First off, if you want to curse and act a fool then this is not worth it to me. I dont act tough over the internet, feel me? Internet tough guys are LAME. One reason this board has dropped tremendously over the years is because people bring NOTHING to it. I made a comment that I stick by 100%. You disagree, thats okay but dont generalize your belief by saying they ranked 6th in the league in defense and then say Im posting bullshit. That generalization did more to prove my sentiment correct. I showed FACTS stating what they have done over the years at home. I didnt say they sucked on defense thus they lose game. I said they are lacking on the defensive side of the ball this year, which statiscally is CORRECT. I dont care if they avg 120 a game they still gave up more 100 point games at home than the previous years. I dont care whose on the court, if Joe Smoe dresses for them, and walks onto that court in the Quicken Loans Arena donning a Cavs jersey then he's apart of my sentiment.
We are both wrong. They have given up a 100 points 9 times this year at home. 2x as many as last year.
11/14/09 Utah 107-103 W
11/17/09 G. State 114-108 W
12/30/09 Atlanta 106-101 W
1/19/10 Toronto 108-100 W
2/6/10 New York 113-106 W
2/11/10 Orlando 115-106 W
2/18/10 Denver 116-118 (OT) L
4/6/10 Toronto 113-101 W
4/9/10 Indiana 113-116 L
First off, if you want to curse and act a fool then this is not worth it to me. I dont act tough over the internet, feel me? Internet tough guys are LAME. One reason this board has dropped tremendously over the years is because people bring NOTHING to it. I made a comment that I stick by 100%. You disagree, thats okay but dont generalize your belief by saying they ranked 6th in the league in defense and then say Im posting bullshit. That generalization did more to prove my sentiment correct. I showed FACTS stating what they have done over the years at home. I didnt say they sucked on defense thus they lose game. I said they are lacking on the defensive side of the ball this year, which statiscally is CORRECT. I dont care if they avg 120 a game they still gave up more 100 point games at home than the previous years. I dont care whose on the court, if Joe Smoe dresses for them, and walks onto that court in the Quicken Loans Arena donning a Cavs jersey then he's apart of my sentiment.
We are both wrong. They have given up a 100 points 9 times this year at home. 2x as many as last year.
11/14/09 Utah 107-103 W
11/17/09 G. State 114-108 W
12/30/09 Atlanta 106-101 W
1/19/10 Toronto 108-100 W
2/6/10 New York 113-106 W
2/11/10 Orlando 115-106 W
2/18/10 Denver 116-118 (OT) L
4/6/10 Toronto 113-101 W
4/9/10 Indiana 113-116 L
i still haven't seen anything from the Cavs to warrant them being considered the favorite to win the championship... they had the best record, and all, but clearly some teams were not as motivated during the regular season as they were...
i still think the Celts are going to give them trouble, and that will go at least 6 games...
i still haven't seen anything from the Cavs to warrant them being considered the favorite to win the championship... they had the best record, and all, but clearly some teams were not as motivated during the regular season as they were...
i still think the Celts are going to give them trouble, and that will go at least 6 games...
Another tactic that you unsucessful tried to use to discredit the information given to you....is that:
[The Cavs have been a top notch defensive team all year and in the 1st 2 games of the playoffs. And when they give up 100+ at home they win those games so some of the pts given up are due to starters sitting and/or fouling by the trailing team that extends games and pts allowed.]
Look here statistics are not based on "woulda coulda shouldas". If player A or Team A achieves something on the court it is marked into the official game log. Once the game is over, history has been written. In the history books they dont note how many triple doubles Lebron could of had if the Cavs didnt blow out such team by 40 and he had to sit the 4th quarter.
There were years where NO TEAM scored more than a 100 in Detroit against the Pistons when they were on top of basketball...hell I'll out go out on a limb (w/out researching) to say the top teams in the league didnt score more than 92 points win or lose during their mini dynasty. So I dont want to hear the nonsesne that they gave up a 100 because of this that or the third.
Also I never said the Cavs weren't a good defense I said they are lackluster (this being said countless times already) BECAUSE THEY RANKED #1 last year in the category of ppgs and ppg @ home.
