I really think the Cards and Nats series goes 5 games. I think if my A's chase loses today, I will put the losses on one of those teams and chase it from there. I'm a noob and realize this is risky, but feel very comfortable doing it if I have to. Anyone have any thoughts on this idea?
0
I really think the Cards and Nats series goes 5 games. I think if my A's chase loses today, I will put the losses on one of those teams and chase it from there. I'm a noob and realize this is risky, but feel very comfortable doing it if I have to. Anyone have any thoughts on this idea?
SF is showing value at this price in a must win situation
because of the success they’ve had on the road. They are 15-6 in their
last 21 road games, 7-2 in their last 9 games as a road underdog and 6-2
in their last 8 playoff road games. SF is 10-3 in their last 13 games as an underdog. This 2010 champion will not go down without a fight!
Cincy is just 1-5 in Bailey’s last 6 home starts!
0
Info on SF play...
SF is showing value at this price in a must win situation
because of the success they’ve had on the road. They are 15-6 in their
last 21 road games, 7-2 in their last 9 games as a road underdog and 6-2
in their last 8 playoff road games. SF is 10-3 in their last 13 games as an underdog. This 2010 champion will not go down without a fight!
McShady said Reds TT un 4.5 & Oak TT ov 3.5....Odds i got on these games are...Oak TT 3.5 -120 ov / Oak TT 3.5 -110 un & Det TT 3.0 -135 ov / Det TT 3.0 +105 un......As for S.F. TT 3.0 -145 ov / S.F. 3.0 +105 un / Reds TT 3.5 -130 ov / Reds TT 3.5 un even...So Reds TT must have gone down from 4.5 to 3.5..Big move to under.
0
McShady said Reds TT un 4.5 & Oak TT ov 3.5....Odds i got on these games are...Oak TT 3.5 -120 ov / Oak TT 3.5 -110 un & Det TT 3.0 -135 ov / Det TT 3.0 +105 un......As for S.F. TT 3.0 -145 ov / S.F. 3.0 +105 un / Reds TT 3.5 -130 ov / Reds TT 3.5 un even...So Reds TT must have gone down from 4.5 to 3.5..Big move to under.
Big thanks to Semper for the under in the O's game and Balt. Mr. McShady already thanked you for the easy over win in Cards and rode St. Louis also for my first 4 team RR this year. Had the Jets and under also so made some nice money thanks to you gentlemen. Going to do the same today in a 4team RR using SF over SF Oakland and under A's. Thanks again gentlemen amazing.
0
Big thanks to Semper for the under in the O's game and Balt. Mr. McShady already thanked you for the easy over win in Cards and rode St. Louis also for my first 4 team RR this year. Had the Jets and under also so made some nice money thanks to you gentlemen. Going to do the same today in a 4team RR using SF over SF Oakland and under A's. Thanks again gentlemen amazing.
But if ur not committed for that much. I ask why did you start to Chase unless you planned on going past 3. Correct?
Not sure if you are responding to me, but if you are I am not understanding the question. I am willing to go past game 3, but either I win or lose the chase on game 3, with A's down 2 games already.
0
Quote Originally Posted by McShady:
G3 puts 10% of my bankroll on the line
G4 puts 25%....this is why I stop at 3
But if ur not committed for that much. I ask why did you start to Chase unless you planned on going past 3. Correct?
Not sure if you are responding to me, but if you are I am not understanding the question. I am willing to go past game 3, but either I win or lose the chase on game 3, with A's down 2 games already.
Basically I was saying I cant recommend Chasing past 3 games when u mentioned jumping to a series with at least 2 more games have to be played. A 5 game fomula with the amt of $ involved would never be an option for me.
But I dont teach $ management so hope it works out for ya
0
Basically I was saying I cant recommend Chasing past 3 games when u mentioned jumping to a series with at least 2 more games have to be played. A 5 game fomula with the amt of $ involved would never be an option for me.
But I dont teach $ management so hope it works out for ya
I get it now. I am still debating it anyway. If the A's win it's a mute point anyway. I do like the idea of chasing the last 3 games of the Cards/Nats series though, regardless if the A's win or lose. I would treat it like a regular 3 game series. If the A's win I would bet my standard first game bet. If they lose I would consider putting the losses I got from chasing the A's as my first game bet. Not sure I explained that well or not.
0
I get it now. I am still debating it anyway. If the A's win it's a mute point anyway. I do like the idea of chasing the last 3 games of the Cards/Nats series though, regardless if the A's win or lose. I would treat it like a regular 3 game series. If the A's win I would bet my standard first game bet. If they lose I would consider putting the losses I got from chasing the A's as my first game bet. Not sure I explained that well or not.