• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

    Hit it up: HUGE PROFIT to be made on the Knicks tomorrow night by fading Linsanity (with write-up)

    «First Previous 123
    CalifDreamin
    3BallBomber
    FrenchMontana
    flatron123
    dalegend
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 6141
    Posts: 74
    «First Previous 123
     
    CalifDreamin
    CalifDreamin
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2011
    Posts: 5598
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 12:32 AM ET #51

    Guy had a big play and it was a blowout loser. It happens, still enjoyed the write-up and when it comes to sports imo scalabrine has some good insight. Good luck to you Scalabrine and the rest of the guys

     

    Reply

    Guy had a big play and it was a blowout loser. It happens, still enjoyed the write-up and when it comes to sports imo scalabrine has some good insight. Good luck to you Scalabrine and the rest of the guys

     

     
    3BallBomber
    3BallBomber
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2008
    Posts: 14500
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 1:24 AM ET #52

    but sometimes it's good to just post your plays and state you're putting extra units to depict your confidence on the play rather than advertising it in this manner.

    bad luck though bro
    Reply
    but sometimes it's good to just post your plays and state you're putting extra units to depict your confidence on the play rather than advertising it in this manner.

    bad luck though bro
     
    FrenchMontana
    FrenchMontana
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2012
    Posts: 45
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 1:36 AM ET #53

    Sorry about your play.  That being said, your write-up was absolutely ridiculous.  You might as well have said "Knicks are better, so they will win".  As if you came up with an inside angle that Vegas didn't think of.  Not only that, you completely reversed the Jeremy Lin motivation angle.  Why would the Knicks be more motivated to beat Jeremy Lin, they were the ones who opted not to match the contract offer?  They figured he wasn't worth the money, so they made the choice to let him go.  Jeremy wanted to stay in New York.  If anything, he should be motivated to beat them!  Anyways, I'm sorry for your loss tonight, and I hope you continue to learn and pick winners in the future.  If you came across little less obnoxious in your analysis you would receive less hate.  Lastly, try to look for angles a little more in depth than "Knicks are better".  Vegas knows that the Knicks are better, and with such a short line, they were most likely looking for betters like yourself to make large bets on the "better" team, in a less than ideal situation for the team.  Whether it be a difficult situation on the schedule, a matchup mismatch, rebounding advantage, fast break point edge, free throws, decision making etc.  Not all teams match up well with each other and the "better team" record wise will not always come out on top.  Good luck in the future my friend.  
    Reply
    Sorry about your play.  That being said, your write-up was absolutely ridiculous.  You might as well have said "Knicks are better, so they will win".  As if you came up with an inside angle that Vegas didn't think of.  Not only that, you completely reversed the Jeremy Lin motivation angle.  Why would the Knicks be more motivated to beat Jeremy Lin, they were the ones who opted not to match the contract offer?  They figured he wasn't worth the money, so they made the choice to let him go.  Jeremy wanted to stay in New York.  If anything, he should be motivated to beat them!  Anyways, I'm sorry for your loss tonight, and I hope you continue to learn and pick winners in the future.  If you came across little less obnoxious in your analysis you would receive less hate.  Lastly, try to look for angles a little more in depth than "Knicks are better".  Vegas knows that the Knicks are better, and with such a short line, they were most likely looking for betters like yourself to make large bets on the "better" team, in a less than ideal situation for the team.  Whether it be a difficult situation on the schedule, a matchup mismatch, rebounding advantage, fast break point edge, free throws, decision making etc.  Not all teams match up well with each other and the "better team" record wise will not always come out on top.  Good luck in the future my friend.  
     
    flatron123
    flatron123
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2009
    Posts: 1339
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 1:58 AM ET #54

    IT"S LINSANITY girl !!!! SUCK IT!!!
    Reply
    IT"S LINSANITY girl !!!! SUCK IT!!!
     
    dalegend
    dalegend
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 1723
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 1:59 AM ET #55

    Quote Originally Posted by FrenchMontana:

    Sorry about your play.  That being said, your write-up was absolutely ridiculous.  You might as well have said "Knicks are better, so they will win".  As if you came up with an inside angle that Vegas didn't think of.  Not only that, you completely reversed the Jeremy Lin motivation angle.  Why would the Knicks be more motivated to beat Jeremy Lin, they were the ones who opted not to match the contract offer?  They figured he wasn't worth the money, so they made the choice to let him go.  Jeremy wanted to stay in New York.  If anything, he should be motivated to beat them!  Anyways, I'm sorry for your loss tonight, and I hope you continue to learn and pick winners in the future.  If you came across little less obnoxious in your analysis you would receive less hate.  Lastly, try to look for angles a little more in depth than "Knicks are better".  Vegas knows that the Knicks are better, and with such a short line, they were most likely looking for betters like yourself to make large bets on the "better" team, in a less than ideal situation for the team.  Whether it be a difficult situation on the schedule, a matchup mismatch, rebounding advantage, fast break point edge, free throws, decision making etc.  Not all teams match up well with each other and the "better team" record wise will not always come out on top.  Good luck in the future my friend.  

