• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

    The BEST WRITE-UP on the board tonight (1/17/14) to get you out of debt and swimmin' in $$$!!!

    12345 Next Last»
    scalabrine
    diondimucci
    unitpalooza
    TreyInventor
    SLEEEE
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 8215
    Posts: 116
    12345 Next Last»
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 2:37 PM ET #1

    I'm typing with my thumbs so this will be short but I wanted to share this pick.

    I do not take these picks lightly. If the game doesn't involve the Knicks or the Nets, I have to have watched the team I like for several games before I do a write-up.

    I've followed this team for about 7 games and now is the time to strike while the iron is hot.

    Take the Lakers +7.

    Several reasons and I'll keep them short and sweet:

    1. Conventional square thinking: Rondo back = Celtics much better and they win in a romp at home.

    Wrong. Rondo will be on a minutes restriction to about 5 minutes a quarter. That will upset the flow of the actual starter Avery Bradley and the chemistry of the team itself which needs adjusting. Also, the head coach had already come out and said to not expect Rondo to be a world beater tonight hinting he will be rusty after almost a year on the sidelines.

    The +7 has a built in overreaction due to his return. Take the points.

    2. Avery Bradley - Rondo in 15/20 minutes means Bradley gets the rest. Bradley is not a true PG. The true PG is gone to the Warriors. BUT, you say the Celtics just beat the Atlantic leading Raps with him starting!

    The problem: that was the game right after the Crawford trade which many here know is always a game to jump on the team that just lost a key player (or traded one) because the replacement and the team in general come out more inspired.

    Crawford had 20 in a starting Pg and Jared Sullenger had 25 and 20!!! Talk about inspired! Good for them!  (You're gonna count on 25 and 20 tonight from Jared tonight to cover your 7?)

    Guess how long that inspiration lasts? Usually ONE GAME. That game is done and over with and they won it. Add to that the Celtics needed to snap a NINE game losing streak along with it and you have all the inspiration you need, which dissipates with rusty Rondo's return which is inspiration for the future itself, but less so tonight.

    Lost in that win is Bradley shot 8-21 and 67% from the line. He is a chucker at the PG position (since he is not a true Pg) and will cost the Celtics possessions tonight.

    So you have more points built into this line for the home win and Bradley's play. Take the inflated 7.

    3. Lastly, the Lakers lose Nick Young tonight.  I say good. They weren't winning with him scoring 20 a game and can win without him. There is a reason no one came to his defense in the Sun's fight. He's a nut and not well-liked which gives us the exact opposite of what conventional thinking would dictate and what I mentioned for the Celtics above last game: tonight is the game the Lakers turn to play inspired ball without a key player catching 7 to boot.

    More line inflation: Nick young out. Grab the 7.

    4. Lastly, why the hell are the Celtics giving ANYONE 7!? They just lost 9 in a row! That alone, outside of all the writing above should give you major pause before picking the Celtics.

    5. Lastly the Lakers are on a brutal losing run. They've lost 12 of 13 and 2 straight after the a** kicking they got from the Clippers.

    BUT,  against Cleveland, they covered and Luol Deng needed to give the Cavs 27 to win by two scoring 118.


    A night later  on a back to back against a team that will run you off the floor even without Bledsoe, they played neck and neck for 3.5 quarters and still got inside the number of 11 losing 121-114. 

    So they covered the last two and could have won both. The effort is there and the team desperately wants a W.


    Their offense is there. It's the defense (embarrassing at that) that needs to tighten up and with 7 they don't even need to win if they come to play moderate D, which they haven't been doing but that will have to change. There is a lot of room for error with this line which makes me quite comfortable.

    Offset the East Coast travel with the desperation of the Lakers, badly in need of a W on a six game losing streak (which puts this game right at the point they snapped their last 6 game losing streak...the 7th against the Jazz...the Celts are a bad team like the Jazz and the Lakers if anything, beat the bad ones at least.)

    Finally, this, for all its history is still Lakers Celtics, a historic rivalry that will get the players to at least get inside this number and play with diginity of some sort...maybe but that is just grasping at straws but I thought if mention it.


    I think the Lakers can win and with 7 and all the inflation above, I can't pass up the spread.

