• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 1
      NFL Week 1
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Odds
      • 49ers vs. Rams Prediction
      • 49ers vs. Rams TD Picks
      • 49ers vs. Rams Prop Picks
      • ATS Picks
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

    Cavs Championship futures ticketholders?Save yourself the grief and put those babies in the shredder

    «First Previous 111213 ... 212223 Next Last»
    RodWoman
    scalabrine
    smartbets
    Carpinteria
    BWS77
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 38707
    Posts: 572
    «First Previous 111213 ... 212223 Next Last»
     
    RodWoman
    RodWoman
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2009
    Posts: 1472
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 12:59 PM ET #251

    Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:

    The irony is that the Cavs turned things around once they got Shumpert and Smith from the Knicks (not to mention Mozgov), which also affected the Knicks who were unloading to tank. Scal wrote this (and the Knicks thread) before all this went down, so I don't think his predictions apply. People need to get a life.
      Then they lost Love and Irving.  You should get a life.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:

    The irony is that the Cavs turned things around once they got Shumpert and Smith from the Knicks (not to mention Mozgov), which also affected the Knicks who were unloading to tank. Scal wrote this (and the Knicks thread) before all this went down, so I don't think his predictions apply. People need to get a life.
      Then they lost Love and Irving.  You should get a life.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 1:26 PM ET #252

    Quote Originally Posted by RodWoman:

    Quote Originally Posted by JDHPro:

    Scal stop embarrassing yourself. Anyone who got the Cavs at 30/1 or at least 3/1 already made a profit guaranteed. So no, the tickets aren't useless or toast. Sorry man. Just admit you were wrong. It's okay to be wrong sometimes.
      The self-righteous Tweedle Dum will never, ever admit he is wrong.  He will keep defending his stupidity until the horn goes off the final time in June.


    Again, what am I wrong about? The second poster in this thread months ago said the same thing you are saying now. It's not unique in any way so get a new argument.

    Until this ticket hits (it won't) my larger point which misses you and all the other troglodytes here, stands.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by RodWoman:

    Quote Originally Posted by JDHPro:

    Scal stop embarrassing yourself. Anyone who got the Cavs at 30/1 or at least 3/1 already made a profit guaranteed. So no, the tickets aren't useless or toast. Sorry man. Just admit you were wrong. It's okay to be wrong sometimes.
      The self-righteous Tweedle Dum will never, ever admit he is wrong.  He will keep defending his stupidity until the horn goes off the final time in June.


    Again, what am I wrong about? The second poster in this thread months ago said the same thing you are saying now. It's not unique in any way so get a new argument.

    Until this ticket hits (it won't) my larger point which misses you and all the other troglodytes here, stands.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 1:31 PM ET #253

    Quote Originally Posted by bobmaloogatimesfive:

    According to one of the bbookmakers (Bob Scucci) at the Orleans the lowest liability currently going is the Cavs because they have been faves all year -- it is actually in vegas's interest for LeBron to win it all this year -- crazy?


    Yes, that is crazy. I respect Scucci but that is hard to believe. Who were all the other futures bets on? GS? SA? Clips (and that's a stretch)? Cleveland played tremendous in the second half. Bets weren't rolling in on them as much as GS at that time??? Flat GS futures hitting not going to outdo a 30-1 tickets hitting in theory.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by bobmaloogatimesfive:

    According to one of the bbookmakers (Bob Scucci) at the Orleans the lowest liability currently going is the Cavs because they have been faves all year -- it is actually in vegas's interest for LeBron to win it all this year -- crazy?


    Yes, that is crazy. I respect Scucci but that is hard to believe. Who were all the other futures bets on? GS? SA? Clips (and that's a stretch)? Cleveland played tremendous in the second half. Bets weren't rolling in on them as much as GS at that time??? Flat GS futures hitting not going to outdo a 30-1 tickets hitting in theory.
     
    smartbets
    smartbets
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2009
    Posts: 8526
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 1:44 PM ET #254

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:



    Was it a great call with:

    Bucks over heat
    Houston over dallas
    Spurs over clippers
    Harvard over yale
    Rangers over Caps at +150???

    Conveniently leave out 5 straight winners in the past 5 with write-ups you couldn't provide in 20 lifetimes. Yeah leave those out while you get rich off those picks and bash the loser which will come to god himself if he bet.
    would be a more accurate assessment to just keep a documented record. Stating you won 5 bets is great, but how many losses? I don't really care, just proving a point. 

    I notice you like to write a lot. You should look into journalism because you clearly care more about what you have to say than winning. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:



    Was it a great call with:

    Bucks over heat
    Houston over dallas
    Spurs over clippers
    Harvard over yale
    Rangers over Caps at +150???

    Conveniently leave out 5 straight winners in the past 5 with write-ups you couldn't provide in 20 lifetimes. Yeah leave those out while you get rich off those picks and bash the loser which will come to god himself if he bet.
    would be a more accurate assessment to just keep a documented record. Stating you won 5 bets is great, but how many losses? I don't really care, just proving a point. 

    I notice you like to write a lot. You should look into journalism because you clearly care more about what you have to say than winning. 
     
    Carpinteria
    Carpinteria
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2014
    Posts: 6477
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 1:57 PM ET #255

    Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:


    You should look into journalism because you clearly care more about what you have to say than winning. 

     

    Pefectly said

     

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:


    You should look into journalism because you clearly care more about what you have to say than winning. 