    ??? Real easy to say after the game is complete. Moron.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by FrenchMontana:

    Sorry about your play.  That being said, your write-up was absolutely ridiculous.  You might as well have said "Knicks are better, so they will win".  As if you came up with an inside angle that Vegas didn't think of.  Not only that, you completely reversed the Jeremy Lin motivation angle.  Why would the Knicks be more motivated to beat Jeremy Lin, they were the ones who opted not to match the contract offer?  They figured he wasn't worth the money, so they made the choice to let him go.  Jeremy wanted to stay in New York.  If anything, he should be motivated to beat them!  Anyways, I'm sorry for your loss tonight, and I hope you continue to learn and pick winners in the future.  If you came across little less obnoxious in your analysis you would receive less hate.  Lastly, try to look for angles a little more in depth than "Knicks are better".  Vegas knows that the Knicks are better, and with such a short line, they were most likely looking for betters like yourself to make large bets on the "better" team, in a less than ideal situation for the team.  Whether it be a difficult situation on the schedule, a matchup mismatch, rebounding advantage, fast break point edge, free throws, decision making etc.  Not all teams match up well with each other and the "better team" record wise will not always come out on top.  Good luck in the future my friend.  

    ??? Real easy to say after the game is complete. Moron.
     
    baller85
    baller85
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 187
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 2:55 AM ET #56

    you win some you lose some. peace fellas, we're all trying to help each other make some money 
    Reply
    you win some you lose some. peace fellas, we're all trying to help each other make some money 
     
    EastOakland
    EastOakland
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2012
    Posts: 4489
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 3:26 AM ET #57

    Hardensanity
    Reply
    Hardensanity
     
    aceindhoe
    aceindhoe
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2010
    Posts: 45
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 4:57 AM ET #58

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    Game: Knicks @ Rockets
    Line: Knicks -4 (you can still find it at 3.5 too on Bovada as of this posting)

    Linsanity is a thing of the past right? A fleeting moment in Knicks history that is no longer relevant. 

    Well let me give you a wake-up call. To the Knicks, in their first game against Jeremy Lin, it is very, very relevant. 

    Felton, the guy who the Knicks signed may just have the game of his life against Lin. That will be combined with Kidd making a point to show him up as much as possible in this game as well. 

    The Knicks will smother Lin. You will see turnovers and some of the most aggressive D possible to ensure Lin doesn't do anything of consequence in the box score against the Knicks. Lin will score and get some assists because he does have talent, but this will NOT be a Linsanity type game of last year.

    Therefore, in my view, this will be a 4 on 5. So how will the rest of the team fair against the Rockets? The Knicks have the best point differential in the league (Offensive output - Defensive Pts allowed). Why is this important? Listen to the top teams in the league in Pt Differential last year: Miami, Chicago, OKC, San Antonio, and Boston.

    Needless to say, Pt Differential determines playoff teams and champions.

    The Knicks are playoff, and at this point, championship material. 

    Curious about the Rockets Pt. Differential this year? -1.1

    They are an average to a below average team playing one of the best, if not the best team in the league at this point. Remember the Knicks smoked the Heat opening night and beat San Antonio in their house this year. The only reason they have two losses is because the second leg of both games were on B2B's, one against Memphis (the other Dallas) who is another elite team in the West. Without the B2B's the Knicks could easily be undefeated as the rest of their wins are by significant margins and are no fluke.

    The Knicks are winning games no in ways that are, amazingly, boring. They are almost TOO efficient (see the recent win over the Hornets). 

    So what's the opening line? -4 Knicks.

    Guys, this line is ideal. I'm making this one of the biggest plays this year thusfar given I'm so comfortable with them covering it.

    So to summarize:

    We have what may be the best team in the league, offensively and defensively, going against an average to below average team coupled with the extra motivation to show up the guy who created hysteria in their city (and worldwide) and leave Houston with a convincing win. 

