The irony is that the Cavs turned things around once they got Shumpert and Smith from the Knicks (not to mention Mozgov), which also affected the Knicks who were unloading to tank. Scal wrote this (and the Knicks thread) before all this went down, so I don't think his predictions apply. People need to get a life.
Cavs Championship futures ticketholders?Save yourself the grief and put those babies in the shredder
The irony is that the Cavs turned things around once they got Shumpert and Smith from the Knicks (not to mention Mozgov), which also affected the Knicks who were unloading to tank. Scal wrote this (and the Knicks thread) before all this went down, so I don't think his predictions apply. People need to get a life.
The irony is that the Cavs turned things around once they got Shumpert and Smith from the Knicks (not to mention Mozgov), which also affected the Knicks who were unloading to tank. Scal wrote this (and the Knicks thread) before all this went down, so I don't think his predictions apply. People need to get a life.
Scal stop embarrassing yourself. Anyone who got the Cavs at 30/1 or at least 3/1 already made a profit guaranteed. So no, the tickets aren't useless or toast. Sorry man. Just admit you were wrong. It's okay to be wrong sometimes.
Again, what am I wrong about? The second poster in this thread months ago said the same thing you are saying now. It's not unique in any way so get a new argument.
Until this ticket hits (it won't) my larger point which misses you and all the other troglodytes here, stands.
Scal stop embarrassing yourself. Anyone who got the Cavs at 30/1 or at least 3/1 already made a profit guaranteed. So no, the tickets aren't useless or toast. Sorry man. Just admit you were wrong. It's okay to be wrong sometimes.
Again, what am I wrong about? The second poster in this thread months ago said the same thing you are saying now. It's not unique in any way so get a new argument.
Until this ticket hits (it won't) my larger point which misses you and all the other troglodytes here, stands.
According to one of the bbookmakers (Bob Scucci) at the Orleans the lowest liability currently going is the Cavs because they have been faves all year -- it is actually in vegas's interest for LeBron to win it all this year -- crazy?
Yes, that is crazy. I respect Scucci but that is hard to believe. Who were all the other futures bets on? GS? SA? Clips (and that's a stretch)? Cleveland played tremendous in the second half. Bets weren't rolling in on them as much as GS at that time??? Flat GS futures hitting not going to outdo a 30-1 tickets hitting in theory.
According to one of the bbookmakers (Bob Scucci) at the Orleans the lowest liability currently going is the Cavs because they have been faves all year -- it is actually in vegas's interest for LeBron to win it all this year -- crazy?
Yes, that is crazy. I respect Scucci but that is hard to believe. Who were all the other futures bets on? GS? SA? Clips (and that's a stretch)? Cleveland played tremendous in the second half. Bets weren't rolling in on them as much as GS at that time??? Flat GS futures hitting not going to outdo a 30-1 tickets hitting in theory.
Was it a great call with:
Bucks over heat
Houston over dallas
Spurs over clippers
Harvard over yale
Rangers over Caps at +150???
Conveniently leave out 5 straight winners in the past 5 with write-ups you couldn't provide in 20 lifetimes. Yeah leave those out while you get rich off those picks and bash the loser which will come to god himself if he bet.
Was it a great call with:
Bucks over heat
Houston over dallas
Spurs over clippers
Harvard over yale
Rangers over Caps at +150???
Conveniently leave out 5 straight winners in the past 5 with write-ups you couldn't provide in 20 lifetimes. Yeah leave those out while you get rich off those picks and bash the loser which will come to god himself if he bet.
Pefectly said
![]()
Pefectly said
![]()
would be a more accurate assessment to just keep a documented record. Stating you won 5 bets is great, but how many losses? I don't really care, just proving a point.
Why even keep a documented record anymore? I went 65% last year in all sports and posters here give the A) Last year is last year and this year is this year and B) I win 5 in a row and posters here bump 6 month old threads. What's the point? Who am I impressing. They harp on the losses and discard the wins.
And if you have a down year, they'll bring that up...for several years.
I posted my last 5 rock solid wins in a row because that little douc*ebag wanted to call me out on one bet...made SIX months ago. Wow. I'm hurt.
And I have more to say than I care about winning?
Kid, my write-ups on this site are the largest and among the most informative it has ever seen or ever will see.
So please, step off.
would be a more accurate assessment to just keep a documented record. Stating you won 5 bets is great, but how many losses? I don't really care, just proving a point.