     

    Pefectly said

     

     

     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 2:19 PM ET #256

    Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:

    would be a more accurate assessment to just keep a documented record. Stating you won 5 bets is great, but how many losses? I don't really care, just proving a point. 

    I notice you like to write a lot. You should look into journalism because you clearly care more about what you have to say than winning. 

    Why even keep a documented record anymore? I went 65% last year in all sports and posters here give the A) Last year is last year and this year is this year and B) I win 5 in a row and posters here bump 6 month old threads. What's the point? Who am I impressing. They harp on the losses and discard the wins.

    And if you have a down year, they'll bring that up...for several years.

    I posted my last 5 rock solid wins in a row because that little douc*ebag wanted to call me out on one bet...made SIX months ago. Wow. I'm hurt.

    And I have more to say than I care about winning?

    Kid, my write-ups on this site are the largest and among the most informative it has ever seen or ever will see.

    So please, step off.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:

    would be a more accurate assessment to just keep a documented record. Stating you won 5 bets is great, but how many losses? I don't really care, just proving a point. 

    I notice you like to write a lot. You should look into journalism because you clearly care more about what you have to say than winning. 

    Why even keep a documented record anymore? I went 65% last year in all sports and posters here give the A) Last year is last year and this year is this year and B) I win 5 in a row and posters here bump 6 month old threads. What's the point? Who am I impressing. They harp on the losses and discard the wins.

    And if you have a down year, they'll bring that up...for several years.

    I posted my last 5 rock solid wins in a row because that little douc*ebag wanted to call me out on one bet...made SIX months ago. Wow. I'm hurt.

    And I have more to say than I care about winning?

    Kid, my write-ups on this site are the largest and among the most informative it has ever seen or ever will see.

    So please, step off.

     
    smartbets
    smartbets
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2009
    Posts: 8526
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 2:55 PM ET #257

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    Why even keep a documented record anymore? I went 65% last year in all sports and posters here give the A) Last year is last year and this year is this year and B) I win 5 in a row and posters here bump 6 month old threads. What's the point? Who am I impressing. They harp on the losses and discard the wins.

    And if you have a down year, they'll bring that up...for several years.

    I posted my last 5 rock solid wins in a row because that little douc*ebag wanted to call me out on one bet...made SIX months ago. Wow. I'm hurt.

    And I have more to say than I care about winning?

    Kid, my write-ups on this site are the largest and among the most informative it has ever seen or ever will see.

    So please, step off.


    1. Sounds like you kept a documented record for one year. Be more consistent.
    2. If people bash you for a bad year, but you have multiple good years, just show them the stats, the facts. If it's not good enough for them, oh well. Since you're not here to impress anyone, right?
    3. You should learn who exactly you are talking to before you address me as "kid". 
    4. I'd never dispute your write ups are the longest at covers, but being the most informative is just an opinion coming from the author. It does not make it a fact. I have read a lot of your threads and it's merely your opinions with a lot of narrative, hence my early comment about you like to talk more than you like winning. Because if you didn't like to talk and didn't care about wanting others to read your opinions, you would not keep posting here and you surely wouldn't keep posting the long winded narratives that you do. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    Why even keep a documented record anymore? I went 65% last year in all sports and posters here give the A) Last year is last year and this year is this year and B) I win 5 in a row and posters here bump 6 month old threads. What's the point? Who am I impressing. They harp on the losses and discard the wins.

    And if you have a down year, they'll bring that up...for several years.

    I posted my last 5 rock solid wins in a row because that little douc*ebag wanted to call me out on one bet...made SIX months ago. Wow. I'm hurt.

    And I have more to say than I care about winning?

    Kid, my write-ups on this site are the largest and among the most informative it has ever seen or ever will see.

    So please, step off.


    1. Sounds like you kept a documented record for one year. Be more consistent.
    2. If people bash you for a bad year, but you have multiple good years, just show them the stats, the facts. If it's not good enough for them, oh well. Since you're not here to impress anyone, right?
    3. You should learn who exactly you are talking to before you address me as "kid". 
    4. I'd never dispute your write ups are the longest at covers, but being the most informative is just an opinion coming from the author. It does not make it a fact. I have read a lot of your threads and it's merely your opinions with a lot of narrative, hence my early comment about you like to talk more than you like winning. Because if you didn't like to talk and didn't care about wanting others to read your opinions, you would not keep posting here and you surely wouldn't keep posting the long winded narratives that you do. 
     
    smartbets
    smartbets
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2009
    Posts: 8526
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 3:01 PM ET #258

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:



    Was it a great call with:

    Bucks over heat
    Houston over dallas
    Spurs over clippers
    Harvard over yale
    Rangers over Caps at +150???

    Conveniently leave out 5 straight winners in the past 5 with write-ups you couldn't provide in 20 lifetimes. Yeah leave those out while you get rich off those picks and bash the loser which will come to god himself if he bet.
    this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool. 

    So while "congrats" on those 5 wins, they are irrelevant to the topic you created in this thread. It's merely a covering up act you are performing. You realize you were wrong, so now you go find something that has nothing to do with this thread, and throw it up and say HEY! I was right here though!!

    The best thing to do when you are wrong is just admit it. Eat the crow. You'll at least earn people's respect. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:



    Was it a great call with:

    Bucks over heat
    Houston over dallas
    Spurs over clippers
    Harvard over yale
    Rangers over Caps at +150???