    The ONLY con I can think of is that the Knicks likely didn't practice today and may have fattened themselves up a bit too much with family with stuffing and mash. But even at that, the Rockets likely didn't practice as well and fattened themselves up like the rest of the league and America as well. Otherwise, there is NO REASON you shouldn't pound this line for all of the reasons above.

    This is not a trap line, just a bad one at the moment for you to take advantage of. Forget your unwarranted fear of the public pounding/what vegas knows that we don't! Sometimes that is warranted but not in this game. Let Vegas take a bath on this one while you profit.

    The pick:

    KNICKS -4 over Rockets


    Nice Write-Up!  Now tell me what were you smoking on when you analyzed this game.  I want some of that garbage you smoking. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    Game: Knicks @ Rockets
    Line: Knicks -4 (you can still find it at 3.5 too on Bovada as of this posting)

    Linsanity is a thing of the past right? A fleeting moment in Knicks history that is no longer relevant. 

    Well let me give you a wake-up call. To the Knicks, in their first game against Jeremy Lin, it is very, very relevant. 

    Felton, the guy who the Knicks signed may just have the game of his life against Lin. That will be combined with Kidd making a point to show him up as much as possible in this game as well. 

    The Knicks will smother Lin. You will see turnovers and some of the most aggressive D possible to ensure Lin doesn't do anything of consequence in the box score against the Knicks. Lin will score and get some assists because he does have talent, but this will NOT be a Linsanity type game of last year.

    Therefore, in my view, this will be a 4 on 5. So how will the rest of the team fair against the Rockets? The Knicks have the best point differential in the league (Offensive output - Defensive Pts allowed). Why is this important? Listen to the top teams in the league in Pt Differential last year: Miami, Chicago, OKC, San Antonio, and Boston.

    Needless to say, Pt Differential determines playoff teams and champions.

    The Knicks are playoff, and at this point, championship material. 

    Curious about the Rockets Pt. Differential this year? -1.1

    They are an average to a below average team playing one of the best, if not the best team in the league at this point. Remember the Knicks smoked the Heat opening night and beat San Antonio in their house this year. The only reason they have two losses is because the second leg of both games were on B2B's, one against Memphis (the other Dallas) who is another elite team in the West. Without the B2B's the Knicks could easily be undefeated as the rest of their wins are by significant margins and are no fluke.

    The Knicks are winning games no in ways that are, amazingly, boring. They are almost TOO efficient (see the recent win over the Hornets). 

    So what's the opening line? -4 Knicks.

    Guys, this line is ideal. I'm making this one of the biggest plays this year thusfar given I'm so comfortable with them covering it.

    So to summarize:

    We have what may be the best team in the league, offensively and defensively, going against an average to below average team coupled with the extra motivation to show up the guy who created hysteria in their city (and worldwide) and leave Houston with a convincing win. 

    The ONLY con I can think of is that the Knicks likely didn't practice today and may have fattened themselves up a bit too much with family with stuffing and mash. But even at that, the Rockets likely didn't practice as well and fattened themselves up like the rest of the league and America as well. Otherwise, there is NO REASON you shouldn't pound this line for all of the reasons above.

    This is not a trap line, just a bad one at the moment for you to take advantage of. Forget your unwarranted fear of the public pounding/what vegas knows that we don't! Sometimes that is warranted but not in this game. Let Vegas take a bath on this one while you profit.

    The pick:

    KNICKS -4 over Rockets


    Nice Write-Up!  Now tell me what were you smoking on when you analyzed this game.  I want some of that garbage you smoking. 
     
    Bruno_Saturn
    Bruno_Saturn
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2012
    Posts: 385
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 6:11 AM ET #59

    thnx for ur insight i won 5k betting on the rockets -12 pts HAHAHA 
    knicks havent won a game der in 8 yrs.. perfect game.. this is the biggest game ur right but not for the knicks lolz bol on ur next bet
    Reply
    thnx for ur insight i won 5k betting on the rockets -12 pts HAHAHA 
    knicks havent won a game der in 8 yrs.. perfect game.. this is the biggest game ur right but not for the knicks lolz bol on ur next bet
     
    benhogan76
    benhogan76
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2008
    Posts: 63850
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 4:57 PM ET #60

    You like anything tonight?
    We should stop eating bananas.
    Reply
    You like anything tonight?
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 5:09 PM ET #61

    Quote Originally Posted by cpgraves:

    Your angles are seen from a narrow scope.  After years of betting on the NBA, I'll tell you one thing, HOME COURT MATTERS.  Now because of your write up and making this your biggest play of the year... I will gladly fade you and take the home team with the points.

