• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 1
      NFL Week 1
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Odds
      • Anytime TD Picks
      • Anytime Touchdown Grades
      • NFL ATS Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

    *** NFL Championship Weekend ***

    123 ... 789 Next Last»
    LeagueCapper
    FSerpico
    tchamps
    NinjaNight
    backdooor_cover
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 30420
    Posts: 202
    123 ... 789 Next Last»
     
    LeagueCapper
    LeagueCapper
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2011
    Posts: 9317
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 9:52 PM ET #1

    New England Patriots @ Kansas City Chiefs

    Let me put this ‘Patriots are a bad road team’ notion to bed because it keeps coming up and it couldn’t be further from the truth. The Pats were 8-0 at home this year, yet just 3-5 on the road. But that 3-5 road record this season was extremely predictable. Several of those road losses were early in the season but all 5 of them took place during a season that the Pats had to endure more changes than any season they’ve had in a while. This team lost their defensive coordinator of 6 years to the Lions prior to the start of the season. They integrated Edelman back into the offense off his torn ACL, while also bringing in a new #1 receiver in Josh Gordon, only to see him leave the team later in the year. Gronkowski was almost traded before the season and then threatened to retire, and has been a no-show in the passing game all season. They brought in Sony Michel to lead the run game. Lots of changes the Pats offense had to go through this year with Edelman, Gordon, and changing the offense to stray away from Gronk. All while promoting a new defensive coordinator to call the plays on defense. This team has had a lot of moving parts for a majority of this season.

    I faded the Pats in Jacksonville, in Detroit, and in Tennessee this season as again those were predictable struggle games for them. This one is not. This Patriots team has gone through more changes and distractions this year than they’ve had to in a long time, and is one of the reasons I faded them on the road throughout the season. As I said earlier though – this will be an entirely re-focused team late in the year and heading into the playoffs.

    ‘The Pats are a different team on the road’ – this statement is nonsense. What was the Patriots road record prior to this season? 14-1 on the road over the past 2 years prior to this season. ‘The Pats have been awful on the road in the postseason over the years’ – again nonsense. The sample size on this is 2 games over the past decade. Two games, the last of which was against the #1 ranked defense in the league that year, in which it came down to a 2 point conversion to win the game.

    I like the Patriots more this game given they are on the road than I would if they were at home. This will be the first time in a long-time in the playoffs that Brady and Belichick are the hunter instead of the hunted. You can already tell what the mantra is in their locker room after Brady came out and said they hear everyone saying they suck and are finished and can’t win games. They are true underdogs this time around in these playoffs, and Brady is 15-6 ATS as an underdog over the past decade, covering those games by an average of 8.43 points. Even better, 3 of those 6 ATS losses were by exactly 1 point, meaning he’s a few plays away from being 18-3 ATS as an underdog over the past decade. And these were mostly games as an underdog facing elite defenses.

    The Chiefs have the worst ranked rush defense in the league, and are the most penalized team in the NFL. While this is the healthiest the Patriots have been in the postseason in years. Good luck. I love this pick, and I’m upgrading them to 5x despite the futures in play.

    1. Pats +3 -105 (5x) 
    2. Rams +3.5 -105 (3x) 
    3. Pats +9.5 / Rams +10.5 -120 (1.5x) 

    Pending:
    1. Patriots AFC +300 (2.5x)
    2. Rams NFC +260 (3x)

    NFL YTD: 115-63 ATS +96.45 Units

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.

    New England Patriots @ Kansas City Chiefs

    Let me put this ‘Patriots are a bad road team’ notion to bed because it keeps coming up and it couldn’t be further from the truth. The Pats were 8-0 at home this year, yet just 3-5 on the road. But that 3-5 road record this season was extremely predictable. Several of those road losses were early in the season but all 5 of them took place during a season that the Pats had to endure more changes than any season they’ve had in a while. This team lost their defensive coordinator of 6 years to the Lions prior to the start of the season. They integrated Edelman back into the offense off his torn ACL, while also bringing in a new #1 receiver in Josh Gordon, only to see him leave the team later in the year. Gronkowski was almost traded before the season and then threatened to retire, and has been a no-show in the passing game all season. They brought in Sony Michel to lead the run game. Lots of changes the Pats offense had to go through this year with Edelman, Gordon, and changing the offense to stray away from Gronk. All while promoting a new defensive coordinator to call the plays on defense. This team has had a lot of moving parts for a majority of this season.

    I faded the Pats in Jacksonville, in Detroit, and in Tennessee this season as again those were predictable struggle games for them. This one is not. This Patriots team has gone through more changes and distractions this year than they’ve had to in a long time, and is one of the reasons I faded them on the road throughout the season. As I said earlier though – this will be an entirely re-focused team late in the year and heading into the playoffs.

    ‘The Pats are a different team on the road’ – this statement is nonsense. What was the Patriots road record prior to this season? 14-1 on the road over the past 2 years prior to this season. ‘The Pats have been awful on the road in the postseason over the years’ – again nonsense. The sample size on this is 2 games over the past decade. Two games, the last of which was against the #1 ranked defense in the league that year, in which it came down to a 2 point conversion to win the game.

    I like the Patriots more this game given they are on the road than I would if they were at home. This will be the first time in a long-time in the playoffs that Brady and Belichick are the hunter instead of the hunted. You can already tell what the mantra is in their locker room after Brady came out and said they hear everyone saying they suck and are finished and can’t win games. They are true underdogs this time around in these playoffs, and Brady is 15-6 ATS as an underdog over the past decade, covering those games by an average of 8.43 points. Even better, 3 of those 6 ATS losses were by exactly 1 point, meaning he’s a few plays away from being 18-3 ATS as an underdog over the past decade. And these were mostly games as an underdog facing elite defenses.

