As always, great post and analysis! So what is your thoughts on the total on the Pitt/Tex game? Trends and sharps pointing to under game.
I'd love to help, but I'm not into totals yet so I have no valuable information to provide in this regard. Sorry about that. However, I'm curious why you are saying sharps are pointing to the under. 54% of bets have gone on the under, and the line moved from 44 to 45.5 so I see more sharp money on the over.
Quote Originally Posted by Daone2nvy:
Hi Proffessor MJ,
As always, great post and analysis! So what is your thoughts on the total on the Pitt/Tex game? Trends and sharps pointing to under game.
I'd love to help, but I'm not into totals yet so I have no valuable information to provide in this regard. Sorry about that. However, I'm curious why you are saying sharps are pointing to the under. 54% of bets have gone on the under, and the line moved from 44 to 45.5 so I see more sharp money on the over.
You are correct, my apologizes on statement of sharps on the under.
So how strong do you feel about Pit -9? I would to think they will take care of business and beat Hou by 13 but Pitt has to be the toughest team with a winning record to bet/watch - game after game they just barely win; if my memory serves me right you have to go all the way to week 11 against Tenn in which they won comfortably.
Then you have Hou which only good players they actively have is Clowney and Hopkins. You brought up good point of motivation and things to play for which clearly Pitt has more at stake.
I normally am not a big fan of the total but am looking at it because I feel this game is tough to choose.
Mj,
You are correct, my apologizes on statement of sharps on the under.
So how strong do you feel about Pit -9? I would to think they will take care of business and beat Hou by 13 but Pitt has to be the toughest team with a winning record to bet/watch - game after game they just barely win; if my memory serves me right you have to go all the way to week 11 against Tenn in which they won comfortably.
Then you have Hou which only good players they actively have is Clowney and Hopkins. You brought up good point of motivation and things to play for which clearly Pitt has more at stake.
I normally am not a big fan of the total but am looking at it because I feel this game is tough to choose.
You are correct, my apologizes on statement of sharps on the under.
So how strong do you feel about Pit -9? I would to think they will take care of business and beat Hou by 13 but Pitt has to be the toughest team with a winning record to bet/watch - game after game they just barely win; if my memory serves me right you have to go all the way to week 11 against Tenn in which they won comfortably.
Then you have Hou which only good players they actively have is Clowney and Hopkins. You brought up good point of motivation and things to play for which clearly Pitt has more at stake.
I normally am not a big fan of the total but am looking at it because I feel this game is tough to choose.
Sorry I could not respond in time, but was with my girlfriend's family for Christmas. Happy Holidays and good luck on your bets!
Quote Originally Posted by Daone2nvy:
Mj,
You are correct, my apologizes on statement of sharps on the under.
So how strong do you feel about Pit -9? I would to think they will take care of business and beat Hou by 13 but Pitt has to be the toughest team with a winning record to bet/watch - game after game they just barely win; if my memory serves me right you have to go all the way to week 11 against Tenn in which they won comfortably.
Then you have Hou which only good players they actively have is Clowney and Hopkins. You brought up good point of motivation and things to play for which clearly Pitt has more at stake.
I normally am not a big fan of the total but am looking at it because I feel this game is tough to choose.
Sorry I could not respond in time, but was with my girlfriend's family for Christmas. Happy Holidays and good luck on your bets!
Hot Forum Topics