    Vegas isn't dumb...and they don't take one game off..  

    I'll be with vegas tomorrow,...

    Good luck with your BIGGEST BET OF THE YEAR!!!! 

    And this was your angle:

    HOME COURT MATTERS!!!

    And that is the essence of capping buffoonery...
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by cpgraves:

    Your angles are seen from a narrow scope.  After years of betting on the NBA, I'll tell you one thing, HOME COURT MATTERS.  Now because of your write up and making this your biggest play of the year... I will gladly fade you and take the home team with the points.

    Vegas isn't dumb...and they don't take one game off..  

    I'll be with vegas tomorrow,...

    Good luck with your BIGGEST BET OF THE YEAR!!!! 

    And this was your angle:

    HOME COURT MATTERS!!!

    And that is the essence of capping buffoonery...
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 5:11 PM ET #62

    Quote Originally Posted by cpgraves:

    wow they might score more than 130... with no overtime..

    HOW OFF WERE YOU?!?!?! - its one thing to lose a close one, but to be completely off like you were...WOW, re-evaluate your betting son.

    I mean you seemed pretty confident with your angles...

    LMFAO!!!

    Boy you are a trip aren't you.


    And if they scored 230, do you think I lost any extra money because of it. The team took the night off in the 2H. 130, 230, 330 means nothing beyond a loss.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by cpgraves:

    wow they might score more than 130... with no overtime..

    HOW OFF WERE YOU?!?!?! - its one thing to lose a close one, but to be completely off like you were...WOW, re-evaluate your betting son.

    I mean you seemed pretty confident with your angles...

    LMFAO!!!

    Boy you are a trip aren't you.


    And if they scored 230, do you think I lost any extra money because of it. The team took the night off in the 2H. 130, 230, 330 means nothing beyond a loss.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 5:12 PM ET #63

    Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:


    A rolling head from a guy that literally posts 14+ bets in JUST the NFL during a typical weekend. 

    Follow him and keep the quarter in your pocket that could do just as well (except the fact that a quarter doesn't have to pay juice on a bet).

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:


    A rolling head from a guy that literally posts 14+ bets in JUST the NFL during a typical weekend. 

    Follow him and keep the quarter in your pocket that could do just as well (except the fact that a quarter doesn't have to pay juice on a bet).

     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 5:13 PM ET #64

    Quote Originally Posted by CalifDreamin:

    Guy had a big play and it was a blowout loser. It happens, still enjoyed the write-up and when it comes to sports imo scalabrine has some good insight. Good luck to you Scalabrine and the rest of the guys

     

     Probably the only morsel of class in the entire thread with minor exceptions. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by CalifDreamin:

    Guy had a big play and it was a blowout loser. It happens, still enjoyed the write-up and when it comes to sports imo scalabrine has some good insight. Good luck to you Scalabrine and the rest of the guys

     

     Probably the only morsel of class in the entire thread with minor exceptions. 
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 5:16 PM ET #65

    Quote Originally Posted by 3BallBomber:

    but sometimes it's good to just post your plays and state you're putting extra units to depict your confidence on the play rather than advertising it in this manner.

    bad luck though bro

    Thanks but I've never been into just posting.

    The reasoning was sound on the Lin front. He was pretty much shut down in the first half as predicted, did not 'go off' as some had suspected he'd have motivation to. Obviously in a 130+ pt victory his line was tame and padded by garbage time. 

    If bettors want to put their money on Chandler Parsons dropping 30 before gametime when they place the bet, go right ahead..
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by 3BallBomber:

    but sometimes it's good to just post your plays and state you're putting extra units to depict your confidence on the play rather than advertising it in this manner.

    bad luck though bro

    Thanks but I've never been into just posting.

    The reasoning was sound on the Lin front. He was pretty much shut down in the first half as predicted, did not 'go off' as some had suspected he'd have motivation to. Obviously in a 130+ pt victory his line was tame and padded by garbage time. 