    The Chiefs have the worst ranked rush defense in the league, and are the most penalized team in the NFL. While this is the healthiest the Patriots have been in the postseason in years. Good luck. I love this pick, and I’m upgrading them to 5x despite the futures in play.

    1. Pats +3 -105 (5x) 
    2. Rams +3.5 -105 (3x) 
    3. Pats +9.5 / Rams +10.5 -120 (1.5x) 

    Pending:
    1. Patriots AFC +300 (2.5x)
    2. Rams NFC +260 (3x)

    NFL YTD: 115-63 ATS +96.45 Units

     
    FSerpico
    FSerpico
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2009
    Posts: 1381
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 10:08 PM ET #2

    First sentence revealed your pick. Good luck. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    First sentence revealed your pick. Good luck. 
     
    tchamps
    tchamps
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2018
    Posts: 656
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 10:08 PM ET #3

    Respect you LC but sadly it seems your futures bets will ultimately cloud your vision.  

     

    Pats won't cover and when the Rams make it to the Superbowl, you will probably bet against the Chiefs once again.  Sadly LC you missed tons of spots to bet the Chiefs this season.  Chiefs will win Superbowl.

     

    There have been signs all season long that this year is for the Chiefs. 

     

    Don't care about history/trends, Beli/Brady bla bla bla.  None of that applies in regards to outliers,  The Chiefs this season are an outlier, same as the Broncos in 2013 or Pats in 2007.  Seasons like these are unicorns and only come around every now and then.  

     

    I mean the Chiefs QB will become the league MVP and Superbowl MVP, all in his first season starting.   It will easily be the greatest start to a QBs career ever by far.

     

    Unlike the Pats, the Chiefs are battle tested.  Same as the Chargers were and Broncos were as well.  The Chargers just couldn't overcome the travelling and fatigue.  Not to mention a horribly idiotic defensive game plan against the GOAT.  If any team had a shot at stopping KC it was the Chargers.  That ship has sailed.

     

    BOL but Pats have zero chance of covering.   

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Respect you LC but sadly it seems your futures bets will ultimately cloud your vision.  

     

    Pats won't cover and when the Rams make it to the Superbowl, you will probably bet against the Chiefs once again.  Sadly LC you missed tons of spots to bet the Chiefs this season.  Chiefs will win Superbowl.

     

    There have been signs all season long that this year is for the Chiefs. 

     

    Don't care about history/trends, Beli/Brady bla bla bla.  None of that applies in regards to outliers,  The Chiefs this season are an outlier, same as the Broncos in 2013 or Pats in 2007.  Seasons like these are unicorns and only come around every now and then.  

     

    I mean the Chiefs QB will become the league MVP and Superbowl MVP, all in his first season starting.   It will easily be the greatest start to a QBs career ever by far.

     

    Unlike the Pats, the Chiefs are battle tested.  Same as the Chargers were and Broncos were as well.  The Chargers just couldn't overcome the travelling and fatigue.  Not to mention a horribly idiotic defensive game plan against the GOAT.  If any team had a shot at stopping KC it was the Chargers.  That ship has sailed.

     

    BOL but Pats have zero chance of covering.   

     
    NinjaNight
    NinjaNight
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 5206
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 10:37 PM ET #4

    Have to agree with tchamps on this one 
    On a quest to be the very best
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Have to agree with tchamps on this one 
     
    backdooor_cover
    backdooor_cover
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 7929
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 10:49 PM ET #5

    I 110% agree about the Patriots.  Focused and determined leader with Brady is huge.  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I 110% agree about the Patriots.  Focused and determined leader with Brady is huge.  
     
    Chutzpah
    Chutzpah
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2019
    Posts: 10
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 11:03 PM ET #6

    Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNight:

    Have to agree with tchamps on this one 

    So, the Patriots have ZERO chance of covering based on what exactly...? The "unicorns" he compared the Chiefs to did not even win the super bowl in their respective seasons. The Chiefs are battle tested and the Patriots are not? The Patriots were 4-0 in the regular season against teams that made the playoffs, while the Chiefs were 2-4. Fine if you agree on the side he's taken, but making claims like the Patriots have zero chance of covering and providing no real substantive information brings nothing to the conversation for anyone. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNight:

    Have to agree with tchamps on this one 

    So, the Patriots have ZERO chance of covering based on what exactly...? The "unicorns" he compared the Chiefs to did not even win the super bowl in their respective seasons. The Chiefs are battle tested and the Patriots are not? The Patriots were 4-0 in the regular season against teams that made the playoffs, while the Chiefs were 2-4. Fine if you agree on the side he's taken, but making claims like the Patriots have zero chance of covering and providing no real substantive information brings nothing to the conversation for anyone. 
     
    Trumpinator2020
    Trumpinator2020
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2017
    Posts: 7453
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 11:04 PM ET #7

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
     
    gutinstinctus
    gutinstinctus
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2018
    Posts: 1941
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 11:06 PM ET #8

    Beautiful write up! Makes my lean even stronger, but I know I will find a better spot live. 

    LC, could you give me please a very short summary of why you like the Rams? Please! Ive seen several guys pick them, but have not yet seen a decent argument other than "the Saints are overrated"

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Beautiful write up! Makes my lean even stronger, but I know I will find a better spot live. 