    Conveniently leave out 5 straight winners in the past 5 with write-ups you couldn't provide in 20 lifetimes. Yeah leave those out while you get rich off those picks and bash the loser which will come to god himself if he bet.
    this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool. 

    So while "congrats" on those 5 wins, they are irrelevant to the topic you created in this thread. It's merely a covering up act you are performing. You realize you were wrong, so now you go find something that has nothing to do with this thread, and throw it up and say HEY! I was right here though!!

    The best thing to do when you are wrong is just admit it. Eat the crow. You'll at least earn people's respect. 
     
    BWS77
    BWS77
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 35351
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 3:49 PM ET #259

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    Why even keep a documented record anymore? I went 65% last year in all sports and posters here give the A) Last year is last year and this year is this year and B) I win 5 in a row and posters here bump 6 month old threads. What's the point? Who am I impressing. They harp on the losses and discard the wins.

    And if you have a down year, they'll bring that up...for several years.

    I posted my last 5 rock solid wins in a row because that little douc*ebag wanted to call me out on one bet...made SIX months ago. Wow. I'm hurt.

    And I have more to say than I care about winning?

    Kid, my write-ups on this site are the largest and among the most informative it has ever seen or ever will see.

    So please, step off.


    65% was 2 years ago, you also vary your amounts on your plays so winning percentage becomes almost meaningless.  

    The "6 month old thread" is relevent TODAY and will be for a few more weeks since it is a championship futures bet and the team is still in contention for the championship.  

    Your opinion of your write-ups stems from your Grandiose Delusional Disorder which makes you believe that your words and thoughts are more important than others.   


    1. Grandiose: A person with this type of delusional disorder has an over-inflated sense of worth, power, knowledge, or identity. The person might believe he or she has a great talent or has made an important discovery.







    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    Why even keep a documented record anymore? I went 65% last year in all sports and posters here give the A) Last year is last year and this year is this year and B) I win 5 in a row and posters here bump 6 month old threads. What's the point? Who am I impressing. They harp on the losses and discard the wins.

    And if you have a down year, they'll bring that up...for several years.

    I posted my last 5 rock solid wins in a row because that little douc*ebag wanted to call me out on one bet...made SIX months ago. Wow. I'm hurt.

    And I have more to say than I care about winning?

    Kid, my write-ups on this site are the largest and among the most informative it has ever seen or ever will see.

    So please, step off.


    65% was 2 years ago, you also vary your amounts on your plays so winning percentage becomes almost meaningless.  

    The "6 month old thread" is relevent TODAY and will be for a few more weeks since it is a championship futures bet and the team is still in contention for the championship.  

    Your opinion of your write-ups stems from your Grandiose Delusional Disorder which makes you believe that your words and thoughts are more important than others.   


    1. Grandiose: A person with this type of delusional disorder has an over-inflated sense of worth, power, knowledge, or identity. The person might believe he or she has a great talent or has made an important discovery.







     
    melossinglet
    melossinglet
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2013
    Posts: 15769
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 4:45 PM ET #260

    Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:

    The irony is that the Cavs turned things around once they got Shumpert and Smith from the Knicks (not to mention Mozgov), which also affected the Knicks who were unloading to tank. Scal wrote this (and the Knicks thread) before all this went down, so I don't think his predictions apply. People need to get a life.



    just to play devils advocate,beginner-boy....yea thats true,things turned the cavs way with decisions they made but thats PART of futures,wen you bet on them they include ANYTHING that happens in the distant FUTURE....so all possible scenarios have to be taken into account wherever possible.....and in this situation,with who just re-joined the team,it is 100% clear and obvious that management is in a must win now mode and will do anything to satisfy and placate lebron and put him in the best position to succeed...so,sure things fell their way.....but it was cos they were pro-active and because they have the greatest player on the planet(and extremely unselfish to boot)to draw and attract talent...so im not taking sides but its a cop-out to say that any prediction is null and void cos of a trade-line "bounce of the ball",or 2...or 3....wen handicapping single games you also gotta take into account those same "bad bounces",even moreso with a future...we cant foresee everything but a bold move if things werent going smoothly for cleveland shudnt surprise anyone one little bit.
    for me,wats more surprising is just how much shumpert,smith and mosgov have added to the team..they are all nice additions in their own way and can offer a specific skill-set each...but my god theyre not the type that many teams were desperately chasing and now the trio has played a huge role in pretty much transforming the teams prospects.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:

    The irony is that the Cavs turned things around once they got Shumpert and Smith from the Knicks (not to mention Mozgov), which also affected the Knicks who were unloading to tank. Scal wrote this (and the Knicks thread) before all this went down, so I don't think his predictions apply. People need to get a life.



    just to play devils advocate,beginner-boy....yea thats true,things turned the cavs way with decisions they made but thats PART of futures,wen you bet on them they include ANYTHING that happens in the distant FUTURE....so all possible scenarios have to be taken into account wherever possible.....and in this situation,with who just re-joined the team,it is 100% clear and obvious that management is in a must win now mode and will do anything to satisfy and placate lebron and put him in the best position to succeed...so,sure things fell their way.....but it was cos they were pro-active and because they have the greatest player on the planet(and extremely unselfish to boot)to draw and attract talent...so im not taking sides but its a cop-out to say that any prediction is null and void cos of a trade-line "bounce of the ball",or 2...or 3....wen handicapping single games you also gotta take into account those same "bad bounces",even moreso with a future...we cant foresee everything but a bold move if things werent going smoothly for cleveland shudnt surprise anyone one little bit.
    for me,wats more surprising is just how much shumpert,smith and mosgov have added to the team..they are all nice additions in their own way and can offer a specific skill-set each...but my god theyre not the type that many teams were desperately chasing and now the trio has played a huge role in pretty much transforming the teams prospects.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 5:34 PM ET #261

    Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:


    1. Sounds like you kept a documented record for one year. Be more consistent.
     
    I stopped keeping a documented record. It became worthless given I have people bumping 6 month old threads. I can tell you I've won the last 5. And not just 5 picks. 5 picks with the biggest and quality-laced write-ups on covers. That means a bit more than throwing darts and getting hot.
     
