Dude, the only thing that matters is what the scoreboard says when the buzzer sounds at the end of the game. Boston was just trying to stay close, knowing they'd played the night before and then WHAM! Lay the "D" on them and take the lead. Worked like a charm.
You're not very smart. You can do a good job of handicapping the game and still end up losing a wager. Just ask people who had the NW ML last night.
Now I'll go look for your post yesterday where you said Dallas would handle Boston for almost the entire game only to give it up right at the end. ![]()
Dude, the only thing that matters is what the scoreboard says when the buzzer sounds at the end of the game. Boston was just trying to stay close, knowing they'd played the night before and then WHAM! Lay the "D" on them and take the lead. Worked like a charm.
You're not very smart. You can do a good job of handicapping the game and still end up losing a wager. Just ask people who had the NW ML last night.
Now I'll go look for your post yesterday where you said Dallas would handle Boston for almost the entire game only to give it up right at the end. ![]()
no excuses, you were popping off and got de-railed.....or railed, whichever you prefer..........at least you came back to face the music ![]()
no excuses, you were popping off and got de-railed.....or railed, whichever you prefer..........at least you came back to face the music ![]()
You're not very smart. You can do a good job of handicapping the game and still end up losing a wager. Just ask people who had the NW ML last night.
Now I'll go look for your post yesterday where you said Dallas would handle Boston for almost the entire game only to give it up right at the end. ![]()
yeah but taking Dallas last night wasnt a good handicapping decision. It was a bad one. Dallas didnt handle Boston the whole game. Boston played with them the entire game until crunch time. Then the better team gave them a beat down
You're not very smart. You can do a good job of handicapping the game and still end up losing a wager. Just ask people who had the NW ML last night.
Now I'll go look for your post yesterday where you said Dallas would handle Boston for almost the entire game only to give it up right at the end. ![]()
yeah but taking Dallas last night wasnt a good handicapping decision. It was a bad one. Dallas didnt handle Boston the whole game. Boston played with them the entire game until crunch time. Then the better team gave them a beat down
yeah but taking Dallas last night wasnt a good handicapping decision. It was a bad one. Dallas didnt handle Boston the whole game. Boston played with them the entire game until crunch time. Then the better team gave them a beat down
yeah but taking Dallas last night wasnt a good handicapping decision. It was a bad one. Dallas didnt handle Boston the whole game. Boston played with them the entire game until crunch time. Then the better team gave them a beat down
I guess a 15 point lead automatically means Boston was out matched? It was a good game Boston just missed shots.....Going like 2-15 FG missing a shit load of easy wide open shots is bad will put you down 15..........Betting against the best team in the league with a good ATS record overall and on the road is NEVER a good decision
I guess a 15 point lead automatically means Boston was out matched? It was a good game Boston just missed shots.....Going like 2-15 FG missing a shit load of easy wide open shots is bad will put you down 15..........Betting against the best team in the league with a good ATS record overall and on the road is NEVER a good decision
I guess a 15 point lead automatically means Boston was out matched? It was a good game Boston just missed shots.....Going like 2-15 FG missing a shit load of easy wide open shots is bad will put you down 15..........Betting against the best team in the league with a good ATS record overall and on the road is NEVER a good decision
I guess a 15 point lead automatically means Boston was out matched? It was a good game Boston just missed shots.....Going like 2-15 FG missing a shit load of easy wide open shots is bad will put you down 15..........Betting against the best team in the league with a good ATS record overall and on the road is NEVER a good decision
We both had our reasons bro no hard feelings, we both have our strategies ![]()
We both had our reasons bro no hard feelings, we both have our strategies ![]()
Can't agree more with everyone who backed mookin. We don't want to lose insightful cappers. I enjoy reading most everyones perspective as I myself have done like the first post for Golden State last night. I can't support anyone who chastises and tries to put a lid on anyone attempting to provide insight on this forum. If all our write-ups/ handicapping had to win in the end for us to remain on covers, none of us bold cappers (those actually trying to offer some free insight to beat your man) would be left within 2 weeks. I'm sure mookin knows some people just like to argue for arguments sake and never attempt to offer insight which is largely what this blog is predicated. Am I right?
Can't agree more with everyone who backed mookin. We don't want to lose insightful cappers. I enjoy reading most everyones perspective as I myself have done like the first post for Golden State last night. I can't support anyone who chastises and tries to put a lid on anyone attempting to provide insight on this forum. If all our write-ups/ handicapping had to win in the end for us to remain on covers, none of us bold cappers (those actually trying to offer some free insight to beat your man) would be left within 2 weeks. I'm sure mookin knows some people just like to argue for arguments sake and never attempt to offer insight which is largely what this blog is predicated. Am I right?
I guess a 15 point lead automatically means Boston was out matched? It was a good game Boston just missed shots.....Going like 2-15 FG missing a shit load of easy wide open shots is bad will put you down 15..........Betting against the best team in the league with a good ATS record overall and on the road is NEVER a good decision
Yah don't bet against the C's on the road, bet against them at home, thats where they lose straight up.
I guess a 15 point lead automatically means Boston was out matched? It was a good game Boston just missed shots.....Going like 2-15 FG missing a shit load of easy wide open shots is bad will put you down 15..........Betting against the best team in the league with a good ATS record overall and on the road is NEVER a good decision
Yah don't bet against the C's on the road, bet against them at home, thats where they lose straight up.
Ooops....
the problem with your bet is overall trends were about even, the Celts were tired, but you also put too much emphasis on this game and it was on tv, so you likely overbet it
no really good gamblers, at least ones who make money, bet a lot on the TV games... the trends favored a Celtics pick anyway, so to go against that is ballsy
your RSI is 0, so you either are not in the weekly contest or ahve no reputation. Mine isnt all taht great but at least im 55% ish
Ooops....
the problem with your bet is overall trends were about even, the Celts were tired, but you also put too much emphasis on this game and it was on tv, so you likely overbet it
no really good gamblers, at least ones who make money, bet a lot on the TV games... the trends favored a Celtics pick anyway, so to go against that is ballsy
your RSI is 0, so you either are not in the weekly contest or ahve no reputation. Mine isnt all taht great but at least im 55% ish
Ooops....
the problem with your bet is overall trends were about even, the Celts were tired, but you also put too much emphasis on this game and it was on tv, so you likely overbet it
no really good gamblers, at least ones who make money, bet a lot on the TV games... the trends favored a Celtics pick anyway, so to go against that is ballsy
your RSI is 0, so you either are not in the weekly contest or ahve no reputation. Mine isnt all taht great but at least im 55% ish
How lucky I must be that your first ever post was in my thread...
I lost one game here man...its not that big of a deal
RSI...dude do you have clue...why would I participate in weekly contests...55%ish....congrats...you are barely beating the Vig. Read the entire thread with every post before you pop off at the mouth
Ooops....
the problem with your bet is overall trends were about even, the Celts were tired, but you also put too much emphasis on this game and it was on tv, so you likely overbet it
no really good gamblers, at least ones who make money, bet a lot on the TV games... the trends favored a Celtics pick anyway, so to go against that is ballsy
your RSI is 0, so you either are not in the weekly contest or ahve no reputation. Mine isnt all taht great but at least im 55% ish
How lucky I must be that your first ever post was in my thread...
I lost one game here man...its not that big of a deal
RSI...dude do you have clue...why would I participate in weekly contests...55%ish....congrats...you are barely beating the Vig. Read the entire thread with every post before you pop off at the mouth

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.