DOn't you think both defense can score, and take it over,? that is why I like the over.
good luck on the chargers game
yes i do think so but these 2 offenses in my opinion are not high risktakers. they take what u give them. the skill sets on offense are veteran players that protect the pill. with the addition of tj for baltimore, coupled with the te and boldin i dont see them makin mental istakes. flacco is a gamer, he wont fuck it up. sanchez is a leader now and is respected in the locker room. the defenses speak for themselves. 2 tds and 2 fgs from each team shouldnt be hard to obtain but with the hype surrounding this game i stayed away. so much more i could talk about but i wont. i hate giving reasonings because logically a person can give valid reasoning for over or under. i dont get it when people ask for a reason because both sides of the coin has validity to it. in my opinion u have to watch football and no the schemes.
i was watchin a game yesterday, i forget which one but they had a stat that was really interesting. it was something about how teams play within their division as opposed to their rotating schedules concerning scoring tds. u have to look at all options when capping games. some people just float around and find a few good named cappers from forum to forum and post plays as their own. i found this out the hard way when someone was posting my plays a couple years back as their own at another spot, just by chance someone sent me an email here to tell me about it. i dont give a shit really because i go ito slumps and shit the bed often. but one thing i do know is that very very few people play totals across all sports like i do. i take pride in that because its not the norm.
so yes, i do think they can get to 37 with special teams and short fields but schematically speaking i wouldnt bet on it. with sd/kc i think the 45 comes by mid 3rd qtr.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ricardo_am:
DOn't you think both defense can score, and take it over,? that is why I like the over.
good luck on the chargers game
yes i do think so but these 2 offenses in my opinion are not high risktakers. they take what u give them. the skill sets on offense are veteran players that protect the pill. with the addition of tj for baltimore, coupled with the te and boldin i dont see them makin mental istakes. flacco is a gamer, he wont fuck it up. sanchez is a leader now and is respected in the locker room. the defenses speak for themselves. 2 tds and 2 fgs from each team shouldnt be hard to obtain but with the hype surrounding this game i stayed away. so much more i could talk about but i wont. i hate giving reasonings because logically a person can give valid reasoning for over or under. i dont get it when people ask for a reason because both sides of the coin has validity to it. in my opinion u have to watch football and no the schemes.
i was watchin a game yesterday, i forget which one but they had a stat that was really interesting. it was something about how teams play within their division as opposed to their rotating schedules concerning scoring tds. u have to look at all options when capping games. some people just float around and find a few good named cappers from forum to forum and post plays as their own. i found this out the hard way when someone was posting my plays a couple years back as their own at another spot, just by chance someone sent me an email here to tell me about it. i dont give a shit really because i go ito slumps and shit the bed often. but one thing i do know is that very very few people play totals across all sports like i do. i take pride in that because its not the norm.
so yes, i do think they can get to 37 with special teams and short fields but schematically speaking i wouldnt bet on it. with sd/kc i think the 45 comes by mid 3rd qtr.
thanks for posting the redskins/cowboys total. I usually cant pull the trigger on unders but that game was a joy to watch. The only time I cussed a little was that touchdown at the half. But, it was an easy under ride. I made some significant money on that game.
0
thanks for posting the redskins/cowboys total. I usually cant pull the trigger on unders but that game was a joy to watch. The only time I cussed a little was that touchdown at the half. But, it was an easy under ride. I made some significant money on that game.
thanks for posting the redskins/cowboys total. I usually cant pull the trigger on unders but that game was a joy to watch. The only time I cussed a little was that touchdown at the half. But, it was an easy under ride. I made some significant money on that game.
thnx bruh. glad u cashed in. we win some and we lose some. keep killin ya books.
0
Quote Originally Posted by archdriver:
thanks for posting the redskins/cowboys total. I usually cant pull the trigger on unders but that game was a joy to watch. The only time I cussed a little was that touchdown at the half. But, it was an easy under ride. I made some significant money on that game.
thnx bruh. glad u cashed in. we win some and we lose some. keep killin ya books.
yes i do think so but these 2 offenses in my opinion are not high risktakers. they take what u give them. the skill sets on offense are veteran players that protect the pill. with the addition of tj for baltimore, coupled with the te and boldin i dont see them makin mental istakes. flacco is a gamer, he wont fuck it up. sanchez is a leader now and is respected in the locker room. the defenses speak for themselves. 2 tds and 2 fgs from each team shouldnt be hard to obtain but with the hype surrounding this game i stayed away. so much more i could talk about but i wont. i hate giving reasonings because logically a person can give valid reasoning for over or under. i dont get it when people ask for a reason because both sides of the coin has validity to it. in my opinion u have to watch football and no the schemes.
i was watchin a game yesterday, i forget which one but they had a stat that was really interesting. it was something about how teams play within their division as opposed to their rotating schedules concerning scoring tds. u have to look at all options when capping games. some people just float around and find a few good named cappers from forum to forum and post plays as their own. i found this out the hard way when someone was posting my plays a couple years back as their own at another spot, just by chance someone sent me an email here to tell me about it. i dont give a shit really because i go ito slumps and shit the bed often. but one thing i do know is that very very few people play totals across all sports like i do. i take pride in that because its not the norm.
so yes, i do think they can get to 37 with special teams and short fields but schematically speaking i wouldnt bet on it. with sd/kc i think the 45 comes by mid 3rd qtr.
