you seem a bit jealous and bitter about the fact that other human beings possess the ability to formulate and construct full,cogent,rational paragraphs full of words that make sense.
sorry for the distress and emotional turmoil this is causing you and your peanut-sized brain.
hey smooth-brain,how is it that i "like to argue"??and nobody else does??who exactly is it that im responding to in here???real fuggin tough to have an argument with oneself...and yet you think youre doing sumthin by singling one individual out...dope.
steph-18.6 ppg 5.8 assts 3.9 rbs 1.5 stls 48% fg 44% 3pt fg 93% ft PER-19.4
trae- 25.3 ppg 9.4 assts 3.9 rbs 0.8 stls 44% fg 34% 3pt fg 89% ft PER-23
*AND A TRIP TO THE FUCCING ECF WITH A FAIRLY MEDIOCRE TEAM.
trae fans??..are you totally fucced in the head??i know 4 damn sure im no fan of trae and stumptown has stated the same.
wait...wait wait wait...are you such a SIMPLETON that you think that the only way a person can argue a side is if they are emotionally invested in or attached to that side???...bahahahaha
i mean in the case of "throw-dem-lies" and his creepy unrequited love affair with curry that may well be applicable...but for normal functioning adults with fully developed brains?eh,not so much.
i can barely think of a guard in the league that i like less than trae..he doesnt do it for me.
steph-18.6 ppg 5.8 assts 3.9 rbs 1.5 stls 48% fg 44% 3pt fg 93% ft PER-19.4
trae- 25.3 ppg 9.4 assts 3.9 rbs 0.8 stls 44% fg 34% 3pt fg 89% ft PER-23
*AND A TRIP TO THE FUCCING ECF WITH A FAIRLY MEDIOCRE TEAM.
dude,what are you doing???did you go and bump your head real hard or you suffering from a stroke or??you are trying to draw a conclusion on the smallest sample size imaginable???really??so what if we go back and find 22 year old stephs worst game and try and rub it all in your face and say "see,see!!!he sucks!!!trae wins!!"...ya see how moronic that is?
its like writing about how tom bradys a bum who should not even be starting in the nfl cos he threw a couple interceptions in a regular season loss.
at this point you gotta realise that you are not communicating with human beings that have fully grown brains and the ability to communicate properly..they literally do not read nor understand anything written on the screen clearly as you have already stated these facts and yet still the assumption is that anyone using plain logic,results,facts and conclusions based on the eye test must only have come to their opinion cos theyre a "fan"
throw-dem-lies in particular is jaw-droppingly stupid...he hasnt comprehended nor refuted a single word or point raised in 25 pages.
Yes, because one game doesn't define and entire year of time. Specifically, the age of 22. Trae has never been a pure shooter. And he has a rough night, while hobbled, in the Eastern Conference Finals. The whole team looked beat. Like they finally just ran out of gas. They were a 5th seed that nobody thought would make it past the first round. Like i've said, I don't think any of you were watching Steph when he was 22. He was on a bad team that wasn't on TV very often. A west coast team at that. Guys are just remember Steph ar 25, 26. And that's fine. There are plenty of players I think I have a pretty good handle on. And I have had an NBA package, on or off, for about 10 years but if you were to be like, break down Pascal Siakam at 22, i'm not gonna act like I know him better than a diehard Raptors fan. I know what Steph was at 22 quite well though. His strengths. His weaknesses. I just watched all the games and I know you guys didn't. You can claim you did. I'll call bullshit. It's completely nonsensical that a person had an NBA package and was using it to watch the Warriors night night after night back then. It's neither here nor there. This is a stupid thread that just won't die. Now that the hawks are finally done, maybe it will.
@melossinglet
I've refuted everything you guys have said. You guys just ignore Steph's efficiency, ball handling, and IQ. There is nothing Trae does that is special enough to make up for Steph's efficiency. He was much more skilled on offense than Trae. Only a casual amateur basketball fans use boxscores to prove who is better. Of course Trae has more numbers, he's the primary ball handler who has the ball in his hands all the time. He throws a bunch of passes and takes a bunch of shots. We've seen it before. It's not that impressive and definitely doesn't make someone better than a player with the efficiency of Steph. Trae is simply not as special as you guys make him out to be. Steph went 48/44/93 as a 22 year old. That's special, especially with his size and the way he plays the game, high level shot making from mid range to beyond nba range. Just skilled as they get. You just aren't very knowledgeable about basketball.
@ThrowDemDarts
hahahahaha...repeats the same 3 corny,played out cliches from the past 25 pages and then proceeds to tell someone that they "arent very knowledgable about basketball"...you would have to be one of the dumbest human beings alive....(if you arent in fact a bot,which i find rather likely)
who is "ignoring" currys efficiency and IQ??what a truly bizarre thing to say...youre really dumb
there is no way whatsoever to prove that either player had a better IQ or ball-handling but by the eye test it is very close or trae ahead..steph just didnt have anywhere near the same responsibility to show a great edge in those regards anyhow.trae is the unquestioned leader and primary playmaker at this stage of his career......and not a single fuccing person in here has refuted that steph was clearly a more accurate shooter so ONCE AGAIN you are making shi.t up about things being "ignored" but youre a queer kind of guy and thats your modus operandi so no surprise there.
if anybody is ignoring anything here its you and your other weasly little minions any time the raw numbers are brought up and the role that trae plays in a great team achievement and the CLEAR AND OBVIOUS ADVANTAGES he has in leadership,passing,getting in the paint and scoring,and drawing fouls...YOU REFUSE TO ADDRESS ANY OF THIS or just brush it to the side like its nothing (being better at almost EVERYTHING doesnt "make up" for stephs very good shooting.you write that like its a fact and not just your shi.tty solo opinion)and continue to fall back on the ONLY THING YOU KNOW,which is "48/44/93....48/44/93....48/44/93...48/44/93..."..and thats understandable once we take into account the fact that you are really,really dumb...and that you know basically ZILCH about basketball or the players that play it...oh except of course for the corny,tired cliches that you heard some talking head on t.v say that youve been regurgitating here for 25 pages straight.
only in covers land could someone look at the comparable output and team accomplishments of both players and come to the conclusion that the guy with MUCH LESS is the better player,and not only that,but that he is "much better" and "its not even close"
...but thats the bizarro world we inhabit unfortunately.
interwebz a gift and a curse..the downside is that it gives creepy lunatics like yourself a "voice" and a reason to think they are important and valid in their insane,unjustified opinions.
just imagine this hypothetical scenario if you would indulge me for a second....say that everything was reversed,that steph was the one with WAY MORE points and assists and a better PER and a leading driver of a deep playoff run with only mediocre talent around him in which he stepped up.....and it was trae who was inferior in most things except he was a more efficient shooter at each level but he had no influence over improving his garbage team at all.
can you fuccing imagine "throw-dem-lies" response to someone that claimed trae was better?????...hysterical,hysterical stuff...covers,where up is down and black is white and grass is red.
@ThrowDemDarts
That you think you are knowledgable about basketball is comical. I'd wager money that you have never played or coached an organized game, at any level. Not high school. Not middle school, nor AAU. And I don't think you watched very many of Steph's games at 22. It's cool. Everybody has an opinion. I have some strong opinions. I can come off as a know it all. The thing is I base my opinions on shit I know. If I don't know something, and know it well, I keep my shit to myself. I don't think you or bud know dick about the player Steph was at 22. That's why you talk about his college days and his shooting percentage. I talk about the things I saw game after game.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