    Ok, this write-up wasn't that short. All the better I have detailed reasons. The pick:

    LAKERS +7 OVER CELTICS
    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    I'm typing with my thumbs so this will be short but I wanted to share this pick.

    I do not take these picks lightly. If the game doesn't involve the Knicks or the Nets, I have to have watched the team I like for several games before I do a write-up.

    I've followed this team for about 7 games and now is the time to strike while the iron is hot.

    Take the Lakers +7.

    Several reasons and I'll keep them short and sweet:

    1. Conventional square thinking: Rondo back = Celtics much better and they win in a romp at home.

    Wrong. Rondo will be on a minutes restriction to about 5 minutes a quarter. That will upset the flow of the actual starter Avery Bradley and the chemistry of the team itself which needs adjusting. Also, the head coach had already come out and said to not expect Rondo to be a world beater tonight hinting he will be rusty after almost a year on the sidelines.

    The +7 has a built in overreaction due to his return. Take the points.

    2. Avery Bradley - Rondo in 15/20 minutes means Bradley gets the rest. Bradley is not a true PG. The true PG is gone to the Warriors. BUT, you say the Celtics just beat the Atlantic leading Raps with him starting!

    The problem: that was the game right after the Crawford trade which many here know is always a game to jump on the team that just lost a key player (or traded one) because the replacement and the team in general come out more inspired.

    Crawford had 20 in a starting Pg and Jared Sullenger had 25 and 20!!! Talk about inspired! Good for them!  (You're gonna count on 25 and 20 tonight from Jared tonight to cover your 7?)

    Guess how long that inspiration lasts? Usually ONE GAME. That game is done and over with and they won it. Add to that the Celtics needed to snap a NINE game losing streak along with it and you have all the inspiration you need, which dissipates with rusty Rondo's return which is inspiration for the future itself, but less so tonight.

    Lost in that win is Bradley shot 8-21 and 67% from the line. He is a chucker at the PG position (since he is not a true Pg) and will cost the Celtics possessions tonight.

    So you have more points built into this line for the home win and Bradley's play. Take the inflated 7.

    3. Lastly, the Lakers lose Nick Young tonight.  I say good. They weren't winning with him scoring 20 a game and can win without him. There is a reason no one came to his defense in the Sun's fight. He's a nut and not well-liked which gives us the exact opposite of what conventional thinking would dictate and what I mentioned for the Celtics above last game: tonight is the game the Lakers turn to play inspired ball without a key player catching 7 to boot.

    More line inflation: Nick young out. Grab the 7.

    4. Lastly, why the hell are the Celtics giving ANYONE 7!? They just lost 9 in a row! That alone, outside of all the writing above should give you major pause before picking the Celtics.

    5. Lastly the Lakers are on a brutal losing run. They've lost 12 of 13 and 2 straight after the a** kicking they got from the Clippers.

    BUT,  against Cleveland, they covered and Luol Deng needed to give the Cavs 27 to win by two scoring 118.


    A night later  on a back to back against a team that will run you off the floor even without Bledsoe, they played neck and neck for 3.5 quarters and still got inside the number of 11 losing 121-114. 

    So they covered the last two and could have won both. The effort is there and the team desperately wants a W.


    Their offense is there. It's the defense (embarrassing at that) that needs to tighten up and with 7 they don't even need to win if they come to play moderate D, which they haven't been doing but that will have to change. There is a lot of room for error with this line which makes me quite comfortable.

    Offset the East Coast travel with the desperation of the Lakers, badly in need of a W on a six game losing streak (which puts this game right at the point they snapped their last 6 game losing streak...the 7th against the Jazz...the Celts are a bad team like the Jazz and the Lakers if anything, beat the bad ones at least.)

    Finally, this, for all its history is still Lakers Celtics, a historic rivalry that will get the players to at least get inside this number and play with diginity of some sort...maybe but that is just grasping at straws but I thought if mention it.


    I think the Lakers can win and with 7 and all the inflation above, I can't pass up the spread.

    Ok, this write-up wasn't that short. All the better I have detailed reasons. The pick:

    LAKERS +7 OVER CELTICS
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 2:39 PM ET #2

    I put 'lastly' for points 3/4/5. Guess I wanted to wrap it up at each but there was so much more to say!