Another tactic that you unsucessful tried to use to discredit the information given to you....is that:
[The Cavs have been a top notch defensive team all year and in the 1st 2 games of the playoffs. And when they give up 100+ at home they win those games so some of the pts given up are due to starters sitting and/or fouling by the trailing team that extends games and pts allowed.]
Look here statistics are not based on "woulda coulda shouldas". If player A or Team A achieves something on the court it is marked into the official game log. Once the game is over, history has been written. In the history books they dont note how many triple doubles Lebron could of had if the Cavs didnt blow out such team by 40 and he had to sit the 4th quarter.
There were years where NO TEAM scored more than a 100 in Detroit against the Pistons when they were on top of basketball...hell I'll out go out on a limb (w/out researching) to say the top teams in the league didnt score more than 92 points win or lose during their mini dynasty. So I dont want to hear the nonsesne that they gave up a 100 because of this that or the third.
Also I never said the Cavs weren't a good defense I said they are lackluster (this being said countless times already) BECAUSE THEY RANKED #1 last year in the category of ppgs and ppg @ home.
Still you have displayed NO statistics or information to debunk what I have already proved. I cant even spark a debate on this site without seing a thousand emoticans or garnering some form of ignorance. Im incline to believe 80% of the people on this site make ZERO money sports wagering because they bet with their hearts and have become fans of the teams they wager on. And thus the continue decline of Covers.com
You brought statistics into this argument, when given the information you debunk it by stating BS. So to end this pointless convo with you. I'll put into lamen terms... last year the Cavs gave up a 100 points 4 times at home. This year 9. Last year they ranked #1 in defensive ppgs, fg %, and second chance points. This year they rank 6th, 4th and 7th in those categories.
THE CAVS' DEFENSE AT HOME HAS BEEN LACKLUSTER THIS YEAR COMPARED TO LAST YEAR
THIS IS PROVEN BY NBA.COM, ESPN.COM AND COVERS.COM team statistic databases
/thread
Still you have displayed NO statistics or information to debunk what I have already proved. I cant even spark a debate on this site without seing a thousand emoticans or garnering some form of ignorance. Im incline to believe 80% of the people on this site make ZERO money sports wagering because they bet with their hearts and have become fans of the teams they wager on. And thus the continue decline of Covers.com
You brought statistics into this argument, when given the information you debunk it by stating BS. So to end this pointless convo with you. I'll put into lamen terms... last year the Cavs gave up a 100 points 4 times at home. This year 9. Last year they ranked #1 in defensive ppgs, fg %, and second chance points. This year they rank 6th, 4th and 7th in those categories.
THE CAVS' DEFENSE AT HOME HAS BEEN LACKLUSTER THIS YEAR COMPARED TO LAST YEAR
THIS IS PROVEN BY NBA.COM, ESPN.COM AND COVERS.COM team statistic databases
/thread
These are not post season stats that you posted son? You actually just posted some incomplete post season stats in your last post.
This is what VegasVeteran wrote to challenge my initial statement. But I guess since I debunked this and use the tool that he used (which are regular season stats) all of sudden the regular season doesnt count for anything now. Now his argument is based soley on 2 games at home vs the Chicago Bulls. Okay ![]()
And on top of that VegasVeteran wrote and I quote:
"You use meaningless regular season stats and compare previous years and generations---all a bunch of bullshit that means nothing."
Huh? Are you serious, you stooped to this level now? I use concrete information to back by setiment and its meaningless...YOU RIGHT
and
"And what did those defensive stats do for them last year??? Orlando torched the shit out of them."
So now based on your theory Cleveland was not a good defensive team AT ALL last year because they didnt match up well with the Magic...another contradictory. So as the #1 ranked defense they sucked and lost and now as the #6 ranked defense they're much improved? You're acting a fool online, its not a good look.
These are not post season stats that you posted son? You actually just posted some incomplete post season stats in your last post.
This is what VegasVeteran wrote to challenge my initial statement. But I guess since I debunked this and use the tool that he used (which are regular season stats) all of sudden the regular season doesnt count for anything now. Now his argument is based soley on 2 games at home vs the Chicago Bulls. Okay ![]()
And on top of that VegasVeteran wrote and I quote:
"You use meaningless regular season stats and compare previous years and generations---all a bunch of bullshit that means nothing."