Why even keep a documented record anymore? I went 65% last year in all sports and posters here give the A) Last year is last year and this year is this year and B) I win 5 in a row and posters here bump 6 month old threads. What's the point? Who am I impressing. They harp on the losses and discard the wins.
And if you have a down year, they'll bring that up...for several years.
I posted my last 5 rock solid wins in a row because that little douc*ebag wanted to call me out on one bet...made SIX months ago. Wow. I'm hurt.
And I have more to say than I care about winning?
Kid, my write-ups on this site are the largest and among the most informative it has ever seen or ever will see.
So please, step off.
Why even keep a documented record anymore? I went 65% last year in all sports and posters here give the A) Last year is last year and this year is this year and B) I win 5 in a row and posters here bump 6 month old threads. What's the point? Who am I impressing. They harp on the losses and discard the wins.
And if you have a down year, they'll bring that up...for several years.
I posted my last 5 rock solid wins in a row because that little douc*ebag wanted to call me out on one bet...made SIX months ago. Wow. I'm hurt.
And I have more to say than I care about winning?
Kid, my write-ups on this site are the largest and among the most informative it has ever seen or ever will see.
So please, step off.
Why even keep a documented record anymore? I went 65% last year in all sports and posters here give the A) Last year is last year and this year is this year and B) I win 5 in a row and posters here bump 6 month old threads. What's the point? Who am I impressing. They harp on the losses and discard the wins.
And if you have a down year, they'll bring that up...for several years.
I posted my last 5 rock solid wins in a row because that little douc*ebag wanted to call me out on one bet...made SIX months ago. Wow. I'm hurt.
And I have more to say than I care about winning?
Kid, my write-ups on this site are the largest and among the most informative it has ever seen or ever will see.
So please, step off.
Was it a great call with:
Bucks over heat
Houston over dallas
Spurs over clippers
Harvard over yale
Rangers over Caps at +150???
Conveniently leave out 5 straight winners in the past 5 with write-ups you couldn't provide in 20 lifetimes. Yeah leave those out while you get rich off those picks and bash the loser which will come to god himself if he bet.
Was it a great call with:
Bucks over heat
Houston over dallas
Spurs over clippers
Harvard over yale
Rangers over Caps at +150???
Conveniently leave out 5 straight winners in the past 5 with write-ups you couldn't provide in 20 lifetimes. Yeah leave those out while you get rich off those picks and bash the loser which will come to god himself if he bet.
Why even keep a documented record anymore? I went 65% last year in all sports and posters here give the A) Last year is last year and this year is this year and B) I win 5 in a row and posters here bump 6 month old threads. What's the point? Who am I impressing. They harp on the losses and discard the wins.
And if you have a down year, they'll bring that up...for several years.
I posted my last 5 rock solid wins in a row because that little douc*ebag wanted to call me out on one bet...made SIX months ago. Wow. I'm hurt.
And I have more to say than I care about winning?
Kid, my write-ups on this site are the largest and among the most informative it has ever seen or ever will see.
So please, step off.
- Grandiose: A person with this type of delusional disorder has an over-inflated sense of worth, power, knowledge, or identity. The person might believe he or she has a great talent or has made an important discovery.
Why even keep a documented record anymore? I went 65% last year in all sports and posters here give the A) Last year is last year and this year is this year and B) I win 5 in a row and posters here bump 6 month old threads. What's the point? Who am I impressing. They harp on the losses and discard the wins.
And if you have a down year, they'll bring that up...for several years.
I posted my last 5 rock solid wins in a row because that little douc*ebag wanted to call me out on one bet...made SIX months ago. Wow. I'm hurt.
And I have more to say than I care about winning?
Kid, my write-ups on this site are the largest and among the most informative it has ever seen or ever will see.
So please, step off.
- Grandiose: A person with this type of delusional disorder has an over-inflated sense of worth, power, knowledge, or identity. The person might believe he or she has a great talent or has made an important discovery.
The irony is that the Cavs turned things around once they got Shumpert and Smith from the Knicks (not to mention Mozgov), which also affected the Knicks who were unloading to tank. Scal wrote this (and the Knicks thread) before all this went down, so I don't think his predictions apply. People need to get a life.
The irony is that the Cavs turned things around once they got Shumpert and Smith from the Knicks (not to mention Mozgov), which also affected the Knicks who were unloading to tank. Scal wrote this (and the Knicks thread) before all this went down, so I don't think his predictions apply. People need to get a life.
this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool.
The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong.
Excuse me. Putting tickets in a shredder is a figure of speech. It is hyperbole telling those who have them they won't get a dime for them in the end.
