All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

Did Vegas put curry's wife up to that tweet?

...

Participants:

Posts: 45

YoungBuckman

Prospect

Joined: Mar, 2013

Posts: 455

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 3:39 AM ET #26

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

Again who is Vegas? Is it a single person? A single sportsbook? I love hearing the term "vegas" as if its' one person. These theories are great. Hello Ayesha this is Vegas calling please put a tweet blasting the league and the officials.

Excellent post, everyone who uses the term "Vegas" on here it is a clear indicator that they are mentally unstable. They think the world revolves around "Vegas" when in reality international online bookmakers such as Bet365, Ladbrokes, Williamhill probably take far more action on sports betting. I mean, if I'm not mistaken, casinos in Vegas can only take bets at the window - or am I mistaken?

Quote Originally Posted by davemsh:

You do know Vegas is only a tiny % of the bets wagered. Vegas is a nobody.. Offshore books probably take 10X more bets $$ than vegas. Betcris/Bookmaker in reality sets the lines for games and than Vegas follows and adjusts.

Exactly!

He's an idiot and doesn't understand how to gamble. Yesterday's bet on Golden State line + Cavs ML is clear evidence.

Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:

Quote Originally Posted by Jcarver:

Can some mod just put this guy out of his misery? its getting really sad lately

Have some respect man I just want to get the last green bar
And have respect for my opinions and theories...Ive been right on quite a few of them so far

You don't deserve much respect because you make zero sense. How can you be 98% sure Cavs are going to win, but not putting half your life savings on it. If I had a 98% chance of winning a bet at odds of +170, I would be throwing everything I have on it. 98% means that Cavs will win 98 times out of 100, where are you getting this idiotic figure from?
Also as someone pointed out, instead of backing Cavs ML AND hedging on GS ML, why not just put less on Cavs???

Exactly!

He's an idiot and doesn't understand how to gamble. Yesterday's bet on Golden State line + Cavs ML is clear evidence.

Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:

Quote Originally Posted by Jcarver:

Can some mod just put this guy out of his misery? its getting really sad lately

Have some respect man I just want to get the last green bar
And have respect for my opinions and theories...Ive been right on quite a few of them so far

Hodor

Prospect

Joined: Jan, 2015

Posts: 65

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 3:58 AM ET #27

Not gonna read thread. Read stupid title, saw username and it all made sense. Please get professional help if your not trolling.

Scratch that I'm pretty sure your just trolling for attention which is even more sad, please leave your parents basement once in a while.

mgmprofits

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2012

Posts: 6659

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 12:20 PM ET #28

Quote Originally Posted by YoungBuckman:

Excellent post, everyone who uses the term "Vegas" on here it is a clear indicator that they are mentally unstable. They think the world revolves around "Vegas" when in reality international online bookmakers such as Bet365, Ladbrokes, Williamhill probably take far more action on sports betting. I mean, if I'm not mistaken, casinos in Vegas can only take bets at the window - or am I mistaken?

Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:

Instead of hedging small on gsw why don't you just bet that much less on cavs ml?It's not really hedging when you have a piece of the action on both sides.If it were a future or last game of a parlay different story.

He's an idiot and doesn't understand how to gamble. Yesterday's bet on Golden State line + Cavs ML is clear evidence.

Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:

Quote Originally Posted by Jcarver:

Can some mod just put this guy out of his misery? its getting really sad lately
Have some respect man I just want to get the last green bar
And have respect for my opinions and theories...Ive been right on quite a few of them so far

You don't deserve much respect because you make zero sense. How can you be 98% sure Cavs are going to win, but not putting half your life savings on it. If I had a 98% chance of winning a bet at odds of +170, I would be throwing everything I have on it. 98% means that Cavs will win 98 times out of 100, where are you getting this idiotic figure from?
Also as someone pointed out, instead of backing Cavs ML AND hedging on GS ML, why not just put less on Cavs???

Using the word "Vegas" is a figure of speech. Nothing more, nothing less.

Actually you are just mentally retarded.

Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:

Using the word "Vegas" is a figure of speech. Nothing more, nothing less.

