• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Falcons-Packers Picks
      • Survivor Picks
      • Week 3 Odds
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    NFL THURS Bears vs Packers, BAIT/TRAP line of the week here.

    123456 Next Last»
    RazorSharps
    SportsFreak69
    kevone623
    lakerballah08
    Ambition
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 23473
    Posts: 136
    123456 Next Last»
     
    RazorSharps
    RazorSharps
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2011
    Posts: 1158
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2012 - 4:07 PM ET #1

    NFL-X 21-19 (53%) ( +38 units )

    NFL Season 7-6 ( 54%) ( +43.75 units )

    NCAAF 17-11 (61%) ( +117.65 units )


    Gonna start the week off with what my version of a trap/bait line is.  I saw it with the Seahawks this past week and now I see it again.  So I am putting this play in now.  Layed off MNF cuz sometimes you have to take a break,  Wish I didn't cuz i did love the Chargers,  But oh well.  Money management has to come first.


    BEARS +6 MAX UNIT PLAY (15 UNITS)

    The Packers is a big big bait line this week,  and I love the fact that its obvious.  Had this line been -7.5 or greater I would be all over the Packers.  Lines are a huge part of my strategy in capping these games, the rest is all hunch and just knowing your talent, i could give two fucks about trends.  Lines, gut instinct, situations, stats/players/matchups.  Thats really it.  And I know a bait/trap line when i see one.  Most common bettors will be thinking they have a pissed off Packers team at home only -6??  Listen guys,  the Bears are fucking good, and they play very well in games like this.  The Packers defense got chewed up bad by the Niners, and did not have an answer for them.  And of course the offense couldnt amount to anything.  I had Max units/pod on the Packers last week but now that I have seen them play and this line is begging for Packers backers.  Not happening.  I am getting my money back from that loss with this game to start off a solid week.  The Bears may even win this SU but this is a FG game tops



    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.

    NFL-X 21-19 (53%) ( +38 units )

    NFL Season 7-6 ( 54%) ( +43.75 units )

    NCAAF 17-11 (61%) ( +117.65 units )


    Gonna start the week off with what my version of a trap/bait line is.  I saw it with the Seahawks this past week and now I see it again.  So I am putting this play in now.  Layed off MNF cuz sometimes you have to take a break,  Wish I didn't cuz i did love the Chargers,  But oh well.  Money management has to come first.


    BEARS +6 MAX UNIT PLAY (15 UNITS)

    The Packers is a big big bait line this week,  and I love the fact that its obvious.  Had this line been -7.5 or greater I would be all over the Packers.  Lines are a huge part of my strategy in capping these games, the rest is all hunch and just knowing your talent, i could give two fucks about trends.  Lines, gut instinct, situations, stats/players/matchups.  Thats really it.  And I know a bait/trap line when i see one.  Most common bettors will be thinking they have a pissed off Packers team at home only -6??  Listen guys,  the Bears are fucking good, and they play very well in games like this.  The Packers defense got chewed up bad by the Niners, and did not have an answer for them.  And of course the offense couldnt amount to anything.  I had Max units/pod on the Packers last week but now that I have seen them play and this line is begging for Packers backers.  Not happening.  I am getting my money back from that loss with this game to start off a solid week.  The Bears may even win this SU but this is a FG game tops



     
    SportsFreak69
    SportsFreak69
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2008
    Posts: 36843
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2012 - 4:27 PM ET #2

    Best of Luck 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Best of Luck 
     
    kevone623
    kevone623
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2007
    Posts: 529
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2012 - 4:33 PM ET #3

    always appreciate ur input on games but i feel like the line is begging for bears action. bears put the whoopin and win by 20 plus points. packers look like shit against sf defense and their offense looked outta rythm.why not make the line 3.5 or 4. but thats why we gamble to see. gl as always
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    always appreciate ur input on games but i feel like the line is begging for bears action. bears put the whoopin and win by 20 plus points. packers look like shit against sf defense and their offense looked outta rythm.why not make the line 3.5 or 4. but thats why we gamble to see. gl as always
     
    lakerballah08
    lakerballah08
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2010
    Posts: 478
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2012 - 4:37 PM ET #4

    Razor your the man. I was thinking the same; If this was a line greater than a td then I would as well be all over gb and less than 6 is an all out play for Chi, but at 6 makes me gun shy. I agree with you regardless, there is a lot of information in these lines.
    BOL man
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Razor your the man. I was thinking the same; If this was a line greater than a td then I would as well be all over gb and less than 6 is an all out play for Chi, but at 6 makes me gun shy. I agree with you regardless, there is a lot of information in these lines.
    BOL man
     