Very good explanation!
0
Quote Originally Posted by kalind:
yes i do think so but these 2 offenses in my opinion are not high risktakers. they take what u give them. the skill sets on offense are veteran players that protect the pill. with the addition of tj for baltimore, coupled with the te and boldin i dont see them makin mental istakes. flacco is a gamer, he wont fuck it up. sanchez is a leader now and is respected in the locker room. the defenses speak for themselves. 2 tds and 2 fgs from each team shouldnt be hard to obtain but with the hype surrounding this game i stayed away. so much more i could talk about but i wont. i hate giving reasonings because logically a person can give valid reasoning for over or under. i dont get it when people ask for a reason because both sides of the coin has validity to it. in my opinion u have to watch football and no the schemes.
i was watchin a game yesterday, i forget which one but they had a stat that was really interesting. it was something about how teams play within their division as opposed to their rotating schedules concerning scoring tds. u have to look at all options when capping games. some people just float around and find a few good named cappers from forum to forum and post plays as their own. i found this out the hard way when someone was posting my plays a couple years back as their own at another spot, just by chance someone sent me an email here to tell me about it. i dont give a shit really because i go ito slumps and shit the bed often. but one thing i do know is that very very few people play totals across all sports like i do. i take pride in that because its not the norm.
so yes, i do think they can get to 37 with special teams and short fields but schematically speaking i wouldnt bet on it. with sd/kc i think the 45 comes by mid 3rd qtr.
Good Luck Kalind. I looked at this one pretty hard also. Just cant pull the string with the Chargers having only Antonio Gates to throw the ball too. I think this game will feature alot of running with the talented Ryan Matthews.
Good Luck to you.!
0
Good Luck Kalind. I looked at this one pretty hard also. Just cant pull the string with the Chargers having only Antonio Gates to throw the ball too. I think this game will feature alot of running with the talented Ryan Matthews.
yes i do think so but these 2 offenses in my opinion are not high risktakers. they take what u give them. the skill sets on offense are veteran players that protect the pill. with the addition of tj for baltimore, coupled with the te and boldin i dont see them makin mental istakes. flacco is a gamer, he wont fuck it up. sanchez is a leader now and is respected in the locker room. the defenses speak for themselves. 2 tds and 2 fgs from each team shouldnt be hard to obtain but with the hype surrounding this game i stayed away. so much more i could talk about but i wont. i hate giving reasonings because logically a person can give valid reasoning for over or under. i dont get it when people ask for a reason because both sides of the coin has validity to it. in my opinion u have to watch football and no the schemes.
i was watchin a game yesterday, i forget which one but they had a stat that was really interesting. it was something about how teams play within their division as opposed to their rotating schedules concerning scoring tds. u have to look at all options when capping games. some people just float around and find a few good named cappers from forum to forum and post plays as their own. i found this out the hard way when someone was posting my plays a couple years back as their own at another spot, just by chance someone sent me an email here to tell me about it. i dont give a shit really because i go ito slumps and shit the bed often. but one thing i do know is that very very few people play totals across all sports like i do. i take pride in that because its not the norm.
so yes, i do think they can get to 37 with special teams and short fields but schematically speaking i wouldnt bet on it. with sd/kc i think the 45 comes by mid 3rd qtr.
very true, good stuff kalind. I'm wit you 2night!
0
Quote Originally Posted by kalind:
yes i do think so but these 2 offenses in my opinion are not high risktakers. they take what u give them. the skill sets on offense are veteran players that protect the pill. with the addition of tj for baltimore, coupled with the te and boldin i dont see them makin mental istakes. flacco is a gamer, he wont fuck it up. sanchez is a leader now and is respected in the locker room. the defenses speak for themselves. 2 tds and 2 fgs from each team shouldnt be hard to obtain but with the hype surrounding this game i stayed away. so much more i could talk about but i wont. i hate giving reasonings because logically a person can give valid reasoning for over or under. i dont get it when people ask for a reason because both sides of the coin has validity to it. in my opinion u have to watch football and no the schemes.
i was watchin a game yesterday, i forget which one but they had a stat that was really interesting. it was something about how teams play within their division as opposed to their rotating schedules concerning scoring tds. u have to look at all options when capping games. some people just float around and find a few good named cappers from forum to forum and post plays as their own. i found this out the hard way when someone was posting my plays a couple years back as their own at another spot, just by chance someone sent me an email here to tell me about it. i dont give a shit really because i go ito slumps and shit the bed often. but one thing i do know is that very very few people play totals across all sports like i do. i take pride in that because its not the norm.
so yes, i do think they can get to 37 with special teams and short fields but schematically speaking i wouldnt bet on it. with sd/kc i think the 45 comes by mid 3rd qtr.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.