    Take the Lakeshow!
    Reply
    I put 'lastly' for points 3/4/5. Guess I wanted to wrap it up at each but there was so much more to say!

    Take the Lakeshow!
     
    diondimucci
    diondimucci
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 12934
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 2:42 PM ET #3

    excellent 
    Reply
    excellent 
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 2:44 PM ET #4

    Quote Originally Posted by diondimucci:

    excellent 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by diondimucci:

    excellent 
     
    unitpalooza
    unitpalooza
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2009
    Posts: 1236
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 2:49 PM ET #5

             Great write up as usual.        Good luck scalabrine.    

    Reply

             Great write up as usual.        Good luck scalabrine.    

     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 2:49 PM ET #6

    Quote Originally Posted by unitpalooza:

             Great write up as usual.        Good luck scalabrine.    


    Thanks. Let's collect on it!
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by unitpalooza:

             Great write up as usual.        Good luck scalabrine.    


    Thanks. Let's collect on it!
     
    TreyInventor
    TreyInventor
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2012
    Posts: 13775
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 2:53 PM ET #7

    Now THIS is a fukin intelligent write up. Makes me want to tail it small just off principle. Swaggy P is a p.o.s IMO. All he does is chuck up a million 3s a game like JR Smith. I may co sider the 7. GL
    Reply
    Now THIS is a fukin intelligent write up. Makes me want to tail it small just off principle. Swaggy P is a p.o.s IMO. All he does is chuck up a million 3s a game like JR Smith. I may co sider the 7. GL
     
    SLEEEE
    SLEEEE
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2013
    Posts: 387
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 2:55 PM ET #8

    The longer the write up and the more you rely on sports knowledge to make your pick the more I want to fade it! Vegas counts on people who think they know sports to cap
    Reply
    The longer the write up and the more you rely on sports knowledge to make your pick the more I want to fade it! Vegas counts on people who think they know sports to cap
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 2:59 PM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by TreyInventor:

    Now THIS is a fukin intelligent write up. Makes me want to tail it small just off principle. Swaggy P is a p.o.s IMO. All he does is chuck up a million 3s a game like JR Smith. I may co sider the 7. GL

    Swaggy P = JR Smith. You beat me to the punch. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by TreyInventor:

    Now THIS is a fukin intelligent write up. Makes me want to tail it small just off principle. Swaggy P is a p.o.s IMO. All he does is chuck up a million 3s a game like JR Smith. I may co sider the 7. GL

    Swaggy P = JR Smith. You beat me to the punch. 
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:01 PM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by SLEEEE:

    The longer the write up and the more you rely on sports knowledge to make your pick the more I want to fade it! Vegas counts on people who think they know sports to cap

    Yes, eschew knowledge in favor of 'gut instinct.'

    I wonder if surgeons did the same in their profession when making a choice of when and how to operate?
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by SLEEEE:

    The longer the write up and the more you rely on sports knowledge to make your pick the more I want to fade it! Vegas counts on people who think they know sports to cap

    Yes, eschew knowledge in favor of 'gut instinct.'

    I wonder if surgeons did the same in their profession when making a choice of when and how to operate?
     
    AStefani
    AStefani
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 8836
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:01 PM ET #11

    Impressive write up!  I am on Boston but almost feel compelled to hedge out after reading this.

    Reply

    Impressive write up!  I am on Boston but almost feel compelled to hedge out after reading this.

     
    melossinglet
    melossinglet
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2013
    Posts: 15769
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:03 PM ET #12

    way too many points for celtics to be laying...even with a lead we've seen how they can collapse late in earlier games in the season...on the spread lakers is the only play.
    to be fair tho young really HAS to chuck all nite every nite.who else is gonna get buckets for lakers?
    then blazers still looking strong scalabrine,making me look a fool,prepared to back-track on them about now as a genuine force in the west.
    cheers for sharing
    Reply
    way too many points for celtics to be laying...even with a lead we've seen how they can collapse late in earlier games in the season...on the spread lakers is the only play.
    to be fair tho young really HAS to chuck all nite every nite.who else is gonna get buckets for lakers?
    then blazers still looking strong scalabrine,making me look a fool,prepared to back-track on them about now as a genuine force in the west.
    cheers for sharing
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:09 PM ET #13

    Quote Originally Posted by AStefani:

    Impressive write up!  I am on Boston but almost feel compelled to hedge out after reading this.



