TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +110 (-1.5 and not RL, People don't have to guess)
SF Giants ML-108
Over 7 OAK A's - SEA Mariners -120
(how exactly did you come up with -157$? Check your counting next time - you had two wins (+200) and one loss (-100 because the odds were +125). Don't you guys bet for real?)
greengiants 1-2 -98$
LA Dodgers ML-106
ARI Diamondbacks ML -111
SEA Mariners ML +129
(ML capital letters)
natalieportman9 1-2 -95$
TOR Blue Jays RL +115
MIL Brewers -1.5 +150 (-1.5 and no RL)
0
2/2
MikeTizzy 3-0 311$
OVER 8.5 TOR Blue Jays - CLE Indians -115
UNDER 9 ARI D'Backs - STL Cardinals +100
SickCallREf 3-0 +305
CLE Indians -1.5 +230
TEX Rangers -1.5 -110
OAK Athletics -1 +101
phixer 1-0 +100$
Under 8 HOU Astros - TEX Rangers -115
Teemosanchez 2-1 +100$
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +110 (-1.5 and not RL, People don't have to guess)
SF Giants ML-108
Over 7 OAK A's - SEA Mariners -120
(how exactly did you come up with -157$? Check your counting next time - you had two wins (+200) and one loss (-100 because the odds were +125). Don't you guys bet for real?)
Ok guys. I want you to understand that demanding posting under similar format as the books do has it's purpose. Fist of all we all want to act as professionally as we can no matter what we do. Right? So if we're handicapping - why not do it like the pros do? That is like a booth camp where everyone is equal and starts from zero together under the same codes. Once you'll get used to discipline yourselves format wise as well as choosing no more than 3 games per night and also reasoning your picks- you'll discover that those habits although forced upon you by me - will improve your overall success rate (as long as you look into your reasoning after the games are over and take necessary notes?.
Please do not forget that 3 most successful handicappers on covers (KingMidasTouch, Tirbovtk and Phixer) grew to be a better men and better handicappers (by their own admission and supported by their records) following precisely my rules of the contest set on NBA thread. You're invited to check their respective records on the thread contest (KingMidasToucjh 30-14, Torbovtk 30-17 and Phixer 21-9). Those 3 are all also big money earners exercising strict Money Management.
So, the system has proven itself not only with those 3 that are outstanding - but many others who keep positive records and do not have to deposit to the books for some time now and all who has been on that contest on a thread can testify that they have improved their handicapping habits.
So, next time any of you feels "violated" by my rules - Please remember what kind of effort I invest here and how much time I need to reformat your picks as well.
There many on this thread that come from the other thread that have been on tremendous runs as well and I respect each and every person with a basic drive to improve.
0
Ok guys. I want you to understand that demanding posting under similar format as the books do has it's purpose. Fist of all we all want to act as professionally as we can no matter what we do. Right? So if we're handicapping - why not do it like the pros do? That is like a booth camp where everyone is equal and starts from zero together under the same codes. Once you'll get used to discipline yourselves format wise as well as choosing no more than 3 games per night and also reasoning your picks- you'll discover that those habits although forced upon you by me - will improve your overall success rate (as long as you look into your reasoning after the games are over and take necessary notes?.
Please do not forget that 3 most successful handicappers on covers (KingMidasTouch, Tirbovtk and Phixer) grew to be a better men and better handicappers (by their own admission and supported by their records) following precisely my rules of the contest set on NBA thread. You're invited to check their respective records on the thread contest (KingMidasToucjh 30-14, Torbovtk 30-17 and Phixer 21-9). Those 3 are all also big money earners exercising strict Money Management.
So, the system has proven itself not only with those 3 that are outstanding - but many others who keep positive records and do not have to deposit to the books for some time now and all who has been on that contest on a thread can testify that they have improved their handicapping habits.
So, next time any of you feels "violated" by my rules - Please remember what kind of effort I invest here and how much time I need to reformat your picks as well.
There many on this thread that come from the other thread that have been on tremendous runs as well and I respect each and every person with a basic drive to improve.