    LC, could you give me please a very short summary of why you like the Rams? Please! Ive seen several guys pick them, but have not yet seen a decent argument other than "the Saints are overrated"

     
    NinjaNight
    NinjaNight
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 5206
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 11:23 PM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by Chutzpah:


    So, the Patriots have ZERO chance of covering based on what exactly...? The "unicorns" he compared the Chiefs to did not even win the super bowl in their respective seasons. The Chiefs are battle tested and the Patriots are not? The Patriots were 4-0 in the regular season against teams that made the playoffs, while the Chiefs were 2-4. Fine if you agree on the side he's taken, but making claims like the Patriots have zero chance of covering and providing no real substantive information brings nothing to the conversation for anyone. 

    I would never say zero chance against the Patriots. I mean I agree with his analysis and I don't think they have a very good chance of covering.
    On a quest to be the very best
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Chutzpah:


    So, the Patriots have ZERO chance of covering based on what exactly...? The "unicorns" he compared the Chiefs to did not even win the super bowl in their respective seasons. The Chiefs are battle tested and the Patriots are not? The Patriots were 4-0 in the regular season against teams that made the playoffs, while the Chiefs were 2-4. Fine if you agree on the side he's taken, but making claims like the Patriots have zero chance of covering and providing no real substantive information brings nothing to the conversation for anyone. 

    I would never say zero chance against the Patriots. I mean I agree with his analysis and I don't think they have a very good chance of covering.
     
    tchamps
    tchamps
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2018
    Posts: 656
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 11:24 PM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by Chutzpah:

    Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNight:

    Have to agree with tchamps on this one 
    So, the Patriots have ZERO chance of covering based on what exactly...? The "unicorns" he compared the Chiefs to did not even win the super bowl in their respective seasons. The Chiefs are battle tested and the Patriots are not? The Patriots were 4-0 in the regular season against teams that made the playoffs, while the Chiefs were 2-4. Fine if you agree on the side he's taken, but making claims like the Patriots have zero chance of covering and providing no real substantive information brings nothing to the conversation for anyone.

    A.  Chiefs have played the toughest schedule of all the playoff teams back before the wildcard started.

    B. Chiefs offense and elite pass rush have never been stopped, not once.  Even in their losses.  Meanwhile, the Pats and every other team in the league has looked like garbage at least once.  (Saints Offense vs Cowboys, Rams offense vs Bears, Pats offense vs Lions, Pats offense vs Titans, Pats offense vs Steelers, Pats defense vs Jaguars)

    C. Mahomes won't have any early game jitters as he had in the last matchup in Foxboro.  That game could have easily been a Chiefs blowout.

     

    So to think the Pats defense in the noisiest and arguably toughest stadiums to play in will stop an offense that has never been stopped once so far or a pass rush that took on the best OL group last week and dominated, well they have zero shot at either of those two feats.

     

    So now you are left with only one scenario that the Pats have of covering this game.  That is, keeping up in a shootout, on the road in the noisest, hostile stadium there is.  Your strength (rushing) will be abandoned when they are down early.   

     

    That whole "we're just going to run the ball and keep Mahomes on the bench....." gameplan was uttered by every single DC every week and it has never worked once single time.  And trust me the Ravens had the perfect personnel to pull it off and they still failed.  Pats have zero chance of playing keep away.  

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Chutzpah:

    Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNight:

    Have to agree with tchamps on this one 
    So, the Patriots have ZERO chance of covering based on what exactly...? The "unicorns" he compared the Chiefs to did not even win the super bowl in their respective seasons. The Chiefs are battle tested and the Patriots are not? The Patriots were 4-0 in the regular season against teams that made the playoffs, while the Chiefs were 2-4. Fine if you agree on the side he's taken, but making claims like the Patriots have zero chance of covering and providing no real substantive information brings nothing to the conversation for anyone.

    A.  Chiefs have played the toughest schedule of all the playoff teams back before the wildcard started.

    B. Chiefs offense and elite pass rush have never been stopped, not once.  Even in their losses.  Meanwhile, the Pats and every other team in the league has looked like garbage at least once.  (Saints Offense vs Cowboys, Rams offense vs Bears, Pats offense vs Lions, Pats offense vs Titans, Pats offense vs Steelers, Pats defense vs Jaguars)

    C. Mahomes won't have any early game jitters as he had in the last matchup in Foxboro.  That game could have easily been a Chiefs blowout.

     

    So to think the Pats defense in the noisiest and arguably toughest stadiums to play in will stop an offense that has never been stopped once so far or a pass rush that took on the best OL group last week and dominated, well they have zero shot at either of those two feats.

     

    So now you are left with only one scenario that the Pats have of covering this game.  That is, keeping up in a shootout, on the road in the noisest, hostile stadium there is.  Your strength (rushing) will be abandoned when they are down early.   

     

    That whole "we're just going to run the ball and keep Mahomes on the bench....." gameplan was uttered by every single DC every week and it has never worked once single time.  And trust me the Ravens had the perfect personnel to pull it off and they still failed.  Pats have zero chance of playing keep away.  

     
    DonkeyPlays
    DonkeyPlays
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2018
    Posts: 274
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 11:31 PM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

    ...
    Pats +3 -105 (5x) Rams +3.5 -105 (3x) Pats +9.5 / Rams +10.5 -120 (1.5x) Pending:Patriots AFC +300 (2.5x)Rams NFC +260 (3x)NFL YTD: 115-63 ATS +96.45 Units


    Feels bad to be on the other side of you on a bet..

    Just going to point out some things that were maybe (but most likely not) overlooked..  I know they won't change your opinion since your bet is locked.

    The Patriots got away with murder in the previous meeting with the Chiefs. There were many key no calls and calls that went in their favor. The Refs WILL throw the flag this time if they hold Kelce on a key play. I can write a book about how biased the calls and no calls were that game. 