    I would never lay 7 with the Celtics at the moment. It would almost have to be a D-league team. I saw 7 and salivated on the Lakers side.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by AStefani:

    Impressive write up!  I am on Boston but almost feel compelled to hedge out after reading this.



    I would never lay 7 with the Celtics at the moment. It would almost have to be a D-league team. I saw 7 and salivated on the Lakers side.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:13 PM ET #14

    Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:

    way too many points for celtics to be laying...even with a lead we've seen how they can collapse late in earlier games in the season...on the spread lakers is the only play.
    to be fair tho young really HAS to chuck all nite every nite.who else is gonna get buckets for lakers?
    then blazers still looking strong scalabrine,making me look a fool,prepared to back-track on them about now as a genuine force in the west.
    cheers for sharing

    I don't know if young has to chuck. 

    I know what you are saying but the Knicks has a truly awful stretch and JR chucked nightly and they lost again and again. Just like with Nick chucking.

    JR sits against the Heat and the Knicks get an impressive win. 

    I look for the same with the Lakeshow tonight and no Nick.

    Blazers are legit and that's not a news flash. I'd be afraid to take the Spurs on a series ML after a full 82 and a round if I were the Spurs and had the Blazers in a later round given the Spurs age/wear and tear.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:

    way too many points for celtics to be laying...even with a lead we've seen how they can collapse late in earlier games in the season...on the spread lakers is the only play.
    to be fair tho young really HAS to chuck all nite every nite.who else is gonna get buckets for lakers?
    then blazers still looking strong scalabrine,making me look a fool,prepared to back-track on them about now as a genuine force in the west.
    cheers for sharing

    I don't know if young has to chuck. 

    I know what you are saying but the Knicks has a truly awful stretch and JR chucked nightly and they lost again and again. Just like with Nick chucking.

    JR sits against the Heat and the Knicks get an impressive win. 

    I look for the same with the Lakeshow tonight and no Nick.

    Blazers are legit and that's not a news flash. I'd be afraid to take the Spurs on a series ML after a full 82 and a round if I were the Spurs and had the Blazers in a later round given the Spurs age/wear and tear.
     
    HugeLetDown
    HugeLetDown
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2014
    Posts: 535
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:14 PM ET #15

    Not convinced Lakers are desperate for a win. I could say Boston is also desperate for a win. Lakers 3 games in 4 nights and an unmotivated gasol with a short roster. Poor defenses... I'm liking over instead. But I do agree the line is inflated.
    Reply
    Not convinced Lakers are desperate for a win. I could say Boston is also desperate for a win. Lakers 3 games in 4 nights and an unmotivated gasol with a short roster. Poor defenses... I'm liking over instead. But I do agree the line is inflated.
     
    jriv189
    jriv189
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 1891
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:17 PM ET #16

    great write up scal im 3-0 when tailing your knicks bets ... im on this one as well    
    Reply
    great write up scal im 3-0 when tailing your knicks bets ... im on this one as well    
     
    composite
    composite
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 4418
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:20 PM ET #17

    While I wouldn't take Boston -7, I wouldn't touch the Lakers with a ten foot pole. They only have 8 active roster players.  Their *starting* PG was playing D-league one month ago. They're easily the least talented team in the NBA at the moment.Because of Nick Young's suspension they picked up another D-leaguer for tonight's game.  25% of the team (2 out of 8) were D-leaguers last month.  Even more were D-leaguers last year. 

    You're wrong about everyone hating Young.  Kendall Marshall just apologized for his remarks thru twitter.  Young is  a large part of their offense.  If the shot clock is under :10 and there's no set play, he's the guy they turn to. 

    You make good points that Rondo's return might hurt Boston.  And they did lose 8 in a row, but I can't stress how bad this Laker team is right now. 

    But if you're dead set on the Lakers - take them 1H. For some reason, they always cover 1H but then completely collapse in the 2H.