    2. If people bash you for a bad year, but you have multiple good years, just show them the stats, the facts. If it's not good enough for them, oh well. Since you're not here to impress anyone, right?
     
    I am not going to show them stats from previous years because they only care about the here and now. The here and now is I've won 5 in a row with a +150 series line on the Rangers.
     
    3. You should learn who exactly you are talking to before you address me as "kid". 
     
    I only call people kid when they act like one. You could be 80 and peeing in a bedpan and I have no problem with the terminology 'kid'.
     
    4. I'd never dispute your write ups are the longest at covers, but being the most informative is just an opinion coming from the author. It does not make it a fact. I have read a lot of your threads and it's merely your opinions with a lot of narrative, hence my early comment about you like to talk more than you like winning. Because if you didn't like to talk and didn't care about wanting others to read your opinions, you would not keep posting here and you surely wouldn't keep posting the long winded narratives that you do. 
     
    Well then you have a reading comprehension problem or you simply don't understand that every write-up in history is a 'sell' for a side, therefore, it has to have some opinion woven in.
     
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:


    1. Sounds like you kept a documented record for one year. Be more consistent.
     
    I stopped keeping a documented record. It became worthless given I have people bumping 6 month old threads. I can tell you I've won the last 5. And not just 5 picks. 5 picks with the biggest and quality-laced write-ups on covers. That means a bit more than throwing darts and getting hot.
     
    2. If people bash you for a bad year, but you have multiple good years, just show them the stats, the facts. If it's not good enough for them, oh well. Since you're not here to impress anyone, right?
     
    I am not going to show them stats from previous years because they only care about the here and now. The here and now is I've won 5 in a row with a +150 series line on the Rangers.
     
    3. You should learn who exactly you are talking to before you address me as "kid". 
     
    I only call people kid when they act like one. You could be 80 and peeing in a bedpan and I have no problem with the terminology 'kid'.
     
    4. I'd never dispute your write ups are the longest at covers, but being the most informative is just an opinion coming from the author. It does not make it a fact. I have read a lot of your threads and it's merely your opinions with a lot of narrative, hence my early comment about you like to talk more than you like winning. Because if you didn't like to talk and didn't care about wanting others to read your opinions, you would not keep posting here and you surely wouldn't keep posting the long winded narratives that you do. 
     
    Well then you have a reading comprehension problem or you simply don't understand that every write-up in history is a 'sell' for a side, therefore, it has to have some opinion woven in.
     
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 5:45 PM ET #262

    Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:

    this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool. 

    So while "congrats" on those 5 wins, they are irrelevant to the topic you created in this thread. It's merely a covering up act you are performing. You realize you were wrong, so now you go find something that has nothing to do with this thread, and throw it up and say HEY! I was right here though!!

    The best thing to do when you are wrong is just admit it. Eat the crow. You'll at least earn people's respect. 

    The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong.

    Excuse me. Putting tickets in a shredder is a figure of speech. It is hyperbole telling those who have them they won't get a dime for them in the end.

    And I want to make this clear. I said that AFTER the odds dropped to 3-1.

     I NEVER had a doubt in my mind, as stated all throughout this thread, they would make the playoffs. And in the East ANYONE can come out of it especially one with the biggest star of them all.

    Cleveland had a very minor struggle at 5-7 and 19-20 and that was it. No one was jumping off buildings at those times and I never doubted they could make the playoffs even as a high seed.

    No one is wrong here. The ticket is as good as being shredded until it hits.

    I won't even get into effective hedging and the value of effective hedging because too many posters here have demonstrated they do not understand the topic.

    And all this talk about 'guaranteed' money. You have no idea what that guarantee is. Is it 2x 3x 4x. If it's 4 times, the 30-1 becomes a 4-1. Well that is nothing to go bonkers about. And might I add, they will be dogs to Golden state which is the worst possible way to hedge. And how much will they hedge for? Will they even hedge? The hundred dollar bettor making $400? Wow! Is that something to bump a thread 100 times for?

    We've all hit parlays. There is nothing extraordinary about that.

    And might I add, nothing was guaranteed with the Knicks handing the Cavs two of three starters and the Nuggets playing a role with Mozgov.

    So here is what you needed after your placed your 30-1 bet:

    Lebron signs

    Love is traded for

    JR and Shumpert are given to the Cavs

    Mozgov is traded for two effective high second rounders

     

    Without ALL those things happening, the Cavs are NOT in the place they are today.

    And ultimately in the end, that 30-1 STILL will not get paid off. So the hedging for 2/3/4 times their bet (which by the way NO ONE has posted in terms of showing me a hedge) is NOT remarkable or noteworthy in any way! It's a nice little parlay payout.

    So until that 30-1 hits, you can keep quiet.

     

    If the 30-1 hits (it won't) come back and hoot and holler. Got it?