Huh? Are you serious, you stooped to this level now? I use concrete information to back by setiment and its meaningless...YOU RIGHT
and
"And what did those defensive stats do for them last year??? Orlando torched the shit out of them."
So now based on your theory Cleveland was not a good defensive team AT ALL last year because they didnt match up well with the Magic...another contradictory. So as the #1 ranked defense they sucked and lost and now as the #6 ranked defense they're much improved? You're acting a fool online, its not a good look.
"I never said the Cavs defense was average so far in these playoffs"the Thread Creator Mark Dawg isaid that...I said in post #18
Posted: 4/19/2010 11:06:56 PM
The Cavs defense all year has been lackluster IMO. Hell look at how many games they given up 98-105 at home. But that can be attributed to the faster pace they play at now...I guess ![]()
My argument has been steadfast on the above sediment. Your original rebuff was on them being the #6 ranked defense this year. I counter that with statiscal information from this year and last. Now you're talking about 2 games into the playoffs. I have no clue what you are talking about and you have switched positions on this matter too many times to count. You've LOST...stop it...please
"I never said the Cavs defense was average so far in these playoffs"the Thread Creator Mark Dawg isaid that...I said in post #18
Posted: 4/19/2010 11:06:56 PM
The Cavs defense all year has been lackluster IMO. Hell look at how many games they given up 98-105 at home. But that can be attributed to the faster pace they play at now...I guess ![]()
My argument has been steadfast on the above sediment. Your original rebuff was on them being the #6 ranked defense this year. I counter that with statiscal information from this year and last. Now you're talking about 2 games into the playoffs. I have no clue what you are talking about and you have switched positions on this matter too many times to count. You've LOST...stop it...please
You've got to be kidding. If this is your considered opinion, you're going to lose more money.
You've got to be kidding. If this is your considered opinion, you're going to lose more money.
THE CAVS' DEFENSE AT HOME HAS BEEN LACKLUSTER THIS YEAR COMPARED TO LAST YEAR
THIS IS PROVEN BY NBA.COM, ESPN.COM AND COVERS.COM team statistic databases
/thread
I'm a fan and bettor and I think when it becomes obvious they've got to be more defensively intense they will be.
nil
THE CAVS' DEFENSE AT HOME HAS BEEN LACKLUSTER THIS YEAR COMPARED TO LAST YEAR
THIS IS PROVEN BY NBA.COM, ESPN.COM AND COVERS.COM team statistic databases
/thread
I'm a fan and bettor and I think when it becomes obvious they've got to be more defensively intense they will be.
nil
Cavaliers will sweep the series. Every Cav who had a poor or mediocre last game (Shaq, Mo Wms for example) will cycle up and the Bulls are going to get smashed next game.
nil
Cavaliers will sweep the series. Every Cav who had a poor or mediocre last game (Shaq, Mo Wms for example) will cycle up and the Bulls are going to get smashed next game.
nil
Uh oh....this great Cavs defense is on display at home giving up back to back 30 point quarters on their home court. I forgot all about this thread until my feelings about their defense arose watching them give up uncontested Boston layups and jumpers.
Uh oh....this great Cavs defense is on display at home giving up back to back 30 point quarters on their home court. I forgot all about this thread until my feelings about their defense arose watching them give up uncontested Boston layups and jumpers.
120 dropped on the Cavs at home
This is 2 out of the 3 home games the Cavs have given up 100+ and over 51% shooting from the field to the Celtics.
and ps. the Cavs dropping 125 against the C's in Boston was impressive but Boston is an AVERAGE home team. This on the other hand was troubling...I would of never saw this coming. On top of the LeBron took the night off.
120 dropped on the Cavs at home
This is 2 out of the 3 home games the Cavs have given up 100+ and over 51% shooting from the field to the Celtics.
and ps. the Cavs dropping 125 against the C's in Boston was impressive but Boston is an AVERAGE home team. This on the other hand was troubling...I would of never saw this coming. On top of the LeBron took the night off.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.