Posted:
#501
Plus, the champs are a little overvalued on the spread.
0
CHASE THE PLAYOFFS...RD.2
Posted:
#503
Quote Originally Posted by Angle4U999:
NBA...Write this down.
Always fade the defending NBA champion the night of the ring/banner ceremony. That is usually the first home game.
It won last year with Mia at Dallas, Clips at Lakers before that and I can't remember how far back. Maybe at least 5 years. I know it has won every year I have played it.
Maybe somebody can back check this.
The visiting team gets motivated by playing the champs and seeing the rings/banner etc. just lights a fire under them that much more!
NBA...Write this down.
Always fade the defending NBA champion the night of the ring/banner ceremony. That is usually the first home game.
It won last year with Mia at Dallas, Clips at Lakers before that and I can't remember how far back. Maybe at least 5 years. I know it has won every year I have played it.
Maybe somebody can back check this.
The visiting team gets motivated by playing the champs and seeing the rings/banner etc. just lights a fire under them that much more!
I get what your saying but both LA and Dallas weren't nearly as good the next year.
I wouldn't fuck with Miami. They got better.
0
Posted:
#509
No time for write ups: LEANS ONLY
Cards -125...... Lohse is having a career year and I see the Cards getting to Cain.
Tigers/yanks...Under 3.5 F5 I have run the numbers here and I have a total of 5 runs for thr game. I now it's and elimination game so there may be some added bonus runs in the late innings so I will stick with a F5 bet only.
0
Posted:
#510
Quote Originally Posted by McShady:
One of the funniest things I see on Covers is posters +20 units and their daily card has 20 units In Play or more...Whats the point?
One of the funniest things I see on Covers is posters +20 units and their daily card has 20 units In Play or more...Whats the point?
It is completely nonsense. I have noticed it as well, and i doesn't make sense. Just divide it by 20. Think they feel more important when they do it like that.
0
Posted:
#517
Quote Originally Posted by McShady:
Working on NFL BYE week Trendz....
Working on NFL BYE week Trendz....
If you FADED a team the game b4 their BYE
If you FOLLOWED a team G1 after their BYE
If you FADED a team G2 after their BYE
18-2 ATS
Amazing. Well done, you just keep finding the niche to succeed. First of all, thanks for the research. Mostly, thanks for sharing. Much appreciated.
0
Posted:
#520
Quote Originally Posted by McShady:
Hope u feel better soon
@billyloco
Thanks Shady...everyday I get stronger, tomorrow is my Heart Surgeon's appt....all I want is to be able to drive and ride the gym bike...
..PLUS, all of you if ya got Diabetes OR a sibling, parent, has/had it....get yourselves checked out ... IT CAN BE CONTROLLED!!
..PLUS, all of you if ya got Diabetes OR a sibling, parent, has/had it....get yourselves checked out ... IT CAN BE CONTROLLED!!0
Posted:
#522
Quote Originally Posted by McShady:
Working on NFL BYE week Trendz....
Working on NFL BYE week Trendz....
If you FADED a team the game b4 their BYE
If you FOLLOWED a team G1 after their BYE
If you FADED a team G2 after their BYE
18-2 ATS
I'd be careful. Using https://sportsdatabase.com/nfl/query
Since 2006:
If you FADED a team the game b4 their BYE: 97-96-3 ATS
If you FOLLOWED a team G1 after their BYE: 92-70-4 ATS
Haven't figured out how to get the query right for Game 2 after a bye. Might just be looking at a statistical anomaly with the YTD stats
0
Posted:
#523
Thx for that Nads..
I NEVER have bet one of my Trendz blindly. Just a starting point to look into a game
And I dont really follow any stat that doesnt pertain to the current season
And I wish we were watching NFL from 2006-2010...This current style football with rule changes and team dynamics....These guys are PUSSIES!
0
Posted:
#525
Quote Originally Posted by McShady:
And I wish we were watching NFL from 2006-2010...This current style football with rule changes and team dynamics....These guys are PUSSIES!
I agree with that. The fact that the rules keep changing, makes it difficult to put alot of faith in the results you get from back testing. Its a completely different game now than it was 6-7 years ago.
0
Hot Forum Topics