And I want to make this clear. I said that AFTER the odds dropped to 3-1.
I NEVER had a doubt in my mind, as stated all throughout this thread, they would make the playoffs. And in the East ANYONE can come out of it especially one with the biggest star of them all.
Cleveland had a very minor struggle at 5-7 and 19-20 and that was it. No one was jumping off buildings at those times and I never doubted they could make the playoffs even as a high seed.
No one is wrong here. The ticket is as good as being shredded until it hits.
I won't even get into effective hedging and the value of effective hedging because too many posters here have demonstrated they do not understand the topic.
And all this talk about 'guaranteed' money. You have no idea what that guarantee is. Is it 2x 3x 4x. If it's 4 times, the 30-1 becomes a 4-1. Well that is nothing to go bonkers about. And might I add, they will be dogs to Golden state which is the worst possible way to hedge. And how much will they hedge for? Will they even hedge? The hundred dollar bettor making $400? Wow! Is that something to bump a thread 100 times for?
We've all hit parlays. There is nothing extraordinary about that.
And might I add, nothing was guaranteed with the Knicks handing the Cavs two of three starters and the Nuggets playing a role with Mozgov.
So here is what you needed after your placed your 30-1 bet:
Lebron signs
Love is traded for
JR and Shumpert are given to the Cavs
Mozgov is traded for two effective high second rounders
Without ALL those things happening, the Cavs are NOT in the place they are today.
And ultimately in the end, that 30-1 STILL will not get paid off. So the hedging for 2/3/4 times their bet (which by the way NO ONE has posted in terms of showing me a hedge) is NOT remarkable or noteworthy in any way! It's a nice little parlay payout.
So until that 30-1 hits, you can keep quiet.
If the 30-1 hits (it won't) come back and hoot and holler. Got it?
NO ONE is wrong. NOTHING had been paid out and NO ONE has posted a hedge. You're posting this like the Cavs have won the championship!!! Wrong!
this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool.
The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong.
Excuse me. Putting tickets in a shredder is a figure of speech. It is hyperbole telling those who have them they won't get a dime for them in the end.
And I want to make this clear. I said that AFTER the odds dropped to 3-1.
I NEVER had a doubt in my mind, as stated all throughout this thread, they would make the playoffs. And in the East ANYONE can come out of it especially one with the biggest star of them all.
Cleveland had a very minor struggle at 5-7 and 19-20 and that was it. No one was jumping off buildings at those times and I never doubted they could make the playoffs even as a high seed.
No one is wrong here. The ticket is as good as being shredded until it hits.
I won't even get into effective hedging and the value of effective hedging because too many posters here have demonstrated they do not understand the topic.
And all this talk about 'guaranteed' money. You have no idea what that guarantee is. Is it 2x 3x 4x. If it's 4 times, the 30-1 becomes a 4-1. Well that is nothing to go bonkers about. And might I add, they will be dogs to Golden state which is the worst possible way to hedge. And how much will they hedge for? Will they even hedge? The hundred dollar bettor making $400? Wow! Is that something to bump a thread 100 times for?
We've all hit parlays. There is nothing extraordinary about that.
And might I add, nothing was guaranteed with the Knicks handing the Cavs two of three starters and the Nuggets playing a role with Mozgov.
So here is what you needed after your placed your 30-1 bet:
Lebron signs
Love is traded for
JR and Shumpert are given to the Cavs
Mozgov is traded for two effective high second rounders
Without ALL those things happening, the Cavs are NOT in the place they are today.
And ultimately in the end, that 30-1 STILL will not get paid off. So the hedging for 2/3/4 times their bet (which by the way NO ONE has posted in terms of showing me a hedge) is NOT remarkable or noteworthy in any way! It's a nice little parlay payout.
So until that 30-1 hits, you can keep quiet.
If the 30-1 hits (it won't) come back and hoot and holler. Got it?
NO ONE is wrong. NOTHING had been paid out and NO ONE has posted a hedge. You're posting this like the Cavs have won the championship!!! Wrong!
yea thats true,things turned the cavs way with decisions they made but thats PART of futures,wen you bet on them they include ANYTHING that happens in the distant FUTURE....so all possible scenarios have to be taken into account wherever possible
Not true. You don't place a bet on anything happening. You can go to a track, lay your money on a 99-1 shot and say, "Listen anything can happen. The entire field can fall in a heap and my horse can come in." That would be unwise.