    Ambition
    Ambition
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2012
    Posts: 100
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2012 - 4:39 PM ET #5

    lk it GL Razor 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    lk it GL Razor 
     
    seminole8
    seminole8
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2006
    Posts: 540
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2012 - 4:44 PM ET #6

    Love the Bears.  BOL.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Love the Bears.  BOL.
     
    chargerfan10
    chargerfan10
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 1291
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2012 - 4:58 PM ET #7

    if thats the way you rationalize.  i think it's just the opposite.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    if thats the way you rationalize.  i think it's just the opposite.
     
    idle_havoc
    idle_havoc
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2011
    Posts: 4517
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2012 - 5:00 PM ET #8

    agree 
    Gotta go pee!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    agree 
     
    RazorSharps
    RazorSharps
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2011
    Posts: 1158
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2012 - 5:02 PM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by kevone623:

    always appreciate ur input on games but i feel like the line is begging for bears action. bears put the whooping and win by 20 plus points. packers look like shit against sf defense and their offense looked outta rhythm.why not make the line 3.5 or 4. but that's why we gamble to see. gl as always



    Kevone,

    Your point would be very valid had the Bears beat up a proven team like say the Patriots or Giants.  The fact they beat up on the Colts is not really surprising.  The line on that game was Bears -10 at most betting cages by the start of the game, so it was expected that the bears would blow them out, and they did.  Try to see it,  the Packers are home coming off an embarrassing home loss and only -6??.....Bro your betting instinct has to be firing here.  Catching the Packers under a measly TD???  that's a steal right??  WRONG
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by kevone623:

    always appreciate ur input on games but i feel like the line is begging for bears action. bears put the whooping and win by 20 plus points. packers look like shit against sf defense and their offense looked outta rhythm.why not make the line 3.5 or 4. but that's why we gamble to see. gl as always



    Kevone,

    Your point would be very valid had the Bears beat up a proven team like say the Patriots or Giants.  The fact they beat up on the Colts is not really surprising.  The line on that game was Bears -10 at most betting cages by the start of the game, so it was expected that the bears would blow them out, and they did.  Try to see it,  the Packers are home coming off an embarrassing home loss and only -6??.....Bro your betting instinct has to be firing here.  Catching the Packers under a measly TD???  that's a steal right??  WRONG
     
    Getty3
    Getty3
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 25178
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2012 - 5:11 PM ET #10

    I agree with you on this one. Chicago may actually have better balanced offensive weapons than GB. The Packers don't have a clue how to run the ball effectively anymore. I think there will be lots of interest in a bounceback situation for GB, but they might be in over their heads with the Bears right now.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I agree with you on this one. Chicago may actually have better balanced offensive weapons than GB. The Packers don't have a clue how to run the ball effectively anymore. I think there will be lots of interest in a bounceback situation for GB, but they might be in over their heads with the Bears right now.
     
    doliver517
    doliver517
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2009
    Posts: 3083
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2012 - 5:15 PM ET #11

    Why not wait and see if you could 6.5 or 7 with your theory?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Why not wait and see if you could 6.5 or 7 with your theory?
     
    metalbill
    metalbill
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2008
    Posts: 3310
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2012 - 5:31 PM ET #12

    packers defence is painful to watch, it's pathetic. and their lack of a running game well... i don't think the bears need to really worry about that much.

    49ers may be a bit better, more complete than the bears right now, time will tell. packers got serious issues and the bears are more than capable of beating them thursday.

    side note, Jennings missed practice (groin)

    probably sit this one out, hate betting against the packers (homer) but i can see many reasons why guys would take the bears +6 even the m.l. bol man
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    packers defence is painful to watch, it's pathetic. and their lack of a running game well... i don't think the bears need to really worry about that much.

    49ers may be a bit better, more complete than the bears right now, time will tell. packers got serious issues and the bears are more than capable of beating them thursday.

    side note, Jennings missed practice (groin)

    probably sit this one out, hate betting against the packers (homer) but i can see many reasons why guys would take the bears +6 even the m.l. bol man
     
    wiseman22
    wiseman22
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2011
    Posts: 6451
    Posted: Sep. 11, 2012 - 5:45 PM ET #13

    Quote Originally Posted by doliver517:

    Why not wait and see if you could 6.5 or 7 with your theory?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by doliver517:

    Why not wait and see if you could 6.5 or 7 with your theory?

     
    RazorSharps
    RazorSharps
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2011
    Posts: 1158
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2012 - 8:44 AM ET #14

    Doliver...

    I am not anticipating the line moving much if at all
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Doliver...

    I am not anticipating the line moving much if at all
     
    JohnnyLonghorn
    JohnnyLonghorn
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2012
    Posts: 997
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2012 - 9:06 AM ET #15

    Good luck man! You got some balls unloadiing your payroll against GB at Lambo I'll give you that!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Good luck man! You got some balls unloadiing your payroll against GB at Lambo I'll give you that!
     
