1u ea the fades are the 2nd team listed otherwise they are not fades
Bal 119 c
Atl -105 AB
Cin 105 c nt phi -125
Cle 125 c nt det -150
Was 109 b
Tor 1.5 -125 bc data boosted should fade
Bo’s -111 b
Hou 100 c min -118
Mil 1.5 -130 nd
Col 1.5 -125 nd
Laa 105 nd data oak -125
Chw 1 -113 b
Ari -140 bc
Sd 1.5 -130 b
1u per nowadays as I am the worst bettor on here this season, should’ve faded my non picks yesterday as they went 1-4 so would’ve went 4-1 rather than no action. I technically should fade all c picks but I like to torture myself and take the orioles who are my hometown team to show up today, and Tampa has won enough they gotta let up eventually. Almost faded Toronto but I thought -145 was better than -170 and I used a boost for that to bring it down lower.
Sides: 234-239-22-82.58
Faded record 89-67-3 15.17
The stars might lie but the #’s never do…I feel lucky today
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
1u ea the fades are the 2nd team listed otherwise they are not fades
Bal 119 c
Atl -105 AB
Cin 105 c nt phi -125
Cle 125 c nt det -150
Was 109 b
Tor 1.5 -125 bc data boosted should fade
Bo’s -111 b
Hou 100 c min -118
Mil 1.5 -130 nd
Col 1.5 -125 nd
Laa 105 nd data oak -125
Chw 1 -113 b
Ari -140 bc
Sd 1.5 -130 b
1u per nowadays as I am the worst bettor on here this season, should’ve faded my non picks yesterday as they went 1-4 so would’ve went 4-1 rather than no action. I technically should fade all c picks but I like to torture myself and take the orioles who are my hometown team to show up today, and Tampa has won enough they gotta let up eventually. Almost faded Toronto but I thought -145 was better than -170 and I used a boost for that to bring it down lower.
1u ea the fades are the 2nd team listed otherwise they are not fades Bal 119 c Atl -105 AB Cin 105 c nt phi -125 Cle 125 c nt det -150 Was 109 b Tor 1.5 -125 bc data boosted should fade Bo’s -111 b Hou 100 c min -118 Mil 1.5 -130 nd Col 1.5 -125 nd Laa 105 nd data oak -125 Chw 1 -113 b Ari -140 bc Sd 1.5 -130 b 1u per nowadays as I am the worst bettor on here this season, should’ve faded my non picks yesterday as they went 1-4 so would’ve went 4-1 rather than no action. I technically should fade all c picks but I like to torture myself and take the orioles who are my hometown team to show up today, and Tampa has won enough they gotta let up eventually. Almost faded Toronto but I thought -145 was better than -170 and I used a boost for that to bring it down lower. Sides: 234-239-22 -82.58 Faded record 89-67-3 15.17
I fed your picks into chatGpt and smoke came out of the app and now my phone is bricked along with a Oklahoma City server farm that crashed.
WTF are your picks? Why not just post the picks?
The pen is mightier than the pigs
0
Quote Originally Posted by ScroopyNoopers:
1u ea the fades are the 2nd team listed otherwise they are not fades Bal 119 c Atl -105 AB Cin 105 c nt phi -125 Cle 125 c nt det -150 Was 109 b Tor 1.5 -125 bc data boosted should fade Bo’s -111 b Hou 100 c min -118 Mil 1.5 -130 nd Col 1.5 -125 nd Laa 105 nd data oak -125 Chw 1 -113 b Ari -140 bc Sd 1.5 -130 b 1u per nowadays as I am the worst bettor on here this season, should’ve faded my non picks yesterday as they went 1-4 so would’ve went 4-1 rather than no action. I technically should fade all c picks but I like to torture myself and take the orioles who are my hometown team to show up today, and Tampa has won enough they gotta let up eventually. Almost faded Toronto but I thought -145 was better than -170 and I used a boost for that to bring it down lower. Sides: 234-239-22 -82.58 Faded record 89-67-3 15.17
I fed your picks into chatGpt and smoke came out of the app and now my phone is bricked along with a Oklahoma City server farm that crashed.
I took Detroit, the picks from the system are all on the left and if it was a c pick and nd should be faded so I wrote the fade on the right. The reason I don’t write one pick only for fades is so I know when recording the results of the system to record the pick not the fade. Last year for mlb and this most recent nhl season were a mild success but this MLB season has been a disaster and may end my betting career. I lowered units so I should survive but all hope for success have been lost hence the fading. The most success has come from fading this season and I decided not to fade orioles out of hometown pride and that game is lost lol so pretty much all I know is that c picks suck and should be faded. Prior to a week ago A picks were winning at 70% but that’s quickly disintegrating. So yea only thing it appears I can do is fade C picks which is uninspiring and almost not worth continuing for. I was trying to find a way to bet every game for nhl and mlb to have bets every day but it seems that this mlb season isn’t agreeing. Thanks raiders and fuse you may not have to wish my bol soon for the course I am on lol
The stars might lie but the #’s never do…I feel lucky today
0
I took Detroit, the picks from the system are all on the left and if it was a c pick and nd should be faded so I wrote the fade on the right. The reason I don’t write one pick only for fades is so I know when recording the results of the system to record the pick not the fade. Last year for mlb and this most recent nhl season were a mild success but this MLB season has been a disaster and may end my betting career. I lowered units so I should survive but all hope for success have been lost hence the fading. The most success has come from fading this season and I decided not to fade orioles out of hometown pride and that game is lost lol so pretty much all I know is that c picks suck and should be faded. Prior to a week ago A picks were winning at 70% but that’s quickly disintegrating. So yea only thing it appears I can do is fade C picks which is uninspiring and almost not worth continuing for. I was trying to find a way to bet every game for nhl and mlb to have bets every day but it seems that this mlb season isn’t agreeing. Thanks raiders and fuse you may not have to wish my bol soon for the course I am on lol
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.