Actually you are just mentally retarded.

mgmprofits

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2012

Posts: 6659

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 12:22 PM ET #29

Y..B........Vegas has online aps where you can make bets.

Guess you've never been here before, if you didn't even know that

mgmprofits

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2012

Posts: 6659

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 12:25 PM ET #30

Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:

That's the part that goes over your head. I mentioned I COULD do that, but because of the way my brain works, I'd rather keep track of both separetly.

And I did invest a shitload into cavs. A little too much and I am worried now after the way game 6 went. You know I think the exact opposite as the public does.

I don't know if the tweet was a good thing or bad thing yet...these are just THEORIES nothing more, nothing less.

Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:

That's the part that goes over your head. I mentioned I COULD do that, but because of the way my brain works, I'd rather keep track of both separetly.

And I did invest a shitload into cavs. A little too much and I am worried now after the way game 6 went. You know I think the exact opposite as the public does.

I don't know if the tweet was a good thing or bad thing yet...these are just THEORIES nothing more, nothing less.

mgmprofits

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2012

Posts: 6659

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 12:26 PM ET #31

And I am no longer 98% sure, I'm down to about 60% (I said 50 in another thread but since then my opinion has went up about 10%)

By tomorrow I should be up to 80% hopefully (at least)

I was dead serious about being 98% sure though. You aren't me, so you don't know what I think

mgmprofits

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2012

Posts: 6659

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 12:29 PM ET #32

You keep forgetting I only risked 1 unit on the ride winnings system originally.

And I risked more on the multiple cavs futures I have. So, that's why I prefer to keep track separeltly. And make guaranteed money either way yes,

but rather than just putting less on cavs was not part of my plan.

Yeah I know I sound retarded, but you don't have my brain so you don't see what I see

RCDirect

Prospect

Joined: Feb, 2009

Posts: 318

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 1:02 PM ET #33

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

Again who is Vegas? Is it a single person? A single sportsbook? I love hearing the term "vegas" as if its' one person.

These theories are great. Hello Ayesha this is Vegas calling please put a tweet blasting the league and the officials.

You are right Deezy, That's exactly how it happened. All of the Vegas books are in on it along with all of the offshore books. People don't realize what a tight knit group it is.

Once they decide their strategy at the daily bookie meeting, Arnold goes to work. Arnold is the guy that sets up all these deals with the refs, the TV network and Curry's wife. Now when he calls he doesn't use his real name Arnold because he's smart enough to protect himself. Like you said, he just says, "Hello this is Vegas". That way he can never be accused of wrong doing because Vegas is not a real person. It's kind of like Citizen's United in reverse. It was Arnold that set up that 3rd foul on Love because the bookies knew that Cleveland would play better without him. These guys are sharp.

So now, all we can do is try to figure out what Vegas cooked up in this mornings bookie meeting. Will they use Ayesha again or will they get Arnold to bribe Shumpert's hairdresser? Everyone has a price so the hairdresser could slip an electronic device into Shump's hair causing his brain to become imbalanced so he'll blow the game. But I have my doubts. That strategy could backfire as it may cause Shumpert to play really well and score 63 points. Either way, Vegas will have a master plan.

I've got to give this more thought before placing a bet. I've got to think like Vegas.

mgmprofits

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2012

Posts: 6659

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 1:07 PM ET #34

Quote Originally Posted by RCDirect:

You are right Deezy, That's exactly how it happened. All of the Vegas books are in on it along with all of the offshore books. People don't realize what a tight knit group it is.

I've got to give this more thought before placing a bet. I've got to think like Vegas.

OCwager

Veteran

Joined: Apr, 2016

Posts: 4721

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 1:34 PM ET #35

mgm..u must be asian...