    HookEmHorns22
    HookEmHorns22
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2011
    Posts: 22266
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2012 - 9:09 AM ET #16

    On it...let's cash 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    On it...let's cash 
     
    Sopranoman27
    Sopranoman27
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2008
    Posts: 562
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2012 - 9:15 AM ET #17

    I'm with you on this....Vegas rakes it in on GB backers early this year.  They have a lot of issues right now.  Their defense looked pathetic against the 9ers, they made Alex Smith look like Brady out there and Gore had a pretty good game too.  Defense wins this game and bears obvs have the better one.  If GB wins it will only be by a fg
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I'm with you on this....Vegas rakes it in on GB backers early this year.  They have a lot of issues right now.  Their defense looked pathetic against the 9ers, they made Alex Smith look like Brady out there and Gore had a pretty good game too.  Defense wins this game and bears obvs have the better one.  If GB wins it will only be by a fg
     
    BMWSLSMN
    BMWSLSMN
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 163
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2012 - 9:15 AM ET #18

    Quote Originally Posted by metalbill:

    packers defence is painful to watch, it's pathetic. and their lack of a running game well... i don't think the bears need to really worry about that much.

    49ers may be a bit better, more complete than the bears right now, time will tell. packers got serious issues and the bears are more than capable of beating them thursday.

    side note, Jennings missed practice (groin)

    probably sit this one out, hate betting against the packers (homer) but i can see many reasons why guys would take the bears +6 even the m.l. bol man

    The Bears are nowhere near the team that SF is.  SF has arguably the best DEF in the NFL and Rodgers still put up 22.  Tillman is out for CHI making Rodgers life a heck of a lot easier.

    CHI beat Indy who without Luck would be worse than last years team and with Luck are still a crappy team with a good QB.  CHI travelling on a short week to Lambo after a tough loss.  CHI will only be in this game for the first half.  Then Rodgers takes over and shows why he's considered the best in the league.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by metalbill:

    packers defence is painful to watch, it's pathetic. and their lack of a running game well... i don't think the bears need to really worry about that much.

    49ers may be a bit better, more complete than the bears right now, time will tell. packers got serious issues and the bears are more than capable of beating them thursday.

    side note, Jennings missed practice (groin)

    probably sit this one out, hate betting against the packers (homer) but i can see many reasons why guys would take the bears +6 even the m.l. bol man

    The Bears are nowhere near the team that SF is.  SF has arguably the best DEF in the NFL and Rodgers still put up 22.  Tillman is out for CHI making Rodgers life a heck of a lot easier.

    CHI beat Indy who without Luck would be worse than last years team and with Luck are still a crappy team with a good QB.  CHI travelling on a short week to Lambo after a tough loss.  CHI will only be in this game for the first half.  Then Rodgers takes over and shows why he's considered the best in the league.
     
    Chiefthechief
    Chiefthechief
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 1830
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2012 - 9:52 AM ET #19

    i agree - bears will run all over them and bears d is way better- bears for me
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    i agree - bears will run all over them and bears d is way better- bears for me
     
    CannedGoods
    CannedGoods
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2012
    Posts: 592
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2012 - 9:53 AM ET #20

    Quote Originally Posted by BMWSLSMN:


    The Bears are nowhere near the team that SF is.  SF has arguably the best DEF in the NFL and Rodgers still put up 22.  Tillman is out for CHI making Rodgers life a heck of a lot easier.

    CHI beat Indy who without Luck would be worse than last years team and with Luck are still a crappy team with a good QB.  CHI travelling on a short week to Lambo after a tough loss.  CHI will only be in this game for the first half.  Then Rodgers takes over and shows why he's considered the best in the league.


    This.

    GB by two touchdowns.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by BMWSLSMN:


    The Bears are nowhere near the team that SF is.  SF has arguably the best DEF in the NFL and Rodgers still put up 22.  Tillman is out for CHI making Rodgers life a heck of a lot easier.

    CHI beat Indy who without Luck would be worse than last years team and with Luck are still a crappy team with a good QB.  CHI travelling on a short week to Lambo after a tough loss.  CHI will only be in this game for the first half.  Then Rodgers takes over and shows why he's considered the best in the league.


    This.

    GB by two touchdowns.
     
    thawv
    thawv
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2003
    Posts: 3476
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2012 - 9:57 AM ET #21

    Quote Originally Posted by BMWSLSMN:


    The Bears are nowhere near the team that SF is.  SF has arguably the best DEF in the NFL and Rodgers still put up 22.  Tillman is out for CHI making Rodgers life a heck of a lot easier.