    If bettors want to put their money on Chandler Parsons dropping 30 before gametime when they place the bet, go right ahead..
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 5:21 PM ET #66

    Quote Originally Posted by FrenchMontana:

    Sorry about your play.  That being said, your write-up was absolutely ridiculous.  You might as well have said "Knicks are better, so they will win".  As if you came up with an inside angle that Vegas didn't think of.  Not only that, you completely reversed the Jeremy Lin motivation angle.  Why would the Knicks be more motivated to beat Jeremy Lin, they were the ones who opted not to match the contract offer?  They figured he wasn't worth the money, so they made the choice to let him go.  Jeremy wanted to stay in New York.  If anything, he should be motivated to beat them!  Anyways, I'm sorry for your loss tonight, and I hope you continue to learn and pick winners in the future.  If you came across little less obnoxious in your analysis you would receive less hate.  Lastly, try to look for angles a little more in depth than "Knicks are better".  Vegas knows that the Knicks are better, and with such a short line, they were most likely looking for betters like yourself to make large bets on the "better" team, in a less than ideal situation for the team.  Whether it be a difficult situation on the schedule, a matchup mismatch, rebounding advantage, fast break point edge, free throws, decision making etc.  Not all teams match up well with each other and the "better team" record wise will not always come out on top.  Good luck in the future my friend.  

    Kid, you are a joke. 

    The Knicks have been the most dominant team in the league until last night, should have been undefeated and the Rockets were on a slide into Western Conference oblivion going 3-6 in their last 10. 

    You can take your 'vegas knows' capping method and put your money in the fire on the yule log.

    The fact of the matter is, even though the Knicks didn't show up, the line was a good one for Knicks bettors as Vegas has been making them short since the beginning of the year. The exact same write-up minus lin talk for the Hornets game is a winner.

    I'm still waiting for a single poster to tell me why the Rockets were a good spot.

    This was an excellent spot for the Knicks. They simply didn't show up on either side of the ball. Nuff said. You move on to the next hundred betting nights in the future and forget about it.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by FrenchMontana:

    Sorry about your play.  That being said, your write-up was absolutely ridiculous.  You might as well have said "Knicks are better, so they will win".  As if you came up with an inside angle that Vegas didn't think of.  Not only that, you completely reversed the Jeremy Lin motivation angle.  Why would the Knicks be more motivated to beat Jeremy Lin, they were the ones who opted not to match the contract offer?  They figured he wasn't worth the money, so they made the choice to let him go.  Jeremy wanted to stay in New York.  If anything, he should be motivated to beat them!  Anyways, I'm sorry for your loss tonight, and I hope you continue to learn and pick winners in the future.  If you came across little less obnoxious in your analysis you would receive less hate.  Lastly, try to look for angles a little more in depth than "Knicks are better".  Vegas knows that the Knicks are better, and with such a short line, they were most likely looking for betters like yourself to make large bets on the "better" team, in a less than ideal situation for the team.  Whether it be a difficult situation on the schedule, a matchup mismatch, rebounding advantage, fast break point edge, free throws, decision making etc.  Not all teams match up well with each other and the "better team" record wise will not always come out on top.  Good luck in the future my friend.  

    Kid, you are a joke. 

    The Knicks have been the most dominant team in the league until last night, should have been undefeated and the Rockets were on a slide into Western Conference oblivion going 3-6 in their last 10. 

    You can take your 'vegas knows' capping method and put your money in the fire on the yule log.

    The fact of the matter is, even though the Knicks didn't show up, the line was a good one for Knicks bettors as Vegas has been making them short since the beginning of the year. The exact same write-up minus lin talk for the Hornets game is a winner.

    I'm still waiting for a single poster to tell me why the Rockets were a good spot.

    This was an excellent spot for the Knicks. They simply didn't show up on either side of the ball. Nuff said. You move on to the next hundred betting nights in the future and forget about it.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 5:22 PM ET #67

    Quote Originally Posted by dalegend:


    ??? Real easy to say after the game is complete. Moron.

    And they ALWAYS come in the thread AFTER the game...

    Never sticking their neck out before so it's on the line....

    Cowards...
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by dalegend:


    ??? Real easy to say after the game is complete. Moron.

    And they ALWAYS come in the thread AFTER the game...

    Never sticking their neck out before so it's on the line....

    Cowards...
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 5:22 PM ET #68

    Quote Originally Posted by baller85:

    you win some you lose some. peace fellas, we're all trying to help each other make some money 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by baller85:

    you win some you lose some. peace fellas, we're all trying to help each other make some money 
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 5:24 PM ET #69

    Quote Originally Posted by aceindhoe:



    Nice Write-Up!  Now tell me what were you smoking on when you analyzed this game.  I want some of that garbage you smoking. 

