It's an angle. That is all.
Who did the Spurs meat in the playoffs? The Thunder.
Who won the series? The Spurs.
Who won the championship? The Spurs.
MEAT? Seriously? For a guy who sits on his high horse and spends a good deal of his time telling everyone how smart he is and how he will always win, I could not pass up that opportunity.
Yes, Giants.
Who did the Spurs meat in the playoffs? The Thunder.
Who won the series? The Spurs.
Who won the championship? The Spurs.
MEAT? Seriously? For a guy who sits on his high horse and spends a good deal of his time telling everyone how smart he is and how he will always win, I could not pass up that opportunity.
Typically a typo like that should be called out EXCEPT in this case...
Did you see my last thread about MEAT tenderizers???
POUND THIS GAME like EMERIL!
Likely won't see them again?
They are co-favorites to meet in the Super Bowl.
Yes, it is a long way off but let's not sit here and dismiss meeting again.
True. But it's still a substantial winning streak and keeping a team hungry and focused is important.
When you are on a winning streak, that could break at the worst possible time (in the playoffs).
Without wanting to sound like a huge square, you don't often see + money/points about the Patriots, and when you do it generally pays to take it.
Patriots show bite as an underdog. New England is listed as underdogs for the fifth time this season. The Patriots have won each time by an average margin of 21.3 points.
Without wanting to sound like a huge square, you don't often see + money/points about the Patriots, and when you do it generally pays to take it.
Patriots show bite as an underdog. New England is listed as underdogs for the fifth time this season. The Patriots have won each time by an average margin of 21.3 points.
Totally understood.
It's just an angle because laying upwards of -3.5 against the Pats(which to me, with that hook, is near mind-boggling) is so distasteful.
Scal..decent theory. I think Pop is a freakin' genius and I love what he does. Bellichek is def. the Pop of the NFL. so I enjoyed the theory.
My only knock is that in the WEST last year
It was pretty much a guarantee that the Spurs would meet again. They were damn near locks to meet in the Western Finals and did.
Patriots AND Packers both making the Super Bowl is a lot harder than OKC and SAS both making the western finals. That changes things big time.
I do however believe in the not showing your hand theory. I actually felt that way a few weeks back. CAVS VS SPURS. The one where LeBron bounced the ball off his legs in the final seconds and the SPurs won.
I figured the Spurs didn't really care about that game. After all, they won the title last year. Where I felt like LBJ wanted revenge for the finals and he would go ball out. And the Spurs would just see it as a meaningless reg. season game.
SPurs won, I was wrong but I love the angles. Gluck on NYG today Scal.
Established in 1995,
To all the above
Hot Forum Topics