    Pats have some pretty ugly Yards per play numbers compared to the rest of the teams left.. but I guess this can be ignored because they obviously defy stats.

    How is Belichick going to take away Hill and Kelce while containing Mahomes.... Yea he is the all time greatest defensive mind, but he can't pull a rabbit out of a hat. The Patriots defensive personnel are simply not talented enough to stop a team like Kansas City. 

    ***Justin Houston is in full form now and healthy, which he wasn't in their previous meeting. This is perhaps my biggest comfort being on the Chiefs side. Brady lost three superbowls to teams with good pass rushers. KC has the most sacks in the NFL. Hit 41 year old Brady hard in the freezing temperatures and you are going to make him hurt very very bad.... He will definitely be off his game if there are some early sacks.

    Berry is also back.. but I think people are overvaluing what he can do. He is out of shape and should not be 100% in form. I wouldn't mind if he didn't even play. 

    Michel and White should cause problems.. but they cannot even come close to winning with them alone. The KC defense will not be as porous as in the previous meeting. 


    All this being said.. I do expect Belichick to empty his entire arsenal of trick plays and exploitations of current NFL rules.. (like he did against the Ravens in their 2015 playoff meeting) This could make a touchdown or more difference in the game.

    Shit. Maybe I should have taken the Pats lol.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

    ...
    Pats +3 -105 (5x) Rams +3.5 -105 (3x) Pats +9.5 / Rams +10.5 -120 (1.5x) Pending:Patriots AFC +300 (2.5x)Rams NFC +260 (3x)NFL YTD: 115-63 ATS +96.45 Units


    Feels bad to be on the other side of you on a bet..

    Just going to point out some things that were maybe (but most likely not) overlooked..  I know they won't change your opinion since your bet is locked.

    The Patriots got away with murder in the previous meeting with the Chiefs. There were many key no calls and calls that went in their favor. The Refs WILL throw the flag this time if they hold Kelce on a key play. I can write a book about how biased the calls and no calls were that game. 

    Pats have some pretty ugly Yards per play numbers compared to the rest of the teams left.. but I guess this can be ignored because they obviously defy stats.

    How is Belichick going to take away Hill and Kelce while containing Mahomes.... Yea he is the all time greatest defensive mind, but he can't pull a rabbit out of a hat. The Patriots defensive personnel are simply not talented enough to stop a team like Kansas City. 

    ***Justin Houston is in full form now and healthy, which he wasn't in their previous meeting. This is perhaps my biggest comfort being on the Chiefs side. Brady lost three superbowls to teams with good pass rushers. KC has the most sacks in the NFL. Hit 41 year old Brady hard in the freezing temperatures and you are going to make him hurt very very bad.... He will definitely be off his game if there are some early sacks.

    Berry is also back.. but I think people are overvaluing what he can do. He is out of shape and should not be 100% in form. I wouldn't mind if he didn't even play. 

    Michel and White should cause problems.. but they cannot even come close to winning with them alone. The KC defense will not be as porous as in the previous meeting. 


    All this being said.. I do expect Belichick to empty his entire arsenal of trick plays and exploitations of current NFL rules.. (like he did against the Ravens in their 2015 playoff meeting) This could make a touchdown or more difference in the game.

    Shit. Maybe I should have taken the Pats lol.

     
    NinjaNight
    NinjaNight
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 5206
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 11:31 PM ET #12

    Don't forget tchamps is the same guy that told everyone last week the Colts have absolutely no chance to cover against the Chiefs. Everything he said turned out to be exactly right, so he knows what he's talking about when it comes to this team.
    On a quest to be the very best
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Don't forget tchamps is the same guy that told everyone last week the Colts have absolutely no chance to cover against the Chiefs. Everything he said turned out to be exactly right, so he knows what he's talking about when it comes to this team.
     
    budwiser
    budwiser
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 17917
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 11:34 PM ET #13

    Great stuff LC and a great season.

    Great reasoning. 

    Devil's advocate Pats are 1-4 ATS on grass.  You look at the games on grass:

    20 points at Jacksonville, gave up 31

    38 at Chicago, gave up 31

    10 at Tennessee, gave up 34

    33 at Dolphins, gave up 34

    10 at Steelers, gave up 17

    Meaning, their general history this year on grass is they are getting killed on defense (other than the Pittsburgh game) not exactly outperforming on offense.  They gave up 31, 34, and 34 to Jacksonville, Tennessee, and the Dolphins, not exactly offensive juggernauts.

    KC has a heated field, and the temperature will be in the 20s.  So we'll get about what the Colts got, and the Colts couldn't move the ball.

    Anyways, just playing devil's advocate, great stuff and thanks.   I haven't put anything or made a decision on the games yet.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Great stuff LC and a great season.

    Great reasoning. 

    Devil's advocate Pats are 1-4 ATS on grass.  You look at the games on grass:

    20 points at Jacksonville, gave up 31

    38 at Chicago, gave up 31

    10 at Tennessee, gave up 34

    33 at Dolphins, gave up 34

    10 at Steelers, gave up 17

    Meaning, their general history this year on grass is they are getting killed on defense (other than the Pittsburgh game) not exactly outperforming on offense.  They gave up 31, 34, and 34 to Jacksonville, Tennessee, and the Dolphins, not exactly offensive juggernauts.

    KC has a heated field, and the temperature will be in the 20s.  So we'll get about what the Colts got, and the Colts couldn't move the ball.