Ok guys. I want you to understand that demanding posting under similar format as the books do has it's purpose. Fist of all we all want to act as professionally as we can no matter what we do. Right? So if we're handicapping - why not do it like the pros do? That is like a booth camp where everyone is equal and starts from zero together under the same codes. Once you'll get used to discipline yourselves format wise as well as choosing no more than 3 games per night and also reasoning your picks- you'll discover that those habits although forced upon you by me - will improve your overall success rate (as long as you look into your reasoning after the games are over and take necessary notes?.
Please do not forget that 3 most successful handicappers on covers (KingMidasTouch, Tirbovtk and Phixer) grew to be a better men and better handicappers (by their own admission and supported by their records) following precisely my rules of the contest set on NBA thread. You're invited to check their respective records on the thread contest (KingMidasToucjh 30-14, Turbovtk 30-17 and Phixer 21-9). Those 3 are all also big money earners exercising strict Money Management.
So, the system has proven itself not only with those 3 that are outstanding - but many others who keep positive records and do not have to deposit to the books for some time now and all who has been on that contest on a thread can testify that they have improved their handicapping habits.
So, next time any of you feels "violated" by my rules - Please remember what kind of effort I invest here and how much time I need to reformat your picks as well.
There many on this thread that come from the other thread that have been on tremendous runs as well and I respect each and every person with a basic drive to improve.
true. nobody likes to be told what to do and how. that is why sa spurs have popovic and real madrid has morinho. they only listen to top guns. mavin is a handicapping top gun for me. same goes for your trading skills in binary options mavin.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
Ok guys. I want you to understand that demanding posting under similar format as the books do has it's purpose. Fist of all we all want to act as professionally as we can no matter what we do. Right? So if we're handicapping - why not do it like the pros do? That is like a booth camp where everyone is equal and starts from zero together under the same codes. Once you'll get used to discipline yourselves format wise as well as choosing no more than 3 games per night and also reasoning your picks- you'll discover that those habits although forced upon you by me - will improve your overall success rate (as long as you look into your reasoning after the games are over and take necessary notes?.
Please do not forget that 3 most successful handicappers on covers (KingMidasTouch, Tirbovtk and Phixer) grew to be a better men and better handicappers (by their own admission and supported by their records) following precisely my rules of the contest set on NBA thread. You're invited to check their respective records on the thread contest (KingMidasToucjh 30-14, Turbovtk 30-17 and Phixer 21-9). Those 3 are all also big money earners exercising strict Money Management.
So, the system has proven itself not only with those 3 that are outstanding - but many others who keep positive records and do not have to deposit to the books for some time now and all who has been on that contest on a thread can testify that they have improved their handicapping habits.
So, next time any of you feels "violated" by my rules - Please remember what kind of effort I invest here and how much time I need to reformat your picks as well.
There many on this thread that come from the other thread that have been on tremendous runs as well and I respect each and every person with a basic drive to improve.
true. nobody likes to be told what to do and how. that is why sa spurs have popovic and real madrid has morinho. they only listen to top guns. mavin is a handicapping top gun for me. same goes for your trading skills in binary options mavin.
(Don't be smart a.. Format the way I tell you. No abbreviations you just invented and no RL. Just -1.5 or +1.5. If you do as I say you'll gain before you know 8it and will taken seriously by me and other handicappers. If not - don't waste my time or yours. No Rox and Bjays neither. It is no democracy here buddy - it's my way or highway. With all due respect - I don't work for you and don't waste my time the next time please. Next time I either will be able to copy paste your picks or you're out and I don't care if you're gonna be 10-0))
Neildellacrose 2-0 +100$
Over 6.5 BAL Orioles-TB Rays -125
STL Cardinals ML +107
(pay attention to m7y corrections. If you're not able to figure that out - I can't help you. And count your wins and losses and money before posting. From tom orroe the picks won't be entered unless...)
