So basically you are betting ON teams that have won 3 in a row and AGAINST teams that have lost 3 in a row?
Yes. Sort of....
>Trying to profit $100 per team throughout the course of the season. $50 for a 4 game win streak and $50 for a 4 game losing streak. > Once a team has accomplished one of these 4 game streaks (San Fran for example), we have already made the $50 on the win streak. Therefore, the next time they have a 3 game win streak, they are a "no-play." But, the next time they are on a 3 game losing streak they are a "play against."
0
Quote Originally Posted by depeche2:
So basically you are betting ON teams that have won 3 in a row and AGAINST teams that have lost 3 in a row?
Yes. Sort of....
>Trying to profit $100 per team throughout the course of the season. $50 for a 4 game win streak and $50 for a 4 game losing streak. > Once a team has accomplished one of these 4 game streaks (San Fran for example), we have already made the $50 on the win streak. Therefore, the next time they have a 3 game win streak, they are a "no-play." But, the next time they are on a 3 game losing streak they are a "play against."
GL with this. However, I'd like to point out that linesmakers know about streaks. After 3 wins in a row, you're gonna be paying some high juice. You're going to need alot of those wins.
And after 3 losses, linesmakers are gonna start shorting the line a little each time b/c of the mentality that the losing team has to win sometime.
I think between needing to win the high juiced games and not making as much as you could on a dog, the system might break even in the long run, maybe losing the juice. Just a thought.
I think its winning so far, so again....gl....i'm interested to see how this plays out.
0
GL with this. However, I'd like to point out that linesmakers know about streaks. After 3 wins in a row, you're gonna be paying some high juice. You're going to need alot of those wins.
And after 3 losses, linesmakers are gonna start shorting the line a little each time b/c of the mentality that the losing team has to win sometime.
I think between needing to win the high juiced games and not making as much as you could on a dog, the system might break even in the long run, maybe losing the juice. Just a thought.
I think its winning so far, so again....gl....i'm interested to see how this plays out.
i do close to the same thing..did it last year but when they start at a streak of 2 i play them till they lose and after streaks of 4 ill play them again during the year as long as they start streaking again.....that goes for streaks of losses also
0
i do close to the same thing..did it last year but when they start at a streak of 2 i play them till they lose and after streaks of 4 ill play them again during the year as long as they start streaking again.....that goes for streaks of losses also
GL with this. However, I'd like to point out that linesmakers know about streaks. After 3 wins in a row, you're gonna be paying some high juice. You're going to need alot of those wins.
But for every system play pick by his Dad there are a bunch of other systems probably going the other way.
Quote Originally Posted by logicsays:
And after 3 losses, linesmakers are gonna start shorting the line a little each time b/c of the mentality that the losing team has to win sometime.
Which actually plays in the favor of the system, the old "Ït's due" factor which this system is a system that respects the streak.
Quote Originally Posted by logicsays:
I think between needing to win the high juiced games and not making as much as you could on a dog, the system might break even in the long run, maybe losing the juice. Just a thought.
I think its winning so far, so again....gl....i'm interested to see how this plays out.
So am I. This is just another Nightingale system that picks its spots a different way, not much different than throwing darts and doubling till you win, athough I think this one has a better shot.I Like it. Keep up the good work
The pen is mightier than the pigs
0
Quote Originally Posted by logicsays:
GL with this. However, I'd like to point out that linesmakers know about streaks. After 3 wins in a row, you're gonna be paying some high juice. You're going to need alot of those wins.
But for every system play pick by his Dad there are a bunch of other systems probably going the other way.
Quote Originally Posted by logicsays:
And after 3 losses, linesmakers are gonna start shorting the line a little each time b/c of the mentality that the losing team has to win sometime.
Which actually plays in the favor of the system, the old "Ït's due" factor which this system is a system that respects the streak.
Quote Originally Posted by logicsays:
I think between needing to win the high juiced games and not making as much as you could on a dog, the system might break even in the long run, maybe losing the juice. Just a thought.
I think its winning so far, so again....gl....i'm interested to see how this plays out.
So am I. This is just another Nightingale system that picks its spots a different way, not much different than throwing darts and doubling till you win, athough I think this one has a better shot.I Like it. Keep up the good work
GL with this. However, I'd like to point out that linesmakers know about streaks. After 3 wins in a row, you're gonna be paying some high juice. You're going to need alot of those wins.
But for every system play pick by his Dad there are a bunch of other systems probably going the other way.
Quote Originally Posted by logicsays:
And after 3 losses, linesmakers are gonna start shorting the line a little each time b/c of the mentality that the losing team has to win sometime.
Which actually plays in the favor of the system, the old "It's due" factor which this system is not, rather it's system that respects the streak.
Quote Originally Posted by logicsays:
I think between needing to win the high juiced games and not making as much as you could on a dog, the system might break even in the long run, maybe losing the juice. Just a thought.
You lost me here.
Quote Originally Posted by logicsays:
I think its winning so far, so again....gl....i'm interested to see how this plays out.
So am I. This is just another Nightingale system that picks its spots a different way, not much different than throwing darts and doubling till you win, athough I think this one has a better shot. I Like it. Keep up the good work
The pen is mightier than the pigs
0
Please disregard my last post...