    CHI beat Indy who without Luck would be worse than last years team and with Luck are still a crappy team with a good QB.  CHI travelling on a short week to Lambo after a tough loss.  CHI will only be in this game for the first half.  Then Rodgers takes over and shows why he's considered the best in the league.


    No he didn't.  Cobb ran one back.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by BMWSLSMN:


    The Bears are nowhere near the team that SF is.  SF has arguably the best DEF in the NFL and Rodgers still put up 22.  Tillman is out for CHI making Rodgers life a heck of a lot easier.

    CHI beat Indy who without Luck would be worse than last years team and with Luck are still a crappy team with a good QB.  CHI travelling on a short week to Lambo after a tough loss.  CHI will only be in this game for the first half.  Then Rodgers takes over and shows why he's considered the best in the league.


    No he didn't.  Cobb ran one back.
     
    BMWSLSMN
    BMWSLSMN
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 163
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2012 - 10:03 AM ET #22

    Quote Originally Posted by thawv:



    No he didn't.  Cobb ran one back.

    Your absolutely right!!! I was typing faster than I was thinking GB put up 22.  Still believe this is a good spot for GB to beat the Bears.  Freeney was out after the first qrtr making an already crappy Indy def crappier.  CHI looked better than they are.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by thawv:



    No he didn't.  Cobb ran one back.

    Your absolutely right!!! I was typing faster than I was thinking GB put up 22.  Still believe this is a good spot for GB to beat the Bears.  Freeney was out after the first qrtr making an already crappy Indy def crappier.  CHI looked better than they are.
     
    Sopranoman27
    Sopranoman27
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2008
    Posts: 562
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2012 - 10:12 AM ET #23

    Jennings probably won't play- 1 less receiver to worry about.

    Green bay couldn't stop the run for shit, couldn't stop anything actually. 

    Bears are no SF, but still a great defense.  And against a rival, they aren't just going to lay down.  They smell blood and can get GB to start 0-2 would be huge.

    Take them points +6 or buy a pt and get +7, this one will be close.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Jennings probably won't play- 1 less receiver to worry about.

    Green bay couldn't stop the run for shit, couldn't stop anything actually. 

    Bears are no SF, but still a great defense.  And against a rival, they aren't just going to lay down.  They smell blood and can get GB to start 0-2 would be huge.

    Take them points +6 or buy a pt and get +7, this one will be close.
     
    bob696969
    bob696969
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2008
    Posts: 4049
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2012 - 10:50 AM ET #24

    While i dont believe in "reading lines", as that is sujective and could be intepreted either way, the one evident fact is that the packers defense was out of sync, needs time to practice and gel and now they are playing on a short week without practice against a team that can both run and pass the ball effectively.

    The packers offensively cant run the ball right now and the bears pass rushers should hassle rogers all day long

    bears should cover as long as cutler doesnt get too crazy and throw 3+ ints
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    While i dont believe in "reading lines", as that is sujective and could be intepreted either way, the one evident fact is that the packers defense was out of sync, needs time to practice and gel and now they are playing on a short week without practice against a team that can both run and pass the ball effectively.

    The packers offensively cant run the ball right now and the bears pass rushers should hassle rogers all day long

    bears should cover as long as cutler doesnt get too crazy and throw 3+ ints
     
     
    Yanasaur
    Yanasaur
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2011
    Posts: 3054
    Posted: Sep. 12, 2012 - 10:54 AM ET #25

    This line actually seems very tight to me. Packers are at home which is worth 3 points and then Aaron Rodgers and explosive offense equals another field goal. I honestly think this line is set to generate even action. My theory is that Vegas takes a stand on some games and sets trap lines on someand on some they just look for even action. I think most people would agree this game could go either way and it seems Vegas thinks the same with this line. I don't think theyre trying to trick anyone here. Id lean towards taking the points in this type of matchup but im gonna lay off bc it seems tight and i dont see a lot of value on either side.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    This line actually seems very tight to me. Packers are at home which is worth 3 points and then Aaron Rodgers and explosive offense equals another field goal. I honestly think this line is set to generate even action. My theory is that Vegas takes a stand on some games and sets trap lines on someand on some they just look for even action. I think most people would agree this game could go either way and it seems Vegas thinks the same with this line. I don't think theyre trying to trick anyone here. Id lean towards taking the points in this type of matchup but im gonna lay off bc it seems tight and i dont see a lot of value on either side.
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    123456 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,485 Covers arrow
    • Giants vs Rams MNF in-game live 2,481 Covers arrow
    • Monday 09/21/2026 460 Covers arrow
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,168 Covers arrow
    • ***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play*** 4,123 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 99,546 Covers arrow
    • New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams 5,053 Covers arrow
    • Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown 2,563 Covers arrow
    • ?? KBO Plays 🥎 14,771 Covers arrow
    • Monday Night 4,403 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.