Mike Trout Strikeouts

@TxRangers

 What is his percentage?  Do you know off the top of your head?  It seems pretty close.

For his career is what I assume it listed.  

I haven't looked. But he only averages 74 a year, trout 111. That's all I need to know.

@Raiders22

 Here's two questions. Do you want to Alvarez or trout on your team right now. Is Manny Machado a Hall of famer? Because Machado stats will be better than trout stats when they both retire. Is Machado a Hall of famer?

7380 PA

1708 SO

23.1% K ratio

Isn't that pretty accurate?

Alvarez, because Trout is in the twilight of his career.

But that does not detract from his body of work.

I think Machado is very likely a HoF -- he is very close at this point.

What do you think about him?

@TxRangers

  I haven't looked at other strikeout props. Only trout.

Why not?  Is it very profitable?  Like do you have an idea of ROI or +/- on it for the year?

If it is -- then why not do it for other power hitters that strike out?

Why not bet even more and more as the bankroll builds on on these?

Are the books not adjusting at all?

@Raiders22

 In the past 6 seasons trout has a 36% strikeout rate, for his career, 29% strikeout rate. Alvarez in his career, has a 22% struck out rate. END OF STORY. And for the record, AI, is a bunch of BS.

How in the world can AI say Alvarez strikes out more than trout?? That's ridiculous. That's because it's not true. But oh well.

That is NOT the END of the STORY -- For Hall of Fame they look at the total career.

AI is NOT BS -- It makes some mistakes but overall is very quick and easy.

7380 PA 

1708 SO

23.1% K ratio

Those are not from AI -- they came straight from MLB reference website.

It varies by season and as the post pointed out he is still developing and Trout is late in his career.

These are hard numbers -- plate appearances and strikeouts that they use for their career.

@TxRangers

  I haven't looked at other strikeout props. Only trout.

Why not?  Is it very profitable?  Like do you have an idea of ROI or +/- on it for the year?

If it is -- then why not do it for other power hitters that strike out?

Why not bet even more and more as the bankroll builds on on these?

Are the books not adjusting at all?

Again, I am seriously interested in the win/loss total on this and if it is such a winner?  Why not others, why have the books allowed this, etc.?

OK, here's what I can gather for the year on Trout strikeout props. I looked at DK today, his prop for "1+ strikeouts" was at -365.

I know that it probably varied over the course of the season, but it couldn't of been by much. Talking pennies here when bets are juiced so high as it is.

I'm assuming -365 odds on all bets, every game, and you're laying $365 to win $100.

In the month of March:

4-2 for -$330

April: 

15-10 for +$135

May:

7-1 for +$335

Total profit for Trout strikeouts 26-13 for +140.00

I'm also assuming that on these bets, you win if Trout gets 1 strikeout. As opposed to him landing on 1 is a push. You'd be in a world of hurt if that was the case. Trout has landed on exactly 1 strikeout 11 times