Quote Originally Posted by logicsays:
GL with this. However, I'd like to point out that linesmakers know about streaks. After 3 wins in a row, you're gonna be paying some high juice. You're going to need alot of those wins.
But for every system play pick by his Dad there are a bunch of other systems probably going the other way.
Quote Originally Posted by logicsays:
And after 3 losses, linesmakers are gonna start shorting the line a little each time b/c of the mentality that the losing team has to win sometime.
Which actually plays in the favor of the system, the old "It's due" factor which this system is not, rather it's system that respects the streak.
Quote Originally Posted by logicsays:
I think between needing to win the high juiced games and not making as much as you could on a dog, the system might break even in the long run, maybe losing the juice. Just a thought.
You lost me here.
Quote Originally Posted by logicsays:
I think its winning so far, so again....gl....i'm interested to see how this plays out.
So am I. This is just another Nightingale system that picks its spots a different way, not much different than throwing darts and doubling till you win, athough I think this one has a better shot. I Like it. Keep up the good work
a suggestion: play ON home teams that are on a 3W streak and AGAINST away teams that are on a 3L streak
should give you a pretty decent overall winnings, even if you stop playing them after one win/loss
Eh...I see the point, but I think you are going to be laying juice all the time that way. I will go back and look it over after I get a big enough sample size.
0
Quote Originally Posted by LookKaPyPy:
a suggestion: play ON home teams that are on a 3W streak and AGAINST away teams that are on a 3L streak
should give you a pretty decent overall winnings, even if you stop playing them after one win/loss
Eh...I see the point, but I think you are going to be laying juice all the time that way. I will go back and look it over after I get a big enough sample size.
BRR not flaming on you at all hoss, but when when you been around as long as i have..........you can't really call something a system unless it has worked for several years. Believe me when i tell you Vegas and Locals love hearing " system ". Music to their ears. gl
0
BRR not flaming on you at all hoss, but when when you been around as long as i have..........you can't really call something a system unless it has worked for several years. Believe me when i tell you Vegas and Locals love hearing " system ". Music to their ears. gl
8-1 so far isn't a very bad system dude. Does your father know you're using his system? Does he get your winnings? I'm only kidding. The logic seems sound and I thank you for your post.
I'm a big believe in betting on momentum, which seems to be a part of your system. GL
0
8-1 so far isn't a very bad system dude. Does your father know you're using his system? Does he get your winnings? I'm only kidding. The logic seems sound and I thank you for your post.
I'm a big believe in betting on momentum, which seems to be a part of your system. GL
I'm doing an opposite system. After a team wins 5 games straight, fade them until they lose up to 5 times.
If a team goes over the total 5 times in a row bet the under chasing up to 5 times. If a team goes under the total 5 times in a row bet the over chasing up to 5 times.
0
I'm doing an opposite system. After a team wins 5 games straight, fade them until they lose up to 5 times.
If a team goes over the total 5 times in a row bet the under chasing up to 5 times. If a team goes under the total 5 times in a row bet the over chasing up to 5 times.
BRR not flaming on you at all hoss, but when when you been around as long as i have..........you can't really call something a system unless it has worked for several years. Believe me when i tell you Vegas and Locals love hearing " system ". Music to their ears. gl
Gotcha...no problem man. What do you call it before its a system?
0
Quote Originally Posted by GamzOver:
BRR not flaming on you at all hoss, but when when you been around as long as i have..........you can't really call something a system unless it has worked for several years. Believe me when i tell you Vegas and Locals love hearing " system ". Music to their ears. gl
Gotcha...no problem man. What do you call it before its a system?
8-1 so far isn't a very bad system dude. Does your father know you're using his system? Does he get your winnings? I'm only kidding. The logic seems sound and I thank you for your post.
I'm a big believe in betting on momentum, which seems to be a part of your system. GL
He knows I am tracking it. He is on a cruise right now, so I haven't really spoken to him about it. And, I haven't placed one real bet on it yet. I just want to be able to follow it for the season and look back to see where the holes are.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Anent:
8-1 so far isn't a very bad system dude. Does your father know you're using his system? Does he get your winnings? I'm only kidding. The logic seems sound and I thank you for your post.
I'm a big believe in betting on momentum, which seems to be a part of your system. GL
He knows I am tracking it. He is on a cruise right now, so I haven't really spoken to him about it. And, I haven't placed one real bet on it yet. I just want to be able to follow it for the season and look back to see where the holes are.
You could place the system over previous years numbers - just a thought. I am just too busy at work to do something like that. I have to say I am totally a "respect the streak" as opposed to "it's due" kind of player when it comes to baseball.
If nothing else thanks for the interesting topic, oh and Barney's Dad is the guy I call pop.
The pen is mightier than the pigs
0
You could place the system over previous years numbers - just a thought. I am just too busy at work to do something like that. I have to say I am totally a "respect the streak" as opposed to "it's due" kind of player when it comes to baseball.
If nothing else thanks for the interesting topic, oh and Barney's Dad is the guy I call pop.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