    Reply

    While I wouldn't take Boston -7, I wouldn't touch the Lakers with a ten foot pole. They only have 8 active roster players.  Their *starting* PG was playing D-league one month ago. They're easily the least talented team in the NBA at the moment.Because of Nick Young's suspension they picked up another D-leaguer for tonight's game.  25% of the team (2 out of 8) were D-leaguers last month.  Even more were D-leaguers last year. 

    You're wrong about everyone hating Young.  Kendall Marshall just apologized for his remarks thru twitter.  Young is  a large part of their offense.  If the shot clock is under :10 and there's no set play, he's the guy they turn to. 

    You make good points that Rondo's return might hurt Boston.  And they did lose 8 in a row, but I can't stress how bad this Laker team is right now. 

    But if you're dead set on the Lakers - take them 1H. For some reason, they always cover 1H but then completely collapse in the 2H.

     
    SLEEEE
    SLEEEE
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2013
    Posts: 387
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:25 PM ET #18

    Listen to yourselves! Everyone is saying the same thing. It's too many points for the celtics to be laying. Everyone is saying the same thing. So my questions are
    1. Why did the line move in favor of the celtics
    2. What are you going to do if everyone agrees it's too many points to be given?

    Idk about you guys but I'm on celts, luckily got them 6.5 but also took their ml big
    Reply
    Listen to yourselves! Everyone is saying the same thing. It's too many points for the celtics to be laying. Everyone is saying the same thing. So my questions are
    1. Why did the line move in favor of the celtics
    2. What are you going to do if everyone agrees it's too many points to be given?

    Idk about you guys but I'm on celts, luckily got them 6.5 but also took their ml big
     
    Kelevra7
    Kelevra7
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2013
    Posts: 196
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:27 PM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by composite:

    I wouldn't touch the Lakers with a ten foot pole.


    This ... There's a reason they've lost 12 of 13.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by composite:

    I wouldn't touch the Lakers with a ten foot pole.


    This ... There's a reason they've lost 12 of 13.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:34 PM ET #20

    Quote Originally Posted by HugeLetDown:

    Not convinced Lakers are desperate for a win. I could say Boston is also desperate for a win. Lakers 3 games in 4 nights and an unmotivated gasol with a short roster. Poor defenses... I'm liking over instead. But I do agree the line is inflated.

    You could not say boston is 'desperate' for a win when they just snapped a 9 game losing streak. 

    3 games in 4 nights means very little to me, since after the nationally televised embarrassment against Clippers, they've covered their last two and could have won both (one team needed 27 from their new star player and the other needed an ejection and the lakers on a b2b).

    The point is, the lakers don't have to win. They need to lose by <7. There is a lot of margin for error on the lakers side and virtually none in the celtics side (rondo return = blowout or else...).
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by HugeLetDown:

    Not convinced Lakers are desperate for a win. I could say Boston is also desperate for a win. Lakers 3 games in 4 nights and an unmotivated gasol with a short roster. Poor defenses... I'm liking over instead. But I do agree the line is inflated.

    You could not say boston is 'desperate' for a win when they just snapped a 9 game losing streak. 

    3 games in 4 nights means very little to me, since after the nationally televised embarrassment against Clippers, they've covered their last two and could have won both (one team needed 27 from their new star player and the other needed an ejection and the lakers on a b2b).

    The point is, the lakers don't have to win. They need to lose by <7. There is a lot of margin for error on the lakers side and virtually none in the celtics side (rondo return = blowout or else...).
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:39 PM ET #21

    Quote Originally Posted by composite:

    While I wouldn't take Boston -7, I wouldn't touch the Lakers with a ten foot pole. They only have 8 active roster players.  Their *starting* PG was playing D-league one month ago. They're easily the least talented team in the NBA at the moment.Because of Nick Young's suspension they picked up another D-leaguer for tonight's game.  25% of the team (2 out of 8) were D-leaguers last month.  Even more were D-leaguers last year. 

    You're wrong about everyone hating Young.  Kendall Marshall just apologized for his remarks thru twitter.  Young is  a large part of their offense.  If the shot clock is under :10 and there's no set play, he's the guy they turn to. 

    You make good points that Rondo's return might hurt Boston.  And they did lose 8 in a row, but I can't stress how bad this Laker team is right now. 

    But if you're dead set on the Lakers - take them 1H. For some reason, they always cover 1H but then completely collapse in the 2H.