Virtually all futures bets are made with the team in place. This one has a very big addendum in that Lebron would be traded for and then Love was a longshot. And beyond that, nothing else was a given. All else was lucked into. We all knew they were in win now mode. They were talking about trading a future star in Wiggins the day they drafted him.![]()
yea thats true,things turned the cavs way with decisions they made but thats PART of futures,wen you bet on them they include ANYTHING that happens in the distant FUTURE....so all possible scenarios have to be taken into account wherever possible
Not true. You don't place a bet on anything happening. You can go to a track, lay your money on a 99-1 shot and say, "Listen anything can happen. The entire field can fall in a heap and my horse can come in." That would be unwise.
Virtually all futures bets are made with the team in place. This one has a very big addendum in that Lebron would be traded for and then Love was a longshot. And beyond that, nothing else was a given. All else was lucked into. We all knew they were in win now mode. They were talking about trading a future star in Wiggins the day they drafted him.![]()
-
Grandiose: A person with this type of delusional disorder has an over-inflated sense of worth, power, knowledge, or identity. The person might believe he or she has a great talent or has made an important discovery.
Why would you care about my betting amounts? No one gives a shi* about that and I don't post them.
YOUR betting amounts are what matters. And when I post I am very selective and many people here value that. It is their betting amount that matters.
A W/L record is BY FAR the truest indicator of a record because I could bet 50 units today and lose and bet 110 tomorrow and win and go LOOK I'm up 50 units!...and I'm 1-1. 65% speaks to FAR greater than that.
-
Grandiose: A person with this type of delusional disorder has an over-inflated sense of worth, power, knowledge, or identity. The person might believe he or she has a great talent or has made an important discovery.
Why would you care about my betting amounts? No one gives a shi* about that and I don't post them.
YOUR betting amounts are what matters. And when I post I am very selective and many people here value that. It is their betting amount that matters.
A W/L record is BY FAR the truest indicator of a record because I could bet 50 units today and lose and bet 110 tomorrow and win and go LOOK I'm up 50 units!...and I'm 1-1. 65% speaks to FAR greater than that.
Why would you care about my betting amounts? No one gives a shi* about that and I don't post them.
YOUR betting amounts are what matters. And when I post I am very selective and many people here value that. It is their betting amount that matters.
A W/L record is BY FAR the truest indicator of a record because I could bet 50 units today and lose and bet 110 tomorrow and win and go LOOK I'm up 50 units!...and I'm 1-1. 65% speaks to FAR greater than that.
Why would you care about my betting amounts? No one gives a shi* about that and I don't post them.
YOUR betting amounts are what matters. And when I post I am very selective and many people here value that. It is their betting amount that matters.
A W/L record is BY FAR the truest indicator of a record because I could bet 50 units today and lose and bet 110 tomorrow and win and go LOOK I'm up 50 units!...and I'm 1-1. 65% speaks to FAR greater than that.
And please, bump this thread in some alternate universe if they should ever win it all.
And please, bump this thread in some alternate universe if they should ever win it all.
this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool.
this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool.
Here is the issue, he has never been wrong.
Really? I was wrong about the Knicks season win total (obviously)
Have the Cavs won the championship yet or are did you take some time machine to mid-June to inform us all the Cavs already won?
Here is the issue, he has never been wrong.
Really? I was wrong about the Knicks season win total (obviously)
Have the Cavs won the championship yet or are did you take some time machine to mid-June to inform us all the Cavs already won?
Ya know what's hilarious?
I say I won 65% last year. Does that matter? No, that was last season.
So the first game of last season I said I bet half my bankroll.
Now does that matter to trolls like you? YES! Because losses matter to trolls.
Wins? Let's forget about those.
Last season was the most profitable of my life because in addition to hitting 65% I had numerous Spurs futures throughout the year. You have no idea what I bet on any of that, well because NONE of my threads make that distinction.
But keep harping on one play made in the first game of the 2013-2014 season. It makes you that much more credible (and keep bumping that Knicks thread too)...![]()
Ya know what's hilarious?
I say I won 65% last year. Does that matter? No, that was last season.
So the first game of last season I said I bet half my bankroll.
Now does that matter to trolls like you? YES! Because losses matter to trolls.
Wins? Let's forget about those.
Last season was the most profitable of my life because in addition to hitting 65% I had numerous Spurs futures throughout the year. You have no idea what I bet on any of that, well because NONE of my threads make that distinction.
But keep harping on one play made in the first game of the 2013-2014 season. It makes you that much more credible (and keep bumping that Knicks thread too)...![]()
5 is in a row? That means nothing. That is just too small a sample size. How have you done these NBA playoffs?