Musicmatt1 2-1 +72$
BAL Orioles +156
Under 8.5 TOR Blue Jays - CLE Indians -105 (don't forget the odds)
TEX Rangers -1.5 -110
Svern002 0-0 0$
BAL Orioles ML +158
Under 8 HOU Astros - TEX Rangers +100
TOR Blue Jays ML -180
KCsFinest829 1-2 -127$
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +110
TOR Blue Jays TT Over 4.5 -120
SF Giants ML -102
pucku27 1-2 - 100$
BAL Orioles ML + 163
TEX Rangers - 1.5 -110
ARI D'Backs ML - 118
(drop the capital letters where not needed. Please. And use decimal system)
AshyLarryMP 1-2 -$124
CLE Indians TT Under 3.5 -125
Under 8.5 TOR Blue Jays - CLE Indians -105
Under 7 LA Dodgers - SF Giants -120
Eryximaque 0-0 0$
TOR Blue Jays ML -180
Heads21340-0$0
TB Rays ML -175
Over 4.5 TOR Blue Jays TT 4.5 -130
0
2/1
SimonDog 3-0 +307$
TEX Rangers ML -182
LA Dodgers ML -112
BAL Orioles ML +158
washhead 1-0 +100$
Over 7 OAK Athletics - SEA Mariners -120
40acresmafia 2-1 +100$
Under 7 TB Rays - BAL Orioles -120
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +105
COL Rockies ML +135
(Don't be smart a.. Format the way I tell you. No abbreviations you just invented and no RL. Just -1.5 or +1.5. If you do as I say you'll gain before you know 8it and will taken seriously by me and other handicappers. If not - don't waste my time or yours. No Rox and Bjays neither. It is no democracy here buddy - it's my way or highway. With all due respect - I don't work for you and don't waste my time the next time please. Next time I either will be able to copy paste your picks or you're out and I don't care if you're gonna be 10-0))
Neildellacrose 2-0 +100$
Over 6.5 BAL Orioles-TB Rays -125
STL Cardinals ML +107
(pay attention to m7y corrections. If you're not able to figure that out - I can't help you. And count your wins and losses and money before posting. From tom orroe the picks won't be entered unless...)
Musicmatt1 2-1 +72$
BAL Orioles +156
Under 8.5 TOR Blue Jays - CLE Indians -105 (don't forget the odds)
TEX Rangers -1.5 -110
Svern002 0-0 0$
BAL Orioles ML +158
Under 8 HOU Astros - TEX Rangers +100
TOR Blue Jays ML -180
KCsFinest829 1-2 -127$
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +110
TOR Blue Jays TT Over 4.5 -120
SF Giants ML -102
pucku27 1-2 - 100$
BAL Orioles ML + 163
TEX Rangers - 1.5 -110
ARI D'Backs ML - 118
(drop the capital letters where not needed. Please. And use decimal system)
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +110 (-1.5 and not RL, People don't have to guess)
SF Giants ML-108
Over 7 OAK A's - SEA Mariners -120
(how exactly did you come up with -157$? Check your counting next time - you had two wins (+200) and one loss (-100 because the odds were +125). Don't you guys bet for real?)
greengiants 1-2 -98$
LA Dodgers ML-106
ARI Diamondbacks ML -111
SEA Mariners ML +129
(ML capital letters)
natalieportman9 1-2 -95$
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +115
MIL Brewers -1.5 +150 (-1.5 and no RL)
0
2/2
MikeTizzy 3-0 311$
OVER 8.5 TOR Blue Jays - CLE Indians -115
UNDER 9 ARI D'Backs - STL Cardinals +100
OVER 7 OAK A's - SEA Mariners -115
SickCallREf 3-0 +305
CLE Indians -1.5 +230
TEX Rangers -1.5 -110
OAK Athletics -1 +101
phixer 1-0 +100$
Under 8 HOU Astros - TEX Rangers -115
Teemosanchez 2-1 +100$
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +110 (-1.5 and not RL, People don't have to guess)
SF Giants ML-108
Over 7 OAK A's - SEA Mariners -120
(how exactly did you come up with -157$? Check your counting next time - you had two wins (+200) and one loss (-100 because the odds were +125). Don't you guys bet for real?)
