The Lions could have easily scored 35 points last week as they were easily moving the ball. Three of their drives were killed because Eric Ebron (who had a lot of space) dropped an easy first down and their Tackles didn't pick up obvious blitzes. This Chargers front seven is weak and the Bengals have a top-3 OL in the league. Flowers, Verrett and Weddle are quality players but they don't come to play because of their front seven. If they try to contain AJ Green, Dalton will torch them with throws to Eifert. The Chargers have a very weak right side on OL with Fluker out. C Chris Watt looked horrible last week, Barksdale is one of the worst RTs in the league and Chris Hairston is by no means an upgrade over Fluker. They will struggle to run the ball and will have matchup problems with Geno Atkins who looks like the old one. I can easily see Rivers throw another two picks today under pressure.
enjoy the trip my man
Hot Forum Topics