    Anyways, just playing devil's advocate, great stuff and thanks.   I haven't put anything or made a decision on the games yet.

     
    tchamps
    tchamps
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2018
    Posts: 656
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 11:39 PM ET #14

    Quote Originally Posted by DonkeyPlays:

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

    ...Pats +3 -105 (5x) Rams +3.5 -105 (3x) Pats +9.5 / Rams +10.5 -120 (1.5x) Pending:Patriots AFC +300 (2.5x)Rams NFC +260 (3x)NFL YTD: 115-63 ATS +96.45 Units
    Berry is also back.. but I think people are overvaluing what he can do. He is out of shape and should not be 100% in form. I wouldn't mind if he didn't even play. 

     

    Mate, Berry is the QB/DC of that defense.  He is extremely underrated.  The Chiefs secondary is complete ass and their linebackers are mediocre.  Berry is the general on that squad.  Forget his physical talent, he is Peyton Manning on the defense.  Presnap he will make sure everyone is positioned correctly, postsnap he will be on the right side of the rushing attack of the Pats.  He is still a good tackler and understands correct angles to take on guys in space.  

     

    If you want to see a microcosm of the Defense with Berry in and with Berry out. Rewatch the last Chargers game where they were held to 7 in the first half w/ Berry in and then came back down 14 in the 4th w/Berry out.

     

    Bob Sutton is a moron of a DC.  He is lucky he has Chris Jones, Houston and Ford to make up for his crappy playcalling.  With Berry on the back side, Fuller, and Ward, this secondary is instantly better than what the Pats faced last game.

     

    Also, Ron Parker got as a result of LDT being active.  Parker was ass in the secondary.  Addition by subtraction.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by DonkeyPlays:

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

    ...Pats +3 -105 (5x) Rams +3.5 -105 (3x) Pats +9.5 / Rams +10.5 -120 (1.5x) Pending:Patriots AFC +300 (2.5x)Rams NFC +260 (3x)NFL YTD: 115-63 ATS +96.45 Units
    Berry is also back.. but I think people are overvaluing what he can do. He is out of shape and should not be 100% in form. I wouldn't mind if he didn't even play. 

     

    Mate, Berry is the QB/DC of that defense.  He is extremely underrated.  The Chiefs secondary is complete ass and their linebackers are mediocre.  Berry is the general on that squad.  Forget his physical talent, he is Peyton Manning on the defense.  Presnap he will make sure everyone is positioned correctly, postsnap he will be on the right side of the rushing attack of the Pats.  He is still a good tackler and understands correct angles to take on guys in space.  

     

    If you want to see a microcosm of the Defense with Berry in and with Berry out. Rewatch the last Chargers game where they were held to 7 in the first half w/ Berry in and then came back down 14 in the 4th w/Berry out.

     

    Bob Sutton is a moron of a DC.  He is lucky he has Chris Jones, Houston and Ford to make up for his crappy playcalling.  With Berry on the back side, Fuller, and Ward, this secondary is instantly better than what the Pats faced last game.

     

    Also, Ron Parker got as a result of LDT being active.  Parker was ass in the secondary.  Addition by subtraction.

     
    wegstar21
    wegstar21
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2015
    Posts: 647
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 11:42 PM ET #15

    Nice write up... couldn‘t agree more.. I love that kc fans want it so bad that they miss facts.. hunt accounted for 180 plus yards... gone.. and they still lost..yet no chance to cover.. pats have a better run game the real number 1 receiver back...but they have unicorns and Andy Reid... get the fachoutta here in taking them for the str8 up win...

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Nice write up... couldn‘t agree more.. I love that kc fans want it so bad that they miss facts.. hunt accounted for 180 plus yards... gone.. and they still lost..yet no chance to cover.. pats have a better run game the real number 1 receiver back...but they have unicorns and Andy Reid... get the fachoutta here in taking them for the str8 up win...

     
    NinjaNight
    NinjaNight
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 5206
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 11:50 PM ET #16

    I just feel like LC is really underestimating this Chiefs team and completely downplaying the Patriots road issues.

    First of all it's not just this year that they have struggled on the road. This year is a reinforcement of their road issues in history. Historically they're sub .500 on the road in playoff games. Yes there has only been a handful, but it's enough to show real weakness. 

    It's crazy to me to claim that KC would be better off playing in New England. No way, NE is a different beast there. That's where they've done all their winning over the years in these big games. This team is designed to attain homefield advantage throughout the playoffs and make their way to the Superbowl. The fact that they couldn't do that this year also shows weakness.

    Weeks 14 & 15 on the road they have had a lot of time by now to sort out their team issues. What do they do? They lose to Miami and the Steelers, two non-playoff teams. 

    The Chiefs on the other hand haven't shown many signs of weakness. As tchamps said they have been very strong every single game this year even in their losses. Played a very tough schedule. The defense plays much better at home and has the amazing pass rush that's very helpful to defeat Brady. Combine that pass rush with the most potent offense we have seen in years and this is one heck of a beast to defeat in Arrowhead.


    On a quest to be the very best
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I just feel like LC is really underestimating this Chiefs team and completely downplaying the Patriots road issues.

    First of all it's not just this year that they have struggled on the road. This year is a reinforcement of their road issues in history. Historically they're sub .500 on the road in playoff games. Yes there has only been a handful, but it's enough to show real weakness. 

    It's crazy to me to claim that KC would be better off playing in New England. No way, NE is a different beast there. That's where they've done all their winning over the years in these big games. This team is designed to attain homefield advantage throughout the playoffs and make their way to the Superbowl. The fact that they couldn't do that this year also shows weakness.

    Weeks 14 & 15 on the road they have had a lot of time by now to sort out their team issues. What do they do? They lose to Miami and the Steelers, two non-playoff teams. 