    NO ONE is wrong. NOTHING had been paid out and NO ONE has posted a hedge. You're posting this like the Cavs have won the championship!!! Wrong!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:

    this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool. 

    So while "congrats" on those 5 wins, they are irrelevant to the topic you created in this thread. It's merely a covering up act you are performing. You realize you were wrong, so now you go find something that has nothing to do with this thread, and throw it up and say HEY! I was right here though!!

    The best thing to do when you are wrong is just admit it. Eat the crow. You'll at least earn people's respect. 

    The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong.

    Excuse me. Putting tickets in a shredder is a figure of speech. It is hyperbole telling those who have them they won't get a dime for them in the end.

    And I want to make this clear. I said that AFTER the odds dropped to 3-1.

     I NEVER had a doubt in my mind, as stated all throughout this thread, they would make the playoffs. And in the East ANYONE can come out of it especially one with the biggest star of them all.

    Cleveland had a very minor struggle at 5-7 and 19-20 and that was it. No one was jumping off buildings at those times and I never doubted they could make the playoffs even as a high seed.

    No one is wrong here. The ticket is as good as being shredded until it hits.

    I won't even get into effective hedging and the value of effective hedging because too many posters here have demonstrated they do not understand the topic.

    And all this talk about 'guaranteed' money. You have no idea what that guarantee is. Is it 2x 3x 4x. If it's 4 times, the 30-1 becomes a 4-1. Well that is nothing to go bonkers about. And might I add, they will be dogs to Golden state which is the worst possible way to hedge. And how much will they hedge for? Will they even hedge? The hundred dollar bettor making $400? Wow! Is that something to bump a thread 100 times for?

    We've all hit parlays. There is nothing extraordinary about that.

    And might I add, nothing was guaranteed with the Knicks handing the Cavs two of three starters and the Nuggets playing a role with Mozgov.

    So here is what you needed after your placed your 30-1 bet:

    Lebron signs

    Love is traded for

    JR and Shumpert are given to the Cavs

    Mozgov is traded for two effective high second rounders

     

    Without ALL those things happening, the Cavs are NOT in the place they are today.

    And ultimately in the end, that 30-1 STILL will not get paid off. So the hedging for 2/3/4 times their bet (which by the way NO ONE has posted in terms of showing me a hedge) is NOT remarkable or noteworthy in any way! It's a nice little parlay payout.

    So until that 30-1 hits, you can keep quiet.

     

    If the 30-1 hits (it won't) come back and hoot and holler. Got it?

    NO ONE is wrong. NOTHING had been paid out and NO ONE has posted a hedge. You're posting this like the Cavs have won the championship!!! Wrong!

     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 5:49 PM ET #263

    Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:




    just to play devils advocate,beginner-boy....yea thats true,things turned the cavs way with decisions they made but thats PART of futures,wen you bet on them they include ANYTHING that happens in the distant FUTURE....so all possible scenarios have to be taken into account wherever possible.....and in this situation,with who just re-joined the team,it is 100% clear and obvious that management is in a must win now mode and will do anything to satisfy and placate lebron and put him in the best position to succeed...so,sure things fell their way.....but it was cos they were pro-active and because they have the greatest player on the planet(and extremely unselfish to boot)to draw and attract talent...so im not taking sides but its a cop-out to say that any prediction is null and void cos of a trade-line "bounce of the ball",or 2...or 3....wen handicapping single games you also gotta take into account those same "bad bounces",even moreso with a future...we cant foresee everything but a bold move if things werent going smoothly for cleveland shudnt surprise anyone one little bit.
    for me,wats more surprising is just how much shumpert,smith and mosgov have added to the team..they are all nice additions in their own way and can offer a specific skill-set each...but my god theyre not the type that many teams were desperately chasing and now the trio has played a huge role in pretty much transforming the teams prospects.

     

    yea thats true,things turned the cavs way with decisions they made but thats PART of futures,wen you bet on them they include ANYTHING that happens in the distant FUTURE....so all possible scenarios have to be taken into account wherever possible

     

    Not true. You don't place a bet on anything happening. You can go to a track, lay your money on a 99-1 shot and say, "Listen anything can happen. The entire field can fall in a heap and my horse can come in." That would be unwise.

    Virtually all futures bets are made with the team in place. This one has a very big addendum in that Lebron would be traded for and then Love was a longshot. And beyond that, nothing else was a given. All else was lucked into. We all knew they were in win now mode. They were talking about trading a future star in Wiggins the day they drafted him.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:




    just to play devils advocate,beginner-boy....yea thats true,things turned the cavs way with decisions they made but thats PART of futures,wen you bet on them they include ANYTHING that happens in the distant FUTURE....so all possible scenarios have to be taken into account wherever possible.....and in this situation,with who just re-joined the team,it is 100% clear and obvious that management is in a must win now mode and will do anything to satisfy and placate lebron and put him in the best position to succeed...so,sure things fell their way.....but it was cos they were pro-active and because they have the greatest player on the planet(and extremely unselfish to boot)to draw and attract talent...so im not taking sides but its a cop-out to say that any prediction is null and void cos of a trade-line "bounce of the ball",or 2...or 3....wen handicapping single games you also gotta take into account those same "bad bounces",even moreso with a future...we cant foresee everything but a bold move if things werent going smoothly for cleveland shudnt surprise anyone one little bit.
    for me,wats more surprising is just how much shumpert,smith and mosgov have added to the team..they are all nice additions in their own way and can offer a specific skill-set each...but my god theyre not the type that many teams were desperately chasing and now the trio has played a huge role in pretty much transforming the teams prospects.