(Don't be smart a.. Format the way I tell you. No abbreviations you just invented and no RL. Just -1.5 or +1.5. If you do as I say you'll gain before you know 8it and will taken seriously by me and other handicappers. If not - don't waste my time or yours. No Rox and Bjays neither. It is no democracy here buddy - it's my way or highway. With all due respect - I don't work for you and don't waste my time the next time please. Next time I either will be able to copy paste your picks or you're out and I don't care if you're gonna be 10-0))
Neildellacrose 2-0 +100$
Over 6.5 BAL Orioles-TB Rays -125
STL Cardinals ML +107
Musicmatt1 2-1 +72$
BAL Orioles +156
Under 8.5 TOR Blue Jays - CLE Indians -105
TEX Rangers -1.5 -110
Svern002 0-0 0$
BAL Orioles ML +158
Under 8 HOU Astros - TEX Rangers +100
TOR Blue Jays ML -180
KCsFinest829 1-2 -127$
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +110
TOR Blue Jays TT Over 4.5 -120
SF Giants ML -102
pucku27 1-2 - 100$
BAL Orioles ML + 163
TEX Rangers - 1.5 -110
ARI D'Backs ML - 118
AshyLarryMP 1-2 -$124
CLE Indians TT Under 3.5 -125
Under 8.5 TOR Blue Jays - CLE Indians -105
Under 7 LA Dodgers - SF Giants -120
Eryximaque 0-0 0$
TOR Blue Jays ML -180
Heads21340-0$0
TB Rays ML -175
Over 4.5 TOR Blue Jays TT 4.5 -130
0
2/1
SimonDog 3-0 +307$
TEX Rangers ML -182
LA Dodgers ML -112
BAL Orioles ML +158
washhead 1-0 +100$
Over 7 OAK Athletics - SEA Mariners -120
40acresmafia 2-1 +100$
Under 7 TB Rays - BAL Orioles -120
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +105
COL Rockies ML +135
(Don't be smart a.. Format the way I tell you. No abbreviations you just invented and no RL. Just -1.5 or +1.5. If you do as I say you'll gain before you know 8it and will taken seriously by me and other handicappers. If not - don't waste my time or yours. No Rox and Bjays neither. It is no democracy here buddy - it's my way or highway. With all due respect - I don't work for you and don't waste my time the next time please. Next time I either will be able to copy paste your picks or you're out and I don't care if you're gonna be 10-0))
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +110 (-1.5 and not RL, People don't have to guess)
SF Giants ML-108
Over 7 OAK A's - SEA Mariners -120
(how exactly did you come up with -157$? Check your counting next time - you had two wins (+200) and one loss (-100 because the odds were +125). Don't you guys bet for real?)
greengiants 1-2 -98$
LA Dodgers ML-106
ARI Diamondbacks ML -111
SEA Mariners ML +129
natalieportman9 1-2 -95$
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +115
MIL Brewers -1.5 +150 (-1.5 and no RL)
0
2/2
MikeTizzy 3-0 311$
OVER 8.5 TOR Blue Jays - CLE Indians -115
UNDER 9 ARI D'Backs - STL Cardinals +100
OVER 7 OAK A's - SEA Mariners -115
SickCallREf 3-0 +305
CLE Indians -1.5 +230
TEX Rangers -1.5 -110
OAK Athletics -1 +101
phixer 1-0 +100$
Under 8 HOU Astros - TEX Rangers -115
Teemosanchez 2-1 +100$
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +110 (-1.5 and not RL, People don't have to guess)
SF Giants ML-108
Over 7 OAK A's - SEA Mariners -120
(how exactly did you come up with -157$? Check your counting next time - you had two wins (+200) and one loss (-100 because the odds were +125). Don't you guys bet for real?)