    And I'm sure Bator was smoking garbage, the best thing this forum has ever seen, when he capped the Pats to beat the Giants, a game in which only the worst of Giants homers bet the ML (and none of you certainly did)...
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by aceindhoe:



    Nice Write-Up!  Now tell me what were you smoking on when you analyzed this game.  I want some of that garbage you smoking. 

    And I'm sure Bator was smoking garbage, the best thing this forum has ever seen, when he capped the Pats to beat the Giants, a game in which only the worst of Giants homers bet the ML (and none of you certainly did)...
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 5:24 PM ET #70

    Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

    You like anything tonight?
    I do actually.

    What do you think I'll give up capping because of one game where a team doesn't show up???
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

    You like anything tonight?
    I do actually.

    What do you think I'll give up capping because of one game where a team doesn't show up???
     
    benhogan76
    benhogan76
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2008
    Posts: 63850
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 5:29 PM ET #71

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    I do actually.

    What do you think I'll give up capping because of one game where a team doesn't show up???
    I know you wont, just seems like these page long write ups dont come around often enough.  BOL, just bad luck last night.
    We should stop eating bananas.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    I do actually.

    What do you think I'll give up capping because of one game where a team doesn't show up???
    I know you wont, just seems like these page long write ups dont come around often enough.  BOL, just bad luck last night.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 5:36 PM ET #72

    Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

    I know you wont, just seems like these page long write ups dont come around often enough.  BOL, just bad luck last night.

    I think write-ups have gone the way of the dinosaur in the NBA forums.

    Yes, they don't always win. Yes, many disagree, but with just a post and pick, other than the capper's record and rep, how can anyone put any stock in the pick?

    I come around so infrequently, I offer write-ups as a way of justifying the pick and this one was NOT just a Lin-based pick. It didn't work out. Anyhow, people should fade the pick if they don't like the write-up. But at least they know they are disagreeing with unsound thinking. It's about how much you know, not about, as Rumsfeld would say the "unknown unknowns".
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

    I know you wont, just seems like these page long write ups dont come around often enough.  BOL, just bad luck last night.

    I think write-ups have gone the way of the dinosaur in the NBA forums.

    Yes, they don't always win. Yes, many disagree, but with just a post and pick, other than the capper's record and rep, how can anyone put any stock in the pick?

    I come around so infrequently, I offer write-ups as a way of justifying the pick and this one was NOT just a Lin-based pick. It didn't work out. Anyhow, people should fade the pick if they don't like the write-up. But at least they know they are disagreeing with unsound thinking. It's about how much you know, not about, as Rumsfeld would say the "unknown unknowns".
     
    hansivonmueller
    hansivonmueller
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 1908
    Posted: Nov. 24, 2012 - 5:42 PM ET #73

    I'm having a go at capping NBA and last night I had Raptors +2 and Nicks -4.5. I thought the Nicks was my strongest play, but it turned out it was not. That game left me scratching my head and learning a few hard lessons as well. Its tough when your confidence play gets chucked in the garbage bin. Chalk one up for experience, and move on. Good luck with your future plays.

    P.S. Thanks go to the people who saw differently to this play and voiced their opinion. Some good feedback, though a little harsh at times. Takes a man to stomp on someone when their on the ground.
    Reply
    I'm having a go at capping NBA and last night I had Raptors +2 and Nicks -4.5. I thought the Nicks was my strongest play, but it turned out it was not. That game left me scratching my head and learning a few hard lessons as well. Its tough when your confidence play gets chucked in the garbage bin. Chalk one up for experience, and move on. Good luck with your future plays.

    P.S. Thanks go to the people who saw differently to this play and voiced their opinion. Some good feedback, though a little harsh at times. Takes a man to stomp on someone when their on the ground.
     
     
    crod1980
    crod1980
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2012
    Posts: 688
    Posted: Dec. 4, 2012 - 10:19 PM ET #74

    scalabrine, are you being serious here when you do these ridiculously long write ups, or are you just goofing around with everyone?
    Reply
    scalabrine, are you being serious here when you do these ridiculously long write ups, or are you just goofing around with everyone?
    All Forums | NBA Betting Forum
    «First Previous 123

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 450,601
    • Monday 09/28/2026 803
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 265,214
    • Rams vs Broncos in game live SNF 2,739
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 102,092
    • Eagles@Bears discussion 2,701
    • Another BS PI 997
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 28,545
    • NCAA WEEK 4 *** Parlay Picasso *** 9,341
    • HELP PLEASE 1,623

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.