     

    yea thats true,things turned the cavs way with decisions they made but thats PART of futures,wen you bet on them they include ANYTHING that happens in the distant FUTURE....so all possible scenarios have to be taken into account wherever possible

     

    Not true. You don't place a bet on anything happening. You can go to a track, lay your money on a 99-1 shot and say, "Listen anything can happen. The entire field can fall in a heap and my horse can come in." That would be unwise.

    Virtually all futures bets are made with the team in place. This one has a very big addendum in that Lebron would be traded for and then Love was a longshot. And beyond that, nothing else was a given. All else was lucked into. We all knew they were in win now mode. They were talking about trading a future star in Wiggins the day they drafted him.

     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 5:51 PM ET #264

    Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


    65% was 2 years ago, you also vary your amounts on your plays so winning percentage becomes almost meaningless.  

    The "6 month old thread" is relevent TODAY and will be for a few more weeks since it is a championship futures bet and the team is still in contention for the championship.  

    Your opinion of your write-ups stems from your Grandiose Delusional Disorder which makes you believe that your words and thoughts are more important than others.   


    1. Grandiose: A person with this type of delusional disorder has an over-inflated sense of worth, power, knowledge, or identity. The person might believe he or she has a great talent or has made an important discovery.







     

    Why would you care about my betting amounts? No one gives a shi* about that and I don't post them.

    YOUR betting amounts are what matters. And when I post I am very selective and many people here value that. It is their betting amount that matters.

    A W/L record is BY FAR the truest indicator of a record because I could bet 50 units today and lose and bet 110 tomorrow and win and go LOOK I'm up 50 units!...and I'm 1-1. 65% speaks to FAR greater than that.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


    65% was 2 years ago, you also vary your amounts on your plays so winning percentage becomes almost meaningless.  

    The "6 month old thread" is relevent TODAY and will be for a few more weeks since it is a championship futures bet and the team is still in contention for the championship.  

    Your opinion of your write-ups stems from your Grandiose Delusional Disorder which makes you believe that your words and thoughts are more important than others.   


    1. Grandiose: A person with this type of delusional disorder has an over-inflated sense of worth, power, knowledge, or identity. The person might believe he or she has a great talent or has made an important discovery.







     

    Why would you care about my betting amounts? No one gives a shi* about that and I don't post them.

    YOUR betting amounts are what matters. And when I post I am very selective and many people here value that. It is their betting amount that matters.

    A W/L record is BY FAR the truest indicator of a record because I could bet 50 units today and lose and bet 110 tomorrow and win and go LOOK I'm up 50 units!...and I'm 1-1. 65% speaks to FAR greater than that.

     
    BWS77
    BWS77
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 35351
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 6:11 PM ET #265

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

     

    Why would you care about my betting amounts? No one gives a shi* about that and I don't post them.

    YOUR betting amounts are what matters. And when I post I am very selective and many people here value that. It is their betting amount that matters.

    A W/L record is BY FAR the truest indicator of a record because I could bet 50 units today and lose and bet 110 tomorrow and win and go LOOK I'm up 50 units!...and I'm 1-1. 65% speaks to FAR greater than that.


    How about when you lose half your bankroll on one play?  

    Percentage is meaningless unless you wager the same amount on every single play.  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

     

    Why would you care about my betting amounts? No one gives a shi* about that and I don't post them.

    YOUR betting amounts are what matters. And when I post I am very selective and many people here value that. It is their betting amount that matters.

    A W/L record is BY FAR the truest indicator of a record because I could bet 50 units today and lose and bet 110 tomorrow and win and go LOOK I'm up 50 units!...and I'm 1-1. 65% speaks to FAR greater than that.


    How about when you lose half your bankroll on one play?  

    Percentage is meaningless unless you wager the same amount on every single play.  
     
    fadeORdie
    fadeORdie
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 3812
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 6:24 PM ET #266

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    And please, bump this thread in some alternate universe if they should ever win it all.

    Should Cavs win... is this alternative universe a Covers forum without scalabrine? That would be quite boring. You're the reason why trolls thrive on this forum.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    And please, bump this thread in some alternate universe if they should ever win it all.

    Should Cavs win... is this alternative universe a Covers forum without scalabrine? That would be quite boring. You're the reason why trolls thrive on this forum.
     
    benhogan76
    benhogan76
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2008
    Posts: 63784
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 7:40 PM ET #267

    Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:

    this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool. 

    So while "congrats" on those 5 wins, they are irrelevant to the topic you created in this thread. It's merely a covering up act you are performing. You realize you were wrong, so now you go find something that has nothing to do with this thread, and throw it up and say HEY! I was right here though!!

    The best thing to do when you are wrong is just admit it. Eat the crow. You'll at least earn people's respect. 
    Here is the issue, he has never been wrong.
    Max Miller a great member of congress!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:

    this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool. 

    So while "congrats" on those 5 wins, they are irrelevant to the topic you created in this thread. It's merely a covering up act you are performing. You realize you were wrong, so now you go find something that has nothing to do with this thread, and throw it up and say HEY! I was right here though!!

    The best thing to do when you are wrong is just admit it. Eat the crow. You'll at least earn people's respect. 
    Here is the issue, he has never been wrong.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 8:24 PM ET #268

    Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

    Here is the issue, he has never been wrong.