I have friends who played blackjack who have won and lost 12 hands in a row.
The problem with your statement is that my games are capped from top to bottom. It's not flipping coins or spinning marbles waiting for them to fall into black and red slots. That is where success and failure deviate. I'm not a gambler. I'm a capper who gambles. Now keep tailing my picks. You might win for once.
GSW play six or seven games? Like the Hawks, their opponent needs to win ONE game first before anyone goes 6 or 7. When they win one, then you can hope for another to get to six otherwise, please stop with the 6 or 7 game series in either one of these matchups. It's clear that now Korver is injured (yet another blessing for the Cavs) they are pretty much done. But what is the East anyway...Nets got through the east twice only to get slaughtered by the Lakers and ultimately handled by the Spurs. Cavs will be in for a big surprise come finals time. a very big surprise...
5 is in a row? That means nothing. That is just too small a sample size. How have you done these NBA playoffs?
I have friends who played blackjack who have won and lost 12 hands in a row.
The problem with your statement is that my games are capped from top to bottom. It's not flipping coins or spinning marbles waiting for them to fall into black and red slots. That is where success and failure deviate. I'm not a gambler. I'm a capper who gambles. Now keep tailing my picks. You might win for once.
GSW play six or seven games? Like the Hawks, their opponent needs to win ONE game first before anyone goes 6 or 7. When they win one, then you can hope for another to get to six otherwise, please stop with the 6 or 7 game series in either one of these matchups. It's clear that now Korver is injured (yet another blessing for the Cavs) they are pretty much done. But what is the East anyway...Nets got through the east twice only to get slaughtered by the Lakers and ultimately handled by the Spurs. Cavs will be in for a big surprise come finals time. a very big surprise...
this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool.
this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool.
Again, I have to say it for the billionth time.
Who is wrong about any of this? These tickets have paid $0 and there is extensive discussion on hedging (ya know, not just cut and dry 'well it was 30-1 and now it's 3-1 sot there's hedging opportunities talk).
I posted this thread when it dropped from 30-1 to 3-1!!! Why in the world do you think I would do that? So the second poster can say "No you can hedge" and I can say "Duhhhhh, yeah, you're right! I was stupid!". There is a major discussion on that topic many here are unwilling and unable to comprehend!
Again, I have to say it for the billionth time.
Who is wrong about any of this? These tickets have paid $0 and there is extensive discussion on hedging (ya know, not just cut and dry 'well it was 30-1 and now it's 3-1 sot there's hedging opportunities talk).
I posted this thread when it dropped from 30-1 to 3-1!!! Why in the world do you think I would do that? So the second poster can say "No you can hedge" and I can say "Duhhhhh, yeah, you're right! I was stupid!". There is a major discussion on that topic many here are unwilling and unable to comprehend!
Ya know what's hilarious?
I say I won 65% last year. Does that matter? No, that was last season.
So the first game of last season I said I bet half my bankroll.
Now does that matter to trolls like you? YES! Because losses matter to trolls.
Wins? Let's forget about those.
Last season was the most profitable of my life because in addition to hitting 65% I had numerous Spurs futures throughout the year. You have no idea what I bet on any of that, well because NONE of my threads make that distinction.
But keep harping on one play made in the first game of the 2013-2014 season. It makes you that much more credible (and keep bumping that Knicks thread too)...![]()
Ya know what's hilarious?
I say I won 65% last year. Does that matter? No, that was last season.
So the first game of last season I said I bet half my bankroll.
Now does that matter to trolls like you? YES! Because losses matter to trolls.
Wins? Let's forget about those.
Last season was the most profitable of my life because in addition to hitting 65% I had numerous Spurs futures throughout the year. You have no idea what I bet on any of that, well because NONE of my threads make that distinction.
But keep harping on one play made in the first game of the 2013-2014 season. It makes you that much more credible (and keep bumping that Knicks thread too)...![]()
Really? I was wrong about the Knicks season win total (obviously)
Have the Cavs won the championship yet or are did you take some time machine to mid-June to inform us all the Cavs already won?
Really? I was wrong about the Knicks season win total (obviously)
Have the Cavs won the championship yet or are did you take some time machine to mid-June to inform us all the Cavs already won?
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
445,996
-
🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets
301,766
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
253,424
-
PART DEUX
350
-
Patriots vs Seahawks in-game live season kickoff
1,434
-
PART TROIS
277
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
95,230
-
9/9 🫣🫣🔥🔥🔥
4,738
-
Thursday 09/10/2026
578
-
Couple thoughts
4,067
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
