All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

Referee #52 in Nuggets Lakers game...

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1798
Posts: 48
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 2486
Posted: #26
Ppe u r an idiot or just plain blind. Go sit in ur car, close the garage door, roll ur windows down, start ur car, and take a nap
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 1906
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by DaBestEver24:

Ppe u r an idiot or just plain blind. Go sit in ur car, close the garage door, roll ur windows down, start ur car, and take a nap

So because the guy who started this thread was WRONG about all 3 calls, you say I am the idiot?  Just LOL.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 2486
Posted: #28
Ur the only person other then the ref who made the calls who thinks those calls were right. Im guessing u dont have a car :(
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 1906
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by DaBestEver24:

Ur the only person other then the ref who made the calls who thinks those calls were right. Im guessing u dont have a car :(

What calls?  Please name one.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 2486
Posted: #30
Jesus christ im not going to explain common sense to a child. If ur really think thosecalls were right then something is wrong with u
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 1906
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by DaBestEver24:

Jesus christ im not going to explain common sense to a child. If ur really think thosecalls were right then something is wrong with u

WHAT CALLS?   Please name one... go ahead.  Oh, you cant?  Sorry.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 671
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by PokerProErik:


WHAT CALLS?   Please name one... go ahead.  Oh, you cant?  Sorry.

How about Kobe being pushed by afflalo and no call. And Bynum getting fouled by nene on that last layup and no call? Even the one that you said kobe threw out of bounds, Harrington fouled him twice. There were also 2 other out bounds calls that went to the nuggets, one wit Bynum involved and another one wit Kobe.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 2486
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by ruxpin810:


How about Kobe being pushed by afflalo and no call. And Bynum getting fouled by nene on that last layup and no call? Even the one that you said kobe threw out of bounds, Harrington fouled him twice. There were also 2 other out bounds calls that went to the nuggets, one wit Bynum involved and another one wit Kobe.
Nicely done. I didnt feel like explaining to this dumb blind retarded E.D loser
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 1906
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by ruxpin810:


How about Kobe being pushed by afflalo and no call. And Bynum getting fouled by nene on that last layup and no call? Even the one that you said kobe threw out of bounds, Harrington fouled him twice. There were also 2 other out bounds calls that went to the nuggets, one wit Bynum involved and another one wit Kobe.

So how is this a call?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 671
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by PokerProErik:


So how is this a call?

Oh ok, I get what ur saying. The refs decided to blow the whistle on plays favoring the nuggets and swallow the whistle on plays favoring the lakers. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 2117
Posted: #36
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 1906
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by ruxpin810:


Oh ok, I get what ur saying. The refs decided to blow the whistle on plays favoring the nuggets and swallow the whistle on plays favoring the lakers. 

I said in another thread, the no call on the Andrew Bynum play was something every ref would have done.  Late in the game, in full speed, you don't call ticky tack stuff like that.  After seeing 23 replays in slow motion, yeah.. but no refs can have that luxury.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 2117
Posted: #38
ruxpin: don't waste your time with that guy. pointless 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 1906
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by sugalboy:

ruxpin: don't waste your time with that guy. pointless 

Not as bad as trying to with you, all you do is   
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 671
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by sugalboy:

ruxpin: don't waste your time with that guy. pointless 

Nah, I got time bro 

So what about the other non-calls then?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 1906
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by ruxpin810:


Nah, I got time bro 

So what about the other non-calls then?

We were discussing bad calls.. not the non calls.  They let Bynum get away with a lot of traveling violations tonight.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 2117
Posted: #42
ppe: why would i  if i won tonight? anyway, not in the mood to argue with you, kindly take a look at the threads in this forum if people think the refs for the game did a horrible job tonight. if you think they didn't, then good for you. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 1906
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by sugalboy:

ppe: why would i  if i won tonight? anyway, not in the mood to argue with you, kindly take a look at the threads in this forum if people think the refs for the game did a horrible job tonight. if you think they didn't, then good for you. 

i dont know why you were being such a cry baby.  You started a whole thread about crying about calls about this and calls about that.  It was a big whine fest in there.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 671
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by PokerProErik:


We were discussing bad calls.. not the non calls.  They let Bynum get away with a lot of traveling violations tonight.


Everyone travels bro, that always evens out, you can't use that argument. But like I said, ur basically saying the refs jst decided to swallow their whistles on plays the would've favored the lakers.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 1906
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by ruxpin810:


Everyone travels bro, that always evens out, you can't use that argument. But like I said, ur basically saying the refs jst decided to swallow their whistles on plays the would've favored the lakers.

NO!  I basically said that none of us would have seen that foul at full speed, and we are only aware of the foul due to literally 23 slow motion replays of the play.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 671
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by PokerProErik:


NO!  I basically said that none of us would have seen that foul at full speed, and we are only aware of the foul due to literally 23 slow motion replays of the play.

Ok, u already said that and I agreed wit u. But since u keep insisting, how do u explain the other non calls?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 2117
Posted: #47
erik: dude, i said what i said. i'm man enough to say that i did. sheesh. why do you have to get on everyone's nerves by posting on every thread and saying we're all crybaby's? cover's is a forum made to vent, to post tips, to post pretty much anything, that is why it is a wonderful site! sheesh. i've been posting here for almost 9 years and i've never been badmouthed by anyone here (maybe because i don't think i've done anything to deserve it?) anyway, i am not here to argue with you. but what i watched is what i saw and posted here. also, kindly read back what i said, that after seeing the first replay of the call on kobe having the last touch on one play, i said i made a mistake, but for all the rest, i stand by what i said. as for the barnes technical, dude, what he did was a normal basketball play, fernandez flopped, the referee blew the whistle, simple as that. it wasn't like barnes was stupid enough to elbow him on purpose?  Anyway, i'm done replying to you, so the same as another veteran here, let's just agree to disagree. thanks for your inputs. 
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 410
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by sugalboy:

erik: dude, i said what i said. i'm man enough to say that i did. sheesh. why do you have to get on everyone's nerves by posting on every thread and saying we're all crybaby's? cover's is a forum made to vent, to post tips, to post pretty much anything, that is why it is a wonderful site! sheesh. i've been posting here for almost 9 years and i've never been badmouthed by anyone here (maybe because i don't think i've done anything to deserve it?) anyway, i am not here to argue with you. but what i watched is what i saw and posted here. also, kindly read back what i said, that after seeing the first replay of the call on kobe having the last touch on one play, i said i made a mistake, but for all the rest, i stand by what i said. as for the barnes technical, dude, what he did was a normal basketball play, fernandez flopped, the referee blew the whistle, simple as that. it wasn't like barnes was stupid enough to elbow him on purpose?  Anyway, i'm done replying to you, so the same as another veteran here, let's just agree to disagree. thanks for your inputs. 
 

Well said, a place to vent.......  some people just don't get it?
All Forums | NBA Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.