    Really? I was wrong about the Knicks season win total (obviously)

    Have the Cavs won the championship yet or are did you take some time machine to mid-June to inform us all the Cavs already won?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:

    Here is the issue, he has never been wrong.

    Really? I was wrong about the Knicks season win total (obviously)

    Have the Cavs won the championship yet or are did you take some time machine to mid-June to inform us all the Cavs already won?

     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 8:27 PM ET #269

    Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


    How about when you lose half your bankroll on one play?  

    Percentage is meaningless unless you wager the same amount on every single play.  

     

    Ya know what's hilarious?

    I say I won 65% last year. Does that matter? No, that was last season.

    So the first game of last season I said I bet half my bankroll.

    Now does that matter to trolls like you? YES! Because losses matter to trolls.

    Wins? Let's forget about those.

    Last season was the most profitable of my life because in addition to hitting 65% I had numerous Spurs futures throughout the year. You have no idea what I bet on any of that, well because NONE of my threads make that distinction.

    But keep harping on one play made in the first game of the 2013-2014 season. It makes you that much more credible (and keep bumping that Knicks thread too)...

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:


    How about when you lose half your bankroll on one play?  

    Percentage is meaningless unless you wager the same amount on every single play.  

     

    Ya know what's hilarious?

    I say I won 65% last year. Does that matter? No, that was last season.

    So the first game of last season I said I bet half my bankroll.

    Now does that matter to trolls like you? YES! Because losses matter to trolls.

    Wins? Let's forget about those.

    Last season was the most profitable of my life because in addition to hitting 65% I had numerous Spurs futures throughout the year. You have no idea what I bet on any of that, well because NONE of my threads make that distinction.

    But keep harping on one play made in the first game of the 2013-2014 season. It makes you that much more credible (and keep bumping that Knicks thread too)...

     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 8:33 PM ET #270

    Quote Originally Posted by NBANFLFAN5:

    5 is in a row? That means nothing. That is just too small a sample size. How have you done these NBA playoffs? 

    Cavs were 6 to 1 after they were down 1-2 to the Bulls. There is no need to hedge, Cavs are winning it this year. Lebron is too good, has legit help and their mission of winning for city of Cleveland is just to much. It will happen. 

    I have followed Cavs and Lebron for over 10 years, I am the expert on them and they win. What if GSW has to play 6 or 7 games, you don't think that would give Cavs an edge

    Yeah 5 wins in a row is a small sample size. Arguments could be made that so are 10 wins or even 15 wins. Just give all of that a quick hand wave.

    I have friends who played blackjack who have won and lost 12 hands in a row.

    The problem with your statement is that my games are capped from top to bottom. It's not flipping coins or spinning marbles waiting for them to fall into black and red slots. That is where success and failure deviate. I'm not a gambler. I'm a capper who gambles. Now keep tailing my picks. You might win for once.

    GSW play six or seven games?  Like the Hawks, their opponent needs to win ONE game first before anyone goes 6 or 7. When they win one, then you can hope for another to get to six otherwise, please stop with the 6 or 7 game series in either one of these matchups. It's clear that now Korver is injured (yet another blessing for the Cavs) they are pretty much done. But what is the East anyway...Nets got through the east twice only to get slaughtered by the Lakers and ultimately handled by the Spurs. Cavs will be in for a big surprise come finals time. a very big surprise...

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by NBANFLFAN5:

    5 is in a row? That means nothing. That is just too small a sample size. How have you done these NBA playoffs? 

    Cavs were 6 to 1 after they were down 1-2 to the Bulls. There is no need to hedge, Cavs are winning it this year. Lebron is too good, has legit help and their mission of winning for city of Cleveland is just to much. It will happen. 

    I have followed Cavs and Lebron for over 10 years, I am the expert on them and they win. What if GSW has to play 6 or 7 games, you don't think that would give Cavs an edge

    Yeah 5 wins in a row is a small sample size. Arguments could be made that so are 10 wins or even 15 wins. Just give all of that a quick hand wave.

    I have friends who played blackjack who have won and lost 12 hands in a row.

    The problem with your statement is that my games are capped from top to bottom. It's not flipping coins or spinning marbles waiting for them to fall into black and red slots. That is where success and failure deviate. I'm not a gambler. I'm a capper who gambles. Now keep tailing my picks. You might win for once.

    GSW play six or seven games?  Like the Hawks, their opponent needs to win ONE game first before anyone goes 6 or 7. When they win one, then you can hope for another to get to six otherwise, please stop with the 6 or 7 game series in either one of these matchups. It's clear that now Korver is injured (yet another blessing for the Cavs) they are pretty much done. But what is the East anyway...Nets got through the east twice only to get slaughtered by the Lakers and ultimately handled by the Spurs. Cavs will be in for a big surprise come finals time. a very big surprise...

     
    RodWoman
    RodWoman
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2009
    Posts: 1472
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 8:40 PM ET #271

    Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:

    this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool. 

    So while "congrats" on those 5 wins, they are irrelevant to the topic you created in this thread. It's merely a covering up act you are performing. You realize you were wrong, so now you go find something that has nothing to do with this thread, and throw it up and say HEY! I was right here though!!

    The best thing to do when you are wrong is just admit it. Eat the crow. You'll at least earn people's respect. 
        Never happen!!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:

    this is all out of context. The thread was about you stating in the beginning of the season, to go ahead and rip up cavs future bets. You stuck your neck out early, when Cleveland didn't look good and it would be best to just admit that you were wrong. Clearly anyone with a future on Cleveland that early, has a great hedge. And before you go rambling on about how they can only hedge for 2-3 times the amount, you do realize it is GUARANTEED Money. Anyone who argue the validity of that is not worth anyone's time. I believe Proverbs would classify that as time wasted talking to a fool. 

