All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

2 PLAYS

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3026
Posts: 43
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 6456
Posted: #26
Good stuff 1 hit keep it up and hope to see you tomorrow
 
GL to all
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 239
Posted: #27
GOOD LOOKING  1 HIT
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 439
Posted: #28
okay anh em cung tracked them be4 and get about 80% of them correct for second half.  1st half I can only guess under/over but Cannot figure out the team yet.  Once I do I will ask for your opinion.  Good night now.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 2093
Posted: #29
swtdreamer,
Since you mention about 2nd half play, please notice 1st H total points below 80. If this scenario happens, the 2nd half hits OVER most of the time.  I don't track the percentage but it's very highly hit.  There is one example today which is SA vs MIA game.  Look at 2nd half points. OVER 93.5 hits .  Good luck.





 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 439
Posted: #30
Thanks ChuyenTinh;  One thing I noticed if 1st half is lower than the point given of 5-10 points and if the 2half totals points set at the same as first half then it will be under but if they set it up higher it will be over.  For Example,
 
Sa/Mia 1st half 86.5 is the total set at and the result was 78points which is about 8.5 point below the mark. 
2nd half they set the total o/u at 94.5 which is 8 points different or higher than the 86.5 (some books were at 86) 
Therefore the oddmakers realized the differences of points that need to be taken care of to still keep the game under but OVER for the second half.  Over was the right place.  But IF the second half was set at 86.5 or lower yesterday then we would of play UNDER.
 
Another example would be Sac/NJ.  Total for the game was 202 and 1st set at 102 but result for first half was 98pts.  Which is 2 points under the 102 mark was given.  Second half they set the point at 101 (some books had it at 101.5).  Which is 1 point less than the first half 102 point given so we Know that UNDER is the right play.  If they intended for the game to go over they would of have the points set at 99 or 100 then we would of play OVER.
 
Hope you understand what I am pointing at.  We will discuss at half time today and I will post some of the 1st half games for us to look at.  I will start a thread on that.   
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 645
Posted: #31
Hey swtdreammer, so you are saying if the 1st half does not cover the over, the second half will.. Or u have to look at the point differential at halftime O/U like u explained above.. Like Nuggets game 1st half went over, but 2nd half went under
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 81
Posted: #32
Would the Bulls fall into system 3???
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 221
Posted: #33
https://exclusivecapper.moogo.com/ CHECK IT OUT HIT LAST COUPLE OF DAYS IN NBA 
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 439
Posted: #34
IGotthis; 
 
You have to look at the point different and the where the line set is at.  Cannot just automatically pick the over because first half was under.  Den/Ind second half played UNDER 109.5 (some books at 110).  Here is why:
 
Total for game was 221 if divided by 2 it will be 110.5
First half line 112  result was 144points (just a guessing that they probably want it to be over they would not given you a free 1.5 point to make you play under)
Second Half line 109.5 the different between is 1 point.  Since they already know that they placed it a little higher than the supposed to be line of 110.5 for first half.  They should add on that 1 point or keep the same line as first half and not reducing it.  You suppose to keep the first half and second half as equal or balance them out so that they add up to be the TOTAL for the game.  If they set the second half as 112 or at least 110.5 then I will play the Over. 
 
These stuffs are so complicated, sometimes it almost only make sense to me and not others.  BOL
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 439
Posted: #35
Bio,
 
Chi/Sac goes with system 3 therefore we would play AGAINST chicago so SAC is the Play today.   for us all.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 81
Posted: #36
swtdreammer, thanks for the help.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 81
Posted: #37
swtdreammer, thanks for the help.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 81
Posted: #38
swtdreammer, thanks for the help.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 81
Posted: #39
swtdreammer, thanks for the help.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 81
Posted: #40
swtdreammer, thanks for the help.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 645
Posted: #41
swt.. will be looking closely to those 1st half and half time lines
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 135
Posted: #42
Thanks had the under in the spurs game last night.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1395
Posted: #43
YOU HAVE GAME TONITE  BRO...... I MISS A GAME LASTNITE
All Forums | NBA Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.