    Ok, well agree to disagree on hating Young. That doesn't disprove the point the lakers can play BETTER for one night without him as he upsets chemistry with his recklessness while still getting streaky and giving 20 on some nights while the Lakers lose despite it.

    I love that D leaguers are playing. Manny Harris was in the D league but it's not like he can't score. He's averaging 30 points a game. That accounts for something when he steps on an NBA floor and his team needs to only lose by 7. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by composite:

    While I wouldn't take Boston -7, I wouldn't touch the Lakers with a ten foot pole. They only have 8 active roster players.  Their *starting* PG was playing D-league one month ago. They're easily the least talented team in the NBA at the moment.Because of Nick Young's suspension they picked up another D-leaguer for tonight's game.  25% of the team (2 out of 8) were D-leaguers last month.  Even more were D-leaguers last year. 

    You're wrong about everyone hating Young.  Kendall Marshall just apologized for his remarks thru twitter.  Young is  a large part of their offense.  If the shot clock is under :10 and there's no set play, he's the guy they turn to. 

    You make good points that Rondo's return might hurt Boston.  And they did lose 8 in a row, but I can't stress how bad this Laker team is right now. 

    But if you're dead set on the Lakers - take them 1H. For some reason, they always cover 1H but then completely collapse in the 2H.


    Ok, well agree to disagree on hating Young. That doesn't disprove the point the lakers can play BETTER for one night without him as he upsets chemistry with his recklessness while still getting streaky and giving 20 on some nights while the Lakers lose despite it.

    I love that D leaguers are playing. Manny Harris was in the D league but it's not like he can't score. He's averaging 30 points a game. That accounts for something when he steps on an NBA floor and his team needs to only lose by 7. 
     
    HugeLetDown
    HugeLetDown
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2014
    Posts: 535
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:39 PM ET #22

    I like your points but I played Lakers the last two games and I felt the covers were pretty lucky... will their luck run out tonight? That's why we gamble boyz. Gl.
    Reply
    I like your points but I played Lakers the last two games and I felt the covers were pretty lucky... will their luck run out tonight? That's why we gamble boyz. Gl.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:39 PM ET #23

    Quote Originally Posted by jriv189:

    great write up scal im 3-0 when tailing your knicks bets ... im on this one as well    

    Let's get it!
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jriv189:

    great write up scal im 3-0 when tailing your knicks bets ... im on this one as well    

    Let's get it!
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:40 PM ET #24

    Quote Originally Posted by SLEEEE:

    Listen to yourselves! Everyone is saying the same thing. It's too many points for the celtics to be laying. Everyone is saying the same thing. So my questions are
    1. Why did the line move in favor of the celtics
    2. What are you going to do if everyone agrees it's too many points to be given?

    Idk about you guys but I'm on celts, luckily got them 6.5 but also took their ml big

    Who is everyone? The public is on the Celtics! Everyone is saying it's perfectly fine to lay!
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by SLEEEE:

    Listen to yourselves! Everyone is saying the same thing. It's too many points for the celtics to be laying. Everyone is saying the same thing. So my questions are
    1. Why did the line move in favor of the celtics
    2. What are you going to do if everyone agrees it's too many points to be given?

    Idk about you guys but I'm on celts, luckily got them 6.5 but also took their ml big

    Who is everyone? The public is on the Celtics! Everyone is saying it's perfectly fine to lay!
     
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Jan. 17, 2014 - 3:41 PM ET #25

    Quote Originally Posted by Kelevra7:



    This ... There's a reason they've lost 12 of 13.

    And there's a reason if you faded the Lakers the last two it cost you big time.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Kelevra7:



    This ... There's a reason they've lost 12 of 13.

    And there's a reason if you faded the Lakers the last two it cost you big time.
    All Forums | NBA Betting Forum
    12345 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 265,048
    • Saturday 09/26/2026 517
    • PART DEUX 196
    • All About streak Survivor! 5,911
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 100,727
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 28,417
    • Saturday Football 11,902
    • **$$$ MD Saturday 9/26 $$$** 7,106
    • ***Macwesties * Sat. Sept. 26, 2026 * Week #4 * NCAAF College Football Plays*** 5,722
    • POY: Clemson +1 at Cal 6,380

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.