    So while "congrats" on those 5 wins, they are irrelevant to the topic you created in this thread. It's merely a covering up act you are performing. You realize you were wrong, so now you go find something that has nothing to do with this thread, and throw it up and say HEY! I was right here though!!

    The best thing to do when you are wrong is just admit it. Eat the crow. You'll at least earn people's respect. 
        Never happen!!
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 8:47 PM ET #272

    Quote Originally Posted by RodWoman:

        Never happen!!

     

    Again, I have to say it for the billionth time.

    Who is wrong about any of this? These tickets have paid $0 and there is extensive discussion on hedging (ya know, not just cut and dry 'well it was 30-1 and now it's 3-1 sot there's hedging opportunities talk).

    I posted this thread when it dropped from 30-1 to 3-1!!! Why in the world do you think I would do that? So the second poster can say "No you can hedge" and I can say "Duhhhhh, yeah, you're right! I was stupid!". There is a major discussion on that topic many here are unwilling and unable to comprehend!

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by RodWoman:

        Never happen!!

     

    Again, I have to say it for the billionth time.

    Who is wrong about any of this? These tickets have paid $0 and there is extensive discussion on hedging (ya know, not just cut and dry 'well it was 30-1 and now it's 3-1 sot there's hedging opportunities talk).

    I posted this thread when it dropped from 30-1 to 3-1!!! Why in the world do you think I would do that? So the second poster can say "No you can hedge" and I can say "Duhhhhh, yeah, you're right! I was stupid!". There is a major discussion on that topic many here are unwilling and unable to comprehend!

     
    BWS77
    BWS77
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 35351
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 9:21 PM ET #273

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

     

    Ya know what's hilarious?

    I say I won 65% last year. Does that matter? No, that was last season.

    So the first game of last season I said I bet half my bankroll.

    Now does that matter to trolls like you? YES! Because losses matter to trolls.

    Wins? Let's forget about those.

    Last season was the most profitable of my life because in addition to hitting 65% I had numerous Spurs futures throughout the year. You have no idea what I bet on any of that, well because NONE of my threads make that distinction.

    But keep harping on one play made in the first game of the 2013-2014 season. It makes you that much more credible (and keep bumping that Knicks thread too)...


    You say your 65% doesn't matter, yet you keep bringing it up.     




    Anyways....  we are debating winning percentage.   You say that W/L's are the truest indicator of a record which is absolutely 100% correct, IF you are wagering the same amount on every play.   If you vary wagers, as you have and I have and many others here have, winning percentage becomes less important.   Someone can hit 4/5 plays.   The 4 wins could have been $100 wagers and the loss is $500 so the 80% winning percentage lost $150.   




    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

     

    Ya know what's hilarious?

    I say I won 65% last year. Does that matter? No, that was last season.

    So the first game of last season I said I bet half my bankroll.

    Now does that matter to trolls like you? YES! Because losses matter to trolls.

    Wins? Let's forget about those.

    Last season was the most profitable of my life because in addition to hitting 65% I had numerous Spurs futures throughout the year. You have no idea what I bet on any of that, well because NONE of my threads make that distinction.

    But keep harping on one play made in the first game of the 2013-2014 season. It makes you that much more credible (and keep bumping that Knicks thread too)...


    You say your 65% doesn't matter, yet you keep bringing it up.     




    Anyways....  we are debating winning percentage.   You say that W/L's are the truest indicator of a record which is absolutely 100% correct, IF you are wagering the same amount on every play.   If you vary wagers, as you have and I have and many others here have, winning percentage becomes less important.   Someone can hit 4/5 plays.   The 4 wins could have been $100 wagers and the loss is $500 so the 80% winning percentage lost $150.   




     
    smartbets
    smartbets
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2009
    Posts: 8526
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 9:56 PM ET #274

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    its the sell? Didn't you state earlier, who are you impressing? Why the need to sell?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    its the sell? Didn't you state earlier, who are you impressing? Why the need to sell?
     
     
    smartbets
    smartbets
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2009
    Posts: 8526
    Posted: May. 23, 2015 - 10:01 PM ET #275

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    Really? I was wrong about the Knicks season win total (obviously)

    Have the Cavs won the championship yet or are did you take some time machine to mid-June to inform us all the Cavs already won?

    title of the thread was about throwing the futures in the trash. Meaning they have no value. Obviously after cavs win the east, they will have plenty of value. You keep trying to avoid what this was all about. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

    Really? I was wrong about the Knicks season win total (obviously)

    Have the Cavs won the championship yet or are did you take some time machine to mid-June to inform us all the Cavs already won?

    title of the thread was about throwing the futures in the trash. Meaning they have no value. Obviously after cavs win the east, they will have plenty of value. You keep trying to avoid what this was all about. 
    All Forums | NBA Betting Forum
    «First Previous 111213 ... 212223 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 445,996 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets 301,766 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 253,424 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 350 Covers arrow
    • Patriots vs Seahawks in-game live season kickoff 1,434 Covers arrow
    • PART TROIS 277 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 95,230 Covers arrow
    • 9/9 🫣🫣🔥🔥🔥 4,738 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 09/10/2026 578 Covers arrow
    • Couple thoughts 4,067 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.