(Don't be smart a.. Format the way I tell you. No abbreviations you just invented and no RL. Just -1.5 or +1.5. If you do as I say you'll gain before you know 8it and will taken seriously by me and other handicappers. If not - don't waste my time or yours. No Rox and Bjays neither. It is no democracy here buddy - it's my way or highway. With all due respect - I don't work for you and don't waste my time the next time please. Next time I either will be able to copy paste your picks or you're out and I don't care if you're gonna be 10-0))
Neildellacrose 2-0 +100$
Over 6.5 BAL Orioles-TB Rays -125
STL Cardinals ML +107
Musicmatt1 2-1 +72$
BAL Orioles +156
Under 8.5 TOR Blue Jays - CLE Indians -105
TEX Rangers -1.5 -110
Svern002 0-0 0$
BAL Orioles ML +158
Under 8 HOU Astros - TEX Rangers +100
TOR Blue Jays ML -180
KCsFinest829 1-2 -127$
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +110
TOR Blue Jays TT Over 4.5 -120
SF Giants ML -102
pucku27 1-2 - 100$
BAL Orioles ML + 163
TEX Rangers - 1.5 -110
ARI D'Backs ML - 118
AshyLarryMP 1-2 -$124
CLE Indians TT Under 3.5 -125
Under 8.5 TOR Blue Jays - CLE Indians -105
Under 7 LA Dodgers - SF Giants -120
Eryximaque 0-0 0$
TOR Blue Jays ML -180
Heads21340-0$0
TB Rays ML -175
Over 4.5 TOR Blue Jays TT 4.5 -130
0
2/1
SimonDog 3-0 +307$
TEX Rangers ML -182
LA Dodgers ML -112
BAL Orioles ML +158
washhead 1-0 +100$
Over 7 OAK Athletics - SEA Mariners -120
40acresmafia 2-1 +100$
Under 7 TB Rays - BAL Orioles -120
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +105
COL Rockies ML +135
(Don't be smart a.. Format the way I tell you. No abbreviations you just invented and no RL. Just -1.5 or +1.5. If you do as I say you'll gain before you know 8it and will taken seriously by me and other handicappers. If not - don't waste my time or yours. No Rox and Bjays neither. It is no democracy here buddy - it's my way or highway. With all due respect - I don't work for you and don't waste my time the next time please. Next time I either will be able to copy paste your picks or you're out and I don't care if you're gonna be 10-0))
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +110 (-1.5 and not RL, People don't have to guess)
SF Giants ML-108
Over 7 OAK A's - SEA Mariners -120
(how exactly did you come up with -157$? Check your counting next time - you had two wins (+200) and one loss (-100 because the odds were +125). Don't you guys bet for real?)
greengiants 1-2 -98$
LA Dodgers ML-106
ARI Diamondbacks ML -111
SEA Mariners ML +129
natalieportman9 1-2 -95$
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +115
MIL Brewers -1.5 +150 (-1.5 and no RL)
0
2/2
MikeTizzy 3-0 311$
OVER 8.5 TOR Blue Jays - CLE Indians -115
UNDER 9 ARI D'Backs - STL Cardinals +100
OVER 7 OAK A's - SEA Mariners -115
SickCallREf 3-0 +305
CLE Indians -1.5 +230
TEX Rangers -1.5 -110
OAK Athletics -1 +101
phixer 1-0 +100$
Under 8 HOU Astros - TEX Rangers -115
Teemosanchez 2-1 +100$
TOR Blue Jays -1.5 +110 (-1.5 and not RL, People don't have to guess)
SF Giants ML-108
Over 7 OAK A's - SEA Mariners -120
(how exactly did you come up with -157$? Check your counting next time - you had two wins (+200) and one loss (-100 because the odds were +125). Don't you guys bet for real?)
Beckett likes to get off to slow starts, pitch himself into trouble and is showing signs that he has to be on the decline. Lincecum is dealing with his struggles as well. Hoping for some crooked numbers.
BOS Red Sox +105
Buchholz has looked good in the spring, solid from stretch now. Looks stronger, another Boston starter that could have a bounce back year. I like this against a Yankee lineup that can't hit with RISP lately. Edge to Boston's lineup and bullpen. They can actually get it done now. I like it as slight dog.
