Posted:
#26
Bears, Cowboys.
Both teams are in the playoff race.
Lions are a disgrace......
Posted:
#27
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
Bears, Cowboys.
Bears, Cowboys.
Both teams are in the playoff race.
Both games they got completely dominated in as well......
Im done talking to Lions fans who have no clue....
when they were 6-0 I said they would finish NO better than 8-8 and I wont be wrong....We will all see and I will be there every week to remind them
Posted:
#32
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
Both games they got completely dominated in as well......
Im done talking to Lions fans who have no clue....
when they were 6-0 I said they would finish NO better than 8-8 and I wont be wrong....We will all see and I will be there every week to remind them
I'll give you the first half of the Cowboys game. Then they made half time adjustments and came back and won. Just like the Vikings game. They were in no way dominated in the first Bears game.
I think a Packers/Bears fan just got his feelings hurt.
Posted:
#33
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101175320&page=2
I see I'm not the only that thinks you're a bandwagon jumping loser.
Posted:
#34
Dude....what did the Lions do in the first game they beat the Bears??? They had like a 85 yd run and 60 yard pass. They got dominated!!!!
Bandwagon?? That doesnt make any sense.
Once again, why in the world would anybody from Illinois jump to being a Packers fan????
Thats like going from a Jets to Giants or Cubs to Cardinals fan.
You are obviously clueless to the Midwest idea of football fans
Posted:
#35
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101175320&page=2
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101175320&page=2
I see I'm not the only that thinks you're a bandwagon jumping loser.
Did you even read the thread??? Ive lived in Chicago all my life. Beeen a Packers fan since I can remember.
Its ok...I know people are lowlifes and have nothing better to do then try to call people out. Even though they have no idea what they are talking about
Posted:
#36
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
GB will be laying 3.5-4.5 in Detroit. Detroit will win SU.
Coach and QB are complete Sally's....rest of the team is full of thugs who resort to cheap shots and dirty plays....
Enjoy watching the playoffs on tv
I hope the Packers are giving under 10 on Thanksgiving
Write that down.
Posted:
#40
Quote Originally Posted by dont_bet:
they just had a bad day? sounds like your a hardcore lions fan.
I assume thye will have another bad day next week and the week after.
I really don't give a rats ass about the Lions but I know a good football team when I see them. YES they had a bad day 6 TURNOVERS....Doesn't that fit the definition of a bad day?
Posted:
#41
Like I have said so many times in so many threads....for atleast 6 weeks now EVERYBODY says oh the Packers will lose this game this is a bad spot....bla bla bla....
History says they will lose...but it gets so sad people say it everyweek...
Because clowns predict it, then they win again and people forget people thought they would lose...
Then when they finally do lose people crawl out like they are so smart....
Too bad, that when they do lose, people will have already bet 5-9 weeks and lost already....
The only 2 weeks they didnt cover this season they allowed backdoor covers as in all 8 games this year they were covering the spread in the 4th qtr....
Kind of hard to cover double digit spreads in the NFL every week....but 6-2 aint to bad....
But, yeah...
People will say the Viks will win this week, or Tampa the next, or Lions the next, or for sure the Giants the next, if not then the Raiders for sure....
Obviosuly they will most likely lose but how many times have you already bet against them to win is the ??
They dont need to go undefeated to prove anything
Posted:
#43
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
Look at the stats from the Lions/Bears game 1
First down Bears 23 Lions 16
Total plays Bears 66 Lions 47
TOP Bears 39 min Lions 21
Lions got 50% of their yardage on 3 long plays....
I love it. You're resorting to criticizing how a team wins now. Let me guess you think the 49ers suck also because Smith never throws for 300 yards?
Did you do this to your own Packers when they let S.D. almost come back and win. How many points did they allow to S.D.? You realize that if Rivers doesn't throw those 2 early pic-6's that the Pack are probably in a world of trouble that game right?
Oh but you don't bring that up. You ignore that because when it comes to Green Bay, a win is a win.
But when it comes to other teams they need to earn style points like they are all trying to play their way into the BCS title game.
I didn't post that thread trying to say you're the Packers/Bears fan(although I'm pretty sure I remember a thread where you said you were a fan of both). I posted that thread to show how big of a douche bag you are and how a bunch of people have called you out for it in the past.
I guess you are that guy that just can't be happy with your team winning, but you also feel the need to rub it in when other people's teams lose....even if it isn't to the Packers.
I see that you failed to bring up the Bengals at any point in this thread also. They have a pretty inflated record as well but I guess that isn't as important to you.....probably because they didn't lose to your Bears today.
I'm glad you're a Packers fan. I'm happy for you that they are winning right now. I can't wait to see who's bandwagon you will jump on if they should stop winning though.
Posted:
#44
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
hey man, I've never attacked you, so don't resort into name calling. I just told you what I think the line will be. And what I think will happen.
HAHAHAHAHAH ok clown....cant wait....so many people will be chasing Thanksgiving day backing the Lions
No way possible its 3 or 4
Other people here may be bashing on you, but I am not. So I would appreciate it if you would not resort to name calling just because I have a difference of opinion on a game.
GL with your season
Posted:
#46
Actually pal, I did call out the Bengals and said the same thing here you go
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101181746
Both teams have played nobody and both will miss the playoffs....
As for the stats, team me a game this year the Packers were dominated??? Please do....
If you dont think the Bears dominated the 1st game they played then you dont know football...
As for people calling me out, I think so far 3 TOTAL people on covers have tried calling me out for being a bandwagon fan joining last year, but like MOST FOOTBALL fans they then see im from Illinois and know thats not possible
And, I usually never rub thing in any teams faces....but the Lions fans when they were 5-0 were out of control. Thinking they already won the superbowl. They are 1-3 since only beating Denver and the Lions fans are gone
By the way, you said the Pack would have been in trouble if Rivers didnt throw the 2 pick tds early.....find out how many punts GB had that game and tell me if they would have been in trouble
Posted:
#50
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
Actually pal, I did call out the Bengals and said the same thing here you go
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=21&sub=101181746
Both teams have played nobody and both will miss the playoffs....
As for the stats, team me a game this year the Packers were dominated??? Please do....
If you dont think the Bears dominated the 1st game they played then you dont know football...
As for people calling me out, I think so far 3 TOTAL people on covers have tried calling me out for being a bandwagon fan joining last year, but like MOST FOOTBALL fans they then see im from Illinois and know thats not possible
And, I usually never rub thing in any teams faces....but the Lions fans when they were 5-0 were out of control. Thinking they already won the superbowl. They are 1-3 since only beating Denver and the Lions fans are gone
By the way, you said the Pack would have been in trouble if Rivers didnt throw the 2 pick tds early.....find out how many punts GB had that game and tell me if they would have been in trouble
Well according to ESPN's box score they punted the exact same amount of times as the Chargers did. Twice
In fact, using your terms for defining who dominated a football game San Diego had more first downs(28-21), more total plays(69-56), and more total yards(460-368), with time of possession being even.
The only difference I can see in this game, which was a TD win for the Packers, was in the turnover margin. And more specifically, which I stated earlier, Rivers two pick-6's early in the game.
So yes, I stand by my previous statement that if Rivers hadn't thrown those two pick-6's early in the game, Green Bay definitely would have been in trouble.
Hot Forum Topics