    The Chiefs on the other hand haven't shown many signs of weakness. As tchamps said they have been very strong every single game this year even in their losses. Played a very tough schedule. The defense plays much better at home and has the amazing pass rush that's very helpful to defeat Brady. Combine that pass rush with the most potent offense we have seen in years and this is one heck of a beast to defeat in Arrowhead.


     
    DonkeyPlays
    DonkeyPlays
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2018
    Posts: 274
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 11:54 PM ET #17

    Quote Originally Posted by tchamps:

    Quote Originally Posted by DonkeyPlays:

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

    ...Pats +3 -105 (5x) Rams +3.5 -105 (3x) Pats +9.5 / Rams +10.5 -120 (1.5x) Pending:Patriots AFC +300 (2.5x)Rams NFC +260 (3x)NFL YTD: 115-63 ATS +96.45 Units
    Berry is also back.. but I think people are overvaluing what he can do. He is out of shape and should not be 100% in form. I wouldn't mind if he didn't even play. 
      Mate, Berry is the QB/DC of that defense.  He is extremely underrated.  The Chiefs secondary is complete ass and their linebackers are mediocre.  Berry is the general on that squad.  Forget his physical talent, he is Peyton Manning on the defense.  Presnap he will make sure everyone is positioned correctly, postsnap he will be on the right side of the rushing attack of the Pats.  He is still a good tackler and understands correct angles to take on guys in space.     If you want to see a microcosm of the Defense with Berry in and with Berry out. Rewatch the last Chargers game where they were held to 7 in the first half w/ Berry in and then came back down 14 in the 4th w/Berry out.   Bob Sutton is a moron of a DC.  He is lucky he has Chris Jones, Houston and Ford to make up for his crappy playcalling.  With Berry on the back side, Fuller, and Ward, this secondary is instantly better than what the Pats faced last game.   Also, Ron Parker got as a result of LDT being active.  Parker was ass in the secondary.  Addition by subtraction.


    I'll go back and watch. Just off the top of my head.. I seem to remember him getting burned pretty bad on a few plays either against the Chargers or Seattle (I bet KC on both). But yea I guess I didn't factor in the Ray Lewis effect he has on the defense. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by tchamps:

    Quote Originally Posted by DonkeyPlays:

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

    ...Pats +3 -105 (5x) Rams +3.5 -105 (3x) Pats +9.5 / Rams +10.5 -120 (1.5x) Pending:Patriots AFC +300 (2.5x)Rams NFC +260 (3x)NFL YTD: 115-63 ATS +96.45 Units
    Berry is also back.. but I think people are overvaluing what he can do. He is out of shape and should not be 100% in form. I wouldn't mind if he didn't even play. 
      Mate, Berry is the QB/DC of that defense.  He is extremely underrated.  The Chiefs secondary is complete ass and their linebackers are mediocre.  Berry is the general on that squad.  Forget his physical talent, he is Peyton Manning on the defense.  Presnap he will make sure everyone is positioned correctly, postsnap he will be on the right side of the rushing attack of the Pats.  He is still a good tackler and understands correct angles to take on guys in space.     If you want to see a microcosm of the Defense with Berry in and with Berry out. Rewatch the last Chargers game where they were held to 7 in the first half w/ Berry in and then came back down 14 in the 4th w/Berry out.   Bob Sutton is a moron of a DC.  He is lucky he has Chris Jones, Houston and Ford to make up for his crappy playcalling.  With Berry on the back side, Fuller, and Ward, this secondary is instantly better than what the Pats faced last game.   Also, Ron Parker got as a result of LDT being active.  Parker was ass in the secondary.  Addition by subtraction.


    I'll go back and watch. Just off the top of my head.. I seem to remember him getting burned pretty bad on a few plays either against the Chargers or Seattle (I bet KC on both). But yea I guess I didn't factor in the Ray Lewis effect he has on the defense. 

     
    tchamps
    tchamps
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2018
    Posts: 656
    Posted: Jan. 18, 2019 - 11:55 PM ET #18

    Quote Originally Posted by wegstar21:

    Nice write up... couldn‘t agree more.. I love that kc fans want it so bad that they miss facts.. hunt accounted for 180 plus yards... gone.. and they still lost..yet no chance to cover.. pats have a better run game the real number 1 receiver back...but they have unicorns and Andy Reid... get the fachoutta here in taking them for the str8 up win...

    Yup, I'm sure you thought the same last week with the Colts and their superior run game, and number 1 OL.....but but this week will be different......Pats will keep Chiefs offense on the bench by running the ball........an_roll_laugh

    Maybe you didn't catch the last game but Chiefs could have easily blown the Pats out.  They were down 24-9.  They moved the ball up and down the field and settled for FGs because Mahomes was jittery.  That was the biggest game for young Mahomes under the brightest of lights.  

     

    This time it will be pure carnage.  Pat have zero shot here.  Will they lose by 12+?  Probably not because Brady but they won't lose under 7.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by wegstar21:

    Nice write up... couldn‘t agree more.. I love that kc fans want it so bad that they miss facts.. hunt accounted for 180 plus yards... gone.. and they still lost..yet no chance to cover.. pats have a better run game the real number 1 receiver back...but they have unicorns and Andy Reid... get the fachoutta here in taking them for the str8 up win...

    Yup, I'm sure you thought the same last week with the Colts and their superior run game, and number 1 OL.....but but this week will be different......Pats will keep Chiefs offense on the bench by running the ball........an_roll_laugh

    Maybe you didn't catch the last game but Chiefs could have easily blown the Pats out.  They were down 24-9.  They moved the ball up and down the field and settled for FGs because Mahomes was jittery.  That was the biggest game for young Mahomes under the brightest of lights.  