ATL Braves -1.5 +165
This is partly a Halladay fade to start the season. Doc's been leaving balls up in the zone, 88-91 velocity. The guy is a warrior and I expect he heats up a some point, but I am anticipating he makes a few mistakes tonight. Edge to Braves' lineup and bullpen, as well as a strong lefty against a Phillies lineup that can struggle against lefties. I will play the run line for value.
0
natalieportman9 1-4 -295$
Over 6.5 SF Giants - LA Dodgers -120
Beckett likes to get off to slow starts, pitch himself into trouble and is showing signs that he has to be on the decline. Lincecum is dealing with his struggles as well. Hoping for some crooked numbers.
BOS Red Sox +105
Buchholz has looked good in the spring, solid from stretch now. Looks stronger, another Boston starter that could have a bounce back year. I like this against a Yankee lineup that can't hit with RISP lately. Edge to Boston's lineup and bullpen. They can actually get it done now. I like it as slight dog.
ATL Braves -1.5 +165
This is partly a Halladay fade to start the season. Doc's been leaving balls up in the zone, 88-91 velocity. The guy is a warrior and I expect he heats up a some point, but I am anticipating he makes a few mistakes tonight. Edge to Braves' lineup and bullpen, as well as a strong lefty against a Phillies lineup that can struggle against lefties. I will play the run line for value.
Peavy has had a horrid spring and the royals have been a team that has given him trouble over the years.Santana has had a decent spring and has had success vs. the white sox in the past.Have to take the dog and the over here.
Under 8.5 HOU Astros - TEX Rangers -102
Two pitchers that have had great springs, I believe Humber will have a great game, being from texas he will be motivated to beat the rangers in front of friends and family.Ogando has a history of pitching well in april.
best of luck to everyone today!
0
greengiants 2-4 -169
Over 7.5 CHI Whitesox - KC Royals -103
KC Royals ML +125
Peavy has had a horrid spring and the royals have been a team that has given him trouble over the years.Santana has had a decent spring and has had success vs. the white sox in the past.Have to take the dog and the over here.
Under 8.5 HOU Astros - TEX Rangers -102
Two pitchers that have had great springs, I believe Humber will have a great game, being from texas he will be motivated to beat the rangers in front of friends and family.Ogando has a history of pitching well in april.
Gio looked good last couple spring starts and nats seem poised to start off nice.. more bats will come alive than bryce harpers this time around and i trust gio to keep Marlins to 2 runs or less.
Blue jays i think morrow is very underrated.. and Ubaldo barring a bounceback year is not his old self rockies days.. i see him coming out erratic walking batters putting himself in bad situations vs a potent lineup.. if morrow throws well vs an improved indians offense i like the -1.5
as for the dodgers.. being a giants fan, i just don't trust lincecum as a starter until he shows me something, new haircut or not.. i love my giants, but until he throws well few starts in a row, i'll be fading lincecum.. espiecially after dodgers just got 2 hit.. hard to repeat that..thought about over 3.5 team runs for Dodgers, but i'll just go with this and root for giants lol
good luck guys!! 2 days in the postive as a group, with this many people impressive!.. lets keep it rolling.
0
AshyLarryMP 3-3 -$34:
WAS Nationals -1.5 -120
TOR BlueJays -1.5 +115
LA Dodgers ML -123
Gio looked good last couple spring starts and nats seem poised to start off nice.. more bats will come alive than bryce harpers this time around and i trust gio to keep Marlins to 2 runs or less.
Blue jays i think morrow is very underrated.. and Ubaldo barring a bounceback year is not his old self rockies days.. i see him coming out erratic walking batters putting himself in bad situations vs a potent lineup.. if morrow throws well vs an improved indians offense i like the -1.5
as for the dodgers.. being a giants fan, i just don't trust lincecum as a starter until he shows me something, new haircut or not.. i love my giants, but until he throws well few starts in a row, i'll be fading lincecum.. espiecially after dodgers just got 2 hit.. hard to repeat that..thought about over 3.5 team runs for Dodgers, but i'll just go with this and root for giants lol
good luck guys!! 2 days in the postive as a group, with this many people impressive!.. lets keep it rolling.
Hot Forum Topics