OCwager

Veteran

Joined: Apr, 2016

Posts: 4721

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 1:35 PM ET #36

mgm...i would call u good if you knew this all before hand...ur always a hand short

mgmprofits

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2012

Posts: 6659

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 2:14 PM ET #37

Quote Originally Posted by OCwager:

mgm...i would call u good if you knew this all before hand...ur always a hand short

wtf are you talking about? I predicted all this BEFORE it happened

Obviously you didn't read all of my 1,500 posts I made this week

(Had 4800 posts last week now up to 6300)

You'll see, Cleveland will win to set up the finals rematch next year tied at 1-1,. rather than GS 2-0....that is NOT entertainment to let GS win again this year

Anyone who thinks GS is winning this series still, then you must think the NBA or whoever scripts these games are idiots. And they'd have to be, to let GS win again

CLE has to win so we can see the 1-1 rematch, best of 3 for 2017

cant wait

mgmprofits

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2012

Posts: 6659

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 2:18 PM ET #38

Because that would bring much higher ratings and distract many more people!

mgmprofits

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2012

Posts: 6659

Posted: Jun. 18, 2016 - 2:19 PM ET #39

Quote Originally Posted by OCwager:

mgm..u must be asian...

Nah I'm a better driver than that!!

mgmprofits

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2012

Posts: 6659

Posted: Jun. 19, 2016 - 12:35 AM ET #40

Quote Originally Posted by statfreak:

ohh forgot to mention in your awful conspiracy theory, you assume, for some reason, that ppl "wont fall for the trap", because to YOU,realize thats the trap, so they actually have to bet clev!!... really mate?? you think thats the way the public will react??

the trap is for ppl to think "vegas" wants them on Clev, but they will

ammm yeah, its not working... ppl is all over the cavs

Like I said it's just a valid theory. Nobody has proven it wrong. And I wasn't saying the PUBLIC would do that. Because the public is ALREADY on GS, I am saying the conspiracy people who think its rigged, like the people on this board, would do that. It worked on me for a few mins I went from 98% sure to 50% sure earlier about cavs

But then I saw clearly what they were doing I thought about it in the correct way and back up to 99%

captainandseven

Banned

Joined: Mar, 2013

Posts: 1980

Posted: Jun. 19, 2016 - 9:56 AM ET #41

Your a person clown get lost loser here is an idea why don't you do all of us a favor and go play in traffic you should be thankful this is the Internet cause if I met you in person id put your head through the pavement your nothing but a joke

PapaShango

Hall of Fame

Joined: Dec, 2010

Posts: 29065

Posted: Jun. 19, 2016 - 12:57 PM ET #42

Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:

The people who work for vegas maybe? Or should I say the people who OWN it.

Oh yea, the people that "OWN" Vegas are putting Ayesha Curry up to tweeting. Literally fuckking retarded. That's one of the dumbest things you've ever said and that's saying a lot. You realize "Vegas" account for like 1-2% of the sportsbetting in America?

PapaShango

Hall of Fame

Joined: Dec, 2010

Posts: 29065

Posted: Jun. 19, 2016 - 12:59 PM ET #43

Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:

That means cavs will win because the bookie is crying about my cavs pick

Why else would he do that? I can't think of a valid reason. If he doesn't like my posts he doesn't have to read them

If it was against the rules to post a lot, why the f.uck would covers give us a participation meter? In which I haven't even filled all the way up yet. So I am definitely not posting "too much"

Maybe he is pissed about your bet because he has too much action on one side for his liking tonight. I mean, dude, get a clue for once. You are just clueless all the time, make up these elaborate theories that are nonsensical and then when you lose, make excuses for your loss.

You told me there was less than a 1% chance Cavs win game 6 and Warriors win game 7. Another useless post you made. Then in 3BB's thread, you are already backtracking and convincing yourself that you'll have an excuse ready once the Warriors win. It's quite pathetic, but every thread you make is pretty pathetic, so it makes sense.

PapaShango

Hall of Fame

Joined: Dec, 2010

Posts: 29065

Posted: Jun. 19, 2016 - 1:01 PM ET #44

Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:

And I am no longer 98% sure, I'm down to about 60% (I said 50 in another thread but since then my opinion has went up about 10%)

By tomorrow I should be up to 80% hopefully (at least)

I was dead serious about being 98% sure though. You aren't me, so you don't know what I think

Yes, we know that and that's why we all know you're a moron. This entire post is you already backtracking.

mgmprofits

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2012

Posts: 6659

Posted: Jun. 19, 2016 - 1:15 PM ET #45

Green bar finally full!

Just wanted to say bye to all my fans and trolls

All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

Did Vegas put curry's wife up to that tweet?

Hot Forum Topics