     

    This time it will be pure carnage.  Pat have zero shot here.  Will they lose by 12+?  Probably not because Brady but they won't lose under 7.

     
    tchamps
    tchamps
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2018
    Posts: 656
    Posted: Jan. 19, 2019 - 12:01 AM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by DonkeyPlays:

    Quote Originally Posted by tchamps:

    Quote Originally Posted by DonkeyPlays:

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

    ...Pats +3 -105 (5x) Rams +3.5 -105 (3x) Pats +9.5 / Rams +10.5 -120 (1.5x) Pending:Patriots AFC +300 (2.5x)Rams NFC +260 (3x)NFL YTD: 115-63 ATS +96.45 Units
    Berry is also back.. but I think people are overvaluing what he can do. He is out of shape and should not be 100% in form. I wouldn't mind if he didn't even play. 
      Mate, Berry is the QB/DC of that defense.  He is extremely underrated.  The Chiefs secondary is complete ass and their linebackers are mediocre.  Berry is the general on that squad.  Forget his physical talent, he is Peyton Manning on the defense.  Presnap he will make sure everyone is positioned correctly, postsnap he will be on the right side of the rushing attack of the Pats.  He is still a good tackler and understands correct angles to take on guys in space.     If you want to see a microcosm of the Defense with Berry in and with Berry out. Rewatch the last Chargers game where they were held to 7 in the first half w/ Berry in and then came back down 14 in the 4th w/Berry out.   Bob Sutton is a moron of a DC.  He is lucky he has Chris Jones, Houston and Ford to make up for his crappy playcalling.  With Berry on the back side, Fuller, and Ward, this secondary is instantly better than what the Pats faced last game.   Also, Ron Parker got as a result of LDT being active.  Parker was ass in the secondary.  Addition by subtraction.
    I'll go back and watch. Just off the top of my head.. I seem to remember him getting burned pretty bad on a few plays either against the Chargers or Seattle (I bet KC on both). But yea I guess I didn't factor in the Ray Lewis effect he has on the defense.

    Yup, I didn't have the words for it and you put it perfectly.  He is the Ray Lewis of that defense.  Even when he's on the sidelines in joggers the team needs him and looks to him for leadership.  On the field, he is the coach.

    And you're correct he did fck up a few times.  Once vs the Chargers, I remember he took a bad angle and let I believe Keenan Allen get open.  Those things happen regardless.  But the Ray Lewis effect he brings with him is giant especially at home with that crowd on their side.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by DonkeyPlays:

    Quote Originally Posted by tchamps:

    Quote Originally Posted by DonkeyPlays:

    Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

    ...Pats +3 -105 (5x) Rams +3.5 -105 (3x) Pats +9.5 / Rams +10.5 -120 (1.5x) Pending:Patriots AFC +300 (2.5x)Rams NFC +260 (3x)NFL YTD: 115-63 ATS +96.45 Units
    Berry is also back.. but I think people are overvaluing what he can do. He is out of shape and should not be 100% in form. I wouldn't mind if he didn't even play. 
      Mate, Berry is the QB/DC of that defense.  He is extremely underrated.  The Chiefs secondary is complete ass and their linebackers are mediocre.  Berry is the general on that squad.  Forget his physical talent, he is Peyton Manning on the defense.  Presnap he will make sure everyone is positioned correctly, postsnap he will be on the right side of the rushing attack of the Pats.  He is still a good tackler and understands correct angles to take on guys in space.     If you want to see a microcosm of the Defense with Berry in and with Berry out. Rewatch the last Chargers game where they were held to 7 in the first half w/ Berry in and then came back down 14 in the 4th w/Berry out.   Bob Sutton is a moron of a DC.  He is lucky he has Chris Jones, Houston and Ford to make up for his crappy playcalling.  With Berry on the back side, Fuller, and Ward, this secondary is instantly better than what the Pats faced last game.   Also, Ron Parker got as a result of LDT being active.  Parker was ass in the secondary.  Addition by subtraction.
    I'll go back and watch. Just off the top of my head.. I seem to remember him getting burned pretty bad on a few plays either against the Chargers or Seattle (I bet KC on both). But yea I guess I didn't factor in the Ray Lewis effect he has on the defense.

    Yup, I didn't have the words for it and you put it perfectly.  He is the Ray Lewis of that defense.  Even when he's on the sidelines in joggers the team needs him and looks to him for leadership.  On the field, he is the coach.

    And you're correct he did fck up a few times.  Once vs the Chargers, I remember he took a bad angle and let I believe Keenan Allen get open.  Those things happen regardless.  But the Ray Lewis effect he brings with him is giant especially at home with that crowd on their side.

     
    NinjaNight
    NinjaNight
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 5206
    Posted: Jan. 19, 2019 - 12:04 AM ET #20

    Just be aware if you're following LC he's overestimating the Patriots to some extent but even moreso he's underestimating the Chiefs. He definitely is not giving enough credit to what KC is capable of and is overconfident on New England as a result.
    On a quest to be the very best
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Just be aware if you're following LC he's overestimating the Patriots to some extent but even moreso he's underestimating the Chiefs. He definitely is not giving enough credit to what KC is capable of and is overconfident on New England as a result.
     
    gambleholic63
    gambleholic63
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 4412
    Posted: Jan. 19, 2019 - 12:11 AM ET #21

    Tremendous respect for all your plays LC peace_5...but I'm strongly on the opposite side on this one. I like Mahomes > Brady, Kelce > Gronk, Hill > any Pats WR, KC pass rushers and home field. 

    But then again, you have the mad genius on your side and that is my one and only concern in being on KC.

    Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Tremendous respect for all your plays LC peace_5...but I'm strongly on the opposite side on this one. I like Mahomes > Brady, Kelce > Gronk, Hill > any Pats WR, KC pass rushers and home field. 

    But then again, you have the mad genius on your side and that is my one and only concern in being on KC.

     
    ByTheBay
    ByTheBay
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2014
    Posts: 4793
    Posted: Jan. 19, 2019 - 12:12 AM ET #22

    Thanks for all you do LC

    Appreciate you bro!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Thanks for all you do LC

    Appreciate you bro!
     
    NinjaNight
    NinjaNight
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 5206
    Posted: Jan. 19, 2019 - 12:14 AM ET #23

    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    Tremendous respect for all your plays LC peace_5...but I'm strongly on the opposite side on this one. I like Mahomes > Brady, Kelce > Gronk, Hill > any Pats WR, KC pass rushers and home field. 

    But then again, you have the mad genius on your side and that is my one and only concern in being on KC.


    100% agree with everything said in this post

    I'll be back to admit I was completely wrong if NE covers this one LC. I'm not being hostile I'm just strongly disagreeing with you.

    On a quest to be the very best
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:

    Tremendous respect for all your plays LC peace_5...but I'm strongly on the opposite side on this one. I like Mahomes > Brady, Kelce > Gronk, Hill > any Pats WR, KC pass rushers and home field. 

    But then again, you have the mad genius on your side and that is my one and only concern in being on KC.


    100% agree with everything said in this post

    I'll be back to admit I was completely wrong if NE covers this one LC. I'm not being hostile I'm just strongly disagreeing with you.

     
    Wizerguy
    Wizerguy
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 38256
    Posted: Jan. 19, 2019 - 1:07 AM ET #24

    Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNight:

    I just feel like LC is really underestimating this Chiefs team and completely downplaying the Patriots road issues.

    First of all it's not just this year that they have struggled on the road. This year is a reinforcement of their road issues in history. Historically they're sub .500 on the road in playoff games. Yes there has only been a handful, but it's enough to show real weakness. 

    It's crazy to me to claim that KC would be better off playing in New England. No way, NE is a different beast there. That's where they've done all their winning over the years in these big games. This team is designed to attain homefield advantage throughout the playoffs and make their way to the Superbowl. The fact that they couldn't do that this year also shows weakness.

    Weeks 14 & 15 on the road they have had a lot of time by now to sort out their team issues. What do they do? They lose to Miami and the Steelers, two non-playoff teams. 

    The Chiefs on the other hand haven't shown many signs of weakness. As tchamps said they have been very strong every single game this year even in their losses. Played a very tough schedule. The defense plays much better at home and has the amazing pass rush that's very helpful to defeat Brady. Combine that pass rush with the most potent offense we have seen in years and this is one heck of a beast to defeat in Arrowhead.



    ..I agree with all of the above..Yes KC has the worse run defense in the league..and NE has given up 6.0 ypc on the road, on defense..not only during the early part of the season..but the ladder ( 4 game road series incl) They haven't fixed anything. Whats that make them. My pure points math model says this: numbers don't lie... NE hasn't fixed anything. If they did they wouldn't have a negative point differential of 80-99 during the last 4 game road series giving up 6.0 ypc on defense. I guess they fixed everything vs Buff/Jets and LAC during their last 3 home games.
    - The storms will come, the storms will pass -
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNight:

    I just feel like LC is really underestimating this Chiefs team and completely downplaying the Patriots road issues.

    First of all it's not just this year that they have struggled on the road. This year is a reinforcement of their road issues in history. Historically they're sub .500 on the road in playoff games. Yes there has only been a handful, but it's enough to show real weakness. 

    It's crazy to me to claim that KC would be better off playing in New England. No way, NE is a different beast there. That's where they've done all their winning over the years in these big games. This team is designed to attain homefield advantage throughout the playoffs and make their way to the Superbowl. The fact that they couldn't do that this year also shows weakness.

    Weeks 14 & 15 on the road they have had a lot of time by now to sort out their team issues. What do they do? They lose to Miami and the Steelers, two non-playoff teams. 

    The Chiefs on the other hand haven't shown many signs of weakness. As tchamps said they have been very strong every single game this year even in their losses. Played a very tough schedule. The defense plays much better at home and has the amazing pass rush that's very helpful to defeat Brady. Combine that pass rush with the most potent offense we have seen in years and this is one heck of a beast to defeat in Arrowhead.



    ..I agree with all of the above..Yes KC has the worse run defense in the league..and NE has given up 6.0 ypc on the road, on defense..not only during the early part of the season..but the ladder ( 4 game road series incl) They haven't fixed anything. Whats that make them. My pure points math model says this: numbers don't lie... NE hasn't fixed anything. If they did they wouldn't have a negative point differential of 80-99 during the last 4 game road series giving up 6.0 ypc on defense. I guess they fixed everything vs Buff/Jets and LAC during their last 3 home games.
     
     
    Teapot_Dome
    Teapot_Dome
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2018
    Posts: 124
    Posted: Jan. 19, 2019 - 1:09 AM ET #25

    peace_5 we are on the same page. I wish you bet point totals to see if I lined up with you there too, guess I'll have to wait and see what badlands thinks there.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    peace_5 we are on the same page. I wish you bet point totals to see if I lined up with you there too, guess I'll have to wait and see what badlands thinks there.

    All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
    123 ... 789 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 446,588 Covers arrow
    • Friday 09/11/2026 690 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 254,402 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 220 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 57,596 Covers arrow
    • 9/11 Fast Cash Five 🤑🤑?? 6,985 Covers arrow
    • Anyone Tracking Scoring Drought System? 27,850 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 95,645 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,322 Covers arrow
    • Happening just recently . . . 34,680 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.